Retired NBC anchor Tom Brokaw spoke for eight minutes at President Ford's memorial service today in Washington, but the most memorable lines offered thanks for how Ford welcomed the media as friends, not enemies, unlike Richard Nixon. He also praised Ford for supporting his wife as she spoke out on issues that weren't "politically correct."
“As a journalist I was especially grateful for his appreciation for our role even when we challenged his policies and taxed his patience with our constant presence and persistence. We could be adversaries, but we were never his enemy, and that was a welcome change in status from his predecessor’s time."
"To be a member of the Gerald Ford White House press corps brought other benefits as well, as we documented a nation and a world in transition, in turmoil. We accompanied him to audiences with the notorious and the merely powerful. We saw Tito, Franco, Marcos, Suharto, the Shah of Iran, the Emperor of Japan; China, with Mao Zedong, Chou en-Lai, and Deng Xiaoping all at once. What was then the Soviet Union, in Vladivostok with Leonid Brezhnev, and Helsinki, one of the most remarkable gatherings of leaders in the 20th century. There were other advantages to being members of his press corps that we didn't advertise quite as widely. We went to Vail at Christmas and Palm Springs at Easter time with our families. Now cynics might argue that contributed to our affection for him. That is not a premise that I wish to challenge."
That line drew laughter. Brokaw then told a story of how Ford (and his chief of staff Dick Cheney) delighted in AP reporter Jim Naughton wearing a fake chicken head to a campaign press conference on the campaign trail in Oregon. Brokaw seemed pleased to represent the political press:
“When the president called me last year and asked me if I would participate in these services, I think he wanted to be sure that the White House press corps was represented: the writers, correspondents, and producers, the cameramen, photographers, the technicians -- and the chicken. He also brought something else to the White House, of course. He brought the humanity that comes with a family that seemed to be living right next door. He was every parent when he said, 'My children have spoken for themselves since they were old enough to speak, and not always with my approval. I expect to have to continue in the future.' And was there a more supportive husband in America than when his beloved Betty started speaking out about issues that were not politically correct at the time? Together, they put on the front pages and on the lead of the evening newscast, the issues that had been underplayed in America for far too long."
"My colleague Bob Schieffer called him the nicest man he ever met in politics. To that I would only add the most underestimated. In many ways, I believe football was a metaphor for his life in politics and after. He played in the middle of the line. He was a center, a position that seldom receives much praise. But he had his hands on the ball for every play, and no play could start without him. And when the game was over and others received the credit, he didn't whine or whimper."
Brokaw then celebrated Ford as another stoic member of the Greatest Generation of World War II fighters. But what about Betty Ford's activism was not "politically correct" with the liberal media? Certainly, breast cancer wasn't so openly discussed, but that wasn't conservative or liberal. Mrs. Ford's stands on social issues were only a problem with the emerging conservative base of the Republican Party. The Baltimore Sun is one of a line of newspapers celebrating Mrs. Ford's "candor" for speaking a liberal mind on television during her husband's tenure:
Betty Ford stumped for the Equal Rights Amendment. She told Barbara Walters that she believed in a woman's right to choose a safe and legal abortion. And, in front of a television audience of millions, she refused to balk when Morley Safer on 60 Minutes asked what she would do if her 18-year-old daughter, Susan, came home and said, "Mother, I'm having an affair."
"I said, 'Well, I wouldn't be surprised. I think she's a perfectly normal human being, like all young girls. If she wanted to continue it, I would certainly counsel and advise her on the subject. And I'd want to know pretty much about the young man,' " she recalls in her autobiography.
On that 1975 show, Safer pressed other hot buttons: Premarital sex? Ford said it might lower the divorce rate. Drugs? She said she didn't think her children were very interested in them.
She also said that if she had been young during the 1970s she probably would have tried marijuana and that her children probably had. She called the Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade a "great, great, decision," something which she had said before.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
weren't "politically cor
January 2, 2007 - 16:42 ET by Chris Norman"...weren't 'politically correct'"? Another term hijacked by Liberals.
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
“As a journalist I was espe
January 2, 2007 - 16:57 ET by bigtimer“As a journalist I was especially grateful for his appreciation for our role even when we challenged his policies and taxed his patience with our constant presence and persistence. We could be adversaries, but we were never his enemy, and that was a welcome change in status from his predecessor’s time."
You and all your empty-suited elitist leftist in the media were his enemy Mr. Brokaw....I remember it well.
I find all of this sudden love for President Ford and the re-writing of history from the talking heads almost unbearable...what hypocritical liars all...they found their sudden joy and love for him because he has criticized President Bush for going to war in Iraq...that simple...nothing more.
I detest Brokaw. Matthews had the audacity to call his speech 'majestic' before he spoke too this morning....hypocritical, you can see right through them idiotic leftist morons...I don't even want to get into the simpleton Imus this morning, I only could take five minutes of him and Brokaw.
Let the love affair with someone who agrees with abortion continue when it comes to Betty Ford, which by the way, I didn't like her then, still don't. (doesn't mean my heart is so cold that I don't feel a little of compassion for her loss.) the country has changed it's opinion since she has made those statements too by the way...thanks to knowledge, people still fighting the good fight against abortion and the technology we have now when looking inside the womb during our babies growths...
Mr. Brokaw and all his ilk are the one's that are divisive, it is their leftist agenda...always will be.
Sadly.
By the way, I watched this service today...President Bush One was the best....his Dana Carvey impression was great! It was PRUDENT!
"If we ever forget that we are a Nation Under God....then we will be a Nation Gone Under." Ronald Reagan
Someone please explain to me
January 2, 2007 - 17:16 ET by JayTeeSomeone please explain to me WHY a Journalist (retired or otherwise) rates any time at all, speaking at Ford's Funeral ? I"m sorry, but this one elude's me. Did he get invited, or did he ask ?
He says Ford asked him Jim, I
January 2, 2007 - 17:23 ET by bigtimerHe says Ford asked him Jim, I think it was mentioned in the piece here.
(I heard it earlier anyway...it's his story and he's sicking to it....lol...although probably true, I told my other half today that Ford probably would of invited Rather until he got shamed.....just kiddin' kind of for you trolls out there....)
Brokaw is overrated....like all the rest of the self-important talking heads.
"If we ever forget that we are a Nation Under God....then we will be a Nation Gone Under." Ronald Reagan
bigtimer,I am with you on thi
January 3, 2007 - 08:21 ET by msh1973bigtimer,
I am with you on this one, President Bush 41 and President Bush 43, did the best job. Their speeches were awesome, never thinking of their own agenda but lifting up the family of Pres. Ford instead. True class on both their parts. Why would Brokaw even be asked to speak, I don't get it? What a jerk.
Brokaw
January 2, 2007 - 17:24 ET by iveseenitallWho does this guy think he's kidding? Every Republican President has been, is, and will be on the media's enemies list. Brokaw, you are a lying hypocrite. But for all those who believe him, I still have that bridge in Brookyn for sale.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
There's a surprise: had to ge
January 2, 2007 - 17:39 ET by kathleenirishThere's a surprise: had to get the digs in. We all predicted it. Self-important, condescending media. I didn't watch the funeral because I knew Brokaw would say something ridiculous and I didn't want to look at those two cow-faces: Hil Rod and Willy, never mind Jimmah.
"He who has a thousand friends has not a friend to spare, and he who has one enemy will meet him everywhere" -Ali ibn-Abi-Talib, 4th Islamic Caliph
Should we really be surprised
January 2, 2007 - 17:54 ET by winston smithShould we really be surprised? Look at the low-brow behavior of liberals at the Wellstone memorial a few years ago. Every event no matter how solemn or customary becomes a platform for some political agenda. Will they ever learn?
Brokaw
January 2, 2007 - 18:09 ET by iveseenitall"a welcome change in status from his predecessor's time." 30+ years and he still can't get over Nixon. I was told that holding a long grudge is more of a female trait. Then again...
NEBER, NEVER trust a liberal
As Natural as Breathing
January 2, 2007 - 21:13 ET by acumen"Every event no matter how solemn or customary becomes a platform for some political agenda."
As you well know Winston, they just can't help themselves - it's as natural as breathing.
"Will they ever learn?"
As zealous by-products of the dissident 60's with almost total control of print and airways - NO! Talk about your bully pulpit.
Something I learned after observing the rise and recent fall of the 'Republican Revolution' was that the Brokawback media will never capitulate to a Republican controlled America - even to the extent of endagering their fellow Americans by publishing national secrets for the selfish reason of providing political advantage to the Democrats. Evil truly never rests. From what type of oil we are allowed to cook our popcorn in to who wins a pulitzer, the activist media has everything, even their very souls, invested in propagating the Democrat power machine. Our current liberal dominated media - A very devious, exclusive club that has the pompous gall to label just one well- known dissenter, the most dangerous man in America. It's far past time to open up that restrictive clique to a more inclusive group. End rant here.....
I could be wrong on this but
January 2, 2007 - 18:07 ET by buddycI could be wrong on this but why do liberals like Brokaw have to use funerals to promote their idealogy? I just don't recall republican speakers using a death to promote idealogy.
COnsider Carter comments at the child's *(can't recall name) funeral, the Wellstone funeral, the Ford funeral, are just a few.
I believe it is only fair to hold political comments for a reasonable period of mourning. That way people who disagree can do so without showing disrespect to the dead. I can't really respond to Brokaw until a reasonable time has passed.
Is this a further wrinkle on the liberal mentality that Ann Coulter discussed when she pointed out that they like to find people who are "immune from criticism" like the Jersey Jerks or Sheehan? Do they do this so when someone disagrees they can saw how awful you are because you are not honoring the dead?
By the way, Tom Brokaw is an asshole! I can't conceive of a single reason why a good republican would have him speak at his/her funeral. Brokaw hates republicans and all they stand for.
Spoken like a true trouble-ma
January 2, 2007 - 19:25 ET bySpoken like a true trouble-maker. Brokaw saw that the conservatives were getting some good press and had to throw a wrench in it.
I had not known that Mrs. Ford promoted abortion. And that is very sad that she used such a position to advocate the murder of the unborn. However, many people in the 1970s did not realize that the unborn baby is a real life.
She would not be the first president's wife to use her position in society wrongly. Mrs. Reagan has done wrong by pushing for embryonic stem cell research.
No matter what, we must treat these women like our own mothers/grandmothers, with respect. We can respectfully disagree with them. Education is the key. If these women truly knew what was happening to the unborn, I don't believe they would have ever promoted such.
Debra... -of: .. www.InformingChristians.com
Debra,I believe that even Bar
January 3, 2007 - 08:15 ET by msh1973Debra,
I believe that even Barbara Bush supports abortion rights. One has to be completely blind to not know what happens to a baby when it is aborted. Ignorance is no excuse, according to my dad.
That's why I quit buying them shoes.
January 3, 2007 - 08:19 ET by acaiguanaThat's why I quit buying them shoes.
Ok, I'm going to my room in the basement now. Yes, I'm taking my rocket science toys. No, I really didn't want any food today anyway. Yes, I'll cancel out my social calendar. No, I understand washing the milk bottles.
Oops.
ACA
...
Acaiguana says: "Which city is next?"
I would respect their elderly
January 3, 2007 - 09:57 ET by Senior ChiefI would respect their elderly status, but will not compromise and will disagree vehemently with their position on abortion rights. First ladies or not, they have the same playing field in the eyes of our Creator, like my mom and grandma. If its a fact that someone used their office to promote murder, as abortion, then respect goes away. I believe the court calls it accessory...Conservatives need to call it, as we see it, otherwise it's clear as mud.
"We went to Vail at Chri
January 2, 2007 - 21:57 ET by HypocriteHater"We went to Vail at Christmas and Palm Springs at Easter time with our families. Now cynics might argue that contributed to our affection for him. That is not a premise that I wish to challenge."
Oh, Tom. You're so witty! So you're basically saying the MSM is like a whore. Bring them along to the vacation spot of their dreams, and they'll tell you you're the best they ever had! Sure beats Crawford, Texas, right Tom? Not many beaches there to sprawl your pasty white, Northeastern body.
"Today we did what we had to do. They counted on America to be passive. They counted wrong." - Ronald Reagan
Typical leftist. ... Thinks
January 2, 2007 - 23:18 ET by replayTypical leftist. ... Thinks a nice suit can connect him to class. I wonder if that schmuck has any idea how many people laugh their asses off at his retarded antics nightly at NBC.
Reminds me that a vote for Hi
January 3, 2007 - 09:06 ET by ucReminds me that a vote for Hillary though if she got enough such that she would meet the standards for passing an amendment to our constitution is still akin to for example again voting for Laura Bush in 2008 to allow a current term limited administration (president's perogative) to legally stay very nearly completely together and the same but for using the other half of a legal union as signer and swearer-in. No law says a spouse has to be of different mind and executive level thinking than other spouse. How did a junior senator raise such money as Hillary - Was being First Lady sufficient experience to be all she needs as qualification for office but not proof that she already can we say held (poetic sense of marriage vows) office and got there for those eight years by election of her union? Seems like a cheep plot twist valued readers would complain about if found in a mystery novel. Happy New Year. Yosarian lives.
Who is Hillary?
January 3, 2007 - 09:48 ET by Herbert LevinsonHillary, it seems to me has worked to improve the state of the American people. Bush has done things only for the super rich. He's a war monger, a liar, and a war profiteer, following in the foot steps of his grandfather, Prescot Bush. Who was a war profiteer and dealt with the Nazis during WWII. This can all be found on the internet.
Herbie, it's a New Year, man. The spaceships are on Holiday.
January 3, 2007 - 09:52 ET by acaiguanaHerbie, it's a New Year, man. The spaceships are on Holiday.
What medicine do you take for your ulcers? Do you know what a 5150 is? Go to California for a while and stand on a corner.
ACA
...
Acaiguana says: "Which city is next?"
"This can all be found
January 3, 2007 - 09:56 ET by MightyMouth"This can all be found on the internet"
You mean like this stuff that is on the internet?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
MM, did you know you can find 'Ninja' sites on the Internet?
January 3, 2007 - 10:03 ET by acaiguanaMM, did you know you can find 'Ninja' sites on the Internet?
The one by the pre-teen kids are pretty cool.
I just love the Internet. I can find sites on dogs, cats, fish, cows, hoops and garlands; Hell, I can even find sites on how to cook frogs if I look.
:-)
ACA
...
Acaiguana says: "Which city is next?"
Yes aca, and the only thing
January 3, 2007 - 10:07 ET by MightyMouthYes aca, and the only thing I trust more than the internet is what I read in the papers and watch on the TV. It must be true or they couldn't say it or print it, right?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
I think Myspace has sorta ruined the home page stuff.
January 3, 2007 - 10:13 ET by acaiguanaI think Myspace has sorta ruined the home page stuff.
The kids today are growing up without really learning what good satire or parady is all about. That is one of the sad things of the current me me me look at me stuff.
On the other hand, the Internet has opened up the Illiterati Papers <oops Illuminati) to a whole bunch of ignorant people. The people behind that stuff originally wish they had it so easy. Of course they are all dead.
Oh well; I suppose if you spend your life studying American dollar bills and pyramids without proper adult supervision anything goes.
ACA
...
Acaiguana says: "Which city is next?"
Troll.
January 3, 2007 - 09:57 ET by Dave RTroll.
By the way, Herbert, you never answered my question the other day.
Do you or do you not have a brother named Eggbert?
You put too much stock in the
January 3, 2007 - 10:17 ET by JimboYou put too much stock in the Clintons and not enough in our President.
Hillary needed to move to the most liberal State in the country to be elected into the Senate when it was painfully clear that her home State of Arkansas would never elect her.
Why is it that whenever a President does what he is supposed to do (protect the people of this country) every liberal automatically tags him as a "war monger"? I would say that the terrorists are the "war mongers". I know this is a tough concept for liberals, but we are the good guys!
If our President is a war profiteer, both Clintons are personal profiteers. Walking out of the White House with property that belongs to the people of this great country as one example. How bout Whitewater?
George W. Bush is a liar? Acting on bad intelligence maybe, but a lair? Hardly. For an example of lying, I would direct you to review Bill Clinton's testimony under oath. That's what you libs don't get - the Clinton impeachment was not about sex. It was disrespecting the office of the President of the United States, and knowingly and willfully breaking the law by LYING UNDER OATH. Proven. Fact. Don't like that example of lying? How about Travelgate? Or how about Sandy berger stealing confidential documents to cover up for Clinton's lack of balls to do anything in his two terms to stop the growth of terror?
And Prescot Bush dealth with the Nazi's during WWII?? While his son was fighting in the Pacific and getting shot down? Show me ONE bit of proof that does not come from communist website written in someone's basement.