Bozell Column: Gerald Ford and Media Historians

Photo of Brent Bozell.

The passing of President Gerald Ford drew a dignified, even warm farewell from the national press. There was near-consensus that he would be remembered for his decency and the risk he took, pardoning Richard Nixon from Watergate prosecutions in an effort to heal the nation. It is proper that the press is kind today. It ought to be remembered, however, that the press was not of this opinion when Ford took office.

For example, Time magazine’s cover story on the pardon in September 1974 declared that "Ford's first major decision raised disturbing questions about his judgment and his leadership capabilities, and called into question his competence." The cover carried suggestive sub-headlines like "Squandered Trust" and "Premature and Unwise." Such was the media’s mood toward this man’s actions in office.

A number of historical factors mellowed the media’s hard feelings for Gerald Ford. Losing narrowly to Jimmy Carter helped, though in some quarters there were those who faulted our 38th president for having the audacity to retire, while praising our 39th for refusing to leave. Ford had led a humble post-presidential life in the background, and that led Time magazine Washington bureau chief Stanley Cloud to mock him in a 1989 story for perfecting his putt while Carter was acclaimed as a "jazzed superhero," circling the globe "seeking opportunities to Do Good."

The rise of Ronald Reagan helped, too. As the Republican Party shifted to the right in the 1980s and 1990s, it made liberal journalists nostalgic for the post-Watergate 1970s, an era of Democratic dominance and Republican moderation. The Reagan tax cuts made liberals pine for the days of Whip Inflation Now.

The rehabilitation of Gerald Ford was complete with the Clinton impeachment. Suddenly that which they’d demanded so fervently in 1974 – a presidential trial – produced precisely what Ford had predicted: national chaos, and with that knowledge came renewed respect from the liberal camp for his decision to pardon Nixon, so much so that in the spring of 2001, the John F. Kennedy Library granted Ford its "Profile in Courage" award, complete with Sen. Ted Kennedy’s blessing.

In the aftermath of President Ford’s death, long-embargoed interviews with liberal journalists and historians have become a part of the story line because they present another joyous opportunity for the "news" media to question the policies of conservative politicians and the war in Iraq.

Washington Post bigfoot Bob Woodward highlighted that Ford had told him in a 2004 interview that he thought the Bush team made a mistake in making the primary justification for the war in Iraq the removal of weapons of mass destruction. Ford didn’t say he opposed the war itself, although he did say he would have delayed war and tried to make sanctions work. So the media shorthand became "Gerald Ford opposed the war," as NBC’s Brian Williams incorrectly reported, and so many others have subsequently repeated.

Another reporter has Ford firmly on the record supporting the war, even if with a caveat. Thomas DeFrank of the New York Daily News reported Ford told him in May that "Saddam Hussein was an evil person and there was justification to get rid of him, but we shouldn't have put the basis on weapons of mass destruction. That was a bad mistake." On Sunday morning’s "Face the Nation" with CBS’s Bob Schieffer, DeFrank was unequivocal, stating he interviewed the former president no less than four times over a four-year period, and each time Ford came out in support of the war.

ABC and NBC newscasts couldn’t find one second of air time to even mention DeFrank or his differing story line. Indeed, ABC went even further in the opposite direction. On Sunday’s "This Week With George Stephanopoulos," Time magazine Washington Bureau Chief Jay Carney declared that it was "unpardonable" that Ford hadn’t shared his allegedly anti-war opinions with Vice President Dick Cheney and then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, two men who had once served under him. ABC’s Claire Shipman, who is also Carney’s wife, had said almost the exact thing Thursday morning on ABC’s Good Morning America.

Did Gerald Ford support, or not support the war in Iraq? In the end the question is wholly irrelevant. The man was a quarter-century removed from the national scene, by all accounts joyfully retired from public service. Let history remember him for what he was, and what he did; not for what we might have wanted of him.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I found it extremely disturbi

I found it extremely disturbing to have scenes from President Ford's funeral continually interrupted by political commentary...particularly as it pushed the "anti-war" agenda.  To air tapes of a man who was 90 or 91 at the time....as a blatant shot at the administration, was disgusting, and disrespectful in the extreme.  And to continue the "d" alliteration...disingenuous.

Even that old liberal talk show host (drawing a blank...Merv Griffin era, brown hair, whiny voice...sorry, can't place the name) was blathering on. 

The pardon of Nixon WAS &quot

The pardon of Nixon WAS "premature and unwise" as the press said at the time.  You don't pardon someone BEFORE they've been tried.  Nixon's crimes were never laid out before a court and a legal judgment given.  We were cheated of the chance to learn important details of Nixon's actions.  But, MOST importantly, Nixon was never forced to admit guilt or apologize.  Nixon was warned by General Haig that Ford was committed to the pardon and encouraged Nixon to stand firm against admissions of guilt or an apology and Ford blinked in the showdown.  THAT was a where the press then, and some of the press now, come up with the judgement that Ford was both "premature and unwise".  I couldn’t agree more.

The premature pardon also set a precedent that has had severe repercussions for the country.  The pardon of the major players in the Iran Contra affair by H.W. Bush as he left office - BEFORE they were tried by the Special Prosecutor Lawrence Walsh - comes to mind.  And these were MAJOR crimes.  And, of course, the extreme example of the current imperial presidency and it's distain for the law, guided by some of the same players that helped Ford, comes to mind as well.  How would both of these examples been different if Nixon had been held accountable?  Makes me wonder who The Shrub is going to pardon as he leaves office.

Your comparison to Clinton couldn't be sillier.  He was dragged before the Senate for the most minor of crimes at a time of extreme partisan rancor.  Any comparison to Nixon’s crimes is laughable.  The Republicans got exactly what they deserved when they were swept out of power by the resultant outrage.

Counterpoint

In actuality, it could be argued he did the right thing, in that it put the entire matter to rest, instead of allowing it to drag on.  The mere passage of the Articles of Impeachment had the desired effect of chasing Nixon from office, did it not?  Besides, what are you so worried about?  It can't be changed now and the 1974 elections resulted in a major Democratic sweep.  Could it be that you are positively enraged that the United States did not become a one-party state in perpetuity that year? 

(Disclaimer: no, I am not particularly fond of Nixon.)

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

Johnbo, your grasp of history is awe inspiring.

Johnbo, your grasp of history is awe inspiring.

Lincoln's amnesty after the Civil War was a pre-emptive pardon for crimes committed (with a few notable exceptions).

Blanket pardons are not new.

Pardons can be written specifically or generally.  They don't follow precedents, they follow crimes.  I find it interesting that you have the cheek to bring up Ford's Pardon of Nixon and Clinton's Presidency (sans comment on his pardons for the crass purpose of money in his pocket) in the same breath.

Your argument about Clinton's crimes follow the idea from the Democrats that they didn't 'rise to the level of...'.

I choose to reject that argument as he in fact was impeached.

Nice legacy Billy Bob.  You (Clinton) managed to take the opportunity to show the world that spoiled Baby Boomers could be President and blew it.  (so to speak).

So, we have a failure as a President, Billy boy Clinton and a failure as a President, Jimmy Carter, being shoved in our faces as if there was something we the American people did to deserve them.

Oh, yeah, we voted them into office.  I almost forgot.  My bad.

Just like the Democrats were voted into office in 2006.

Well, it's going to be a fun two years.  Already shouted down in their debut to declare fiddling with rules in the House is 'important' by the Sheehan (mother of all War Protesters) they ran like rabbits to their warrens.  If they can't control their cats in the herd how the hell are we ever going to learn what their plan is for Iraq?

He He He.

ACA

:-)

...

Acaiguana says:  "Which city is next?"

Cat Herding

aca,

We never will learn what their plan is for Iraq.  Reason?

Cats can only be herded when said cats share some sort of mutual goal. 

When each cat in the herd has its own goal (as the congresscritters do)....forget it.  The Dems will be lucky to herd this bunch to the correct offices.

Interesting times....

Gee, I thought the reason was that we never find Snipes when ...

Gee, I thought the reason was that we never find snipes when ...

Going out for the Snipe Hunt.

:-)

ACA

...

Acaiguana says:  "Which city is next?"

Well, go stand by that tree r

Well, go stand by that tree right over there....

LOL.....If you are making yo

LOL.....

If you are making your point by saying that Clinton brought the same level of "dignity" and "decency" to the WH as Gerald Ford then I can only laugh in your face......the American public know this....and as a result, the American media cooled their ardor and zealous partisanship when speaking of Ford as a man, a husband, a father and a political leader.......

And for the record, I'll take the pardon of Richard Nixon to spare the country more turmoil and angst any day over the Clinton pardons of Marc Rich (a felon avoiding prosecution abroad who gave millions to the Clinton library); David Brown (securities and mail fraud) who gave millions to the Clinton library; Stuart Cohn (illegal sale of silver and gold options) who contributed to the Clinton library; Roger Clinton (his very own brother); Henry Cisneros (a former member of his administration facing federal felony charges); Edward Downe (wire fraud and tax evasion) who gave millions to Clinton campaigns and library; William Fugazy (perjury during bankruptcy proceedings) who entertained Bill when he was alone in NY setting up the party girls; James Lake (illegal corporate campaign contributions and wire fraud) who gave millions to Clinton campaigns; Susan McDougal (who kept silent about her knowledge of Watergate scandal in Arkansas); Samuel Morrison (willful transmission of defense information, unauthorized possession of defense information, theft of government property & convicted under espionage act) for whatever reason I cannot fathom; Howard Riddle (Violation of Lacey Act - importation of endangered species skins to US) from our very own ENVIRONMENTAL president; and Joseph Yazak (perjury to grand jury under oath) to give a break to fellow perjurer under oath. And lest we forget, Clinton granted a total of 22 pardons (the category with highest pardon rate) to individuals in the business of using and/or distributing cocaine and marijuana.  I guess there was so much grass and blow consumed during his eight years in office by his posse that Clinton just didn't see the harm in such things.

Nowhere to Run....Nowhere To Hide.....

That's a heck of a list donsales. Quite impressive.

That's a heck of a list donsales.  Quite impressive.

ACA

...

Acaiguana says:  "Which city is next?"

We aim to please......We also

We aim to please......

We also can tell the difference between smoke and fire.....

Simple stuff.....

Nowhere to Run....Nowhere To Hide.....

I have to say that 4 years of

I have to say that 4 years of Carter was cruel and unusual punishment for pardoning Nixon.  Since the Dems got even with such a vengeance (even punishing themselves in the process with double digit inflation and bad Billy Beer), why are they still so angry?

The Democrats thirst for veng

The Democrats thirst for vengeance is never quenched  - unless it's in the nation's interest  - then it's quenched with just a tiny sip...

The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.

- Arabian Proverb

You don't pardon someone befo

You don't pardon someone before they have been tried?  Then you must oppose the pardon of Marc Rich by Bill Clinton do you not?

And you have the temerity to question who Bush might pardon in his last month of office after Clinton's wholesale selling of pardons not to mention the pardon of his drug dealing half brother and political operative Richard S. Border, the man who refused to testify at Alcee Hasting's extortion trial, leading directly to the aquittal of this corrupt man?  You don't see any hypocrisy in this position?

Nixon's offense was identical to Clinton's.  It differed solely in the form of the bribe offered.  Nixon was alleged to have authorized the payment of a $100,000 bribe to G Gordon Liddey and E Howard Hunt for their silence.  Clinton had Vernon Jordan offer a cushy job to Monica Lewinsky for her silence.  Your claims that Nixon's offense was far greater is simply BS.