Geraldo Steps In to Defend Illegals Against O'Reilly

Photo of Justin McCarthy.

Geraldo Rivera, who established himself as a crusader for illegal immigrants, ventured in to The O’Reilly Factor to pick a fight with host Bill O’Reilly on the issue. First, Geraldo did concede that an illegal immigrant with a criminal record who murdered a Marine should have been deported. However, he quickly moved to defend the 11 million people currently breaking our country’s immigration laws.

He first called the recent raid at an Iowa meat packing plant "the biggest jive mast bust." Geraldo then insulted the American workers exclaiming, "Do you know why they’re working there? They’re almost exclusively illegal, because no citizen will take that crappy job." He then connected those who favor immigration enforcement with bigots and xenophobes calling them "nativists."

The one aspect of the story that was not discussed was that some of those illegal immigrants arrested were on identity theft charges. So Geraldo, how would you react if it was your identity that was stolen? The entire transcript is below.

Bill O’Reilly: "Thanks for staying with us. I'm Bill O'Reilly. In the 'Geraldo' segment this week, the crackdown on illegal immigrants and those that hire them and the shocking, shocking report about the Duke lacrosse rape case. And here he is, star of the syndicated program, 'Geraldo at Large,' Geraldo himself. You just heard this mother, and he, you know, and the lawyer and here's this Marine, and he comes back, and this guy kills her, you know, and Homeland Security knew that he had this sheet and nobody did anything. If you, if you were the father of that Marine, you'd do the same thing wouldn't you? I would have."

Geraldo Rivera: "Oh, definitely. But I want to say, I want to say a couple of things. I think it's very important for me to say it. Because if I won't say it, no one is going to say it. I feel terrible for that family and their loss and the two other victims of this Miguel Padilla who by all accounts is a terrible person. And he's sentenced to, to die now. His appeals will drag on for a while because of some complications, issues."

O’Reilly: "The Mexican government wants him back. You know all of that."

Rivera: "Well, the Mexican government, like many governments does not have the death penalty."

O’Reilly: "Death penalty, right."

Rivera: "But I want to say this as crystal clear as I possibly can. I feel sorry for every family of the over 16,000 murder victims in our country. This is not an issue of illegal immigration. This is an issue of a scum bag murderer who killed three people."

O’Reilly: "But it's more than that. You must see that. If you have a system that will not deport violent people when they shouldn't be here in the first place--"

Rivera: "I have no objection. If believe-"

O’Reilly: "If that's the story..."

Rivera: "I believe that..."

O’Reilly: "...the system is broken."

Rivera: "...once an illegal alien falls into the criminal justice system..."

O’Reilly: "Right, and they still let him go!"

Rivera: "...and does his time he has to be deported."

O’Reilly: "There was no time."

Rivera: "He has to get deported."

O’Reilly: "Right, there was no time though."

Rivera: "But still, he her beef-"

O’Reilly: "Two convictions."

Rivera: "Right, her beef is that he had these processes and they were misdemeanor convictions."

O’Reilly: "But they were violent convictions. They pled him down. They pled them down."

Rivera: "Her, her beef is that once he was in the criminal justice system then they should have referred him to immigration.

O’Reilly: "Booted him out, right."

Rivera: "On that I have no argument."

O’Reilly: "Good."

Rivera: "But that's not about the 11 million or more..."

O’Reilly: "No, but you have to-"

Rivera: "...illegal aliens in this country..."

O’Reilly: "Nobody is condemning-"

Rivera: "...like most meat workers, that is the biggest jive mass bust. I'm telling you, what they did to Swift and Company, I did a documentary in 19- in 2000, in the year 2000 on the Hispanic burgeoning population. I based, I did every one of those meat-packing plants. I went all through the heartland of this country. Everybody knew who worked at the Swift and Company."

O’Reilly: "Well, they have to start punishing them now."

Rivera: "And for the government to raid and to say they're raiding it because of some other criminal act. That is a bunch of baloney and they should be ashamed."

O’Reilly: "But wait a minute, they're starting to crackdown."

Rivera: "These guys, the people raiding the meat packing plants should have been going after the Miguel Padillas of the world, these violent people, and deporting them."

O’Reilly: "You've got to do it all. You've got to do it all."

Rivera: "You have got to regulate and normalize these people's existence. The fact that they could work at the Swift and Company plant- every church is a Spanish church in that town, every restaurant is a Spanish restaurant."

O’Reilly: "I'm not opposed, I'm not opposed to that on the back end."

Rivera: "They speak Spanish on the streets. Anyone who pretends they didn't know is a, is a hypocrite."

O’Reilly: "Listen, you have to do it all. You have to have figure out a way to normalize it."

Rivera: "You have to have a comprehensive immigration reform."

O’Reilly: "Stop with the comprehensive."

Rivera: "Why, why, why?

O’Reilly: "You've got to punish Swift and others who do it."

Rivera: "Should, should, Swift and Company close? The, they produce I don't know a huge percentage of our processed meat in this country. They closed for the day and I don't know when they're going to reopen. Who benefits from that? Who benefits from that? Some P.R. guy at ICE, who says..."

O’Reilly: "Who benefits from it?"

Rivera: "...'look at us'?"

O’Reilly: "It sends a message to other people-"

Rivera: "Do you feel safer that they closed Swift and Company because they're illegal aliens packaging your meat?"

O’Reilly: "Do I feel safer? You know what I feel safer about? That finally the federal government is looking at the border, is looking at the businesses, and I want them to start looking at that."

Rivera: "This is Iowa. This is Iowa."

O’Reilly: "It doesn't matter where it is. You've got to-"

Rivera: "These people have families, they have roots there-"

O’Reilly: "Everybody has families."

Rivera: "Do you what it's like to work in a meat packing plant? Do you know what it's like to kill those cows and to carve those steaks?"

O’Reilly: "Geez, I can't believe you. I can't believe you"

Rivera: "Do you know why they're working there? They're almost exclusively illegal, because no citizen will take that crappy job."

O’Reilly: "That's bull. That's bull."

Rivera: "It is not bull."

O’Reilly: "I don't believe that for a second."

Rivera: "Why do you think they're doing it?"

O’Reilly: "Because Mexico can't provide them with jobs. That's why."

Rivera: "The United States unemployment is four percent. Where are you going to find people to fill those plants? You can't."

O’Reilly: "If you can't then they come here legally."

Rivera: "The hypocrisy, the hypocrisy. Build your 700 foot wall for 700 billion."

O’Reilly: "Stop. I'll put you in charge.."

Rivera: "I should be."

O’Reilly: "...and you can be in charge of the guest worker program."

Rivera: "I should be. I should be.

O’Reilly: "If they can't fill the jobs, let them come here legally."

Rivera: "Miguel Padilla, he commits a crime, I'd throw his behind out of this country. These hard-working people deserve those jobs."

O’Reilly: "You are basically saying to every person south of the border, 'come on in here and come here anyway that you can. It's OK.'"

Rivera: "I'm basically saying to the minutemen and the nativists who are against these people, do you want this job?"

O’Reilly: "You can do that legally."

Rivera: "I'm going to give you $40,000 to cut off the heads of cows. Do you want that job?"

O’Reilly: "You can do that legally. You can set up a way for them to get that job."

Rivera: "Do you know why the union is fighting for them? Because they are the union. That's why the union is fighting for them."

O’Reilly: "That's why- I know that. They want them in as members."

Rivera: "Those people should have green cards. They are vital to the U.S. national security. No one else wants that job."

O’Reilly: "If it were your program this thing would never stop, and it's got to stop."

—Justin McCarthy is a news analyst at Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I love how Rivera talks himse

I love how Rivera talks himself into a hole. Almost every other sentence he contradicts himself. Like most liberals he should do some research before making an arguement.

He should fired.  I don't ca

He should be fired.  I don't care if you're a Liberal or a Conservative or whatever else, but at least have some logic and reasoning and fact in what you say.  Jerry Rivers is a tabloid hack who belongs on local cable access at best.

I agree matt...he should stic

I agree matt...he should stick with opening Al Capones vault.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

pals, I want ya should know:

Hi, Pals,
Just to let you know, I've returned. You'll note my new 2007 name.

Yes, and I wantcha should know; Um not associated at all with the Liberal icon Geraldo Rivera; who prolly wouldn't agree with me in 99% of my political views. Nevertheless as you all knew, he & I have reached ALMOST common grounds on the illegal alien quandary this country is struggling with. Just do not call me a bedfellow of this character.

I'm a strong conservative. And straight.

tumbler....Your sarcasm has e

tumbler....

Your sarcasm has evolved I see!

yes, dear clear one

Hi., clear thinker.

I got myself suspended, (evidently) a few days. Too many of my posts were abrasive.

They hardly ever were rebutted fairly, but I failed to answer some of the diatribes youz guys posted without some kind of barb. I guess I got redundant.

So I appealed for another chance, and here I am. Have to be careful not to grab you by the cyber-lapels too often. I got to keep a lid on my temper. Anyhow; here again Geraldo stands up for poor hispanics. He doesn't even apologize for doing it.

I never approved of the law-breaking, but did appeal to my fellow Americans for more understanding. Now is the time; before our next presidential election arrives. I'd hate to someday see Hillary or Barack name our next incoming Supreme Court Justices. We must find a way to keep the White House. A share of the 2008 hispanic vote would come in handy.

tumbler

Well, glad to see you will at least try and be civil, I will take the opportunity to start over myself.

I think Mr Bill is right, let them come here legally, and then we have no argument.

I have said it before...

I have said it before and will say it again, change is inevitable and for conservatives, change sometimes is a very difficult experience. Not always mind you but enough of the time that it is a fair characterization to some extent. But to my point. Tumbler is right. Conservatives need Hispanics and the Hispanic vote. The fact is that some odd million Hispanics can become an asset and do not have to be a liability. And I don't think it is the POLITICIANS this time that are dragging their feet with regard to KEEN ideas and OUT of the BOX ideas about what REALISTICALLY can and should be done with the influx of Hispanics from the SOUTH. THEY know we need to convert them but...it is the population of conservative VOTERS that don't understand and are having a hard time accepting their foreign faces. But if we want to preserve a nation we had better get beyond singular images of what conservatives are.

Before you start with the idea of just rounding them all up how about reconsidering AMNESTY and make it a REPUBLICAN decision. Yes, AMNESTY and a program to educate and make them citizens. It will happen, they aren't going away. You better make lemonade out of what some consider lemons or this "Hispanic" problem will come back to haunt conservatives the way RACISM and WHITE hatred has become rampant in the Democratic black culture and who do they blame....Republicans and conservatives. I wish I could hold back the hands of time too and only have to ride one horse all my life, but that is fiction and it ain't real life so when a new pony comes along you better learn to ride it or you are gonna get left behind. Don't punish your Republican CONGRESSMAN OR WOMAN for trying to come up with a realistic solution, one that could and will benefit conservatives and Republicans in the long run, meaning your children and grand children. And yeah, I want a humongous fence and wall too.

If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal.

there is hope, Guy

If we could share in the hispanic vote next time, our chances of electing a Republican to the presidency would increase.

Keep in mind; illegals aren't the voters we have to appeal to. It's guys more like me; conservative hispanics and Mexican-Americans. Even the Geraldo types from Puerto Rico, who ordinarily vote for Charlie Rangel et al.

You cannot alienate so many of our conservatives in the hispanic community in the next election, without sending them straight to Hillary and Obammy. By upbringing and cultural identity these are people who fit a conservative mold. I call it a shame to lose them to demagogues like Pelosi and Teddy Kennedy & the likes. Because in their hearts they're very much like me,

Pro-Life, anti-gay marriage, strong for the military, for tax cutting and family values. The only thing liberal they ever favored is affirmative action. Otherwise, they're Republicans!

History for GAT

"It will happen, they aren't going away. You better make lemonade out of what some consider lemons or this "Hispanic" problem will come back to haunt conservatives the way RACISM and WHITE hatred has become rampant in the Democratic black culture and who do they blame....Republicans and conservatives."

1.  The Republican Party was born out of the ashes of the Whig party and took a firm stand against (Hold your Horses) slavery.   

2.  It was a Democratic Supreme Court that ruled in favor of Jim Crowe (Separate but Equal) laws.

3. It was the Democratic Party that gave us the current broken down and tax sucking welfare system we have today by not repealing it after WWII.   

4.  Republicans are the reason the Civil Rights Laws were signed into place (Ask your Dem Favorites about Byrd and Al Gores Dad and how they felt about it).  Democrats from the South tried to block it.

The welfare system in this country is bad enough and still needs fixing and now you have no problem handing it to a person who is illegally (un-documented as the Libs like to say it)  in this country.  They are breaking the law no matter how hard they work.  I have no problem with a guessed worker program but your butt better be legal.  This country owes a lot to its emigrants and the blood that runs in the veins of Americans is filled with it.  I want to see people succeed when they come to this country but you need to be LEGAL and DOCUMENTED before you come in. 

Lax laws on who we let into our country are part of the cause of 9/11.  And if you haven’t taken a good look into South America lately was Mr. Chavez would love to get some of his friends from abroad across that boarder.  May already have (We don’t know because of Libs panties being in a wad over Wire Taps and Money watching; Thank you NYT) them here.

No Amnesty; Build the wall and keep the illegal’s out.   

The new world order is in power. God help us all.  Airforce_5_O, 2330, November 7, 2006

Why the name change tumbler

Why the name change tumbler? Aren't you afraid people will think you are a noob? :-)

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

"I'm a strong conser


"I'm a strong conservative. And straight."

And stupid. Still, if you can't be stupid here, where can you?

Tumber...

Tumber, welcome back and as you will see one of the many reasons Republicans LOST in 2006 is demonstrated here by some, the inability to have a dialogue with another conservative with whom they disagree.

If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal.

I watched about two minutes o

I watched about two minutes of this and then had to turn it off.  Geraldo always grated on my nerves, but now he's just stupid.  Why does O'Reilly continue to allow him on his show?  Doesn't O'Reilly get that regular watchers like me are turning off?

dear gotham p

I'm a regular watcher. I see nothing wrong with a fair & balanced Fox program calling on Geraldo.

To hear you, nothing but the knee-jerk view from the Republican "base" is worthy of your consideration. There are two sides to the story and I applaud O'Reilly for at least trying to get under Geraldo's skin. After a lot of squawking, he nearly had a draw. Geraldo held his own, IMHO.

"To hear you, nothing bu

"To hear you, nothing but the knee-jerk view from the Republican "base" is worthy of your consideration."

Generalize much???

My gripe is with Geraldo who has never been able to put forth a logical argument.  I said nothing about other guests O'Reilly has on the show.

Rivera on illegals: "The

Rivera on illegals: "They are vital to the U.S. national security."

Ohhhhhh, I wish I was in that studio when he slipped that in.  I realize that O'Reilly was running out of time when Rivera uttered it (O'Reilly might not have heard it),  but he should've demanded that Rivera explain how that could possibly be true.  It Rivera is right, we should invite all of Mexico into the U.S.

It's one thing to be an advocate for the illegals.  It's yet another thing to lie about them.

He must have meant they poi

He must have meant they point out the glaring LACK of national security.

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

Illegals & National Security

Well, folks, I'm proud to say for once Florida gets something right (since we're obviously very bad at elections).....south Florida prepares to repel boarders.

Apparently, the rumor mill is that Fidel es muerte, again, and we may be faced with another Mareilito type boat-lift action of epic proportions.

Wonder what Geraldo and Tumbler have to say about repelling illegal boat people, since they're not Mexican, and all.  They're political refugees, rather than economic opportunists.

what Geraldo might say

No telling what he'd say. I'd rather think that many exiled Cubans are likely to sail for Havana, not the other way round. That'll be the last nail in Fidel's coffin.

As for the crackdown on Swift; I have no quarrel. Yet Geraldo says it's a cheap shot. But I do agree with Geraldo that a new fence on our southern border won't help deport 12 million squatters. We still have that to deal with, and it won't be as simple as you think.

You have no idea how simple y

You have no idea how simple you think I think it'd be.

"It's too difficult, so, f*ck it" is the mantra for a new generation.

Yeah Roger,Every long journe

Yeah Roger,

Every long journey starts with a first step. Swift  was a fine first step.

"But I do agree with Ger

"But I do agree with Geraldo that a new fence on our southern border won't help deport 12 million squatters."

Of course it won't, but then, no one ever argued that it would.

"We still have that to deal with, and it won't be as simple as you think."

On the contrary, it will be simpler than you care to admit. That's why you object so strongly to our government cracking down.

If you believe it is simple, I gladly will listen...

If you believe it is simple then I will ask you: How many illegals are going to be taken into custody, where are they all, how is each local law enforcement agency going to afford the extra man power and additional need for space even while waiting for the feds to send them to a fed facility, how many additional fed people are going to be needed to keep them in custody while deporting, meaning not just house them but feed and clothe them and then transport them? I am not disagreeing with the assesment necessarily that they should be deported but to say IT IS SIMPLE, well spell out just how simple it is, How many are there, where are they all and where will the additional revenue and resources come from?

If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal.

Guy, it is simple. If the

Guy, it is simple. If the fence goes up, that will slow the flow a great deal. Once you turned off the water, you can fix the pipes. As we crack down on illegals, as well as go after the land-lords and business owners who knowingly hires an illegal, most will leave on their own. When we tell the Mexican government that we recognize their acts of war as acts of war, and they need to stop or we will use military action against them, then maybe the Mexican government will do their job as well.

I agree with the fence...

I made another post about the mandatory 10 sentence of anyone knowingly hiring an illegal, but it won't ever happen and the Republican's don't REALLY want the illegals out because if they did they would being doing EXACTLY what you are saying.

If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal.

Which is why the Republican

Which is why the Republicans lost. They ignored that 80% of Americans think the federal government was negligent on the border (as well as negligent on spending).

Please!

Once again "conservative voice" has NO idea what he's talking about. He's talking about waterworks.

And deliberately ignoring the political fallout of these hare-brained remedies for our illegal problem. "Military action" INDEED! The words of a nincompoop. Wish I could see O'Reilly's and Geraldo's reactions to this rhetorical beep-beep. Pure nonsense!

And machine-gun nests!  (Neu

And machine-gun nests! 

(Neutron bomb test range canceled)

And once again a well thought

And once again a well thought out and right-on-the-money metaphor sails right over tumbler's head.

Oh, tumbler....name calling, there guy. 

Can you say banned?

Rivera: "Do you know why

Rivera: "Do you know why they're working there? They're almost exclusively illegal, because no citizen will take that crappy job."

Let's assume for the sake of argument that illegals do take the jobs that Americans won't do.  Fine.  They also take other things from American citizens - a seat in a public school, the waiting room of an ER, acceptance in to a University (at in-state tuition rates, no less), welfare money, social assistance, etc.

Geraldo made a point

Dutch, --He made even a better point than I ever have about the jobs.

Rivera: "Do you know why they're working there? They're almost exclusively illegal, because no citizen will take that crappy job." In this context: --We have only 4% unemployed! Who is there who'll do this work? The entire 4% of our unemployed? HARDLY!

Your further arguments are straw dogs: "a seat in a public school, the waiting room of an ER, acceptance in to a university at in-state tuition rates, no less, welfare money, social assistance, etc." --If it were so, nobody would dispute it. Most of those working illegals are NOT costing us for everything, the way you presume. Most are simply paying their way.

Yes; many take advantage of some part of this. Wouldn't you? We are only talking about possibly 2 millions out of a total 30 million inhabitants in this country. You'd try to associate all 12 million illegals with an unfair advantage they don't deserve. That's fundamentally flawed thinking if not disingenuous.

I couldn't believe it when Ge

I couldn't believe it when Geraldo said with 4% unemployment there's nobody to fill those jobs.  I guess Bush & Co can't do anything right.  They bring unemployment to record lows and now we can't bust the illegals cause we're out of labor.

I guess liberals will use any and all topics to bash this administration, regardless of truth. 

Well you know, like the sayin

Well you know, like the saying goes, truth is in the eye of the beholder.

...

Wait thats beauty, nevermind.

tumbler - no straw dog argument, sorry.

Sorry tumbler, you were wrong before and you're still wrong now.

Most of those working illegals are NOT costing us for everything, the way you presume.  Most are simply paying their way.

You are the one who is presuming here....like a liberal...because you say so, it must be true.  No cites ever to support your presumptions.

The cost of illegal immigrants to the federal government is in the TENS OF BILLIONS of dollars annually.  This, of course, does not include the costs to state and local governments...and of course the true cost is borne by me, the taxpayer.

Further, your assertion that no one else would take these jobs is so much claptrap as well.  If these jobs went unfilled, employers would be forced to raise their wages to the point that Americans and legal immigrants would take them.  It's basic economics....something you might want to try studying before you go off on the same old rant again.

Now that you've been presented with FACTS, not feelings, tell me again, whose thinking here is fundamentally flawed...if not disingenuous?

I leave U to your thoughts

I don't agree with you, Blonde. You've never substantiated anything, just repeating the old knee-jerk. That's all right; it's a free country. When you can PROVE that a majority of the illegals now working in America are freeloaders, bring the info to us. Not a POLL, mind you. Polls mean very little over all. And opinions are nice, but not indisputable.

Again; wages would NOT just rise from the mere fact we deport illegals who do our menial work. And if they ever would, we'd be paying through the noses for the ensuing rise in everyday prices. (For everything from groceries to car washes.)

Of course you don't tumbler.Y

Of course you don't tumbler.

You can't argue with the facts.  FACTS.  Hard costs.  Dollars and cents...numbering in the Billions! 

I'd rather pay a fair market price than pay extra taxes to support line jumpers, tumbler.

There are millions of people who are more worthy than the current crop of illegals (who are breaking our laws by their mere presence)....and those who seek legal immigration should be given priority over a bunch of no-account law breakers. 

P.S.  What "poll"?  Talk about another nonsensical statement.  And FYI, I get my car washed by a nice bunch of American gentlemen who are raising money for their church. 

dear old blonde:

That's not a valid argument. I told ya; PROVE what you claim. Save the blanket statements for the choir you always preach to; they need your reassurance.

We're participants in a National Debate; over a fair and balanced blog run by honorable people. If they can afford me my contrarian insights into a very hard problem, you can control your rhetorical broadsides at "moi." I have every right to defend those who never get a chance to speak on their own behalf. It isn't my only concern but I feel qualified to speak.

Geraldo, with whom I rarely agree, feels even more entitled. The subject of this thread is his upstart defiance of Bill O'Reilly, not how many billions of dollars you jump up and squawk about. You worry about chump change. Human lives are more important than your almighty dollar, Lady.

As usual, you add nothing.Ooo

As usual, you add nothing.

Ooops...nada.

...

  What the...?

  What you say makes no sense.  You tell her to PROVE her side, and she offers you data.  But apparently you missed the part where YOU have to prove YOUR assertions too.  As of yet, we haven't seen you do that.  Show us some links that say that illegal immigrants AREN'T costing the government money.

  Your "contrarian insights" exist only to be contrary.  They provide nothing useful on the account that you will not support them.

  You try to get all high-and-mighty with your "Human lives are more important than your almighty dollar," but you know what?  We're not entitled to support every human life on the planet.  Nowhere in the Constitution does it say we have to, and even by common sense, it is impossible.  Our laws exist for our own citizens, and people who flagrantly violate the law when they are not citizens should never have the chance to become citizens.  They can stand in line and/or get green cards like everyone else.  Geraldo's "upstart defiance" is definately the issue, and it just so happens that taxpayer money happens to be a key issue of illegal immigration.

  You want contrarian?  I'll give you contrarian.  The Mexican government is corrupt and its people refuse to do anything about it.  The most common of them just get up and run away, and they come here.  Have you tried checking the Mexican government's stance on illegal immigrants from their southern border?  Have you checked its stance on legal immigrants, for that matter?  I say we adopt the exact same stance on illegal immigrants, play it by their own rules.  Incindentally, mass deportation and building a fence would go a long way to making this possible.  It'd also make it so that the Mexican emigrants would not be able to emigrate... and would actually have to work to change their government.  As it stands now, they just export the problem to us, and its population can never achieve the critical mass necessary to enact such a thing.  Enforcing the laws to prevent illegal immigration would do a service to both nations, making them both stronger.  Willingly taking their problems as our own will only weaken both.

I agree, this is an emotion

I agree, this is an emotional issue for tumbler. Facts are to be ignored, principles compromised, and political correctness is the law. Tumbler is a social conservative, but on this issue he is very liberal. My heart goes out to the poor in Mexico, but the answer isn't having an open door policy.

CV...My heart goes out to the

CV...

My heart goes out to the poor in Mexico, and the rest of the worlds poor.

I think tumblers energy would be better directed if he did whatever he could to help the poor people of Mexico take back their government. After all, it's the corrupt Mexican government that is causing the whole problem, not us!

agreed

agreed

"And FYI, I get my car

"And FYI, I get my car washed by a nice bunch of American gentlemen who are raising money for their church. "

As do I, well, the American part. My car washers tend to be of the female variety. The only place where car washes are dominated by illegal immigrants are areas that allow themselves to be overrun with illegal immigrants.

"And if they ever woul

"And if they ever would, we'd be paying through the noses for the ensuing rise in everyday prices. (For everything from groceries to car washes.)"

talk about not having proof, lol. Yes, our lettuce would skyrocket from a dollar a head to *GASP* a dollar ten a head. Oh, the horror........

But let's say you're correct. The simple solution would be to outsource those jobs elsewhere, since that's basically what we're doing anyway. If Americans aren't doing the jobs, send them somewhere where folks will do the job.

Bottom line: You aren't entitled to subsidizing your companies success or low prices for Americans on the back of illegal labor. End of story.

By the way, anyone know if Canada is suffering from run away prices as a result of not using illegal labor like many idiots here in the USA feel we are entitled to?

it's fair to estimate

Dear ckc1227,

I once bought my exquisitely hand-made wing-tips at $40 a copy, when the trade paid shoemakers estimated 20% of what they are now paid. They were not Italian shoes, just Bannisters. Today they cost a great deal more, and forget about buying the best.

Economics in our capitalist society works that way. Pay more for production of your goods, and you'll pass on the added cost to the customer. No one ever denies it; why do you?

Illegals

Gee guys, I log out for dinner and you just take over the argument....making all of the points I'd have made.  Good job, and thanks!

As I posted earlier....every long journey begins with a first step.  And the first step we need to take is to deport illegals.  One at a time, a company's worth at a time...it just needs to be done, and done consistently.  Secondly, build the fence.  Third, toss any ideas of amnesty.   Fourth, cut off benefits for illegals.  Fifth, reward legal and appropriate behaviour, and grant legal status on an equal basis.  Once we prove our resolve, success will build upon itself....and the problem will become solvable.

Build the fence NOW (as Florida is preparing to do....a water fence, if you will.  There was a meeting of 75 local, state and federal law enforcment agencies planning for how to meet a Mariel type situation if Castro's death causes another Cuban panic).  I've reposted the link...just because I think an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure when it comes to being overrun by illegal aliens.

"Your further arguments

"Your further arguments are straw dogs: "a seat in a public school, the waiting room of an ER, acceptance in to a university at in-state tuition rates, no less, welfare money, social assistance, etc." --If it were so, nobody would dispute it. Most of those working illegals are NOT costing us for everything, the way you presume. Most are simply paying their way. "

Well, certainly I didn't mean that literally every illegal is doing so, sure.  But a good majority are doing these in some way.  While I'll give you that many of the children of illegals are in fact legal so they legally do have a right to a public school education, I do have to disagree with you that many are paying their way.  In southern California alone, 23 hospitals closed from 1995-2000 due to "financial problems".  This was due to the uninsured, which of course does include American citizens, but includes a HUGE percentage of illegals.  How can they be "paying their way" when they don't make hardly anything? 

One study (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42474)  estimates that illegals cost California alone $10.5 billion (to incarcerate, educate and provide medical care).  Sure they're not costing us "everything", but there's no way you can say that they're covering even the $10.5 they are estimated to cost us Californians.  And that's California alone, not to mention other border states and, now, the other states are starting to feel the effects of illegal immigration.

"Yes; many take advantage of some part of this. Wouldn't you? "

Absolutely.  The blame for that lies squarely with the federal government (current and past administrations) for not enforcing the border, doing interior enforcement and putting these incentives in the law in the first place.  But does that mean that we can't hold illegals responsible for the cost?  Absolutely not. After all, they are still the ones who do cost us a lot of tax money.  The fact the door is open for them is the government's fault, but they still make the choice to break the law and end up costing us a lot of money.

"We are only talking about possibly 2 millions out of a total 30 million inhabitants in this country. "

I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here.  Did you mean 20 million out of 300 million inhabitants? 

"You'd try to associate all 12 million illegals with an unfair advantage they don't deserve. That's fundamentally flawed thinking if not disingenuous."

And aren't you also making the assumption that "most pay their way"?  Do you have stats to back that up?  It seems you're coming at the argument with the assumption that the illegals are basically a benefit to society, and I am coming at it from the opposite viewpoint. 

Anyway, I'm new here, but I enjoy talking about this and I try to do so in a civil way.  That's the hope at least. :)

Dutch

Dutch

Nice try, Dutch....you can post all of the facts you'd like (as I have done)....and it won't make a dent.    Tumbler doesn't care about facts...only about feelings when it comes to this issue.

The local and state governments along the border states are becoming overwhelmed by the demand for services by illegals.  

It's an unfortunate situation, but with resolve, we CAN fix the problem.  But not by amnesty....been there, done that...and it didn't work.

Anyway, welcome, here.

I love how hypocritical liber

I love how hypocritical liberals are about some things.  They are for just about every union out there.  Steel workers, specifically, are given great protections from competition by our government.

Now think about the illegals.  If we kicked them out and didn't allow them to work those jobs we would in essence be creating an American workers union that would include every legal citizen of the US.  We would be offering protection to American workers much like the Steel workers union provides protection from outside competition for their workers. 

Oh, and the argument that no Americans would work those crappy jobs is the most tired and ridiculous argument made on the issue.  Correct, no Americans would work those jobs at the present wage.  That wage is driven down by an excess supply of cheap labor from Mexico.  If that supply of labor was reduced wages would have to go up in order to get people to work those jobs. 

Saying that, I believe we need to be moving toward less protection and a more global economy.

sphig, need i remind you?

We only number near 4% unemployed. By what contortion have you settled on this?

"Correct, no Americans would work those jobs at the present wage. That wage is driven down by an excess supply of cheap labor from Mexico. If that supply of labor was reduced wages would have to go up in order to get people to work those jobs."

You must mean all the jobs now held by the 96% are lower-paying than what Swift would offer you once the illegals are gone? Swift & others would suddenly make my wife, who earns $65K a year without a college degree, go apply for a position as meat-grinder for Swift, at much higher wages? How about that!!!!! I mot come out of retirement!

Illegals

There should be two bullets used on any illegal from any country that crosses the border into the United States and does not go through the correct requirements. After one warning shot by their ear, then the next one between their ears. Illegals already here and working should be gathered and sent back to whatever country of origin they came from and told if they try to return they would be shot. The fact that it is not already being done does not mean it's not a great idea.

your IQ is the equivalent

--You have an IQ of two; the equivalent of the bullets you're suggesting.

I realize there are crude folks running around loose in our country. That might be one reason I keep a .357 Magnum on my nightstand. In case a good ole boy like you comes into my neighborhood. Hey! Partner!!! Just passing through, Hm??? ADIOS ! ! !

hahahahaha ill meet your ma

hahahahaha ill meet your magnum any time with a shotgun....what do you prefer long barrel or sawn off? or even an SKS or maybe my AK-47 the weapon of champions.....if your a communist

"--You have an IQ of t

"--You have an IQ of two; the equivalent of the bullets you're suggesting."

Interesting accusation considering you feel that if folks like your wife won't give up her $65,000 a year job to work for swift in a position that pays more than it does now but less than what she makes means no one will take those jobs.

We have a hog processing plant in my hometown. The jobs there don't pay $40,0000 year, yet somehow, those jobs are dominated by LEGAL Americans. How can that considering it's a job that Americans won't do? Oh wait, maybe it's only COW slaughterhouses that Americans won't work at.

U have more IQ than the dog

Attack dog is a 2 IQ, and you're nearly a 4; twice as smart.

They say you must let the chips fall where they will. If only 4% Americans are available to process hogs in your town, why not compete for them and see how many LEGAL employees come running for the wages? Maybe 50 of those other 96% employed will quit where they are and move into your butcher shop. We can keep a tab and find out. SURE . . .

TUMBLER...Why won't you go to

TUMBLER...

Why won't you go to Mexico and help the poor Mexicans take back their corrupt government?

it is clear thinker, ironically

Ironical as it is, we see someone calling him,her self "clear thinnker" who makes inane statements such as:

"Go to Mexico," (to an American) and, "help poor Mexicans" --I do help them; defending them here against BS and smug assessments by know-nothings like "clear thinker".

"Taking back their corrupt gov't" and so on; all the stupid Gringo cliches we've heard for forty years. THIS is clear thinking? Haw haw! Find something intelligent to contribute, CT. You're spinning your wheels. I never post unless I have something sensible to say. If you disagree with it, just say, "--I don't agree."

What you know about Mexico's government and any of its corruption is equivalent to everything old Bob Hope knew about Morroco. He was in the Road to Morocco on a back lot in Hollywood, reciting a script. Just as you do, about Mexico. He was no expert. Go yourself to Mexico and make an informed judgment.

Here we're discussing American jobs and our economy. Not some joke you remembered about Mexico. And; we're digressing from a subject which centers around Geraldo. I support almost all he said to O'Reilly. It's a VERY important subject deserving of our UNBIASED judgment. It means the FUTURE of our free society!

So I take it that NO ONE on N

So I take it that NO ONE on NB knows more about Mexico than you do? 

"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy."  -Sir Winston Churchill, British statesman (1874-1965)

...

  Funny, but it was clear to everyone else.  Perhaps you missed the irony that, in Mexico, no immigrant, legal or otherwise is allowed to hold a position of power in their government, thanks to their own Constitution.

  It's good you defend them as Mexicans.  Because that means they are not Americans.  Now that you've confirmed that the illegal aliens here are citizens of another country entirely, please explain your logic in supporting them as if they were citizens of your own.

  "Stupid Gringo clichés".  Man, for someone who thinks he's the all-important contrarian poster, you sure do an awesome job of ad hominem attacks and straw men.  Too bad you didn't, you know, actually refute his point with any logic.  But keep up the name calling, I'm sure you can re-register as Tumbler_2008 pretty soon.

  "What you know about Mexican government"  Really?  I've just shared a tidbit with you.  How about you tell me which has a more anal policy on illegal immigrants, the US or Mexico?  You're demonstrating a sheer lack of knowledge as to Mexican laws while ridiculing others for the same.  Hypocrisy, much?

I don't think there is any qu

I don't think there is any quick solve solution, especially just shooting at immigrants.  I can agree with the argument that if wages were raised Americans would be just as likely to compete for the jobs.  I know we can't just have open borders but we can't just gather 12 million people and ship them back. 

Also the fact that this country has throughout it's history has relied on immigrants for hard labor from just about everywhere, good chances some of your relatives immigrated.  I know that things have changed since then but it is still something to consider. 

On the other hand with employing illegals and paying them minimal wages is just kind of like a new form of slavery.  Where the companies are getting cheap labor and breaking the law.  With companies taking this option or outsourcing more and more jobs, I just wonder what jobs will be left. 

I think this is a very hard topic and does need to be addressed, but to be honest I have no idea what is the right thing to do.  I do know for sure that Attack Dogs comments about shooting at immigrants show how ignorant he is.  I hope that was just a bad joke or if people really believe that, it's pretty scary. 

No one here is denying the

No one here is denying the fact that this country is built on immigrant power. I don't mind if more people from Mexico come here then there is currently...but I want it done legally, and I want them to be Americans, know English, melt into our culture, and be law-abiding and be productive (many illegals are productive). I want it to be fair to all the legals here...make the law apply to all non-citizens the same, as we are all should be equal under the law.

Hiring illegals isn't slavery, but it is wrong. Shooting at people who ignore the warning shot, who come here and remove our flag on federal property so that they can put up their own, who invade in droves, some of which who rape and pillage and rob, all the while their government is cheering them on, are acts of war, is not wrong. Knock on my door and ask for food, and I will invite you in and share my supper with you. Force yourself in, don't be surprised if I don't use force, even a gun, to kick you back out.

If this issue was just about jobs, I don't think many Americans would blink.

...

  Since when was basic economics a "contortion"?

  For someone who insults others IQ, you apparently missed the point that 96% of the jobs in the nation aren't all in the meat-packing industry.  The employers of the jobs in areas currently held by a majority of illegals are paying much lower than they should be.  This is because they can get away with it, as there are illegal immigrants there.  Remove illegal immigrants from the equation.  At the rate which said jobs were being paid, a set amount of other workers will flow in, but it will be a trickle, as it is below the cost it should be.  After a time, the company will realize that it can't keep paying those rates, and will have to raise them, which draws a bit more.  Depending on the rate and intensity of change of the job rates, more of the workforce will flow into place until an equilibirum of sorts is achieved.  Filled by legal citizens.

  Incidentally, should the nation actually deport the illegals (like it should), it wouldn't be able to sweep through and get them all at once.  Instead it'd be in bits and pieces like those 'raids'.  This would have individual places hit harshly, but the overall company would be taking minor hits and adjusting, cushioning the transistion.  The industry as a whole would slowly shift in that direction, with no 'crash'.

  This does not mean such wages would immediately leap up to huge values that make every other job pointless, as you are baselessly asserting.  It means they'd start paying the rates they should already.

Unsane tried an argument last

Unsane tried an argument last night that if a person doesn't have sex they won't become pregnant.  Well if companies weren't hiring illegals, they wouldn't come here looking for jobs.  So I think if you want to punish the immigrants, then the companies should also be punished. 

If CEOs didn't make so much more than the average worker, then they could probably afford to pay competitive wages to Americans. 

Also that if the immigrants are already employed and have commited no crimes why don't they deserve something more than being sent back.  I mean they have contributted to our society and many of them would like to become legal.  Since they are here illegally do you think they are going to risk deportation to try and become legal.

One final thought was that I heard a proposal that the immigrants jobs could be filled be ex-cons.  I wasn't sure if that was true, maybe someone could clear that up for me.

stupidest comment of the day

If CEOs didn't make so much more than the average worker, then they could probably afford to pay competitive wages to Americans. 

We can now announce the winner of the stupidest comment (see above) of the day! (12-14-2006)

What's stupid is that CEOs of

What's stupid is that CEOs of large companies receive multimillion dollar bonuses and make over 400 times more than the average worker.

I'm sure you want an example so how about Cheney getting a $100 million bonus from Haliburton when he left.  Does anyone really need that much money, when we have homeless people and people worldwide who can't eat.  Over 1.5 billion people don't even have adequate drinking water.

But at least Dick has more money than he can ever spend.

You can tell who is stuck in a dead-end job...

non sequitor

(I'll come back tomorrow after you've looked that up)

So you are going to...

So now you are go