rainlillie...can you tell me where Newsbusters states that they are "Bush supporters"? Last I read and it was a moment ago, a section you might want to check out, they are a project of the Media Research Center and their objective is to expose and neutralize liberal media bias.

Now I know that Newsbusters is a very challenging website to navigate with words like "forum" "home" "blogs" and the magic "about" sections but if you give it the old college try, you can yourself go to the "about" section and read what they are about.

I myself am a moderate on some issues a conservative on some and some would say liberal on others. For example I am not a supporter of abortion legislation, I believe it is best to be left between a woman or wife/husband and their doctor. That would qualify me as a lib on that issue. But when I watch the MsM such as the dinosaurs of NBC, ABC and that other one that Katie is successfully losing thousands of viewers for each day...uh CBS...when I watch them report on the issue they most often characterize those that support abortion legislation as looney extremist and thoughtless bigots. I may be on the other side of the aisle but I am not so stupid that I can't detect the MsM characterizes the pro-choicers as intelligent, sophisticated and appealingly progressive and the anti-abortion side (I reluctantly use pro-choice and anti-abortion terms but do so for convenience and familiarity) populated by nuts like Randall Terry when that is as far from the case as can be...I see the bias myself though I disagree with them.

And this is one reason why I enjoy Newsbusters so much. They are exposing the hypocrisies of the libs in the media. They want an honest and consistent dialogue. I do too.

You see rainlillie, it is libs and super-libs like you that give your group a bad name and a black eye. You don't even have the integrity to read what Newsbusters clearly states is their mission and none of it includes supporting President Bush. I don't like the President's leadership on a number of points myself, in fact I think he is a very mediocre man regarding his role as President, but in no way do I believe Newsbusters has taken any stated position on the President. They aren't here giving stamps of approval to politicians, they deal with the media. And again, this is where your shame comes in and consistently but sadly, you are par for the course of a lib and super-lib of today.

Instead of honestly representing the arguments or your opponents of giving credence to the validity of their strengths, you do the very thing you complain about against them. You mischaracterize them and misrepresent them. Shame on you. You don't have to agree but at least have enough self-respect to read what Newsbusters is about and not give in to the selfish and self-aggrandizing temptation to misrepresent them just to tickle your tummy and pat yourself on the head for doing a good job of lying about your opponent and hoping someone believes you.

If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal.

Liberals love dead Americans

Brute Force: If It Doesn't Work, then You're Just not Using Enough!

It's kind of hard to do your job when you're doing shady underhanded stuff, like rubbing shoulders with crooked lobbyists or covering up the actions of a child predator.

After all, you as a terrorist-enabling, America-hating Marxist/Leninist type would know, as it was your party that wrote the book on political corruption.

Bush had a Republican Senate and a Republican Congress, and yet he still failed miserably.

In what way has Bush been a failure? By removing Saddam from power? Regime change in Iraq, in case you have forgotten, was the standard policy of the Clinton administration and was duly authorized by your America-hating friends at the UN.

Given the miserable failures of the Kennedy, Johnson, Carter and Clinton administrations, you as member of the Marxist/Leninist party should be real careful who you point to as being incompetent.

Bill Clinton giving missile technology to the Chicoms and nuclear technology to the N. Koreans as well as the Iranians is about to turn around and bite this world squarely in the ass. Iran is now saying they are going to begin sharing their nuclear know-how with their "friends" in the region.

At the end of the day, all you terrorist enablers and appeasers, along with your fellow cowardly friends in the DumbMass Media are really going to accomplish is ensuring that the coming global conflict is going to be far, far more widespread and much more deadly than it needs to be. Hitler could have been stopped early on, with very little bloodshed.  Because of people like you, many millions died as a result. It didn't have to be that way.

They day is coming, and I believe very soon, when people will look back on the number of our brave soldiers who have died in Iraq and Afghanistan and will consider it a bargain.

Maybe when we lose an American city you head-up-your-ass liberals will finally figure out what we are facing. Although, given the fact that most of you are Marxist/Leninists to the bone, you probably won't even care.  After all, your favorite form of government has been the most murderous the world has yet seen, so what's a few hundred thousand dead Americans if it furthers the cause, eh, comrade?