What’s the best way to cover the story that the incoming Democratic House Intelligence Chairman flunked a reporter’s current events quiz? Well, if you’re the producers of CNN’s "American Morning," you devote five minutes to the subject and spend half the time discussing examples of Republicans flubbing such quizzes. Reporter Bob Franken filed two reports for the Tuesday edition of "American Morning" and seemed downright embarrassed to be reporting the fact that Texas Congressman Silvestre Reyes incorrectly responded to a correspondent’s question of who, Shiite or Sunni, primarily comprise al-Qaeda. (Reyes believed the answer to be Shiites.) Franken alternately asserted that the House member must now be aware of "snarky reporters," "treacherous reporters" and claimed that Reyes had been given a "rude welcome." Perhaps to make up for even mentioning the subject, the CNN reporter spent two and a half minutes, out of a combined five total, discussing Republican goofs. At 7:15am, co-host Soledad O’Brien introduced Franken, and set the "we-don’t-want-to-cover-this" tone:
Soledad O’Brien: "In Washington, D.C., Democrats are getting a little taste of what it's like to be in charge on Capitol Hill. Along with the perks of power comes the gotcha moments. The incoming House Intelligence Chairman is the current victim as he flunks an important test. ‘American Morning’s Bob Franken live in Washington for us this morning with details. Good morning."
Story Continues Below Ad ↓Bob Franken: "Well, now we're finding out why some people say that politics is a contact sport. I guess that would include, Soledad, contact with reporters. The incoming House Intelligence Chairman Silvestre Reyes, has just been given a rude welcome, a pop quiz from a 'Congressional Quarterly' reporter. 'Al Qaeda is what,' he was asked, 'Sunni or Shia?' His answer, 'predominantly, probably Shiite.' Al Qaeda is largely Sunni. Nor could he describe Hezbollah, long dominant on the U.S. list of terrorist organization."
Jeff Stein (Congressional Quarterly reporter): "How is the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee going to ask intelligence– intelligent questions of the CIA and the Pentagon spy agencies, if he doesn't know what to ask?"
Having described the incident in as brief a manner as possible, Franken spent the rest of the piece discussing other occasions where this sort of thing has happened. Unsurprisingly, the examples included only Republicans:
Franken: "In 1999, then presidential candidate George W. Bush flubbed a similar impromptu quiz about world leaders."
(video clip)
George W. Bush: "The new Pakistani general, he's just been elected -- not been elected, this guy took over office, he appears he's going to bringing stability to the country. And I think that's good news for the sub-continent."
Reporter: "Can you name him?"
Bush: "General -- I can name the general."
Reporter: "And it's--"
Bush: "General."
(end video clip)
Franken: "He still became president."
And for the media, what could be more fun than showing President Bush fumbling for an answer? Why, highlighting outgoing Senator George Allen, of course:
Franken: "And it is not only reporters who lay in ambush."
(Video clip)
Senator-elect Jim Webb, (D-VA): "We have a situation in the Senkaku Islands which can blow up into an incident. I wonder what you think about that, George?"
Senator George Allen (R-VA): "I would have to study the issue more fully to give you a complete answer."
(end video clip)
Franken: "Of course, we all know the islands are claimed by both Japan and China, right?"
The above example is from the 2006 Virginia Senate race. Jim Webb, the Democratic candidate used the October 9 debate to stump his Republican opponent, George Allen. What CNN doesn’t mention, however, is that this line of questioning was political payback from Webb. Two months earlier, Allen caught the Democrat unaware during a debate. Apparently that sort of example wouldn’t fit the cable network’s template.
Franken continued, pushing back even further in time:
Franken: "This gotcha game is nothing new. Sometimes a candidate even gets himself."
(Video clip from 1976 presidential debate)
Gerald Ford "There is no Soviet domination of Eastern Europe, and there never will be under a Ford administration."
Jimmy Carter: "I would like to see Mr. Ford convince the Polish-Americans and the Czech-Americans and the Hungarian-Americans in this country that those countries don't live under the domination and supervision of the Soviet Union behind the Iron Curtain."
Ford’s comments, admittedly, sound embarrassing, but is it really necessary to reach back 30 years for such examples? Franken closed the report by reiterating what a nuisance reporters can be:
Franken: "Well, that was then. This is now. Incoming Chairman Reyes has put out a statement, saying, quote, he is 'acutely aware of the fact that al-Qaeda wants to do harm to Americans.' And might I add, Soledad, now acutely aware of snarky reporters."
O’Brien: "Yes, I think he is. Welcome to running Congress, sir."
In a previous segment, airing at 6:07am, Franken ended the segment with even tougher language:
Franken: "Of course, President Ford had already had his learning curve and apparently, Miles, Chairman Reyes is still having his. He's got some cramming to do. He did put out a statement saying that he is ‘acutely aware of al-Qaeda's desire to harm Americans.’ Miles."
Miles O’Brien: "And acutely aware of Sunni from Shiite now, I'm sure."
Franken: "And acutely aware of treacherous reporters."
O’Brien: "Yes, indeed. And won't be talking to him any more, I'm sure."
It’s odd, when reporters are covering Republican gaffes, they don’t seem quite so embarrassed about doing their jobs.
A transcript of the 7:15 segment and a partial transcript of the 6:07 transcript follow:
Soledad O’Brien: "In Washington, D.C., Democrats are getting a little taste of what it's like to be in charge on Capitol Hill. Along with the perks of power comes the gotcha moments. The incoming House Intelligence Chairman is the current victim as he flunks an important test. ‘American Morning’s Bob Franken live in Washington for us this morning with details. Good morning."
Bob Franken: "Well, now we're finding out why some people say that politics is a contact sport. I guess that would include, Soledad, contact with reporters. The incoming House Intelligence Chairman Silvestre Reyes, has just been given a rude welcome, a pop quiz from a 'Congressional Quarterly' reporter. 'Al Qaeda is what,' he was asked, 'Sunni or Shia?' His answer, 'predominantly probably, Shiite.' Al Qaeda is largely Sunni. Nor could he describe Hezbollah, long dominant on the U.S. list of terrorists organization."
Jeff Stein: "How is the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee going to ask intelligence– intelligent questions of the CIA and the Pentagon spy agencies, if he doesn't know what to ask?"
Franken: "In 1999, then presidential candidate George W. Bush flubbed a similar impromptu quiz about world leaders.
George W. Bush: "The new Pakistani general, he's just been elected -- not been elected, this guy took over office, he appears he's going to bringing stability to the country. And I think that's good news for the sub-continent."
Reporter: "Can you name him?"
Bush: "General -- I can name the general."
Reporter: "And it's?"
Bush: "General."
Franken: "He still became president. And it is not only reporters who lay in ambush."
Jim Webb, (D-VA): "We have a situation in the Senkaku Islands which can blow up into an incident. I wonder what you think about that, George?"
George Allen (R-VA): "I would have to study the issue more fully to give you a complete answer."
Franken: "Of course, we all know the islands are claimed by both Japan and China, right? This gotcha game is nothing new. Sometimes a candidate even gets himself."
Gerald Ford "There is no Soviet domination of Eastern Europe, and there never will be under a Ford administration."
Jimmy Carter: "I would like to see Mr. Ford convince the Polish-Americans and the Czech-Americans and the Hungarian-Americans in this country that those countries don't live under the domination and supervision of the Soviet Union behind the Iron Curtain."
Franken: "Well, that was then. This is now. Incoming Chairman Reyes has put out a statement, saying, quote, he is 'acutely aware of the fact that Al Qaeda wants to do harm to Americans.' And might I add, Soledad, now acutely aware of snarky reporters."
O’Brien: "Yes, I think he is. Welcome to running Congress, sir."
6:07
Franken: Of course, President Ford had already had his learning curve and apparently, Miles, Chairman Reyes is still having his. He's got some cramming to do. He did put out a statement saying that he is "acutely aware of al Qaeda's desire to harm Americans. Miles.
Miles O’Brien: And acutely aware of Sunni from Shiite now, I'm sure.
Franken: "And acutely aware of treacherous reporters."
O’Brien: "Yes, indeed. And won't be talking to him any more, I'm sure."
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Nobody circles the wagons....
December 12, 2006 - 17:33 ET by Roger the ShrubberNobody circles the wagons.... like the liberal media.
It's just not working out lik
December 12, 2006 - 18:54 ET by Andrew H.It's just not working out like they thought it would (we knew)... this is only the start. Heheh.
Never relent.
Amen to that. The democratic
December 12, 2006 - 19:04 ET by bassndudeAmen to that. The democratic take over seems to no be what they thought. A definate lack of brain power. Not to mention reality challenged.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Yes sir--I only hope and pray
December 12, 2006 - 19:10 ET by Andrew H.Yes sir--I only hope and pray they are prevented from doing too much damage to our defense and judiciary. Our wallets can't stand them either. Incidently--I fish for food! I LIKE it!
Never relent.
Well, I work to fish. And I d
December 12, 2006 - 19:16 ET by bassndudeWell, I work to fish. And I do like it alot myself. Nothing like fresh bass over an open fire, with a good cold one to wash it down with....And as far as the democrats are concerned, I think one of the first things they will do is try to raise the taxes on the "rich", (me I bet), so I cant use my GMC 4X4 to pull my boat to the lake and putt around for a few days. Leave it to them to ruin a good thing.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Oh, man Bassndude--I'm now ve
December 12, 2006 - 19:21 ET by Andrew H.Oh, man Bassndude--I'm now very hungry. Nothing better than campfire cooking--and nothing better than fish in a frypan. Ohhhhhhhhh... I'll have to go soon. But geeze, I'm squireled away at home tonight with only a frozen filet. (Nice rig by the way--damn fine). :)
Never relent.
Andrew
December 12, 2006 - 19:25 ET by bassndudeWhich rig?
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Bassn--GMC 4X4 and bass boat.
December 12, 2006 - 19:28 ET by Andrew H.Bassn--GMC 4X4 and bass boat... it's a great thing.
Never relent.
Lucky for him he didn't spell
December 12, 2006 - 17:33 ET by mattmLucky for him he didn't spell potato with an "E"...
Potatoe's - Yeah, I remember
December 12, 2006 - 20:51 ET by pbanks7Potatoe's - Yeah, I remember that one. The inside, deeper "storie" was that Quayle was given CUE CARDS with the "correct spelling" on them. I wonder if it was a setup.
Ignorance is bliss. It's easier to repeat a mindless slogan than to do some actual research.
Why did he need cue cards???
December 12, 2006 - 21:05 ET by balboaWhy did he need cue cards???
Bal, that was beyond asinine,
December 13, 2006 - 05:00 ET by PeskyDaneBal, that was beyond asinine, even for you. As part of a routine photo op, V.P. Quayle was asked if he wanted to test the national/regional spelling bee champion. He was handed a set of pre-printed of 3 x 5 index cards. This was still in the days when most decent people were naive enough to believe that the left would not take EVERY opportunity to take a sucker punch.
Even so - the premise of this one was incorrect. Up until the 1960's "potatoe" was still the correct spelling. This would be an easy mistake to make, but even something this innocuous was fodder for the drive-by media. Looking back, I still marvel at just how down right nasty things got with Dan Quayle. You and your entire ilk should be ashamed, but I realize that in the area of empty blackness you call a heart, no means are considered off-limits if it serves to validate your hatred for your country. Unfortunately – and here I really do pity you, shame is a concept as inconceivable to you as a day at the beach would be for Dracula.
"Why did he need cue car
December 13, 2006 - 05:59 ET by Indiana Joe"Why did he need cue cards???"
What are you, kidding me?
Ever SEEN a spelling bee, bal? Were you ever IN one as a kid? The judges DO NOT just get to "guess" what the correct spelling of a word is! It is WRITTEN DOWN beforehand, along with the pronunciation, definition and a usage example. Try "judging" a spelling bee without that. To believe any different just shows ignorance.
The whole deal was simple "attack politics," writ small. Tempest in a thimble. And how many years ago now? Perhaps the perfect example of "media bias," on a miniscule scale. Petty crap. It does your side more harm than mine to keep bringing it up.
Give it a rest, already...
Cnn To Reyes
December 12, 2006 - 17:36 ET by exLibCnn to Reyes;
We got your back! Whomever that reporter was, rest assured, they will be given the cold shoulder and we'll be sure to let them know they blew it.
Remember us at CNN, no tough questions or gotchas.
I wonder if CNN is searching for more sniper video
December 12, 2006 - 17:50 ET by Carl Kolchakmust now be aware of "snarky reporters," "treacherous reporters"
This is coming from the same news organization that thought showing video of snipers shooting at American soldiers was newsworthy. Keep in mind that they didn't think it was newsworthy to mention Saddam's atrocities.
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/c/cnn-iraq.htm
"I've always been crazy, but it's kept me from going insane" Waylon Jennings
Iraq coverage vs Kosovo Coverage
December 12, 2006 - 18:02 ET by exLibI sometimes wonder what the coverage of the Iraq war would be like if Clinton prosecuted it.
Considering the coverage for Kosovo was non-existent even though Clinton went in under similar pretense and we are still bringing soldiers home to this today.
As you said, Saddam would be portrayed as a much worse guy, as was Milosivek (sp?)
There wouldn't be one - bubba
December 12, 2006 - 20:30 ET by FastEdThere wouldn't be one - bubba would be swimming in one of the palace pools, and getting serviced in somebody else's office. algore would be complaining of the lake draining by saddam, and how it was contributing to global warming.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad
Iraq coverage vs Kosovo Coverage
December 12, 2006 - 18:02 ET by exLibI sometimes wonder what the coverage of the Iraq war would be like if Clinton prosecuted it.
Considering the coverage for Kosovo was non-existent even though Clinton went in under similar pretense and we are still bringing soldiers home to this today.
As you said, Saddam would be portrayed as a much worse guy, as was Milosivek (sp?)
Definitions of treacherous on
December 13, 2006 - 10:46 ET by fosstenDefinitions of treacherous on the Web:
Pretty strong words. I guess Franken was feeling pretty angry about this. Never heard them call Helen Thomas "treacherous."
To me, at least, the word a
December 13, 2006 - 10:52 ET by sarcasmoTo me, at least, the word also has a certain 'team' implication, which perhaps unintentionally reveals a bias at CNN which dwarfs the bias at Fox News. (Heh, but I'm also slamming Fox News at the moment for their extreme racist guest adulation on the other thread -- so sue me!)
JMR
CNN
December 12, 2006 - 18:08 ET by chinesearithmeticI guess CNN nipped that Ford in '08 threat in the bud. Lord have mercy...
snarky reporters (!!??!!)Sinc
December 12, 2006 - 18:11 ET by ghotifunsnarky reporters (!!??!!)
Since when did a journalist doing his job become "snarky"? Was it shortly after you realized Jeff Stein wasn't going to give Reyes a free pass on basic intel issues? Or was it when you decided yourself to be "snarky" with all the examples of Republicans?
How about "snarky" Jim Webb?
Hey, Soledad (Spanish for sunny [just ask Reyes!]) yeah, I bet the MSM is really going to turn up the heat on the Demsm, now that they're in power and all.
Who you kiddin'?
Treacherous reporters? Stei
December 12, 2006 - 18:12 ET by GalvanicTreacherous reporters? Stein didn't ask Reyes who the #3 man in Al Qaeda is today. Nor did he ask him minute details from the Hamilton-Baker report, or the 9-11 Commission. He asked Reyes some very basic questions about our principal enemies --- enemies with whom Reyes should surely be familiar with during his tenure on the Intelligence Committee. Reyes' answers were scary.
Scary - "As a senior mem
December 12, 2006 - 20:28 ET by FastEdScary - "As a senior member of both the Armed Services and Select Intelligence Committees - Congressman Reyes is a key member of Congress on Defense and military issues." These answers from a guy who's been sleeping while on these committees - I'll say again, the next two years are going to be fun to watch.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad
Hillary Clinton
December 12, 2006 - 20:06 ET by ucLet us all come up with our own intelligence quizes for the Democrats. I might start with this puzzle for Hillary: One Nation under God, indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all - emphasis on one and indivisible - now a question that goes to what I thought once was common sense or just common legal sense -- how can a spouse elected with a Presidential candidate as a married union - whose communications with such President are for the most part not part of public record - who has more access allowed by law than any other person to the President to do with unbridled, because of marriage law - who hopefully shared the dream they sold together to do their very best in their elected term together - who has been at most if not all of the so coveted State Dinners and other functions as a partner - who may have even been the brains and motivation behind such President - how is it we might consider that you haven't already had your eight years? We can't prove you were not or other first spouse were and are not the power behind the power. How is it you come up with thinking that you haven't been a legal "holder of the office of the President" and not so limited by 22 Amendments beautiful language honor spouses while limiting office holders? I still can't find an arguement in your favor. Maybe too old school though in elementary school while you across town were in Law School.
My Quiz:--I'm a Christian, 80
December 12, 2006 - 23:03 ET by NazarethMy Quiz:
--I'm a Christian, 80+% of America claims to be Christian, this makes this a Put answer here Nation.
--God is the Creator, Jesus Christ is His Put answer here .
--Being a Christian Nation, ruled by Christian laws, we should not give Muslims the right to exhert Shari'a law within our borders- True or False?
--At the wedding in Caanan, Jesus turned the water into Put answer here . (Ted Kennedy will get this one right)
--Being an illegal alien is against the law- True or False?
--We don't suspend laws for those non-illegals who break the law, so we should not suspend the law for illegals as well-True or False?
--A 'most ethical congress ever' doesn't include criminals serving in positions of trust- True or False?
--When you drain a 'swamp' you may not like what you find at the bottom when those from your party start poking through the bottom scum- True or False?
http://sacredscoop.com
Nazareth, Liberal answers .
December 12, 2006 - 23:28 ET by hydrodynDMNazareth,
Liberal answers ...
1) Don't label me. I don't fit into your little narrow minded box. And no I don't believe in god or christ cause, you know, that's the cool thing to think. Which pretty much makes me like every other lib - but I'm original, I tell you.
2) Gaia or Saturn or any of the other mythological things I don't believe in anyways might have created the world .... you brown shirt fascist!
3) Of course we should, you fascist brown shirt (see comment above). What right do you have to impose your Nazi ideas on the rest of us?
4) Diversity
5) Who defines what is "legal" and "illegal"? Fascists do, that's who. Calling a man who brakes into your house and takes your stuff a criminal is ..well, you know.
6) your getting old with your jack boot brown shirt fascist blah blah blah
7) what?
8) Oh I know what I'll find. Republicans. And Conservatives. And the NRA. And folks who don't think you can start a sentance with "and".
me
December 12, 2006 - 23:46 ET by misterbill1. Christian 2.Son 3.True 4.wine 5.True 6. True 7.True 8. I have trouble with. If the scum on the bottom are the libtards I would like it.
Lol good answers master Bill-
December 13, 2006 - 01:19 ET by NazarethLol good answers master Bill- yeah the last one is tricky- might just find some GOP-ers there too I'm afraid- but I'm guessin majority be Dems.
Hydro- afraid I'm gonna have to ask you to study harder for the next exam
http://sacredscoop.com
" might just find some G
December 13, 2006 - 08:45 ET by Indiana Joe" might just find some GOP-ers there too I'm afraid- but I'm guessin majority be Dems."
Yep, Nazereth, I passed too.
Guessing some of those GOPs would really be RINOs, a bonus. But hey, whoever they are, get 'em gone! They damage us! And you know we can't be as two-faced as the libs... we ARE better than that, right?
Ooops, almost missed it....Na
December 13, 2006 - 08:48 ET by Indiana JoeOoops, almost missed it....Naz, notice Hydro's first line:
"Liberal answers," or words to that effect.
Sarcasm....or irony? Either way, not Hydro's TRUE feelings, I'm sure.... ;^)
Regards,
IJ
That is correct, sir. It's
December 13, 2006 - 12:23 ET by hydrodynDMThat is correct, sir. It's interesting that someone can post outlandish and over the top answers like I did and not have it dismissed outright as a joke.
Tells you something about the kind of comments we've all become used to seeing by some liberals.
Oh, my God! You mean, there
December 13, 2006 - 08:34 ET by Indiana JoeOh, my God! You mean, there are TWO a$$holes named "Franken" running around out there?
What a thing to wake up to.... ;^D