
On a recent episode of rightANGLE, a current-affairs TV talk show I host, I had the opportunity to interview Charles "Cully" Stimson, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Detainee Affairs. While Stimson has responsibility for detainees world-wide, much of our discussion focused on those held at Guantanamo Bay -- Gitmo.
Observed Stimson: "We've had over 2,000 journalists visit Gitmo. People who go and see it for themselves realize it's almost Alice in Wonderland - down is up and up is down. The caricature of Guantanamo is exactly the opposite of the reality of Guantanamo. Detainees at Gitmo are treated humanely, in accordance with Common Article Three of the Geneva Convention."
Stimson mentioned that the majority of the journalists visiting Gitmo have not been Americans. They represent the A-Z of media outlets, including Al Jazeera TV, and media from China, Russia, the Middle East and Far East. Visitors don't visit just for an hour or so. They go down on a Sunday and leave on a Thursday.
As to the notion that the Pentagon might hand-pick the American media representatives it permits to visit, Stimson responded: "we've never said no. We let everyone go." He invited members of the media, whatever their point of view, to contact the Public Affairs Office of the Secretary of Defense and make arrangements to visit. He mentioned that when he flies down with media representatives, his comments during the entire three-hour flight in each direction are on the record.
Stimson's experience has been that people who had been harsh critics prior to their visit typically change their opinion after they leave. Among the examples cited by Stimson is that of James Ellis, a Brit who had been very critical of conditions at Gitmo. After his visit, he adopted the position that closing Gitmo would in fact make the world a more dangerous place.
As described by Stimson:
- Detaineess receive three square, halal-based, meals a day from a menu from which they can order.
- They are provided the same medical and dental care that our troops at Gitmo receive.
- They have a library with thousands of books in multiple languages, with access on any day.
- Detainees enjoy freedom of religion - there is call to prayer five times a day, which detainees call themselves. Korans and other religious materials are provided in their native language.
- They have the ability to exercise from two up to 14 hours a day.
- Detainees are not held incommunicado, contrary to what some have claimed. Over 44,000 pieces of mail have gone on and off the island to and from detainees. Detainees can write anyone they want, with postage paid by the US government.
- The International Committee of the Red Cross has unfettered access to the prisoners.
- Common Article Three of the Geneva Convention, setting forth the detainees rights, is posted in several languages in a variety of places throughout the camp.
- Unlike POWs, who are kept till the end of the conflict, the US government has transferred over 400 detainees back to their native countries.
Concluded Stimson: "if prisoners in our country knew how could detainees in Gitmo have it, they'd be begging to go to Gitmo to serve out their time."
Specifically with regard to interrogation, Stimson stated that whereas the Army Field Manual provides for 19 types of interrogation, there is only one used: a direct approach of simply talking. Any guard who might mistreat a detainee is pulled off the line and disciplined.
Stimson mentioned that to speed up the adjudication of the detainees' cases, a new courtroom facility is planned. There is currently only one courtroom. The new facility will add two more courtrooms, including one that can handle multiple-defendant trials. With the new facility, Stimson expressed the hope that the trials can be brought to closure in three to four years.
Stimson described the abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib in Iraq as an "atrocious chapter" attributable to a rogue band who have now been held accountable. Subsequent to the incident, the Department of Defense launched twelve separate, high-level investigations, resulting in 492 recommendations. Stimson chairs the committee charged with implementing the recommendations and reported that to date, 486 have been implemented. "We have made massive strides," he observed, mentioning that the remaining handful of recommendations are ones that DoD cannot implement alone.
Bottom line: it is my personal belief that some time in the not-too-distant future, people will look back on this period and conclude that the treatment of detainees by the United States has been the most humane in the history of warfare.
A webcast of my interview of Sec. Stimson is available here
UPDATE 1-08: For those wishing to learn more, and/or to call in with questions or comments, Mr. Stimson will be appearing on C-SPAN's "Washington Journal" (television) on Wednesday, Jan. 10th, from 9:00-9:45 AM.
Mark visited Iraq in November. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Well, lo and behold the Unite
January 5, 2007 - 15:02 ET by Darth DutchWell, lo and behold the United States isn't this big mean bully who loves to torture people. In fact, we treat the Islamic prisoners better than some summer camp attendees. But is anyone surprised that the news media isn't reporting this? Either they are too lazy to go down and see how things are, or it goes against the message they want to present.
We all know the American prisoners wouldn't get a tenth of the consideration from their captors; and that is assuming they even lived past day one of their capture.
Dutch
You place too much credit in
January 5, 2007 - 18:37 ET by bk1955You place too much credit in one self serving report. Wasn't one of his 2,000 visitors representing Fox or the WSJ? Do you think Dep Sec Stimson could be charged if a case was made that illegal torture occured? Stimson is on the short list for accountability on this one. I wouldn't conclude that this is the last word on the subject.
It is quite pathetic to see h
January 6, 2007 - 06:40 ET by UnsaneIt is quite pathetic to see how fast you are to accuse the United States of being this evil torture machine. It may come as a shock to you, but those in the military - myself having been one just a few short months ago (and on the way to the Reserves) - are drilled routinely on the Laws of Armed Conflict. You would be surprised how many Legal officers are running around down there and all over the world to ensure that the United States military is accomplishing the mission by the book.
I would not be surprised in the least if those stationed at Gitmo are thoroughly drillied on the Geneva Convention before they go there.
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
As usual, Un, you are oversta
January 7, 2007 - 19:39 ET by bk1955As usual, Un, you are overstating my position. I see the benifit for you in doing this, it allows you to take a self rightious position and not give your prejuduces a second thought.
I do not belive the US in not an evil torture machine. I do believe elements in the government believe torture is justified in confronting our current enemies. Let's get a free and open debate on the issue.
You may believe no one who was born or serves under the US flag could ever be capable of committing an inhumane act. I honor your idealism. I agree with Ronald Reagan that we should trust, but verify.
An FBI investigation has uncovered some evidence that in spite of all our best attempts at training, some incidents that could be characterized as torture may have occured. I believe it is our duty to all the honorable service people in US history,including you, to investigate this further. Why are you so willing to dishonor yourself and sweep this under the rug for the benefit of politicians, many of whom never served?
Never once did I say anyone s
January 7, 2007 - 19:52 ET by UnsaneNever once did I say anyone serving in the United States military is incapable of an inhumane act. Hell, I am, because I am human, and I am as privy to human nature as you are.
However, what you fail over and over again (intentionally?) to understand is that if I was ever caught doing something inhumane to a POW or enemy combatant, I would be sure to wind up in Fort Leavenworth, KS, for a nice long tour of Turning Big Rocks Into Little Rocks. In the United States military, its soldiers, sailors, Airmen and Marines are constantly drilled in the Law of Armed Conflict and have Legal personnel monitoring us.
With your extreme disdain of our military, I trust you have never witnessed a target-planning session. At such sessions, a Legal officer is present at ALL times, to determine whether or not particular targets can in fact legally be hit. Similar procedures are in place for the handling of POWs/enemy combatants and I have had to take the training repeatedly in my short time in the military.
I won't even address that last sick, insulting sentence with a response, except to say you know nothing about my time served, and you yourself are a coward who will NEVER fight for your own freedom because you think it's a given, when in fact it is not. I can see you getting riddled with bullets from terrorists all the while crying "WAHHHHHH!!! YOU CAN'T DO THIS TO ME! I HAVE RIGHTS! I HAVE RIGHTS!"
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
this is exactly the stuff the
January 5, 2007 - 15:08 ET by Conservative in the Artsthis is exactly the stuff the American public needs to hear! Keep up the good work Mark.
And from the MSM:.........<cricket>.............<cricket>
Sen. Feinstein visits Guantanamo Bay
January 5, 2007 - 15:11 ET by Gary HallSen. Diane Feinstein, (D) CA, and Sen. Daniel Inouye, (D) HI visits Guantanamo Bay. How soon they forget (the MSM never wanted to know)?
ABC World News Tonight , January 27, 2002 -- Senator DIANNE FEINSTEIN (Democrat, California): These are people; if you release them, they're going to go out and kill again.
Fox News, January 28, 2002 - Feinstein and the other senators told reporters after touring the camp that they agreed with the Bush administration's handling of the prisoners and saw nothing to suggest mistreatment.
[Daniel] Inouye, in fact, said they are being treated "in some ways better than we treat our people."
Feinstein said she once worked at a California prison and has visited many others around the world. To those abroad who have suggested the Guantanamo Bay prisoners have been treated improperly she said, "Take another look."
American Forces Press Service
U.S. NAVAL BASE, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA, Jan. 27, 2002 -
All concurred that the detainees were being treated well. Feinstein said the detainees live better than inmates in some California prisons she's seen. Stevens and Inouye seemed to suggest that the detainees were getting better treatment than perhaps they deserved.
"This is not an egregious situation," said Feinstein, noting that the Guantanamo detainees are not being mistreated.
Hutchison said the Joint Task Force 160 troops are doing a good job providing religious materials and medical care to the detainees -- the same type of medical care available to U.S. troops and their family members, she noted.
You've wasted your research o
January 7, 2007 - 19:45 ET by bk1955You've wasted your research on this. The report covers incidents up to 2004. Are you suggesting that our sevice people get a more balanced report on world issues than the rest of US citizens or just the alternative bias?
Why is it the biases we are share more trustworthy?
I wonder if I could convinc
January 5, 2007 - 16:31 ET by james789I wonder if I could convince them to take me there so I could spend a couple of weeks? It would be the best vacation I've had in several years.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price,
peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of
soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
Theodore Roosevelt
the US government has transfe
January 5, 2007 - 17:43 ET by taznarAnd strangely enough, many of those countries don't treat them as well as the US did.
I wish I could remember the terrorist being held by the French who was bemoaning the fact that detainees at Gitmo were treated better than him and had more rights. Apparently, France too can hold terrorists indefinitely without a trial (going by memory from that article).
[Added in Edit]
I was wrong, there's a three year limit. Its not the article I was looking for, but from the WaPo :
Your comment about the qualit
January 5, 2007 - 18:22 ET by bk1955Your comment about the quality of treatment is confused. The 400 detainees were released because, subsequent to the Supreme Court decision, the military couldn't continue to hold them with out evidence. At least some of them are innocent of any crime other than being in the wrong place at the wrong time or being an adversary to an individual who had the ear of the arresting officers.
Since when is France the paragon of humanitarian treatment that we should aspire to. Isn't America better than any European Country in all things, including treatment of its suspected enemies?
To paraphrase my Mom, "If France jumped off the building, would you do it too?
You have been punk'd, my friend. The Bush adminstration punk'd all Americans who think America is the best country in the world because we respect the Freedom and rights of all people.
Once you've been punk'd, the question becomes, how do you get even.
So, when I enter the Reserves
January 6, 2007 - 06:42 ET by UnsaneSo, when I enter the Reserves and get deployed and find myself capturing or otherwise handling captured enemy combatants, at what point do I Mirandize them?
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
Hi Unsane, so when will you
January 7, 2007 - 18:34 ET by bk1955Dup
Hi Unsane, so when will you
January 7, 2007 - 18:34 ET by bk1955Hi Unsane, so when will you join the Reserves? If you're planning on making captures in Iraq, you'd better hurry, if the Dems show any backbone the war will end before the Bush Presidency. Pelosi and Reid seem resistant to Bush's proposed surge.
Alternatively, can you fund your own deployment? It seems there is quite a community who agree with you and refuse to accept the fact they were misled on the necessity and motivation of this conflict. Maybe you could tap them to finance your personal surge.
Of course we'll still finance you to make captures in Afghanistan and Somalia. If you find yourself capturing enemy combatants in those places, do what your manual tells you.
Actually, if the Dems have an
January 7, 2007 - 20:03 ET by UnsaneActually, if the Dems have any brain in them, they will see the Iraq war to its end. But because of crybabies like you who don't want to stick it out, we are in the fix we are in right now.
Like it or not, you are funding the deployments out of your income taxes, as much as that enrages you. See, some of us in this country LIKE having our country defended from terrorists and dictatorships.
Finally, instead of me going to Afghanistan, or IRAQ, or possibly Somalia in the future, all by my lonesome, perhaps you can enlist yourself and learn a little bit about the military up close and personal? Perhaps it will teach you to be a little less smug and condescending in your posts. And maybe you will learn a little bit more about the world and the meaning of the sentence "FREEDOM IS NOT FREE." (A whiny socialist looking at one who does much of the heavy lifting, crying that I'm not doing enough heavy lifting while he sits and enjoys the fruits of my labor. Imagine that.)
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
Hey, bk1955, got a link on that timeline of release of detainees
January 7, 2007 - 18:35 ET by acaiguanaHey, bk1955, got a link on that timeline of release of detainees?
I hate to ask a Liberal to back up his BS with facts, but is there any official timeline regarding the Court Decision and the release of detainees? Numbers please. Before and after.
Otherwise, stuff it.
<edit - oh year and reason for release?>
ACA
...
Acaiguana says: "Which city is next?"
I hate to do research without
January 7, 2007 - 19:14 ET by bk1955I hate to do research without knowing why. Are you trying to suggest that the Guantanemo prisoners were released before the report says they were tortured? If a prisoner was tortured what difference does it make how long they are held?
I want you to back this silly statement up.
January 7, 2007 - 19:48 ET by acaiguanaI want you to back this silly statement up.
'The 400 detainees were released because, subsequent to the Supreme Court decision, the military couldn't continue to hold them with out evidence. At least some of them are innocent of any crime other than being in the wrong place at the wrong time or being an adversary to an individual who had the ear of the arresting officers."
Why? I don't think it is close to factually correct.
Good enough?
Or have you been p'unked?
<edit> Where did you get the 400 number? According to this source there were 695 detainees on 28 Oct 2002 and on 12 Dec 2006 there were 392.?????<end edit>
...
Acaiguana says: "Which city is next?"
Couple of things on this one,
January 5, 2007 - 18:13 ET by bk1955Couple of things on this one, Mark, least important first.
I'm happy that you use every opportunity to promote your journalistic activities, but a reasonable person reading this post would probably conclude that quoting an apologist for the DOD on torture in Guantanemo demonstrates a reverse of the Liberal Bias, don't you think?
Next, how does your bottom line account for this report on the torture reported by the FBI? Did you question Dep Sec Stimson on the disparity between his report and the FBI? Does he have an explanation for why the 2,000 visitors missed what the FBI saw? Is there a liberal bias at the FBI we should know about, or maybe they have a bias for honesty and justice. Stimson's bias seems to lead a bit towards self serving, don't you think?
I seem to remember another le
January 6, 2007 - 00:46 ET by kubob21I seem to remember another leaked FBI report about a flushed Koran that turned out to be completely false. So unless you are prepared to produce a urine soaked, feces encrusted Koran from the Gitmo septic tank, I suggest you take a careful look at all the reporters, political leaders (including Defeatocrats), and the fine men and women of our armed forces (that you despise and obviously hate as evidenced by your lies about them) who say Gitmo is humane, and realize that they make your rehashed (same stuff repeated) "leaked FBI report" look like the horse hockey it is.
Maybe you could confirm your
January 7, 2007 - 18:02 ET by bk1955Maybe you could confirm your memory with a link to to document your statement. There is a link a copy of the FBI report on the link. Rather than relying on your questionable memory and prejudices, why not read a little more?
I don't despise any of the fine men and women of our armed forces. I respect their idealism. BTW it was the fine men and women of our armed forces who responded to the questioning that was the source for the report.
Your world view is simplistic. All reporters and poiticians who don't promote your view are "bad" and all service people are good. Is goodness limited to American service people who agree with you or can someone question your refusal to investigate issues independanly still be good?
If the FBI chooses to keep a
January 6, 2007 - 00:56 ET by JimboIf the FBI chooses to keep a suspected terrorsit at Gitmo awake for 24 hours in an attempt to make this country safer, the only thing I would ask is, "Why not make it 48 hours?"
You're missing the point. S
January 7, 2007 - 18:13 ET by bk1955You're missing the point. Sleep deprivation is only one of the behaviors idenitfied in the FBI report. Follow the link in my post to read the details.
The point is, Mark is posting self serviced and biased reports. He is resorting to the tactics he critises in the MSM, selecitve reporting and a strong political bias Mark is misrepresenting the facts of the issue for the benefit of his journalistic career. Heavens to Geraldo! How can we believe his critisms of Matt Lauler's beer references and Julia Roberts spider rights activities?
Just a thought
January 7, 2007 - 18:20 ET by UnsaneMaybe he is using those same tactics in order to bring BALANCE to the MSM report...
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
You've got a good one here, U
January 7, 2007 - 18:47 ET by bk1955You've got a good one here, Unsane. By presenting an unbalaced report, Mark is bringing balance to the MSM? I'm struggling with this concept. For me to get a balance view of events, do I need to follow all reports on a particular issue? How will I know when I've got all the stories? Do I just count the stories on both sides of an issue, and then give my support to the winner?
Are you suggesting we consumers of media are incapable of drawing conclusions from a fairly reported story?
Do you follow this site and Media Matters to get a balanced view on how out of balance the MSM is?
I believe Mark should be held to the same standard he has established for the MSM. It is the only way, consumers of media, you and I can be sure we are getting a clear picture of national and world events, in spite of our prejudice and bias.
9 stories out of 532 employees.
January 7, 2007 - 19:13 ET by acaiguana9 stories out of 532 employees.
The worst being duct tape on someone, maybe, not collaborated.
As none of the allegations appeared to be collaborated.
But, let's say there were 9 instances of treatment that would be argued as to whether the treatment constituted torture. I would argue a dog barking in front of someone, squatting over a Koran, loud music...etc, does not constitute torture. Now I would argue that sleep deprivation of 24 hours, wasn't it 24 hours, would be close to torture for me, particularly if I had to listen to Rap Music. /Sarc off
So assuming any of these incidents actually happened and the report does not make that judgment; this was prior to 2004. The majority of the 9 serious responses were concerning a time period from 2003 to 2001.
I don't want to rain on your parade here, but 9 resposes that were investigated do not make 'routine torture'. I would agree that it would be good not to ever have maltreatment of any prisoner; but that would fly in the face of the reality of human treatment of prisoners in any setting. I'm sure you can find 9 incidents as bad or worse than this in any State Prison over the same period or even over a week.
ACA
...
Acaiguana says: "Which city is next?"
Actually, the report says 26
January 7, 2007 - 19:25 ET by bk1955Actually, the report says 26 incidents were preorted up to 2004. I am sure others would disagree about whether the taping, the heat and cold, the prolonged shackling or the percieved desecration where worst. I think it is the pattern of treatment that is objectionable.
You have conceded 9 incidents, can you say why shouldn't these 9 be investigated and those responsible held accountable?
Why shouldn't we expect a representative of the government, like Dep Sec Stimson to provide full disclosure and at least report that alleged incidents are being investigated? Positive spin from either side of the spectum is persieved as lies.
Actually, the report says only 9 were worthy of following up.
January 7, 2007 - 19:35 ET by acaiguanaActually, the report says only 9 were worthy of following up.
Having a little trouble reading 244 pages are we?
And the report didn't say the incidents would not be investigated. In fact, I believe the report referes to itself as an 'investigation' of abuse.
So, the presumption of innocence isn't important to you. Just the seriousness of the charge? There is no indication in the report that these incidents were collaborated or true. Just reported and interviews with the 9 people they thought worth while to ask.
My point to you is that you are citing an FBI report as if it were a criminal brief; irrefutable proof that the prisoners at Guantanamo were 'tortured' leaving no room for abuse like happens in most detention or jail facilities. If it's the enemy, it's torture. If it is a prisoner in Chino, it's abuse and violation of their human rights.
You are simply wrong to present the report in the light you are presenting it. If you want to reference the report in a discussion about alleged abuses at Gitmo, be my guest. But you don't do that. You leap from that report to a conclusion that 400 detainees released from Gitmo were a direct result of a court ruling and you have no basis for that article of faith.
If I recall correctly, Congress passed a law that authorized Bush to keep them or let them go. The court never said they had to be charged, the court said the military tribunals needed to be authorized by congress. And Congress authorized them.
So, that is a misrepresentation all by itself.
Why is it the Left has to paint every issue in stark alarmist and overblown terms to try to make a point.
I think your point is that you want an Al Qaeda Bill of Rights and are more interested in the well being of our enemies than you are of the well being of this country. To get behind that belief, you cloak your concern in a 'aren't we better than our enemy' higher than thou morality that frankly...
makes me ill.
ACA
...
Acaiguana says: "Which city is next?"
Historiography and other issues
January 7, 2007 - 19:40 ET by UnsaneYou aren't very familiar with historiography, are you?
Actually, no, he should NOT be held to the same standard that the MSM is. The MSM claims to be 100% impartial and objective. At least Mark TOLD you up front what his biases are. That is why I love The Economist. They make NO bones about their biases, so I can read an issue and not have to think to myself "What's their angle?" ALL the time, just some of the time.
Do you know that most media around the world in fact operates in such a matter? In France, Japan, and many other countries, you know what you are getting, bias wise, once you purchase one of their publications. If you ask me, I think the United States would be better served if the media outlets dropped their charade and declared their biases up front. It might actually lead to more intellectually honest debate.
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
bk1955,No we get the point ve
January 7, 2007 - 18:41 ET by Svenbk1955,
No we get the point very well. First, Mark is using an official to back his assertions up. There is NO torture happening at Gitmo! Secondly, lets not forget that Senators Durbin and Kennedy, who had actually compared our soldiers to Pol Pot prior to visiting gitmo, later said they were impressed with the humane treatment these detainees were receiving.
What I find most appalling about you and your liberal ilk, is that you'll gladly give the enemy ALL manor of justification and impartiality, while looking at your fellow American's (military) with distain and contempt! I mean it really is sick; you seem to be almost hoping that we are torturing people!
What a sad irony for the American soldier: They risk and lose their lives, so bleeding heart, America hating liberals like yourself can spout your toxic drivel. If it wasn't for our military, gutless wonders like yourself wouldn't be able to get on a chat room, or any other forum and practice the right you you enjoy sooooo much...FREE SPEECH!
Your respect for authority is
January 7, 2007 - 19:04 ET by bk1955Your respect for authority is touching. Because an "official" backs up assertions, they must be valid. You have no concern that the official is serving himself in his statements. Does this hold for all officials?
I am impressed that you can make such a strong definitive statement on conditions on an island that is an occupied military outpost very few of us have the previledge to visit.
The good Senators spent very little time and their visit was under controlled conditions. Are you aware that visitors to German Concentration Camps during WWII came back with reports of humane and healthful treatment?
The report I referenced is from the FBI and American law enforcement agency. The individuals who contributed to the report were military personnel! I am appalled by torture. It seems to me you would rather deny a problem could possibly exist than investigate it and hold those responsible accountable. Do you deny torture occured at Abu Graib? How can you be so confident that it couldn't happen somewhere else?
The sad irony for the American Soldier is: he or she is asked to risk his or her life for cause that is in reality more concerned with finance than liberty. I disagree with your designation of gutlessness. It takes more courage to stand up to and question wealth and power than to accept their simplistic, hatefilled justifications.
You place a lot of weight behind a report that is itself ...
January 7, 2007 - 19:18 ET by acaiguanaYou place a lot of weight behind a report that is itself self-serving.
I read your report.
The first three pages primarily make the point that no FBI agent was involved in any wrongdoing at Gitmo. Maybe that was the purpose of this report.
But the report doesn't 'prove' anything. It is bunch of allegations by people who didn't participate, merely observed, and always blames the military and contractors. Odd, isn't it? No one had the guts at the time to make formal complaint from the FBI regarding treatment of prisoners.
Your typical Liberal misrepresentation of what the report is and the lack of any perspective on the events cited goes kinda South when the prime link is the Guardian.
Not a lot of credibility there, Mr. Smug.
ACA
...
Acaiguana says: "Which city is next?"
The Guardian, huh? Are you
January 7, 2007 - 19:27 ET by UnsaneThe Guardian, huh?
Are you saying that our socialist friend bk1955 can't evaluate sources very well?
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???" - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
bk, As I said, you'd rather b
January 7, 2007 - 23:56 ET by Svenbk,
As I said, you'd rather believe the negative about your country, and its soldiers, than the good.
Abu GRaib! Oh brother, are you kidding? The unproportional comparisons between relatively harmless (maybe humiliating treatment), and what these animals did to our soldiers (and reporters!) is mind boggling! Lets also remember, the soldiers in question were punished. But with America hating, malcontents such as yourself, you'd prefer to paint with the broad brush and disparage ALL American soldiers.
BK, the fact remains, US Senators, the named official in this blog post, the Red Cross, and many others have indicated that abuse is not taking place at Gitmo. Even with this, you, like ALL other liberals, choose to believe the worst about your countrymen, while giving support for the enemies.
Oh, and please spare us the "it takes more courage to stand up and question wealth and power...blah, blah." BK, you live in the United States of America. Gutless wonders like yourself are allowed to question authority. It takes NO bravery whatsoever to do that in this country.
If you want to impress us, why not take this "bravery" you claim to have, and go and practice it in Cuba, Iran, Syria, or North Korea! As I said, you are a gutless wonder who only has the courage to trash their own country.
You are discusting!
The total number of German PO
January 7, 2007 - 18:49 ET by Eric TurnerThe total number of German POWs who died from all causes in US hands was 56,000 out of some 5,000,000 held. Just curious...I wonder how many have died at Gitmo...mmm...maybe none? Can't be sure though.
-----------------------------------------------------
"Perpetual itching without benefit of scratching to the enemies of America." - July 4th toast during the Revolution
You're comparing apples to or
January 7, 2007 - 19:08 ET by bk1955Dup
You're comparing apples to or
January 7, 2007 - 19:08 ET by bk1955You're comparing apples to oranges. The comparable statics would show how many were tortured in American POW camps, and in American Internment Camps for that matter? Did our enemies in the last century deserve better treatment, or were our fathers and grandfathers more principled and moral? Can we not strive for their best qualities?
Apples & Oranges
January 7, 2007 - 19:33 ET by BlondeI'll give you Apples & Oranges, bk.
Why don't you just take it on over to Al-Quaeda...you know, join up with them.
Then have a lovely conversation about a more humane way to BEHEAD Americans.
Your love for the enemy is truly a joy for all here to see.
I'd suggest you buy some Korans, and maybe some burkha's, and get your butt on the next plane to Baghdad...then look up al Sad'r & the militias, and please, please, try to talk some sense into them and their death squads about fairness in a war.
Sheesh!
Try this
January 7, 2007 - 19:34 ET by UnsaneI'm sure we can all lock them up at the Waldorf Astoria and make sure they have room service on demand if that makes you FEEL better. Me, I would rather they get the same treatment our hostages got in Iran (read Guests of the Ayatollah), as it is only fitting. Or, maybe you can adopt a few terrorists and show us all how to humanely treat them?
In reality, we are bending over backwards to be nice. Because they did not enter the field of battle with a uniform, according to the Geneva Convention, we have every right to summarily execute them all as unlawful combatants. But because of our humanitarian concerns, we do not do what we legally can do to them. All so people like you can go to bed at night and FEEL better.
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)