Ana Marie Cox: Mary Cheney's Pregnancy Shames White House, May Be A Genetic Experiment

  • Bookmark and Share

Ana Marie Cox of "Time" magazine asserted that the pregnancy of Mary Cheney, the lesbian daughter of Vice President Dick Cheney, shames the White House and pondered whether it was a "...genetic experiment to extend the lineage," on Tuesday’s "Imus in the Morning." Cox, appearing in the 6:00 hour, alluded to Ms. Cheney’s sexual orientation on several occasions and emphasized that she is the vice president’s "gay daughter."

Cox claimed that the Bush administration is "falling apart" because the news of Mary Cheney’s pregnancy is the best they’d received recently:

"This administration’s really falling apart though, I do agree. I think, you know, you know times are bad when the best news the White House has had recently is, you know, Dick Cheney’s gay daughter is pregnant. Like, he’s going to be a granddad, that’s pretty much it."

Cox seems to imply that Mary Cheney’s pregnancy is bad news for the Bush Administration, but its probably safe to assume the president and vice president would disagree. Later, Cox contended that this pregnancy lowers the bar on gay rights for GOP presidential candidates because all they have to say is "well, at least my gay daughter’s not pregnant."

Mary Cheney’s sexual orientation has been widely known for years, yet, Vice President Cheney allowed her in 2004 to run his campaign office. If the Vice President and by extension the Bush campaign, were not too embarrassed for her to hold a position of such responsibility during their reelection campaign, why does Cox assert that her pregnancy shames them now? A more relevant point would have been Ms. Cheney’s activism in campaigning for Virginia not to adopt a ban on gay marriage as an example that may have been embarrassing to the White House.

A transcript of the cited exchanges follows:

6:35

Don Imus: I think a metaphor for this idiotic administration is, if you’re the first lady you can’t show up at a White House reception in the same gown that three other women are wearing, I mean somebody’s got to–somebody has to know what is going on, don’t they?"

Ana Marie Cox: "Right. You know, well this administration has always had trouble with advance intelligence, you know, they don’t seem to, like, you know, they can’t find out things in advance very well. And I think that’s just an example–"

Don Imus: "Well how does that happen?"

Ana Marie Cox: "They said, they told Laura she was going to be greeted as a liberator, you know, instead she had to change her dress. This administration’s really falling apart though, I do agree. I think, you know, you know times are bad when the best news the White House has had recently is, you know, Dick Cheney’s gay daughter is pregnant. Like, he’s going to be a granddad, that’s pretty much it."

Don Imus: "I wonder who the father is?"

Ana Marie Cox: "Do you know who the father is?"

Don Imus: "No I don’t. It’s not David Gregory; it’s not Evan Thomas. And it’s not Senator Rick Santorum."

Ana Marie Cox: "You’re individually asking every guest?"

Don Imus: "Yes. Unless they’re lying to me."

Ana Marie Cox: "I’m not the father either. I think that the only way that it could get worse for this White House is if John Kerry’s the father. <laughter> or Hillary."

6:38

Don Imus: "So now we want to know who that [the father] is."

Ana Marie Cox:" I think, you know, as far as investigative journalism goes, that’s not at the top of my list, but I think you should continue to ask every guest."

Don Imus: "Why wouldn’t you want to know?"

Ana Marie Cox: "Well, I mean, I guess I do kind of want to know just because I wonder how the father feels about this. I was thinking about that. Like, I mean, are they proud that they like, you know, like contributed to the utter shame of this White House. Or are they, is it some good Republican out there that is actually thinking they’re going to, you know, it’s some kind of genetic experiment to extend the lineage? Umm, I’d be curious, sure."

6:44

Don Imus: "Anything else going on I should know about or no?"

Ana Marie Cox: "I don’t think so, oh, I know, apparently we’re having another election soon. I already kind of have ‘08 fatigue at this point. But, you know, I was actually thinking the other thing that Mary Cheney, her being pregnant now, I was thinking that really lowers the bar for every other, you know, Republican ‘08 candidate as far as gay rights goes."

Don Imus: "Oh it does?"

Ana Marie Cox: "Yeah, no matter what happens, they can be like ‘well at least my gay daughter’s not pregnant.’ I mean that seems like, you know, Mitt Romney’s going to get off easy at this point."


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Sorry, but, when is someone g

Sorry, but, when is someone going to smack these people silly?  God, what drivel.  Another mystery: How does that miserable, ugly bastard stay on the air?  Same audience as Olbermann, I suppose.

"He who has a thousand friends has not a friend to spare, and he who has one enemy will meet him everywhere"          -Ali ibn-Abi-Talib, 4th Islamic Caliph

Imus

Imus --"miserable,ugly bastard"--liberal icon. It figures.

NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal

Does anyone other than Rosie

Does anyone other than Rosie O'Donnell care that Dick Cheney's daughter is pregnant? Given everything that is going on in the world, is this important enough to notice?

Mary Cheney is a shameful s

Mary Cheney is a shameful situation. First off, she lives a disgusting gay lifestyle. Secondly she isn't isn't married (why not? Because gays can't and shouldn't be allowed to marry). Third, she and her partner have chosen to raise this child without a father. Sure, the world is full of children raised without fathers, but these two have chosen to. Lastly, they've had to turn to science to have the child, which means God didn't intend for her to have a child (short of a virgin birth). This is shameful, and her parents need to speak out on it, as it goes against everything true conservatives are for.

Ahhh...I love the smell of ju

Ahhh...I love the smell of judgement in the afternoon.

pass the cheese

beware the fartnator

Lastly, they've had to turn

Lastly, they've had to turn to science to have the child, which means
God didn't intend for her to have a child (short of a virgin birth)

So, then women and men who have reproductive difficulties who need to turn to science for help, which means God didn't intend for them to have a child (short of a virgin birth), should also be ashamed and shouldn't be having their children either?

As for her parents speaking out against their grandchild being brought into the world because that is what a "true" conservative would do, you have a vastly different view of what a true conservative is than I do.

&quot;So, then women and me

"So, then women and men who have reproductive difficulties who need to
turn to science for help, which means God didn't intend for them to
have a child (short of a virgin birth), should also be ashamed and
shouldn't be having their children either?"

Yes, they shouldn't be having children. It wasn't God's intent. Unless you believe God intended them to use invitro (which leads to aborting the leftover embryos). Those couples can adopt - maybe that was God's intent, which they were now selfishly circumventing through science.

Not to mention the possibility of passing down their 'infertile' DNA to their child.

So does that mean that if som

So does that mean that if someone can't recover from an illness simply by staying in bed, eating chicken soup, that they shouldn't take medicine to recover? After all, it's "God's intent" that they get sick, apparently, and who are they to circumvent God's intent via science?

I guess only Republicans ar

I guess only Republicans are taken to task for making what would otherwise be considered "anti-gay," insensitive or intolerant statements.

Cox:  &quot; . . . it's some

Cox:  " . . . it's some kind of genetic experiment ot extend the lineage?"

Considering that the Cheneys already have 4 or 5 grandchildren by their other daughter, it would appear that Mary's pregnancy would be rather extreme and totally unnecessary to extending the lineage.

Yeah, but knowing that woul

Yeah, but knowing that would require some actual fact checking.

Using gay people as weapons

How much tolerance and compassion do you have to have to get away with using gay people as weapons against Republicans?  I don't think Mary Cheney initially chose to be in the public eye, and we haven't heard her out bashing her father for not being more supportive of gays.  So why should she and her family have to be subjected to all this public speculation?

I never had a problem with Im

I never had a problem with Imus. He is a major turd; however, I remember him being the same way during the Clintoon years. I vaguely remember him referring to Bill has Monica Lewinsky's "little meat-whistle".

Mitt Romney is responsible fo

Mitt Romney is responsible for homosexual "marriage" in Massachusetts.   Most do not realize that he is playing both sides.....--Debra...www.InformingChristians.com

Don Imus in the 70's

Does anyone here remember an album that Imus put out in the late 70's titled "This Honkey's Nuts"?

It was, and still is, one of the most foul-mouthed peices of crap I ever heard. Hard to beleive but, it was even more vulgar than anything we have today. Not only did he use the F word, he used it every third word. He also crapped on Blacks, Gays, and anything considered Progressive. All this and the liberals love the guy. Go figure?

Figure

Easy to figure. Liberals are hypocrites whose own actions deny what they profess.

NEVER, NEVER trust a liberal