Bush Still President, NY Times Annoyed

  • Bookmark and Share

Now that the Democrats control both houses of Congress, the New York Times apparently wants Bush to stop acting like he's the president or something.

Reporter Jim Rutenberg's "White House Memo," "Bush Reaches Out, but Keeps One Hand on the Wheel," paints Bush as out of touch while taking a jab at the Wall Street Journal.

"In an article published on a friendly op-ed page, and from the regal confines of the White House, President Bush greeted the incoming Democratic leadership of Congress on Wednesday with a message of bipartisanship.

"But he also sent another message: I’m still the guy with the big plane, the big office (the oval one) and the presidential seal.

"With the op-ed, in The Wall Street Journal, and in the Rose Garden appearance, Mr. Bush sought to set the governing agenda one day before Democrats were officially to take control of Congress and alter the balance of power that has favored Mr. Bush’s party for nearly his entire presidency.

"In doing so, Mr. Bush mixed calls for unity in governing with a series of red flags on his signature issues.

"Tax increases? Forget it.

"'The elections have not reversed the laws of economics,' Mr. Bush wrote in The Journal. 'It is a fact that economies do best when you reward hard work by allowing people to keep more of what they have earned.'

"The war in Iraq? 'We now have the opportunity to build a bipartisan consensus to fight and win the war,' he wrote. In other words, we’re staying.

"That new Democratic majority? It isn’t really so big.

"'The minority party, especially where the margins are close,' Mr. Bush wrote, 'has a strong say in the form bills take.' And the president, he added -- lest anyone forget -- has the constitutional authority 'to use his judgment whether they should be signed into law.'

"Several Democrats said Mr. Bush’s words on Wednesday had raised questions about what kind of president would show up when they get down to the business of governing side by side.

Rutenberg paints Bush as someone with something to apologize for, perhaps for winning a close race against sitting Democratic Vice President Al Gore:

"Some Democrats may have hoped it would be the George W. Bush who contritely acknowledged a 'thumpin' for his party the day after the elections in November. But the evidence suggests it is more likely to be the man who all but ignored the disputed circumstances of his election in 2000, governed from then as if he had an expansive mandate and who -- even as he has employed soothing tones in speaking to and about Democrats for the last two months -- has gradually but firmly reasserted himself on both foreign and domestic policy."

A president asserting himself on foreign and domestic policy? Unheard of. One wonders if this was the same tone the Times took on presidential authority when President Bill Clinton's Democratic Party lost control of the House and Senate in 1994.

For more coverage of New York Times bias, visit TimesWatch.

—Clay Waters is the director of Times Watch, an MRC project tracking the New York Times.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Liberal

Just proves the old adage--" Give a liberal 95% of what he wants and he'll just start bitching about the other 5%".

NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal

Or a "Palestinian."

Or a "Palestinian."  I guess that's why the libartards have such an affinity with our enemies.

Good point

Very good point,PD. Congrats.You know history ( unlike the liberals).

NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal

I immediately thought of in

I immediately thought of interesting parallels in this case.

Consider general news media, ratings continue to fall. Story after story after story of negativism. These institutions do not believe in anything but digression. Write a book/article against business, for higher taxes, stop Iraq, education flaws, pollution or SUV's, border fence, global warming, Welfare and or healthcare... and your spotlight will be light.

So what does this sector and it's blind followers believe in? What has been accomplished over the course of the past six years?

Just as the news media does not exist to inform the general public, the 'new and powerful congress' was not elected based upon their beliefs. It's not anyone's guess as to the forthcoming agenda, but their intentions are leftist in nature. They do not believe in the improvement of America and their hatred of President Bush has only increased.

Time was unable to name their person of the year and the following month massive layoffs. How much longer will the public put up with the liberal open slate, let alone inability to commit to improvent?

JDW

Kerry: "You know, education, if you make the most of it ... you can do well. If you don't, you get stuck in Iraq."

Good points, JDW.  The NYT's

Good points, JDW.  The NYT's declining circulation is testament to the public's disfavor with its content, but the editors are either tone-deaf to customer tastes, or willfully ignore them.

Time's problems

Time is continuing its decline - and building momentum as it goes!  Reading the letters to the editor in this week's issue reminded me of my observations re: best photos of the year - almost every one of them was negative...poor sad this or that - focusing on politically correct issues - HELLO, how about some of the positive happenings of 2006...I KNOW there were some! 

Sulzberger & Company are

Sulzberger & Company are a national disgrace......

And their paper and other revenue streams should be boycotted at every turn by patriotic Americans.....

Nowhere to Run....Nowhere To Hide.....

The NYT, America's newspape

The NYT, America's newspaper of record.

Setting the record for decline in subscriptions.

Setting the record for acceleration toward bankruptcy.

Setting the record for number of overpaid wannabe "journalistas" dumped on the street without a job sometime very soon.