Lies of Omission: A Simple Test for Media Bias

By Al Brown | December 13, 2006 - 13:59 ET

Yesterday Howie, one of my co-bloggers at The Jawa Report conducted what he describes as a "simple test" for mainstream media bias against reporting positive news from Iraq.

Howie posted about three separate stories from Iraq, one positive, one mostly positive, and one negative, then tracked the amount of play each story got in the MSM via Google's news search function.

The negative story about a successful suicide bombing, one of many staged for the benefit of Western news cameras, received 779 news citations on Google.

A story from CENTCOM about a bomb discovered at the Golden Mosque in Samarra, that detonated while demolitions experts were trying to move it, causing no injuries and minimal damage, came in second, with ten entries under the technically accurate but misleading headline, "Bomb Explodes at Iraq's Samarra Mosque." The mainstream deliberately put the worst possible face on the story. Instead of a headline about the success of Iraqi and Coalition forces in detecting and minimizing the effect of the bomb, the headline writer managed to add more white noise to the "quagmire" meme. 

The positive story Howie tracked is a CENTCOM news release about Iraqi troops freeing 23 hostages and capturing their 6 kidnappers.

The damning Google search results are here. The only mainstream source that picked up the story was the New York Times, and they buried it within a story headlined "Truck Bomb in Iraq Kills 70 in Shiite Crowd."

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

We just LOVE to see THE NUMB

We just LOVE to see THE NUMBERS!!!!!!!

Much much more please...

Lies of omission is absolutel

Lies of omission is absolutely right! 

LIbEralS

Thanks Al

Thanks for the research, Al.  We'd like to say we're shocked, but...... more and more evidence of the Useful Idiots preying on fat, detached Americans with no sense of perspective.  Makes me sick.  The only way we can lose this war is if we lose our nerve.  Enter the Useful Idiots of the MSM.

A "simple test" is

A "simple test" is almost accurate. It should be called a "simpleton's test." Have you ever heard the old maxim, "if it bleeds, it leads?" When sixty three people die in a bomb explosion, it, of course, is going to be headline news. The other two stories were nice, but hardly of the same magnitude. Maybe that’s why the "test" results were what they were. Man, you people will do anything to try to demonstrate the evil liberal media conspiracy.

Af-So what if there's an ol

Af-

So what if there's an old maxim? What about the old phrase "journalistic integrity"? How many stories have you heard of what you refer to as lesser 'magnitude', but that are positive? Isn't there a duty to provide what would amount to balanced coverage? Apparently, the ratings are the only things that push story. That's sickening.

Let me keep this simple for y

Let me keep this simple for you Agnostic Front; the test was for mentions, not leads. The deliberately misleading headline in the Samarra mosque bomb story (which didn't "bleed," by the way) was a bonus, helpfully provided by a grossly biased media culture. 

In the future, you should try reading for comprehension before commenting.