The true believers in the cause of war at all times to be supported by other people and their children cannot afford to look at themselves in the mirror of reality because the pain would be too much. These will look to any thin reed to support their untenable arguments. Blowing up one small thing to obscure the much larger, uglier picture is all that they can do to hide their problems. Years from now they will still be screaming that the press, and you in particular, will actually be to blame for our "loss of Iraq." It seems like we are to replay Viet Nam for at least another century. After all, the US South is still fighting in many ways.

What liberal blog did you cut and paste that from?

Just because Brit Hume is echoing an AP report does not mean confirmation, BTW how come the AP is not trumpeting this to the skies, even they are pretty mum about their confirmation.  And how come flaks like you are trying to move the dialogue in a false direction.  Jamil's existence is only one part of a story about the AP producing terrorist propaganda.  It has been conclusivly proven that 6 people were not burned alive, even the AP has been forced to admit that but yet they refuse to issue a formal retraction, why?  Because they know that the 61 attributed and many more unattributed stories are just as false.  Terrorist propaganda is not news and that's all the AP is good for these days is terrorist propaganda.  61 stories only 1 that another news agency (al-Reuters) reported only 1 and even that was essentialy a repeat of the AP IE they used the same terrorist stringer.  The Assoiated (with terrorists) Press is genuine.

Like a dog who craped on the carpet, Malkin has her nose rubbed into the truth, This story will be DOA before rightwing bloggers admit their error.

joe

As far s I know this still hasn't been proven one way or the other, please answer with a link like I asked you a minute ago if Michelle is still going or not to investigate for herself, I am serious, I heard she was this morning, Hume reported this same thing yesterday too, I heard she was going just today, I am seriously curious... even with a troll like you....link would help.

"If we ever forget that we are a Nation Under God....then we will be a Nation Gone Under."  Ronald Reagan

"...and her ilk..." ? Her ilk?  OOOoooooh, (in an Elmer Fudd voice now): "she's a scary, scary, wrascally wabbit".  What the hell?  She's a shady, swarmy character, like all us suspicious conservatives who slink around her?

I can safely say Michelle Malkin has more credibility in the tip of her pinky than the AP ever will.  You're concerns are misplaced.  And, the MSM doesn't give a hoot about this story being false or right or whatever, nor will they ever.  They just run with anything that remotely smacks of BushandAmerica-bashing.

"He who has a thousand friends has not a friend to spare, and he who has one enemy will meet him everywhere"          -Ali ibn-Abi-Talib, 4th Islamic Caliph

here's another liberal code word or phrase: 'witch hunt'.  A witch hunt against AP?  That's rich, considering what they've been doing for the last few years!

"He who has a thousand friends has not a friend to spare, and he who has one enemy will meet him everywhere"          -Ali ibn-Abi-Talib, 4th Islamic Caliph

Spider hole!

Why do I come here.  To give you the TRUTH.  It's not a matter of the media being trustworthy. it's a matter of reporting things that are truly happening. many on the right want to blame the press and claim that it is the media that is presenting a false image of violence in iraq. well, those things are happening. car bombs kill dozens and dozens more show up dead in the streets of baghdad every morning. but many on the right claim that because one or two stories can't be authenticated to everyone's satisfaction, then all the other stories are made up. and the indisputable fact is that the press has done more than it's fair share of shilling for bush. they buried all the contrary evidence about wmd in the run up to the war, and all but ignored the downing street memo which said of the case for going to war "the facts were being fixed aroung the policy".

Someone commented on the warbloggers' fanatic rantings over the "fauxtography" incident during the Israeli/Hizbollah fighting; now there's this AP/Capt. Hussein FUD going on. It reminds me of nothing so much as their own revered and frequently referred to Olympian moment: what they like to call "Rathergate." By shifting the emphasis to miniscule differences in fonts, they shifted any discussion away from Bush's actual AWOL from the Texas Air National Guard... It worked then, why shouldn't it work now... Except, like all boys who cry "Wolf!" once too often, people have stopped taking them at face value, and quickly discover that there's really nothing there but some kids with keyboards, typing away with the CAPS LOCK key on...

'bitch-slapped'.  hmm.  As Shake would say on Aqua Teen Hunger Force:

'You're full-blown GAY!"

I feel sorry for you, you are so absurdly lost in liberal la-la land.  I used to be a liberal, but then I had to work for a bunch of the hypocrites, and then I actually listened to what Ted Kennedy and John Kerry were saying, and also read what true conservatism is, and since I'm a home-owning, tax-paying married mother of four, I made the break.  Modern liberalism is anti-American socialism. 

Straighten up and fly right!   -Nat 'King' Cole.