The Pentagon announced that all four major branches of the military met or exceeded their recruiting goals for the month on November. Normally the media glosses over these stories and relegates them to the rarely read deep recesses of the B section. That is unless the news can be used to embed a story within a story – the sort that poisons the main message with a carefully crafted sub-context that is related to any one of a number of liberal agenda items that are being tossed about in the latest news cycle.
This is the case with the AP’s coverage of the pentagon announcement
. One can’t help but note how the AP reporter spins the good news story of recruitment success into a negative screed about American pessimism over the war in Iraq and dissatisfaction with the way President Bush is handling the effort.
So I decided that it would be enlightening to liberate the embedded message and release it from its status as the lowly story within the story. The newly liberated story handily exposes the report for the biased screed that it is. The following passage is the unaltered text from a section of the AP news report with the exception that I removed any text that distracted from the reporter's main message.
WASHINGTON - Americans are increasingly pessimistic about the war in Iraq.
The Army is bearing the brunt of the work in Iraq as U.S. pessimism over the Iraq campaign mounts, according to a recent AP-Ipsos poll. Some 63 percent of Americans said they don’t expect a stable, democratic government to be established in Iraq, up from 54 percent who felt that way in June.
Dissatisfaction with President Bush’s handling of Iraq has climbed to an all-time high of 71 percent, according to the AP-Ipsos survey this month. A bipartisan commission last week released its recommendations for a new course.
The following is the text that I removed.
Washington - The Pentagon said Tuesday it is having success enlisting new troops. The Navy and Air Force met their recruiting goals last month while the Army and Marine Corps exceeded theirs, the Defense Department announced.
The Army did the best. It signed up 6,485 new recruits in November compared with its target of 6,150 — meaning 105 percent of its goal.
All the services turned in similar performances in October as well, meaning they so far are meeting their goals for the 2007 budget year that began Oct. 1.
“The services are starting off well,” said Maj. Stewart Upton, a Pentagon spokesman.
The president held a series of meetings this week to hear from his advisers.
Isn't that enlightening? Put the two back together and you get the passage as it was originally released by the AP.
WASHINGTON - Though Americans are increasingly pessimistic about the war in Iraq, the Pentagon said Tuesday it is having success enlisting new troops. The Navy and Air Force met their recruiting goals last month while the Army and Marine Corps exceeded theirs, the Defense Department announced.
The Army, which is bearing the brunt of the work in Iraq, did the best. It signed up 6,485 new recruits in November compared with its target of 6,150 — meaning 105 percent of its goal.
All the services turned in similar performances in October as well, meaning they so far are meeting their goals for the 2007 budget year that began Oct. 1.
"The services are starting off well," said Maj. Stewart Upton, a Pentagon spokesman.
The progress in recruiting comes as U.S. pessimism over the Iraq campaign mounts, according to a recent AP-Ipsos poll. Some 63 percent of Americans said they don't expect a stable, democratic government to be established in Iraq, up from 54 percent who felt that way in June.
Dissatisfaction with President Bush's handling of Iraq has climbed to an all-time high of 71 percent, according to the AP-Ipsos survey this month. A bipartisan commission last week released its recommendations for a new course and the president held a series of meetings this week to hear from his advisers.
There you have it - the hidden secret behind journalism 101, AP style. Learn these tricks and you too might find yourself the toast of the newsroom while patting each other on the back for a story well spun.
Terry Trippany is the editor and contributor at Webloggin.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
AP
December 13, 2006 - 11:37 ET by iveseenitallWhat can we expect? It has been proved that the AP reporters are anti- American liars. They are left wingers who will never accept American values. They're rooting for our defeat in Iraq, which is just another reason for us to fight on.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
I guess all of John Kerry's a
December 13, 2006 - 11:44 ET by Prester JohnI guess all of John Kerry's and Charlie Rangel's ignorant minorities and rednecks can't find jobs in a 4.5% unemployment rate economy.
Well, certainly Americans are
December 13, 2006 - 11:47 ET by MerlinWell, certainly Americans are increasingly pessimistic about the war in Iraq. With all of the stories coming from the MSM, who wouldn't be?
Things are tough there, but the President did clearly explain that this was going to be a long, tough WOT from the start. Personally, I'm happy that we have true patriots that are willing to help protect our safety...<sarcarism>even if they are the poverty stricken folks with no hopes of any other way of life </sarcasm off>. (Note: I don't by these types of statements by Kerry or Wrangle or their ilk).
If I were younger (50 now) I would certainly join the military again. As an ex Air Force pilot I would happily join the army or marines to ensure the safety of my family and friends.
From my perspective, it is not hard to see folks from all walks of life signing up to serve our country...caring people that seem to understand the meaning of freedom and see the threats on the WOT.
God bless everyone that wears any uniform that ensures our safety and freedom.
So a story on US dis-satisf
December 13, 2006 - 11:52 ET by mclarksonSo a story on US dis-satisfaction with the war, which is on the rise, should be kept seperate from one on the military meeting recruiting goals? I think it clearly illustrates the point that while Americans may disagree with the President's handling of the war we still support our Armed Forces. It also shows that the enhanced benefits packages offered of late are helping sway more towards military service in spite of their distaste for the mistakes made in this war.
I can agree that illustration was not the author's intention but for someone not reading it with polarized lenses that is the point that comes through. I like Jim Baker's level headed approach of not cutting and running but making some policy changes that will lead to weening the Iraqis off of our military support. While that policy differs from the President, it is neither cutting and running which we all agree is an instant failure, nor is it staying the course which to date has been a dismal failure.
read it again
December 13, 2006 - 12:19 ET by FowlerK9I propose you either didn't read Baker's 90+ page report or do don't understand it. There is NOTHING in that report that differs from the current policy in effect in Iraq. Show me something different. And when your done re-reading it (reading it) stop making excuses for the AP.
"NOTHING?"1. Pent
December 13, 2006 - 17:31 ET by j. frank wilson"NOTHING?"
1. Pentagon has been under reporting the violence in Iraq - "The standard for recording attacks acts as a filter to keep events out of reports and databases." Additionally, of course, this makes it pretty tough to blame the Liberal Media for all our woes in Iraq and Afganistan - if only they would just report all that good news. Turns out the media aren't even reporting all the bad news...
2. "...the US Government still does not understand very well either the insurgency in Iraq or the role of the militias." See, say, "The Art of War." Understanding one's enemy is generally considered a threshhold requirement for military success. Not that Iraq has a military solution, of course...
3. Need for more troops in Afganistan. If only we had finished the job in Afganistan with a true international team before trying to doo whatever it is we're trying to do in Iraq. Anyone who has bothered to read even a bit of Afgan military history knows it is a remarkably easy country to invade - and a remarkably difficult country to conquor.
4. Astonishing lack of Arabic speakers - 6 fluent Arabic speakers out of the 1,000 employees in the US embassy in Iraq? Huh? I could find a dozen cab drivers in Fremont, CA, who can speak Arabic. And many of the other languages of Iraq and Afganistan. The Special Forces were sent to Afganistan to work with the local warriors without any means of communicating with them - not even phrase books, let alone fluent speakers of the native tounges.
5. US Defense spending out of control and with no real Congressional supervision. Have you read "Mr. Smith is Dead?" Do you have a clue as to the breathtaking waste the Republicans have packed into the Defense Spending Bills since September 2001?
6. U.S. considering extending the National Guard and Army Reserves deployments. Again. "The Army is now considering breaking its compact with the National Guard and Reserves that limits the number of years that these citizen-soldiers can be deployed."
You need more?
Thanks to Media Matters "What the Media aren't telling you about the Iraq Study Group Report."
great post. It's clear as d
December 13, 2006 - 17:33 ET bygreat post. It's clear as day.
Israel Surrender Group report
December 14, 2006 - 03:43 ET by UnsaneIf it is so clear as day, maybe you, and frank, can explain to me, in detail, why Israel needs to withdraw from the Golan or permit the Palestinians the "right of return" in order for there to be peace in Baghdad.
These ARE recommendations found in the Israel Surrender Group report...
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy." -Sir Winston Churchill, British statesman (1874-1965)
Not so fast McCl.
December 13, 2006 - 13:47 ET by exLibI think that's a pretty weak argument.
1 - It appears that the Armed Services reaaching recruiting goals is AT ODDS with the "polls" stating dissatisfaction with the war in Iraq.
People don't enlist to fight an unpopular war IMHO. They enlist to fight in a war THAT MUST BE WON AT ALL COSTS.
2 - You support the troops in many ways, enlisting isn't 'supporting' the troops it's BEING one of the troops. Quite a different stance.
3 - Most people I know of enlist to fight for their country, not for benefit packages. The Armed Services don't tend to pay well, especially at first.
4 - I found it quite enlightening to read the above and see what a postive story could look like in regards to Iraq. I imagine if more positive stories were written regarding Iraq the public's outlook would be different.
The best illustration of that is to compare economic statistics between now and during the 90's. The MSM mostly spun all the economic news positive in the 90's and left people with a positive "feeling". Those people who had bad experiences with jobs or whatever were left feeling that even though they had bad experiences everyone else was doing OK. Today the opposite is true. Most people have jobs and are doing OK, but the drumbeat on TV leads them to believe the guy next door is doing poorly.
Same with Iraq. The stories are 90% negative, daily and constant.
Most people are just frustrated that when GW Bush said the war would take a long time to bring peace and stability to Iraq he meant a couple weeks. People today are into Instant Gratification and the MSM plays right into that..
...these polls are rigged to
December 13, 2006 - 14:24 ET by TruthMonger...these polls are rigged to begin with, but in addition the responses are based on complete MSM lies - how else can most people hear about Iraq other than the MSM? The MSM is MISLEADING US CITIZENS ON ALL MAJOR ISSUES THAT WE FACE...it's all documented here right down to the actual number of stories...
One day the MSM will go on trial for this...they will be made to pay for these crimes against humanity...
Most people are just frustrat
December 13, 2006 - 19:33 ET by Chicago RepublicanMost people are just frustrated that when GW Bush said the war would take a long time to bring peace and stability to Iraq he meant a couple weeks. People today are into Instant Gratification and the MSM plays right into that.
- - amen, ExLib. Its called the "microwave mentality." The jihadists don't have it; detached, pampered Americans do.
More on the Israel Surrender Group
December 13, 2006 - 16:20 ET by UnsaneIn addition to FowlerK9's critique and request, I would like to see your explanation on how Israel can be blamed for what is going on in Iraq. After all, the Israel Surrender Group (ISG) DID recommend Israel cough up the Golan and Israel permit the "right of return". Sorry, but I cannot understand how a country the size of New Jersey with seven million people can be the cause of all of the ills of a nation that isn't even adjacent to it.
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy." -Sir Winston Churchill, British statesman (1874-1965)
Middle East group on CSPAN
December 13, 2006 - 16:29 ET by dagdaWas watching a Middle East think tank discuss the Iraq Surrender Group's report and they were commenting on the lack of nexus between Palestine, Israel and Iraq. They thought it was a non-starter. They also did not see a way to get them to the table since both Hamas and Olmert are weak politically.
Our real problem, then, is not our strength today; it is rather the vital necessity of action today to ensure our strength tomorrow. Dwight Eisenhower
The MSM has done its dead lev
December 13, 2006 - 11:56 ET by bassndudeThe MSM has done its dead level best to report only bad news from Iraq. Even when the war was going great, they reported it seemed unfair, when the sons were killed, the press almost shed tears while reporting the event. They have gone out of their way to report car bombs and shootings, beheadings and death. Never do you see the side of the soldiers while they are winning, delivering school supplies, medical help and the fact that there is more electric, water and other services now than pre-war. Yes, it is they that are responsible for the view of the war. And that aint fair either. Bunch of panty waisted cowards.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
"...the fact that there
December 13, 2006 - 17:34 ET by j. frank wilson"...the fact that there is more electric, water and other services now than pre-war?" Where?
Not more oil, either.
Free at last
December 13, 2006 - 19:46 ET by acumenHard to find something when you can't be bothered to look. Do your few remaining brain cells a favor and air out that claustrophobic closed mind.
A public service announcement from the FREE people of Iraq.
Not more oil? Blame Saddam
December 14, 2006 - 03:47 ET by UnsaneNot more oil? Blame Saddam for that one. The technology Iraq uses to pump/drill for oil dates to around 1980 - one year after his rise to power. As it stands, massive FDI will be needed to upgrade the oil fields.
And as much as it pains you, Iraq is already getting FDI, especially in its northern reaches. How much of that goes to oil production I cannot say.
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy." -Sir Winston Churchill, British statesman (1874-1965)
Pure genius, Terry! I bet t
December 13, 2006 - 12:11 ET by mattmPure genius, Terry! I bet this could be done to almost every MSM story. Great illustration of how they weave their bias into a story.
Terry, Thanks! This is quit
December 13, 2006 - 14:23 ET by rimskyTerry, Thanks! This is quite revealing. At least there is a good story within. Normally the MSM is terribly biased. Most of their stories from Iraq are very slanted, showing only the IED's, only the incidents where there are civilians killed (usually by the terrorists) and never anything about progress, like school openings, infrastructure repairs, businesses opening and so on. It's no wonder the general public is frustrated and distrusting of Bush and his Iraq policy. Being constantly fed with skewed, twisted, and sometimes made up stories is going to have a devastating affect. Great Work Terry! Thanks, again. NB Rocks!