For creating a story out of nothing and then finger pointing at US society and saying how evil it is, this Dec. 12th CNN story takes the cake. In "Poll: Most Americans see lingering racism -- in others", not only is a somewhat leading poll cited as evidence that America is still rife with racism, but CNN uses comments emailed to them by their viewers as some sort of follow up proof for it!
Very scientific, I know. After all, CNN used science via the Internet and phone lines to conduct this farcical poll, I suppose.
(CNN) -- Most Americans, white and black, see racism as a lingering problem in the United States, and many say they know people who are racist, according to a new poll.
But few Americans of either race -- about one out of eight -- consider themselves racist.
And experts say racism has evolved from the days of Jim Crow to the point that people may not even recognize it in themselves.
How convenient that those "experts" can see racism where no one else can. So, racism is everywhere, but we can't see it, don't understand it as racism, nor do we see any examples of it, but only "feel" it in others. The perfect "proof" to shore up Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton for decades to come.
The "experts" that CNN dredged up really went to town on this "poll", too.
University of Connecticut professor Jack Dovidio, who has researched racism for more than 30 years, estimates up to 80 percent of white Americans have racist feelings they may not even recognize.
"We've reached a point that racism is like a virus that has mutated into a new form that we don't recognize," Dovidio said.
He added that 21st-century racism is different from that of the past.
"Contemporary racism is not conscious, and it is not accompanied by dislike, so it gets expressed in indirect, subtle ways," he said.
That "stealth" discrimination reveals itself in many different situations.
Curiously enough, "researchers" once thought that gold could be created from lead via alchemy, too! These "racism" experts are little different than the sooth-sayers and shamans who pranced around countless primitive campfires with their rattles shaking as they talk in tongues. All "saw" things no one else could and found gullible benefactors to pay them for their visions. The "social sciences" are barely better than cave paintings.
But, more amusing than these supposed experts telling us how we are all secret racists -- so secret we don't even realize it ourselves -- is the interesting reliance on viewer's emails that CNN used to add further "proof" to their shaman's tale.
"Racism here is quite subtle," e-mailed CNN.com reader Blair William, originally from Trinidad, who now lives in Lexington, South Carolina.
The scintillating expertise is overwhelming there.
"I am a firm believer that racism is rampant in the United States," wrote another CNN.com reader, Mark Boyle, of Muncie, Indiana.
Mr. Boyle of Muncie, Indiana is no doubt a learned and well-known observer of American society.
And, not to be outdone by the common folk, CNN pulled in the trenchant commentary from New York Times writer Calvn Sims who, we are told, "recently wrote about his experiences in the city".
"If a cab passes you by, obviously it is frustrating, it's degrading and it's just really confusing, because this is akin to being in the South and being refused service at a lunch counter, which is what happened in the '60s and '70s," he said.
I hope not too many Americans fall for this tripe as serious commentary or scientific study of American society. I also hope that this kind of negative nonsense doesn't turn too many away from the fact that ours is one of the most inclusive societies in the world and that people of every nationality and race can find more opportunity here in the USA than in any other nation.
... and I can find a LOT of emailers to back THAT up!




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Considering various Fox New
December 13, 2006 - 10:38 ET by sarcasmoConsidering various Fox News guests over the past few months, IMO it's a wonder more people don't see even more racism (in others, as usual, of course).
JMR
Racists
December 13, 2006 - 10:39 ET by iveseenitallAccording to the libs, racism and sexism are rampant in America. Communism and socialism exist only in the minds of the conservatives.. Liberals are jerks.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
I thought this poll was about
December 13, 2006 - 11:13 ET by Al CzervikI thought this poll was about Americans being racists. What do NYC cab drivers have to do with Americans?
"Contemporary racism is
December 13, 2006 - 11:26 ET by sphigel"Contemporary racism is not conscious, and it is not accompanied by dislike, so it gets expressed in indirect, subtle ways," he said."
Gee, I wonder if this could have anything to do with the modern day civil rights movement which is in itself inherently racist. It seems to me that race relations are bad specifically due to the liberal policies intended to improve them. Almost no one believes there is any difference between the potential of blacks and whites but when you have govt policies telling you otherwise what are you to do. The "indirect, subtle" racism they mention is due to affirmative action and like policies. It has nothing to do with skin color it has to do with another group not being held to the same standard as you for purely superficial reasons.
Sphigel
December 13, 2006 - 11:42 ET by iveseenitallGreat point, Sphigel. According to lib ideology, only whites can be racists and only men can be sexists. It's how they justify affirmative action. Illogical---sure. But liberals are poster children for illogic and ignorance.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
All Liberals are anti-America
December 13, 2006 - 11:52 ET by mattmAll Liberals are anti-American.
Really, you'd think racism is an American phenomenon. Well, I hate to break it to any of you lib trolls that might be slithering around this site: racism, or any kind of bigotry, is a human problem. In fact, the U.S.A. is probably the least racist of the "white" countries in the world.
Mexicans use the words "gringo" and "wetto"(sp?) freely. French-Canadians hate English Canadians and vice-versa and they all think Blacks are great, especially since there are so few of them in Canada. Europeans have hated each other for centuries. African Hutus hate African Tsutsis. Chinese hate Tibetans. Muslims hate everyone - even other Muslims.
This is a human flaw, not an American one. But don't tell Liberal intellectual elites this - they think everyone else is an idiot.
I think your comments prove
December 13, 2006 - 12:03 ET by kafkakaeferI think your comments prove the study to be right. What a nonsense you wrote there!
"Hegel says somewhere all great events and personalities in world history reappear in one fashion or another. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce."
The Eighteeenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (1852) sect. 1, Cf.
kafka, I'm missing what you
December 13, 2006 - 12:13 ET by hydrodynDMkafka,
I'm missing what you are apparently seeing as racist in this post. Could you explain?
And by the way, a single person's opinion - however you want to interpret it - doesn't "prove" anything in a statistical study.
"And by the way, a singl
December 13, 2006 - 12:21 ET by kafkakaefer"And by the way, a single person's opinion - however you want to interpret it - doesn't "prove" anything in a statistical study."
No of course not. But I catched your attention.
"Hegel says somewhere all great events and personalities in world history reappear in one fashion or another. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce."
The Eighteeenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (1852) sect. 1, Cf.
Care to expand on that vacuou
December 13, 2006 - 12:15 ET by mattmCare to expand on that vacuous accusation? Or can't you put more than one idiotic thought together at a time?
Disagree if you will, but give some logical form of reasoning to back up your childish cut.
Think about your prejudices
December 13, 2006 - 12:25 ET by kafkakaeferThink about your prejudices towards other people. That is often (perhaps not in your case, but you sound very much like it) disguised racism.
"Hegel says somewhere all great events and personalities in world history reappear in one fashion or another. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce."
The Eighteeenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (1852) sect. 1, Cf.
I just said it was a human pr
December 13, 2006 - 12:29 ET by mattmI just said it was a human problem, not an American one. Thereby, since I am a human, I am admitting my own prejudiced tendencies as a human.
The only way you could have possibly missed that is due to your own prejudice against the conservative types, like me, who frequent this site.
Ironic, ain't it?
Irony looks different! &
December 13, 2006 - 12:37 ET by kafkakaeferIrony looks different!
"Hegel says somewhere all great events and personalities in world history reappear in one fashion or another. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce."
The Eighteeenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (1852) sect. 1, Cf.
What's ironic is that you acc
December 13, 2006 - 13:28 ET by mattmWhat's ironic is that you accuse me of prejudice while demonstrating your own prejudices, even though, as I just explained, I never denied that prejudice is a basic human flaw.* But, instead of rebutting my statement or clarifying your argument, you veer off on to the topic of irony by linking to some irrelevant Leftist talking head. That's doubly ironic, and quite revealing.
*My original argument was against the bigoted idea that racism is a uniquely American phenomenon. The examples of racism and bigotry I listed in my original post demonstrate that it's a HUMAN problem, NOT and American one. If you can't get that simple point, then there's little hope for you.
The point is: by looking at y
December 13, 2006 - 18:40 ET by kafkakaeferThe point is: by looking at yourself realizing you have prejudices to conclude that this is a basic human flaw is erroneous and egocentric. Or to put it in a different manner: Please grow up.
"Hegel says somewhere all great events and personalities in world history reappear in one fashion or another. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce."
The Eighteeenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (1852) sect. 1, Cf.
Basic human flaw
December 13, 2006 - 18:48 ET by dagdaHe is absolutely correct. How many aboriginal people call themselves "The People", "The One", etc. How racist are the Chinese and Japanese for instance? How racist were the British against first the Irish and then everyone who was not white? How racist were the Russians against their Slavic neighbors or the Mongols? How racists are Mexicans against the Aztecs?
This is a world wide problem, not just an American problem. To show how bad it is, they only showed racism from the black side. How many blacks are racist? How many times have they practiced racism against whites?
Our real problem, then, is not our strength today; it is rather the vital necessity of action today to ensure our strength tomorrow. Dwight Eisenhower
I didn't say I looked at myse
December 14, 2006 - 03:41 ET by mattmI didn't say I looked at myself to conclude that humans are prejudiced, it's the other way around, and I backed it up with world-wide examples. If you had a clue you'd realize this.
Or to put it another way: You, sir, are a Moron!
kafka, Maybe you need to de
December 13, 2006 - 12:30 ET by hydrodynDMkafka,
Maybe you need to define what "racism" is. Something which the article, oddly enought, never bothers to do.
While blantent racism is a
December 13, 2006 - 12:15 ET by MightyMouthWhile blatent racism is a bad thing, ethnocentrism seems to be perfectly natural. Wouldn't you agree?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Natural doesn't mean agreea
December 13, 2006 - 12:20 ET by kafkakaeferNatural doesn't mean agreeable and or moral. So I disagree, if you mean it is a good thing.
"Hegel says somewhere all great events and personalities in world history reappear in one fashion or another. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce."
The Eighteeenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (1852) sect. 1, Cf.
But as a liberal don't you
December 13, 2006 - 12:24 ET by MightyMouthBut as a liberal don't you believe there are no moral absolutes and society sets morality? You seem to contradict yourself.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
What are you talking about?
December 13, 2006 - 12:27 ET by kafkakaeferWhat are you talking about? Where did you get that opinion from, that "liberals" don't have any moral absolutes? What a crap is that? Yes I have many moral absolutes. More than you I guess.
"Hegel says somewhere all great events and personalities in world history reappear in one fashion or another. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce."
The Eighteeenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (1852) sect. 1, Cf.
Ooooo! I have more morals tha
December 13, 2006 - 12:29 ET by Roger the ShrubberOoooo! I have more morals than you!!!
Mine is longer than yours!
December 13, 2006 - 12:32 ET by kafkakaeferMine is longer than yours! Definitely the longest morality in the world. Bigus Digus greets you.
"Hegel says somewhere all great events and personalities in world history reappear in one fashion or another. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce."
The Eighteeenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (1852) sect. 1, Cf.
Comrad: A: it's Biggus DICKU
December 14, 2006 - 12:52 ET by Roger the ShrubberComrad:
A: it's Biggus DICKUS, and
B: your Kant is full of sh*t, you racist loser. You spout philosophy 101, and it only took me 5 minutes of Googling to prove you to be a quite the retard.
Have a nice day, elitist snob.
"More than you I guess
December 13, 2006 - 12:31 ET by MightyMouth"More than you I guess"
Name one.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
In exchange: How does your
December 13, 2006 - 12:41 ET by kafkakaeferIn exchange: How does your moral look like?
"Hegel says somewhere all great events and personalities in world history reappear in one fashion or another. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce."
The Eighteeenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (1852) sect. 1, Cf.
I didn't think you could na
December 13, 2006 - 12:48 ET by MightyMouthI didn't think you could name a moral absolute you posses, including it's source.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
I will give you the biggest o
December 13, 2006 - 12:56 ET by kafkakaeferI will give you the biggest one. How about Kants Categorical Imperative?
"Hegel says somewhere all great events and personalities in world history reappear in one fashion or another. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce."
The Eighteeenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (1852) sect. 1, Cf.
How would Kant apply the imp
December 13, 2006 - 13:08 ET by NathanHow would Kant apply the imperative to gay marriage? Or a law authorizing the murder of anyone over 60 to conserve resources? Or America's entry into WWII?
???????"Hegel says somew
December 13, 2006 - 13:10 ET by kafkakaefer???????
"Hegel says somewhere all great events and personalities in world history reappear in one fashion or another. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce."
The Eighteeenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (1852) sect. 1, Cf.
I was just trying to think of
December 13, 2006 - 13:25 ET by NathanI was just trying to think of some examples in which application of the categorical imperative would produce outcomes that would be considered generally undesirable or at least undesirable from a liberal perspective. If gay marriage, for example, were universalized, there would be no procreation and its legal sanctioning would therefore result in a logical contradiction. Similarly, a law authorizing forced euthanasia at a certain age would seem permissible under the categorical imperative yet reprehensible under our current system of mores.
kafka, Word of advice - mak
December 13, 2006 - 13:15 ET by hydrodynDMkafka,
Word of advice - making references to topics from a philosophy class you plan to, are or have taken in college isn't going to impress anyone here. Especially when you back it up with a wikipedia link.
And especially when you don't bother to explain how the concepts in the link apply to what is being discussed.
Another word of advice: Lea
December 13, 2006 - 13:34 ET by mattmAnother word of advice: Learn what a non-sequitur is, and stop using them.
I think Kaka is a perfect e
December 13, 2006 - 22:19 ET by Warner Todd HustonI think Kaka is a perfect example of a young person who read a bit of a philosopher and suddenly thinks he "understands" everything. But, all he REALLY has are a few disjointed axioms, prosaic biasis approved by his professor, and buzz words with connections to some web pages others wrote.
It is proof of what the ancient Greeks said: no one under 50 should study philosophy because they just won't be able to understand it all.
Just pat him on the head and send him along his way like a good 'lil fella. He may learn about something someday, but today the kid just "don't get it"!
Please refrain yourself from
December 14, 2006 - 07:35 ET by kafkakaeferPlease refrain yourself from parental advice. Instead you could read the CNN article again and try to understand what is written there. Meaning don't project what you think is written there into what was written. All you really seem to have is a biased point of view, which you think entitles you to write nonsense.
"Hegel says somewhere all great events and personalities in world history reappear in one fashion or another. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce."
The Eighteeenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (1852) sect. 1, Cf.
Please allow me to give you
December 14, 2006 - 13:26 ET by MightyMouthPlease allow me to give you a quick tutorial about moral absolutes.
They come to you from roughly three sources: God, your parents and the society in which you live. They also have a higherarchy. i.e: If society tells you something is right and your parents say it is wrong, rule of thumb, believe your parents. Also if your parents say something is right and God says it is wrong, rule of thumb, believe God. Basically judge everything against what God says. If you need to know what God says, I can recommend a very good book on the subject.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Typical Liberal, if Kakafur w
December 13, 2006 - 18:35 ET by Ten7sTypical Liberal, if Kakafur wants to use Kant as his guide on race, he might at least consider what Kant actually says about the subject. And he might start with Kant's essay "On the Different Races of Man". If he bothered to read that essay, he would find that Kant considered the races to be arranged in a hierarchy of superior to inferior, with Caucasians at the pinnacle and Negroes at the base. Using Kant to argue against racism is like using von Clausewitz to argue against a surprise attack. Liberals we're laughing at you, not with you.
Please! look at the context
December 13, 2006 - 18:51 ET by kafkakaeferPlease! look at the context of me mentioning Kant. Please, try that, will you?
"Hegel says somewhere all great events and personalities in world history reappear in one fashion or another. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce."
The Eighteeenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (1852) sect. 1, Cf.
Oh, I see your "context&
December 13, 2006 - 19:42 ET by Ten7sOh, I see your "context" perfectly. You're flailing, throwing around subjects you know nothing about, hoping to get lucky and make a good point. And its not working.
"Humanity exists in its
December 14, 2006 - 12:47 ET by Roger the Shrubber"Humanity exists in its greatest perfection in the white race. The yellow Indians have a smaller amount of talent. The Negroes are lower, and the lowest are a part of the American peoples." (Kant, Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View)
Ouch.
Oh your quick-wittedness im
December 13, 2006 - 18:47 ET by kafkakaeferOh your quick-wittedness impresses me. If you on the other hand think that you can impress me in writing, quite frankly, nonsense...
"Hegel says somewhere all great events and personalities in world history reappear in one fashion or another. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce."
The Eighteeenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (1852) sect. 1, Cf.
Kafka, Sarcasm is a pretty
December 14, 2006 - 00:10 ET by hydrodynDMKafka,
Sarcasm is a pretty weak form of response. It seems you're the one who needs to work on their ability to argue a point.
Oh, and maybe you'll find this out at some point in the future, but a lot of people get past that whole "I'm in my teens or early twenties and I spend half my time trying to impress people with who I am" phase of life.
Don't project your need to convince yourself of how smart you are onto others.
Who cares about impressing yo
December 14, 2006 - 03:46 ET by mattmWho cares about impressing you? And you called me egocentric? Get over yourself you mindless little puke!
Well, when it comes to talk
December 14, 2006 - 05:54 ET by Jack BauerWell, when it comes to talking cant, you're the expert.
Proud member of the all-powerful and vast
militarist/industrialist/capitalist/zionist-bagelist complex
Jaqueline: I love you. &qu
December 14, 2006 - 07:37 ET by kafkakaeferJaqueline: I love you.
"Hegel says somewhere all great events and personalities in world history reappear in one fashion or another. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce."
The Eighteeenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (1852) sect. 1, Cf.
Sure you do. And you're a l
December 14, 2006 - 08:35 ET by Jack BauerSure you do.
And you're a lumberjack and you're "okay."
Proud member of the all-powerful and vast
militarist/industrialist/capitalist/zionist-bagelist complex
"You've got the brain of
December 14, 2006 - 11:31 ET by mattm"You've got the brain of a 4 year old child and I bet he was glad to get rid of it" - Grouch Marx
Incoherence isn't a strengt
December 13, 2006 - 12:48 ET by hydrodynDMIncoherence isn't a strength when it comes to arguments, kafka.
I was thinking the same thing
December 13, 2006 - 12:28 ET by Roger the ShrubberI was thinking the same thing, MM. It is amusing to see a flaming lib use "morality" as a defense.
The next thing you know rog
December 13, 2006 - 12:34 ET by MightyMouthThe next thing you know rog, the liberals will claim they are going to save our bacon in Iraq. Or some other such nonsense. :-)
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Racist
December 13, 2006 - 12:17 ET by BookswintersI think the article did a good job distinguishing the results of the poll from the various commentators. I think the article could have spent more time discussing the fine points of the polls questions and sample methods.
I am generally favor of articles like this one because (in my view) it promotes an introspective take on race relations. I should note that I have a loose pro-affirmative action bias myself, so that probably affected my reading of the article.
I like affirmative action because I do not think race quotas should be legal in the workplace. (I have heard arguements that race quotas should be legal on the grounds that if a business owner is a racist person, he should not be forced to work with people he hates to run a business. These do not convince me because it is reasonably difficult for a small business owner to get convicted in an affirmative action civil lawsuit.) I do not agree with affirmative action policies regarding academic admissions.
Wow... "I like affi
December 13, 2006 - 22:24 ET by Warner Todd HustonWow...
"I like affirmative action because I do not think race quotas should be legal in the workplace."
Dude, affirmative action IS race quotas in the workplace!!!
I believe it was Lesley Stahl
December 13, 2006 - 12:25 ET by Roger the ShrubberI believe it was Lesley Stahl who, last night, brought on to discuss this important story, two of the biggest racists in America, Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson.
Apparently David Duke, being in Iran, was unavailable.
Without a definition of wha
December 13, 2006 - 12:38 ET by hydrodynDMWithout a definition of what racism is, this study is pretty much useless.
Granted, coming up with a definition is difficult. But when you consider that there are people out there who would accuse you of being racist for pointing out black people, on average, tend to have darker skin that white people, some attempt has to be made at codifying the concept.
Leaving it up to individuals to decide what constitutes racism makes this more a study of what people view as racism than a study of racism itself.
"If a cab passes you by,
December 13, 2006 - 13:25 ET by Gothampc"If a cab passes you by, obviously it is frustrating, it's degrading and it's just really confusing, because this is akin to being in the South and being refused service at a lunch counter, which is what happened in the '60s and '70s," he said."
Why when the talk turns to racism does it always have to use the cab example? And why does it always imply white vs. black? The majority of cab drivers that I've seen in NYC are non-white, so if there is racism, IMO it's not from whites.
I think it's more about economic discrimination. A driver has to make the most that he/she can off a fare. If a person holding a suitcase is hailing a cab, the driver will automatically go to that person no matter what the color, with the hope that that person will be going to the airport (a bigger fare in NYC than just going a few blocks).
If there is racism in the cab industry, why don't black people put in a few drivers that do nothing but pick up black people?
As a rule, I normally refrain
December 13, 2006 - 13:49 ET by Dave RAs a rule, I normally refrain from cutting and pasting here at NB, but there is little, if anything, that I could say that would stray from this as a response to this idiotic poll.
As posted by Neal Boortz:
NEW RACISM POLL OUT
A new poll says racism lingers in the United States. According to a poll conducted for CNN, only about 1 in 8 Americans admit to being a racist. And we all know that according to the media, being a racist is worse than killing someone. The truth is the race pimps of the world don't ever want racism to go away. And neither does the mainstream media.
Why? Because it would be bad for business. As long as there remains racism in our society, those that profit from it will be without a job. The racism industry is quite the thriving enterprise for people like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. What would The Sloganmaster do with his free time if there wasn't any racism?
There are always going to be people who don't like other people, which by the way isn't racism. Instead of obsessing about it and constantly worrying about how to fix the problem, we should just ignore it. There are only racial problems in this country because certain people keep bringing it up over and over again.
And only 1 in 8? It's obviously much higher than that. What an evil place we live in. Jesse is going to need donations now from the other 7.
By the way .. the people who designed the poll don't have a clue about the true definition of racism.
An honest discussion of race is impossible in today's world.
December 13, 2006 - 14:13 ET by acaiguanaAn honest discussion of race is impossible in today's world.
The cab driver doesn't want to take a fare to a slum gang infested area of the city and be robbed, killed by a stray bullet or mugged because he is not of the 'hood. Now that's good racism for him and bad racism for the fare. Is this racism at all? The question would beg some study. If you go to San Francisco and try to tell a cab driver (even if you are white, Chinese or Arab) that you want to go to the slums, four of five will offer you the curb to look for another cab. That's racism?
So, like all other Liberal examples, it is shallow and out of context.
I never think of race unless I'm being browbeaten over the head by the likes of Al Sharpton who wouldn't know racism if it bit him and I think it has already done that.
Take the money out of milking White Guilt in America and you find very little group think racism. There are pockets such as in the White Supremacy gangs or the Black Panthers and many others, but taken as a whole these folks do not represent the many in America who simply try to lead their lives treating others as they would appreciate being treated.
On the other hand, I lived through the Civil Rights struggle era when these 'kings' of racism opportunism were created and I don't remember hearing nearly as much about race at that time for such an extended period as I hear today.
So, we must not be making progress.
Oh, yeah. How can we make progress when the goal posts are being moved on a daily basis. Now, being against Gay Marriage is akin to being against the Civil Rights Act of 1965. Now, being an Evangelical Christian is equilivant to being a White Redneck Racist.
The Left is very good at equlivance. They equate Republican inaction on Foley to condoning predatory sex maniacs. They equate Emmanual's gamemanship with 'good' politics. They equate morality with rigidity of thought and they equate Republicans with Nazi's when Bill Clinton (or was it Hillary) was getting off on bugging some royal phone in England and France.
My gosh, what is power if you can't use it to eavesdrop on the hot stuff in the world and then look smugly around at everyone else as if they were just plebes on the lawn.
I don't see many statues of black men with cane poles in yards anymore.
The real issue today is the anti-Jewish sentiment of the Liberal Elite, not the subtle but unrecognized racism of all those Americans out there.
ACA
...
Acaiguana says: "Ya can't win if ya don't play."
CNN.....You are a collective
December 13, 2006 - 14:23 ET by Clear thinkerCNN.....
You are a collective bunch of morons!