New York Times

In Tuesday's edition, the New York Times added another weeper to the already well-stocked larder of stories lamenting the nationwide firings of gleeful ghouls who celebrated the death of Charlie Kirk. The headline deck: She Was Fired for a Comment on Her Private Facebook Account -- A look at how one state has turbocharged the crackdown on anyone who has criticized Charlie Kirk after…

Bless Paul Krugman’s little birdbrain. The disgruntled propagandist disguising himself as an economist is once again departing from his normal economic mudslinging schtick to kvetch over the climate change boondoogle. It's unclear why he considers himself any kind of authority on this matter when he had just finished nuking his own credibility on economics, but whatever. 

The New York Times Magazine posted a 2,500-word essay by far-left Times journalist Nikole Hannah-Jones: “What the Public Memory of Charlie Kirk Revealed.” Hannah-Jones was the force behind the paper’s discredited revisionist history The 1619 Project. The headline deck to this callous piece, another failed and personally obnoxious attempt at ideological revisionism: “…

Sunday’s New York Times front-page investigation, “Remarks on Kirk’s Assassination Bring On Broad Wave of Firings,” by Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs and Bernard Mokam, was galling for anyone whose sense of history goes back five years. During the 2020-era George Floyd hysteria, the Times ran little news coverage of the many people (many not even conservatives) getting cancelled…

​​​​​​As expected, President Donald Trump’s rebuke of the climate change hysteria in front of the pious apparatchiks at the United Nations sent the media into a tailspin, with The New York Times leading the pack.

Following Wednesday’s indefinite suspension of ABC late-night host Jimmy Kimmel for malicious comments on Monday about the Charlie Kirk assassination, The New York Times penned an article Friday morning online that credited MRC NewsBusters news analyst Alex Christy for sparking the backlash and suspension with a viral social media post (viewed over 15.5 million times).

As the more ghoulish denizens of the left are actually paying personal prices for vile comments they made in the wake of the assassination of  Charlie Kirk, the New York Times is getting defensive on the front page of Tuesday’s New York Times: “White House Threatens Crackdown on ‘Far Left.’” They put "Far Left" in quotes, like they can't imagine it.

Monday’s PBS News Hour alerted its viewers to a new right-wing threat: Education videos? “Why critics are alarmed about the influence of PragerU’s educational videos," the online heading read. “Alarmed” is a strong word, a promise that journalist Stephanie Sy’s actual report failed to fulfill, Noteworthy that it’s PragerU’s right-leaning world-view expressed in the educational videos…

On CNN's The Situation Room on Tuesday, Brian Stelter produced the usual litany about how Trump is "silencing" the "independent" media and that's "dangerous."

In “NPR and PBS Must Transform After Trump’s Cuts Cripple Broadcasters,” which appeared in Sunday’s New York Times, reporters Benjamin Mullin, Jack Healy, and David Chen unwittingly justified the defunding of those taxpayer-funded media outlets that conservatives have been advocating for decades.

New York Times columnist Ezra Klein faced backlash from fellow leftists after expressing sympathy for Charlie Kirk, who was assassinated, in his opinion piece. Klein called for a return to non-violent political discourse and was criticized for defending Kirk. The columnist's call for tolerance and preservation of political discourse was met with intense criticism from opponents,…

While most on CNN and the broadcast networks kept it civil and even eloquent at times in covering the murder of Charlie Kirk, former senior CNN media reporter Oliver Darcy chose to go the opposite direction on Wednesday night at his site Status, raging at conservative media for “particularly alarming” rhetoric “ratchet[ing] up the language” and sending America down “a darker path” unlike “…

For all of New York Times chief economics correspondent Ben Casselman’s fussbudgeting over President Donald Trump supposedly compromising the reliability of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a new report pointing to gross BLS ineptitude just made him look like a complete idiot.

Who knew? The media has turned on George Washington. Or more accurately, the liberal media is throwing a fit because President Trump has turned to the precedent set by America’s first president. Why? It seems that ole George, back there in the mist of time that was August 7, 1789, signed legislation that created - brace yourself! - the United States Department of War.