As reported by NewsBusters, actor Sean Penn made some fairly ridiculous statements about President Bush at an awards ceremony on Monday. On Wednesday’s “Hannity & Colmes,” the panel discussed these inanities, with radio host Michael Reagan sitting in for the vacationing Sean. Colmes set up the discussion, “So is Hollywood out of touch with mainstream America or are they saying exactly what Americans want to hear?” Fox News’s Greg Gutfeld was first up (video available here):
No, actually, I wouldn't even argue with any of Sean Penn's assertions. I have no problems with what he says. What I love about him, though, is that when he does these speeches or when he's on Larry King, he keeps talking about censorship and how people are out to shut him up. But somehow he never shuts up. He just keeps talking. So every time he ever says that, he undermines his own argument. And that's why I love him.
I agree. Alas, Colmes didn’t, and proceeded to bang the same absurd drum he had the evening before with the MRC’s Brent Bozell:
Well, one of the arguments he makes, which is interesting, he says that the most effective form of de facto censorship is preemptive. For example, when Donald Rumsfeld compares those who oppose administration policies to appeasers, like Neville Chamberlain, or when people on my side who are antiwar are called traitors or somehow un-American, isn't that a preemptive form of censorship? And isn't Sean Penn right about that?
GUTFELD: No, because he's actually responding to it. If he wasn't allowed to respond to it, it would be censorship. That's what I'm saying. Every time he says it's censorship, he's actually undermining his own argument, which makes it slightly comical.
Colmes then brought in another guest who, of course, agreed with him:
You know, Ellis, he's speaking out. Thank goodness he is. And that's why he got a First Amendment award, not for saying popular speech, but for saying unpopular. You don't need a First Amendment award for saying things that everybody agrees with and it's safe speech.
ELLIS HENICAN, "NEWSDAY": One of the great things, Alan, about the First Amendment is you can celebrate it without embracing the content of everything that is said. In fact, in the Sean Penn comments, I mean, he took some shots at some friends of mine. He even called our buddy Hannity -- what was that word?
Colmes continued to pound on the same specious theme:
But you don't need First Amendment protection for popular speech or for speech goes along with the majority or that's in favor at the time. It's those who stand up against, speak out against a government, especially a government whose officials, like Rumsfeld, call you appeasers when you oppose them. That's when you get a First Amendment award.
GUTFELD: But, Alan, can I say this?
COLMES: Yes, you can.
GUTFELD: Thanks. Sean Penn never takes the opportunity to say these things in unpopular settings. He speaks to the choir. And what I really hate about it -- and I don't really hate it, I find it funny -- is that it takes on this heroic context that he's out there speaking truth to power, when he's actually talking to people who live in Brentwood, you know, who are friends of his.
Exactly. But, the fun really began when Alan ceded the microphone to Michael Reagan:
REAGAN: Greg's actually right. I mean, he was speaking to the choir. If we weren't covering this tonight on "Hannity & Colmes," nobody would have known what Sean Penn said last night...
(CROSSTALK)
COLMES: They read other things, Michael, besides just watching "Hannity & Colmes."
REAGAN: Alan, Alan, the fact is nobody was covering this, because Sean Penn, you know, what he was saying to a choir of people. What, he took on everybody at FOX, not only Sean. He took on O'Reilly. He took on Murdoch. He took on Ailes. He took on everybody but you, of course, and Alan.
So he's preaching to the choir, and he gets an award for preaching to the choir.
(CROSSTALK)
HENICAN: Michael, but here's the deal. There is no preaching to the choir anymore when stuff is covered as broadly as it is. Anything that you say in a public audience, including on this program or in some speech to the creative coalition, goes everywhere. So it's not like he's sneaking somewhere and saying something...
(CROSSTALK)
REAGAN: Let me go to Greg. Greg, wait a minute. If I would have gone there and said what I would say about the president, supportive of the president, what he was doing, do you think they would have given me a First Amendment award, for standing up with a group of people who disagree with me, and being able to say it?
GUTFELD: No. Whenever a conservative speaks to a hostile audience, they get a pie in their face.
HENICAN: Oh, come on, Greg. That is just silly. That is just silly.
(CROSSTALK)
REAGAN: Ellis, it's not silly at all. You look at what goes on in college campuses in America today...
(CROSSTALK)
HENICAN: You guys can handle that.
REAGAN: ... have to use bodyguards when they go speak at college campuses. At the same time, you go speak at a college campus. Do you need a bodyguard?
HENICAN: No, but when I go on talk radio sometimes I might.
REAGAN: Oh, please, your own show?
HENICAN: Listen, I'm a guy -- Michael, seriously, come on, let's be honest here. I'm a guy whose spent almost his entire life debating people in front of audiences when they disagree with me. Part of this democracy is going into a hostile environment, being outgunned, but still making your case in a creative environment.
REAGAN: That was hostile last night? That was hostile last night, sitting with those left-wing wackos? Come on.
(CROSSTALK)
HENICAN: No, no. I'm not saying that. I'm saying that we all, Michael, we all end up with audiences that are tough. And if you can't handle that, frankly, you shouldn't be in this business.
REAGAN: Wait a minute. Sean Penn hasn't come on my show and said those words on my show.
As the conversation ensued, Gutfeld made a fabulous observation:
The other point worth raising is, why are pacifists so belligerent? I mean, I've never met a friendly pacifist. He talks about world peace, but he's so angry. And the things that he was saying were so classless and brutal and cruel, but yet he's a pacifist.
And then Reagan made his own wonderful point that seems to be lost on the liberal media:
Greg, they say the president of the United States is the dumbest human being on the planet. They make fun of him because he's not smart. But the dumbest person on the planet was able to talk the liberal left into voting for him to go into Iraq and go to war. So who's really stupid?
GUTFELD: He's either an evil genius or he's retarded. You can't have both. That's the fundamental hypocrisy.
Marvelous stuff. What follows is a full transcript of this segment.
ALAN COLMES, CO-HOST:
First, our top story tonight. On Monday evening, at a First Amendment awards dinner, Oscar-winning actor Sean Penn called for the impeachment of the president and vice president. And actor Matt Damon also recently took a shot at the president, saying in an interview that, if Bush were sending people to war, then his own twin daughters should be deployed.
So is Hollywood out of touch with mainstream America or are they saying exactly what Americans want to hear?
Joining us now, FOX News contributor Greg Gutfeld and New York "Newsday" columnist and FOX News contributor Ellis Henican.
Good to see you both once again.
GREG GUTFELD, HUFFINGTONPOST.COM: Hey, you guys.
COLMES: Greg, you know, a Zogby poll earlier this year shows that, if Bush lied about Iraq and about wiretapping and WMDs, 52 percent would like to see him impeached. So go ahead, and I know you're going to tell me how out of touch the elite Hollywood liberals are, but not so much, right?
GUTFELD: No, actually, I wouldn't even argue with any of Sean Penn's assertions. I have no problems with what he says. What I love about him, though, is that when he does these speeches or when he's on Larry King, he keeps talking about censorship and how people are out to shut him up.
But somehow he never shuts up. He just keeps talking. So every time he ever says that, he undermines his own argument. And that's why I love him.
COLMES: Well, one of the arguments he makes, which is interesting, he says that the most effective form of de facto censorship is preemptive. For example, when Donald Rumsfeld compares those who oppose administration policies to appeasers, like Neville Chamberlain, or when people on my side who are antiwar are called traitors or somehow un-American, isn't that a preemptive form of censorship? And isn't Sean Penn right about that?
GUTFELD: No, because he's actually responding to it. If he wasn't allowed to respond to it, it would be censorship. That's what I'm saying. Every time he says it's censorship, he's actually undermining his own argument, which makes it slightly comical.
COLMES: You know, Ellis, he's speaking out. Thank goodness he is. And that's why he got a First Amendment award, not for saying popular speech, but for saying unpopular. You don't need a First Amendment award for saying things that everybody agrees with and it's safe speech.
ELLIS HENICAN, "NEWSDAY": One of the great things, Alan, about the First Amendment is you can celebrate it without embracing the content of everything that is said. In fact, in the Sean Penn comments, I mean, he took some shots at some friends of mine. He even called our buddy Hannity -- what was that word?
COLMES: I don't -- you know, that's censored from my computer. I can't read that.
(CROSSTALK)
HENICAN: It was a little bit -- and seriously I don't think Sean is that at all. I think he believes every single crazy thing he says. So I'm going to stand up for Sean and for O'Reilly and my other friends...
(CROSSTALK)
COLMES: Look, I stand up for Hannity to speak, for you to speak. Even Greg Gutfeld has a right to speak. And even Michael Reagan, can you believe that?
(LAUGHTER)
GUTFELD: Thank you, Alan.
(CROSSTALK)
COLMES: But you don't need First Amendment protection for popular speech or for speech goes along with the majority or that's in favor at the time. It's those who stand up against, speak out against a government, especially a government whose officials, like Rumsfeld, call you appeasers when you oppose them. That's when you get a First Amendment award.
GUTFELD: But, Alan, can I say this?
COLMES: Yes, you can.
GUTFELD: Thanks. Sean Penn never takes the opportunity to say these things in unpopular settings. He speaks to the choir. And what I really hate about it -- and I don't really hate it, I find it funny -- is that it takes on this heroic context that he's out there speaking truth to power, when he's actually talking to people who live in Brentwood, you know, who are friends of his.
(CROSSTALK)
REAGAN: Mike Reagan here in Los Angeles.
(CROSSTALK)
REAGAN: Let me jump in for a moment. Ellis, let me jump in for a minute.
HENICAN: Yes, Mike.
REAGAN: Greg's actually right. I mean, he was speaking to the choir. If we weren't covering this tonight on "Hannity & Colmes," nobody would have known what Sean Penn said last night...
(CROSSTALK)
COLMES: They read other things, Michael, besides just watching "Hannity & Colmes."
REAGAN: Alan, Alan, the fact is nobody was covering this, because Sean Penn, you know, what he was saying to a choir of people. What, he took on everybody at FOX, not only Sean. He took on O'Reilly. He took on Murdoch. He took on Ailes. He took on everybody but you, of course, and Alan.
So he's preaching to the choir, and he gets an award for preaching to the choir.
(CROSSTALK)
HENICAN: Michael, but here's the deal. There is no preaching to the choir anymore when stuff is covered as broadly as it is. Anything that you say in a public audience, including on this program or in some speech to the creative coalition, goes everywhere. So it's not like he's sneaking somewhere and saying something...
(CROSSTALK)
REAGAN: Let me go to Greg. Greg, wait a minute. If I would have gone there and said what I would say about the president, supportive of the president, what he was doing, do you think they would have given me a First Amendment award, for standing up with a group of people who disagree with me, and being able to say it?
GUTFELD: No. Whenever a conservative speaks to a hostile audience, they get a pie in their face.
HENICAN: Oh, come on, Greg. That is just silly. That is just silly.
(CROSSTALK)
REAGAN: Ellis, it's not silly at all. You look at what goes on in college campuses in America today...
(CROSSTALK)
HENICAN: You guys can handle that.
REAGAN: ... have to use bodyguards when they go speak at college campuses. At the same time, you go speak at a college campus. Do you need a bodyguard?
HENICAN: No, but when I go on talk radio sometimes I might.
REAGAN: Oh, please, your own show?
HENICAN: Listen, I'm a guy -- Michael, seriously, come on, let's be honest here. I'm a guy whose spent almost his entire life debating people in front of audiences when they disagree with me. Part of this democracy is going into a hostile environment, being outgunned, but still making your case in a creative environment.
REAGAN: That was hostile last night? That was hostile last night, sitting with those left-wing wackos? Come on.
(CROSSTALK)
HENICAN: No, no. I'm not saying that. I'm saying that we all, Michael, we all end up with audiences that are tough. And if you can't handle that, frankly, you shouldn't be in this business.
REAGAN: Wait a minute. Sean Penn hasn't come on my show and said those words on my show.
(CROSSTALK)
HENICAN: Michael, I'll come on your show. Don't worry.
REAGAN: We invited him on. Oh, you can come on any time you want to.
HENICAN: I'll come. We'll go at it, buddy.
(LAUGHTER)
GUTFELD: The other point worth raising is, why are pacifists so belligerent? I mean, I've never met a friendly pacifist. He talks about world peace, but he's so angry. And the things that he was saying were so classless and brutal and cruel, but yet he's a pacifist.
(CROSSTALK)
REAGAN: ... Greg, they throw out the same stuff, impeaching the president of the United States. Alan says, well, if the president lied, 52 percent of the people think he should be impeached. But where did he lie? You know, one thing, Ellis, and let me ask you this...
HENICAN: We can get to that, too.
REAGAN: ... and maybe you, too, Greg, they say the president of the United States is the dumbest human being on the planet. They make fun of him because he's not smart. But the dumbest person on the planet was able to talk the liberal left into voting for him to go into Iraq and go to war. So who's really stupid?
GUTFELD: He's either an evil genius or he's retarded. You can't have both. That's the fundamental hypocrisy.
HENICAN: You know what? I don't think the guy is stupid. But here's the difference between Republicans and Democrats on this stuff. Democrats don't follow their extremists off the edge of the cliff. Remember the impeachment you guys did? That didn't work out very well, now, did it?
REAGAN: No, but he was impeached.
COLMES: All right, guys, we thank you. Greg, we thank you. Ellis, great to see you.
HENICAN: Great to see you guys.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Henican
December 21, 2006 - 12:26 ET by iveseenitallHe-he Henican ( the giggler) and Crude,rude Colmes (the interrupter)--are there any MEN on the left?
MERRY CHRISTMAS!
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
iveseenitall....
December 21, 2006 - 12:30 ET by ww thumperiveseenitall.... only Hillary :^} ...MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL, GOD BLESS YOU AND YOURS :-) WW
Right
December 21, 2006 - 12:34 ET by iveseenitallRight on ,Thumper! And a MERRY CHRISTMAS to you and yours! God Bless!
MERRY CHRISTMAS!
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
Curious
December 21, 2006 - 18:31 ET by Chicago RepublicanWhy does Sean Penn get a First Amendment Award? I'm really curious what the "statement" made behind such an award is. Is it because he exercises his First Amendment right to free speech? The one he thinks he's always on the verge of losing? Or is it because he and all his Leftist buddies speak freely "in spite of the immenent threat of retribution." I suspect the latter. Gutfeld is right, the fact that he can spew the drivel that he does without LEGAL reprocussion proves his own argument about persecution baseless. So many Democrats that I come in contact with think First Amendment protection of free speech means that they are free from having you disagree with them. Case in point? Dixie Chicks, 2003.
Hey Ignorant Leftists: First Amendment right to free speech simply means that government can't throw you in jail for your political statements. It doesn't mean that the rest of us can't tell you that you're an idiot for your point of view. I'd like to see Sean Penn become a citizen of Castro's Cuba and make the same comments about El Presidente. Then he'd have a REAL free speech infringement.
Seeing what Bush and Cheney d
December 22, 2006 - 00:53 ET by joe conservativeSeeing what Bush and Cheney did during 9/11 attacks, let alone in Vietnam war, leaves me with question are there any men in the GOP.
(Read as one sentence)... We
December 22, 2006 - 05:47 ET by Andrew H.(Read as one sentence)... We know there aren't any real men in the democratic party--the party of raving feminists, socialists and milqtoast pc weak kneed cowwards of haters and resenters--the crowd who resent other's success and so want to take away by tax for those who contribute little or nothing, screaming for their free drugs, rent subsidy, food stamps and to quash the rights of the faithful, free capitolists, family oriented, flag waving, heterosexual men and women who want to be left alone by an intrusive government ran by the likes of a kennedy or clinton who employ minions to protect them like berger while they go about partying hardy on our dime without a care of what we think--the forces of super-rights and pc are aligned with them and so they have power to corrupt our consitution and assure the bottom feeders the highest place at the table and joe--you're a bottom feeder who picks his facts and when they don't fit, make them up--you're either a socialist wishing to receive something from the rest of us or a coward or a hater of all things good and decent because you can't quite make it.
Liberalism is a convenient lie.
AOH, Please let that be your
December 22, 2006 - 06:01 ET by Indiana JoeAOH,
Please let that be your last words to this guy. We know he's not really worth the effort, and you've already said it all. He won't get it, but don't encourage him. Otherwise, he'll never go away. He'll just keep pounding his one-note drum.
Regards,
IJ
Okay, Indianna--on some other
December 22, 2006 - 06:20 ET by Andrew H.Okay, Indianna--on some other threads I have posted some already. You're right--I'm curious as to the why some people go about and argue the nonsense--what is it they want if not to steal from you and me?
Incidently--I can't see the posts or who's on line--are you seeing the organized areas usually on the right side of the page or is it my system?
Thank you, sir.
Liberalism is a convenient lie.
Looks like Bush should get a
December 21, 2006 - 12:45 ET by TruthMongerLooks like Bush should get a FIRST AMENDMENT AWARD for saying such "unpopular" things, right libbies?! Bush sure has a ton of courage, I guess...
And I'm sure it takes a helluvalot of courage for Penn to bash Bush in an industry full of Bush-haters where he'll NEVER WORK AGAIN if he doesn't...what an absolute crock of sh*t...
Slightly comical is the understatement of the year...
A couple of observations:1. C
December 21, 2006 - 12:49 ET by Barkhorn1xA couple of observations:
1. Colmes comes from that privileged POV where critics of the administration should be allowed to say whatever pops into their heads at any given moment and the administration just has to sit back and take it, otherwise they are trying to censor their critics. Seriously, does Colmes really expect ANYONE to buy into his assertion that someone from the Left hears Rumsfeld call them appeasers and un-patriotic (many are BTW!) and they react as follows, “Wow, now I’m afraid to speak out”? In a world filled with drunken height challenged actors imitating the President as a retard, films and books about his assassination and a ballet depicting him as an evil power mad bastard, that assertion is laughable.
2. Sean Penn is a buffoon as a human being. I (sometimes) enjoy his acting and completely ignore him otherwise.
3. When was the last time anyone received a First Amendment Award for bucking the MSM narrative trend? Reagan summed it up beautifully by noting that Penn was preaching to his well-healed homies who all practice reflexive Left Coast group-think that is often contradictory and always asinine.
4. GUTFELD: He's either an evil genius or he's retarded. You can't have both. That's the fundamental hypocrisy. – this is exactly what was said about Reagan’s father. It should be noted that history has been far kinder to RR than his contemporaries and so it will be with Bush.
I would never want Sean Penn
December 21, 2006 - 12:53 ET by winston smithI would never want Sean Penn to be censored in any capacity. Sean, feel free to speak your mind where ever and to whom ever you wish------- I fully support your right to act like a jackass in public any time you like. Wait, it's not an act. Penn is an unwitting, living advertisement for a boycott of the H'wood movie industry.
Exactly--why would anyone wan
December 21, 2006 - 13:51 ET by Andrew H.Exactly--why would anyone want to censor him? He makes it too much fun. Who does he say tries to silence him? I haven't heard. Tell us, Sean. What are you talking about?
Liberalism is a convenient lie.
Andrew, the same folks are ce
December 21, 2006 - 14:09 ET by MikeBAndrew, the same folks are censoring Mr. Spicoli as censored the Ditzy Twits. You notice that they were carted off to prison for their statements and were never heard from again. Oh...wait! That didn't happen. Ummmm...give me a few minutes, I can answer this one...
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
Hi-ya Mike B--it occurs to me
December 21, 2006 - 15:02 ET by Andrew H.Hi-ya Mike B--it occurs to me following up on a Henican remark--that had a Republican been the president accused (with evidence) of perjury--what would the dims have done? Would they not have carried on with impeachment? After all, it concerned one of the issues they claim near and dear--sexual harassment... oh, the questions keep piling up whenever a dim opens his/her mouth.
Does anyone know?
Yet we're accused of following "our radical" elements off a cliff. That cliff was the felony charge of perjury--and still many people in this country do not get it. They're the same ones who vote for the socialists and intellilgence challenged dims. Dims tax us to pay for votes. Why are we insane?
Liberalism is a convenient lie.
Andrew, if Richard Nixon had
December 21, 2006 - 19:37 ET by MikeBAndrew, if Richard Nixon had been accused of doing 10% of the things Bill Clinton actually did, he would have been lynched by the Democrat controlled Congress. Nixon had the good grace to resign. Bill Clinton, on the other hand, could have been caught on tape raping babies, setting up drug deals, and murdering witnesses scheduled to testify against him, and the Democrats would have maintained that it was none of our business, that it did not rise to the level of impeachment.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
Spicoli( has he ever done a
December 21, 2006 - 17:26 ET by Dont_B_NVSSpicoli( has he ever done anything better?) has morphed into Mr. Hand.... or maybe Andy Rooney.
Honestly, I've heard farts th
December 21, 2006 - 14:45 ET by The FugitiveHonestly, I've heard farts that make more sense than ANYTHING penn has to say..... sean penn = A$$HOLE , end of discussion !
Why is it that EVERYTIME a liberal opens their mouth, I feel a sudden urge to hand them a roll of toilet paper?
Okay - so now that
December 21, 2006 - 13:03 ET by Dee BunkOkay - so now that we have a Democrat controlled government they
can give a free speech award to a Republican who criticizes the congress
right? I won’t hold my breath.
Dee Bunk
December 21, 2006 - 13:28 ET by Noel SheppardDee,
Exactly. If I give a speech in front of this group outlining why we will have an unprecedented financial crisis in America if we don't immediately reform Social Security and Medicare, will they give me an award, or tar and feather me? :-) ns
Noel - maybe the MRC and ne
December 21, 2006 - 13:40 ET by Dee BunkNoel - maybe the MRC and newsbusters should start their own free speech award. Oh - but they media still wouldn't cover it!
I've tried it. You'll get &
December 21, 2006 - 13:46 ET by sarcasmoI've tried it. You'll get "the cloak award" if your experience is anything like mine saying the exact same thing over the past decade or so...
JMR
This once again shows the Lef
December 21, 2006 - 14:01 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveThis once again shows the Left's complete misunderstanding of what the first amendment really means. In a nutshell it means that the government cannot stifle an individual's or group's political (or other) speech. It doesn't have anything to do with people or groups that disagree and give debate to whatever claims are made. For some reason the Left thinks that a network that chooses not to show a pro-choice show because they feel it will hurt their bottom line, they scream "CENSORSHIP!" and "Our First Amendment rights are being trampled!" but they have no problem with the farcical "legalized" censorship brought on by the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform Bill which actually IS government censorship of political speech.
When will they get a clue?
Gun Safety Tip #8: No matter how responsible he seems, never give your gun to a monkey. (www.imao.us)
Doc,Exactly. The M-F CFRB is
December 22, 2006 - 06:14 ET by Indiana JoeDoc,
Exactly. The M-F CFRB is the most egregious First Amendment crusher EVER passed by Congress, and then UPHELD by the Supreme Court, no less! I'm STLL shocked that happened! Rejection of that bill was a no-brainer for a one-term government-class high-schooler. Unbelievable to me, to this day....
(btw, regret that I STILL haven't sent those books. It's just been a rough period here. Yeah, like it's "easy" over there, I know.... They are waiting to be boxed, and WILL go, just not quite yet... I'm very ashamed of that...)
Regards and stay safe,
IJ
The definition of censorship
December 21, 2006 - 14:11 ET by GothampcThe definition of censorship to these nutjobs is when someone doesn't agree with what they say. You'll notice that when a non-liberal is trying to make a valid point, they talk over that person so that the conservative point of view doesn't get voiced. They do it everytime Ann Coulter is on.
Gutfeld also made a very interesting point. On college campuses, it's always the conservative that has trouble speaking.
____________________
Gothampc - Winner of Time Magazine's 2006 Person of the Year
This ranks right up there wit
December 21, 2006 - 16:01 ET by FishFace222This ranks right up there with the following "Constitutional Rights:"
-Freedom from religion
-The right to not be offended
-The right to keep arms--from everybody
-Freedom of left wing speech
-Right to an abortion on demand (abortion is never even mentioned in the constitution)
Any more??
-The right to free healthcare
December 21, 2006 - 16:16 ET by Mean Gene Dr. Love-The right to free healthcare
-The right to money that someone else has earned
-The right to subvert Congress and The Constitution by allowing judges proclaim binding law.
I'm sure there are more.
Gun Safety Tip #8: No matter how responsible he seems, never give your gun to a monkey. (www.imao.us)
The right to undermine our Go
December 21, 2006 - 16:31 ET by Clear thinkerThe right to undermine our Government for your own political gain.
The right to cable tv.The rig
December 21, 2006 - 19:42 ET by MikeBThe right to cable tv.
The right to marry the farm animal of your choice.
The right to pornography in prison.
(According to sarcasmo) the right to get high on the illegal drug of your choice.
(According to tumbler) the right for illegal immigrants to all of the benefits provided to citizens of this country.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
The right to flip the bird in
December 21, 2006 - 19:52 ET by Clear thinkerThe right to flip the bird in traffic if you have a Dennis Kucinich bumper sticker on your car.
I watched that discussion las
December 21, 2006 - 16:15 ET by GalvanicI watched that discussion last night, and what got my attention was that no one raised the issue of Penn's reference to Lieberman and Shiva together with his allegations of drug use and sodomy amongst the Republicans and Limbaugh.
Wouldn't the Left classify that as "hate speech?" Is Penn anti-Semitic?
Sean Penn's Kookiness
December 21, 2006 - 17:31 ET by Ten7sKooky Liberals like Sean Penn don't deserve awards for their bizzare statements; they need daily reminders to take their medication. But sane and balanced people don't make for good TV. And that's really the point, isn't it? The Media rewards not "Free Speech" but "Freak Speech", the more twisted, damaged and damaging the better (and of course it must fit the Liberal agenda).
Preemptive Censorship? . . . I'll Show You Preemptive Censorship
December 21, 2006 - 17:55 ET by Junk Science Skeptic"Colmes: For example, when Donald Rumsfeld compares those who oppose
administration policies to appeasers, like Neville Chamberlain, or when
people on my side who are antiwar are called traitors or somehow
un-American, isn't that a preemptive form of censorship?"
NO! That's called free speech. (BTW - The comparison of today's appeasers to Chamberlain is 100% accurate, so it's both free and accurate speech.)
Preemptive censorship is when our elected representatives in Congress
send letters threatening regulatory consequences if the film producers
(Path To 9/11) or oil companies (Exxon's climate research funding)
receiving said letter continue to exercise their right to free speech.
I couldn't have said it any b
December 21, 2006 - 20:29 ET by DesperadoI couldn't have said it any better.
Another example of the left trying to kill real free speach is their campaign to destroy Fox News. It's their MO, that if someone says something that you disagree with, get a lawyer and try to destroy them (or their reputation).
Seems to remind me of a certain method used by the Clintons to get rid of Bill's past by silencing Juanita Broaddrick.
IMHO....I think all the whini
December 21, 2006 - 20:45 ET by Clear thinkerIMHO....
I think all the whining from lefties about Fox news has helped Fox news grow.
Go lefties go!
The prospect of two years of
December 22, 2006 - 00:43 ET by joe conservativeThe prospect of two years of trying to frog march and tar and feather Bush is just one more good reason why the American people put the Democrats in charge of Congress.
Yeah, good luck with that...
December 22, 2006 - 06:20 ET by Indiana JoeYeah, good luck with that... hasn't worked for 6 years, but just keep trying....
But, but, but, Noel, Sean Pea
December 22, 2006 - 08:34 ET by dscottBut, but, but, Noel, Sean Pean won the The 2006 Christopher Reeve First Amendment Award, the Huffington Post thinks he's heroic.
"So...look, if we attempt to impeach for lying about a blowjob, yet accept these almost certain abuses without challenge, we become a cum-stain on the flag we wave. You know, I was listening to Frank Rich this morning, speaking on a book tour. He said he thought impeachment proceedings would amount to a "decadent" sidetrack, while our soldiers were still being killed. I admire Frank Rich. And of course he would be right if impeachment is all we do. But we're Americans. We can do two things at the same time. Yes, let's move forward and swiftly get out of this war in Iraq AND impeach these bastards.
Christopher Reeve promised to get out of that chair. Well, I don't know about you, but it feels like he's up now and I wouldn't be standing here if it weren't on his shoulders. Let it be for something."
Bahahahaha, Bahahaha, LMAO
“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius