CNN Disguises Left-Wing Activist as Everyday Mom

Photo of Scott Whitlock.

On Thursday’s "American Morning," CNN correspondent Dan Lothian reported on the controversy over a new Christian video game that, according to co-host Soledad O'Brien, "critics say" encourages "hate and religious intolerance." Who are these critics? Well, if you believe CNN, they are simply parents and concerned citizens.

In reality, the experts are actually committed left-wing activists. The video game in question, "Left Behind: Eternal Forces," is based on the popular series of religious books. Mr. Lothian informed his cable audience that some people have attacked the game, which features characters battling the anti-Christ and fighting for souls, as bigoted. During the segment, Lothian talked with Rebecca Glenn, who he described simply as "a Christian" and who the onscreen graphic labeled a "parent." Left out of the story? Glenn is also the co-president of CrossWalk America, a left-wing, "progressive" group that fights "radical fundamentalism." Oh, and her organization is also leading a boycott of the game. Think CNN and Dan Lothian should have mentioned that fact?

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

This is how he described Glenn’s interaction with the game:

Dan Lothian: "Rebecca Glenn is a Christian and the mother of a 17-year-old."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Rebecca Glenn "I think some people might pick up this game and think that they are learning about a religion, and it's a very dangerous slant on the Christian religion."

Lothian: "Glenn bought the game for her son, Weston, to test, after hearing about the controversy online."

Weston Glenn (onscreen graphic: teen gamer): "Basically, there's no way to get through the game without killing people in the name of God."

It all seems very innocent, doesn’t it? No mention of her organization, the boycott, or her politcal slant.

"American Morning" co-anchor Soledad O’Brien introduced the segment, which aired at 7:12am, by previewing the cable network’s spin on the game:

Soledad O’Brien: "There's a video game out this holiday season and it's supposed to be promoting Christian values. Critics say, though, in fact, it's encouraging hate and religious intolerance. American Morning’s Dan Lothian has the story for us. Good morning."

Dan Lothian: "Good morning."

O’Brien: "What's the game?"

Lothian: "Well, it is a PC game and it's based on the highly successful ‘Left Behind’ Christian series, which includes books and movies. The theme is the same. The battle against the anti-Christ, good versus evil. But some think this latest effort to spread a religious message using a game has crossed the line. Like most video games, ‘Left Behind: Eternal Forces,’ involves strategy, war, guns, except this is religious entertainment, where you get more points when you pray and lose points when you kill."

Troy Lyndon (onscreen graphic: Left Behind CEO): "Well, the purpose of the game is to create an alternative in an industry that creates a lot of dark content."

Lothian: "But some argue that this Christian game definitely has its share of dark content. And they're calling on the company to pull it, and mega retailer Wal-Mart, to stop selling it."

Tim Simpson (onscreen graphic: Christian Alliance for Progress): "The game presents faith-based killing. It's a manual for religious violence that's being given to children."

First, as Lothian mentioned, you lose points when you kill and get more when you pray. So, what’s the problem? Secondly, who is Tim Simpson? Well, according to Echo Magazine, he’s also part of the boycott against the "Left Behind" game. And he recently attended a rally with, that's right, Rebecca Glenn:

"Rev. Timothy Simpson, Presbyterian minister and president of the Christian Alliance for Progress, also attended the press conference. CAP is a national movement that started in Florida by Americans who want to reclaim Christianity and change its current political picture. He believes the video game rejects the historic way of reading the book of Revelations and drives a wedge between people. 'It teaches teenagers that what God intends is for them to slaughter those who do not share their beliefs. We are here today to challenge that view and to name it for the error that it is.’"

CNN also failed to mention Simpson’s liberal ideology and the fact that he’s an activist in opposition to the video game. Lothian continued his report and featured a third left-wing individual who also went unidentified:

Lothian: "In the war of good versus evil, based loosely on the biblical Book of Revelation, a player tries to recruit others in order to fight the enemy of nonbelievers. Prayer, after killing the opposition, will essentially redeem you."

Clark Stevens: (onscreen graphic: Defconamerica.com) "At a time in history, when religious violence and religious intolerance are real -- the last thing we should be doing is promoting a game like this."

Lothian: "The concern among some critics is that young people playing this game will get the wrong message. And that what they play in here will stick with them out there, in the real world."

The graphic for Clark Stevens simply listed his website: DefconAmerica.com. Yet again, Lothian and CNN make no mention of the site’s political persuasion. Here is their mission statement:

"DefCon is an online grassroots movement combating the growing power of the religious right. We will fight for the separation of church and state, individual freedom, scientific progress, pluralism, and tolerance while respecting people of faith and their right to express their beliefs."

Would conservative websites, such as NewsBusters or RedState.com go unlabeled? Not likely.

Lothian closed his report by noting that the company who has released the game is promoting it to conservatives, but also hopes to appeal to the "mainstream."

Lothian: "The game is targeted at conservative Christians, but, of course, they are trying to appeal to a mainstream audience. By the way, the company and Wal-Mart have no plans to pull this game."

O’Brien: "Well, that teenager clearly is not throwing rocks. He played the game and said very clearly you can't get through it unless you kill people."

Lothian: "That's true. And he said the difference between this game and other games is that typically you're shooting up aliens, make believe. But in this case, he says you feel like you are a real person, and it's a real message. That's why he feels it has a different impact."

O’Brien: "So, that 17-year-old gamer, does he think there's something -- does he think it's the kind of thing parents should not be giving to their kids? Or does he feel like, listen, as a 17-year- old I can tell the difference between what's a game and reality?"

Apparently, CNN finds left-wing individuals and organizations part of the "mainstream" and, as a result, there’s no need to label them. However, Lothian made sure to note that the game would appeal to "conservative Christians." This sort of labeling bias is becoming a habit for the cable news correspondant. In October, he reported on potential Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney and used, not for the first time, the phrase "far right."

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"Ted Kennedy is a politi

"Ted Kennedy is a politically moderate social drinker who hasn't had a reckless driving ticket."

I think I'll buy two copies of the game--and I don't have a player. 

Defcon America--a collection of false teachers, Sarah.  Go there and be bored with the predictable.   

Liberalism is a convenient lie.

I do believe Jesus preached r

I do believe Jesus preached religious intolerance.  He admonished the Pharasees because they were changing and perverting Gods word just as Rebca Glenn is doing.  Jesus wanted us to repudiate all that other religions were and preach the gospel.  She is obviously a secular Christian taht does not study the ?Bible or spread teh Gospel. 

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark. -- save my gun, shoot a liberal.

Dear Dan Man:

Only express your honest opinions AFTER you learn what you're going to be talking about.

Keep in mind that Jesus was the Son of God. If He'd preached or practiced intolerance in this world,

In one swoop He could have eliminated all opposition to His Gospel. Pharisees, pagans, idolaters, devil-worshippers-- all would've been toast. But then His Gospel would not have been about love. The Gospel was entrusted to His apostles; they passed it on to the nations by His Church. He only founded ONE.

All others, though they may think they have the Gospel, are pretenders. They didn't come to the world via the apostles.

A basic principle of Christia

A basic principle of Christianity is FREE WILL. To eliminate all opposition to the Gospel goes directly against that principle. In other words (as my pastor said last Sunday) "God wants people, not puppets."

"The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously." --Hubert Humphrey

You are confusing love for hu

You are confusing love for humankind and man with tolerance for other religions.  You version of tolerance, as seen in your many posts, and the version of what a liberal sees as tolerance is also skewed.  True tolerance as Jesus practiced it was that as God he would not wipe you out but would allow you to continue life on the earth.  He by no means condoned any sin and actively told people this.  Even your Pope knows this and recently told people so in a speech and actively clings to traditional church values.

I can even tolerate the fact you vbeliev I am going to hell because I am not a partiocpant in the Catholic Church.  Tolerance of ones beliefs does not mean I have to agree with them and can atively tell you to your face you are full of it.

Jesus when approached by the men wanting to stone the adulterous woman said those who are without sin throw the first stone also said go and sin no more.  In taht he knew the men were complicit in the woman's affair, otherwise how did they know.  It was a setup and God also knew if he said those without sin would get them to back down.  He also admonished them to sin no more.  That is tolerance.

He not only tolerated thier childish action and averted any sin on his part by allowing the stoning or telling them, contray to the Law,  not to stone the woman.

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark. -- save my gun, shoot a liberal.

Sorry, Tumbler

Sorry, Tumbler, but you are incorrect. Jesus did not preach a gospel of love. He preached a gospel of repentance, sin, and hell.

You really need to go back and read the four gospels again (or for the first time), and this time pay close attention to the words that are printed in red, those being the actual words of Jesus. Note how many times he preaches on hell and repentance vs. how many times he preaches on love.

preaching a gospel of love

fossten:

It may be a little late to get into this, but...

25: And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?
26: He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou?
27: And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.
28: And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live.

Luke 10. 25-28

(then, Jesus tells the parable about the Good Samaritan--which, incidentatlly,  does not mention repentence and hell).

If there is a more simple and direct passage in Scripture, I don't know of it. I don't believe we need to count how many times Jesus preached about this topic or that topic, because loving God and your neighbor entails repentence. 

For how can you love God, who is almighty and who has given you life, without continual repentance--an acknowledgement that we are sinful and base and that we need to apologize for our transgressions? And how can you love God, who is almighty, without an acknowledgement that if we do not repent, we will go to hell?

I'm no theologian, but maybe...He preached about love, hell, and repentance, and sin. You guys need to stop talking past each other.

The problem with secular Chri

The problem with secular Christians is that they want to forget Jesus message.  Jesus said I am the way the only way, accept me or you will suffer the consequences.  The SC try to morph the love for Christ into a tolerance for sin, and in God's word there is none.  We must not tolerate sin and continually speak out against.

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark. -- save my gun, shoot a liberal.

Is there any halfway-popula

Is there any halfway-popular video game these days where players don't kill something/someone to win??
JMR

sarc - that's what I was th

sarc - that's what I was thinking and wondering if this woman has been out there boycotting other more violent games. I guess liberals don't mind killing police, raping women, or killing innocent people in video games, only killing in the name of a religion they don't even believe in.

It's like the way all of the liberals I know wouldn't go see The Passion or the new Gibson movie Apocalypto because of the violence, but they would go see Pulp Fiction, Kill Bill, Sin City or just about any other violent film that only glorifies the violence.

There are plenty of "gam

There are plenty of "games" where you kill people, "Call of Duty" comes to mind, but then I guess it's okay to shoot up Nazi's.

Best video game ever

They should invent the game, "Conservatives vs. Liberals." Liberals score points by inventing lies about conservatives, raising taxes, and smoking weed. Conservatives win by telling the truth, winning wars, and starting businesses.

And if this game is so repuls

And if this game is so repulsive, did her son play it to its end? He did say "you can't get through it without killing," so my question is did he get all the way through it, or did he quit playing after he was "forced" to kill the first victim in the game?

My hunch is that this woman bought the game for her son with the sole purpose of causing a stink about it as a "concerned mother." If that's not creative hipocrisy, I don't know what is.

I do think it is kind of ridiculous to make a Christian based shoot-em-up game, but, evidently there is a market for that type of thing, so let the markets decide the fate of this game. The ONLY reason these people are acting "upset" about this is because it has to do with the "Left Behind" series. If it wasn't the series, then it would be because it has "Christian" underpinnings.

Gun Safety Tip #8: No matter how responsible he seems, never give your gun to a monkey. (www.imao.us)

I'm sure that Ms. Glenn was m

I'm sure that Ms. Glenn was marching in the streets when 'Grand Theft Auto' was released.

One question. What would be

One question. What would be reaction if this were a Mulsim game and you have to "convert" the infidels??

Poor Liberal, he's educated beyond his intelligence

Hey hs29fan, Or what if you

Hey hs29fan,
Or what if you had to "kill the infidels"

I was considering the term ki

I was considering the term kill. BUt I wanted to use the Muslim term for be-heading.

Thought the same thing... Gra

Thought the same thing... Grand Theft Auto isn't about shooting aliens either, your shooting cops and anyone else who gets in your way.

RunningBeer,The problem wit

RunningBeer,

The problem with stories like this - about video games and what they are supposedly all about - is that they usually feature people who not only haven't play a single second of them but know nothing about the types of games that are out there.

"And he said the difference between this game and
other games is that typically you're shooting up aliens, make believe. But in
this case, he says you feel like you are a real person, and it's a real
message. That's why he feels it has a different impact."

What a load of crap. There are a number of popular games out now that involve human vs human scenarios.

And as a side note, your characterization of Grand Theft Auto is misleading. First, Grand Theft Auto (there are actually five varients of the game now as far as I know) is rated "M" - and for good reason. Teenagers have no business playing it and if they are, guess who's fault that is - not the folks who made the game.

Second, the game isn't about "shooting cops", despite what the media would like you to believe. I'm not getting into this to defend the game, but to point out something - this website is dedicated to exposing the bias and lies that the media routinely engages in. In this case, they have managed to convince a ton of people that GTA is something it isn't.

Vid games

Compare this post to the treatment (or lack of ) for this game. The BBC take on both games. Guess which one gets more attention?

Well done Scott.

Well done Scott. We could write a book compiling the media's continued use of this method of "people off the streets." 

Wasn't killing in the name

Wasn't killing in the name of God one of the Seven Signs in that movie with Demi Moore and Jurgen-something?

"It's a manual for relig

"It's a manual for religious violence..."

Whatever happened to The Tarheel Jihadist?

Saw this on Fox last night.

Saw this on Fox last night. According to the developer you're trying to recruit people to fight the antichrist. The only people you may have to kill are the ones who join the antichrist force instead and are trying to kill you. There's a nuetral zone for the people who don't convert to good or evil, the antichrist is the only one who kills them if they don't go to the evil side.

If that's the truth then MSM sure has twisted the intent of the game in an effort to control peoples viewpoints and bring about a rath of anger throughout the... oh yea, it's MSM!

Disclaimer - I grew up on pinball

As someone who has read all o

As someone who has read all of the Left Behind series of books, I can tell you that RunningBear's description sounds very accurate. The people in the book were trying to suvive during the end times by rebelling against the Anti-Christ and his forces. Apparently, the groupo boycotting the game either don't know this or don't care. I suspect it's the latter and they are trying to impose their view of religion on others.

Once again, we have the lefti

Once again, we have the leftist media equating self-defence with murder.  It is just this kind of pacifist attitude that causes them to distort these stories to touch the emotional nerve of middle of the road viewers and hurt the sales of anyone Christian.

Wouldn't it be nice if CNN pu

Wouldn't it be nice if CNN put this much effort into finding Muslims who to fight radical fundamentalist Muslims who use Islam to spread violence, hate and death?  Or maybe they tried but couldn't find any.

I wonder if Rebecca has had a

I wonder if Rebecca has had a chat with young Weston about the day Hillary, Bill, and Janet Reno toasted the Branch-Davidians for real?

Does this screwball woman als

Does this screwball woman also fight radical fundamentalism when it's Muslims trying to kill us in the name of Allah?

Why are their states Blue and ours Red? Shouldn't it be the other way around?

Maybe theirs should be yellow

No she doesn't.  She's a Lib.  Libs fight things that aren't real, like video games.  They don't fight people who actually want to kill or oppress other people, they'd rather surrender.

Maybe their states should be yellow.

Wouldn't it be nice if we cou

Wouldn't it be nice if we could have the images of all the leftist so-called reporters on CNN as bad characters in the game that we must destroy.....you know good vs. evil...heck I'd even consider buying and playing that myself here on a rainy day, er...maybe a sunny day...er how about any ol'day!

These critters are bad characters and anyone with a brain that works knows it.

"Once the coffers of the federal government are opened to the public, there will be no shutting them again." - Grover Cleveland

For Pete's sake, are any of t

For Pete's sake, are any of these Liberals what the MSM represent them as being?

The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.

- Arabian Proverb

Three to nothing

I don't know if the content posted here covers all of the people interviewed, but if it does, it raises a question: Couldn't Lothian find anyone from the makers of the game, or at least someone who understands the thinking behind the game, to explain it? Or couldn't they have spoken to author Tim LaHaye, who co-wrote the books? It wouldn't have been hard to get a little balance here.

The usual tactic of these left-wing Christian groups is to portray Christians on the right as a characature of what they really are. That's what appears to have happened this time.

The maker of the game was on

The maker of the game was on Fox last night and I thought it was ironic that he made mention that one of the first things the anti-Christ does is take away all of the guns so that the people can't defend himself.  He made mention that we cannot comprehend the kind of evil the anti-Christ brings.

Based on these kind of slanted stories, I can only imagine these leftist wackos will be standing in line to get the first interview as soon as he is revealed...  But then again, didn't CBS already get that interview with Ahmadinejad?