The late Jeane Kirkpatrick was well-known for distinguishing the difference between authoritarian governments and totalitarian governments. The Washington Post also distinguishes: it's harsher on right-wing authoritarians then on left-wing communist dictators. Coverage of the death of right-wing Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet was all focused on the "dictator's dark legacy" and how he'd escaped punishment. But upon the death of Chinese dictator Deng Ziaoping in 1997, the Post emphasized how he opened China to outsiders and liberalized the economy (alongside news events like the murderous crackdown on student dissidents in Tiananmen Square in 1989). The first front-page article did not wonder why no one had brought Deng to "justice."
In a story simply headlined "A Chilean Dictator's Dark Legacy," Monte Reel and J.Y. Smith focused heavily on the left-wing brief against Pinochet, Richard Nixon, CIA infiltration, and fear of communism. Note the absence of any talk of democratization and economic liberalization:
Gen. Augusto Pinochet, 91, the former Chilean dictator whose government murdered and tortured thousands during his repressive 17-year rule, died yesterday at a Santiago military hospital of complications from a heart attack, leaving incomplete numerous court cases that had sought to bring him to justice.
Pinochet assumed power on Sept. 11, 1973, in a bloody coup supported by the United States that toppled the elected government of Salvador Allende, a Marxist who had pledged to lead his country "down the democratic road to socialism."
First as head of a four-man military junta and then as president, Pinochet served until 1990, leaving a legacy of abuse that took successive governments years to catalogue. According to a government report that included testimony from more than 30,000 people, his government killed at least 3,197 people and tortured about 29,000. Two-thirds of the cases listed in the report happened in 1973.
It is fair and accurate, not to mention just, to lay out the oppressive and murderous record of Pinochet. But it is also interesting to note that reporters seem to have a much warmer regard for communist dictators. Who would attempt to compare the death toll under Pinochet to the death toll in communist China during Deng's reign, not to mention his role in the party hierarchy before he consolidated power? But on February 20, 1997, a Nexis search showed the Post headline was bland: "China's Deng Ziaoping Is Dead at 92; Respiratory Failure Cited; Rites to Exclude Foreigners." Reporter Steven Mufson provided a much more balanced picture of a liberalizing dictator (and Clinton administration compliments). There was no attempt made to count the murdered bodies or tortured prisoners:
Deng Xiaoping, who oversaw China's economic transformation and ordered the bloody crackdown on democracy demonstrators in 1989, died Wednesday night of respiratory failure at the age of 92, China's official news agency announced.
His death marks the end of an era for China. One of the last survivors of China's communist revolution, Deng had guided the country out of the chaos of the Cultural Revolution, flung open China's doors to the outside world and loosened the grip of central economic planning while insisting that the Communist Party's monopoly on power go unchallenged.
Last seen in public three years ago, looking frail, Deng had gradually faded from China's political scene, and a Reuter news service report Wednesday, before his death was announced, said that his once powerful personal office had been disbanded. Deng died at 8:08 a.m. EST of complications from a lung infection, although the official New China News Agency noted that he had also suffered from the advanced stages of Parkinson's disease.
A 459-member funeral committee headed by Deng's handpicked successor, President Jiang Zemin, issued a statement that spoke of the "incomparable esteem and profound grief of the whole party, the whole army and the people of various ethnic groups throughout the country."
The Chinese flag over Beijing's Tiananmen Square was lowered to half-staff, and a six-day mourning period was declared.The national television anchor announced Deng's death and an overview of his life on the morning news program today. Afterward, Beijing streets were calm as people began going to work. The broadcast statement also said that no foreigners will be invited to the burial ceremonies.
In Boston Wednesday, President Clinton said he was saddened to learn of the death of China's paramount leader, calling Deng an "extraordinary figure on the world stage over the past two decades." His statement described Deng as "the driving force behind China's decision to formalize relations with the United States." He said Deng's 1979 visit to the United States had laid the foundation for a rapid expansion of relations and cooperation between the two countries. "Mr. Deng's long life spanned a century of turmoil, tribulation and remarkable change in China. He spurred China's historic economic reform program, which greatly improved living standards in China and modernized much of the nation," Clinton said.
Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright said in London that the United States "obviously views Deng Xiaoping as a historic figure," but she noted that Deng's record prompted a "mixed assessment." She mentioned the role he played in normalization of ties with Washington, but also noted his handling of the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests.
Ironically, part of the difference in coverage is that Pinochet loosed the reins of power, and ultimately, his opponents took power, as they do in Chile today. But China's communist remain in their dictatorship, so it's easier for Western journalists to see a placid, mourning nation. Mufson's 1997 story on Deng acknowledged: "With a lack of open expression in China of criticism of the Communist Party, it is difficult to gauge the depth of discontent people feel even as they enjoy the fruits of economic reform. But initial popular reaction to the news was quiet." Nevertheless, Mufson ended the story with a Chinese worker lauding Deng's achievements.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center
Editor at Large
Comments Policy
And I'm sure that when ol' Fi
December 11, 2006 - 10:37 ET by Prester JohnAnd I'm sure that when ol' Fidel kicks the bucket the Washington Post's headline will read "A Cuban Dictator's Dark Legacy" and publish number of Cubans who were imprisoned, tortured, and murdered by his secret police thugs.
Right.
Communism
December 11, 2006 - 10:38 ET by iveseenitallCommunism --Americans need to educate themselves about this insidious philosophy. It is not dead by any means. Please note that Hillary's back to her "it takes a village" routine. And did you read Kofi A's farewell address?
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
Ah, but you know what yer a
December 11, 2006 - 10:54 ET by Jack BauerAh, but you know what yer average commie dictator says...
"You can't make an omlet without murdering a few million people."
Proud member of the all-powerful and vast
militarist/industrialist/capitalist/zionist-bagelist complex
And as ol' Uncle Joe Stalin s
December 11, 2006 - 11:09 ET by Prester JohnAnd as ol' Uncle Joe Stalin said, "One man's death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic".
I'll float a theory out the
December 11, 2006 - 11:11 ET by balboaI'll float a theory out there, which you can feel free to crush, spit on, whatever.
Is it possible that communist regimes are seen in a less harsh light because they're usually associated as a revolution by the people?
Communism
December 11, 2006 - 11:14 ET by iveseenitallAs I said, Americans need to educate themselves about the true nature of Communism. Their ignorance is astounding and frightening.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
communism... usually associ
December 11, 2006 - 11:15 ET by Jack Bauercommunism... usually associated as a revolution by the people?
Sure bal. And thanks for proving Lincoln's famous dictum:
You Can Fool Some of the People ALL of the time
Proud member of the all-powerful and vast
militarist/industrialist/capitalist/zionist-bagelist complex
But do you get the point I'
December 11, 2006 - 11:27 ET by balboaBut do you get the point I'm trying to make?
Yeah, I get your point Bal, it's wrong, but I get it.
December 11, 2006 - 11:36 ET by acaiguanaYeah, I get your point Bal, it's wrong, but I get it.
Whenever one reads, thinks or is reminded of the various multi-million human being slaughters that have occurred since the great and brilliant Marx; there is always a communist behind it.
That would be with a big 'C'.
So, the issue isn't the people. The issue is that reporters are stupid.
ACA
...
Acaiguana says: "Ya can't win if ya don't play."
But do you get the point I'
December 11, 2006 - 11:39 ET by Jack BauerBut do you get the point I'm trying to make?
Well, yes.
But as it's not a very good point I was trying to make a small joke.
Unless you were actually joking? Because you're not being serious are you?
I mean, we could start with the Bolsheviks and work our way through a long litany of murderous communist dictatorships to show that they have nothing to do with the "people," but is there really any point?
Proud member of the all-powerful and vast
militarist/industrialist/capitalist/zionist-bagelist complex
Those who have trouble with a
December 11, 2006 - 11:22 ET by Guy Arthur ThomasThose who have trouble with authority tend to be totalitarian in their private lives. I believe that the "Crybaby Boomer" generation and the subsequent generations, what are we at now, Y, Z...anyway, the "Crybaby Boomers" popularized the juvenille, simplistic and self-destructive notion of resisting, opposing and undermining genuine authority and because these "Crybaby Boomers and Beyond" now inhabit the desks of writers and editors news is a reflection and extension of their own personal inadequacies and immaturity. It is a vehicle for personal crusades and attempts at social engineering by means of constant opposition to traditional morality, recognized authority and reasonable social boundaries.
50 years ago such extremists were seen for what they were, extremists without much conscience toward mature civility. But this became the adopted doctrine of most of the "Crybaby Boomer and Beyond" generation and hence, you have this as the rampant mentality.
I lwatched and listened to an early 1970's interview with Katharine Hepburn who identified herself as a liberal, easily left of center and raised this way by her parents, at least a second generation lib. What was missing though was what characterizes libs and super-libs today, hatred and disrespect for authority. She referred to those who protested in a disparaging way regarding Nixon and stated that she might disagree with him on some issues, he is nevertheless the President and needs to be afforded the respect of his office. She spoke proudly of America and the great freedoms we have and have provided for others. She is just one example of libs from another era with decent sense.
If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal.
GAT sadly.............
December 11, 2006 - 11:45 ET by misterbillGAT sadly.............re:decent sense-- they are all dead now. The 60s saw the end of CIVILization for Liberals. All , since then, is modelled after the behavior of that decade. They (from that period) are now in many seats of authority and responsibility and do not have the moral courage to decry the extreme left happenings and attitudes of today. The ir poison has long since infected the MSM, which is eveident daily in America. After all, it was their denunciation of authority and America that framed them. How can they turn around and criticize the liberal extremists of today. Aren't they the same people who burned their draft cards, ran off to Canada, sponsored communal living, fought for the right to kill unborn children, spit on the military uniforms of our Vietnam military, called them baby-killers? What kind of children do you expect them to bring into this world? I am heading out to the bookstore this afternoon to see if I can Find a copy of John Diamond's :The Rise of America" (Fighting the Next American Revolution and the Constitutional Crisis ) to see if I can find any hope for us. I am frightened. I see the divide in America so strong that there will be no resolution save strength of arms.
Liberal=Communism
December 11, 2006 - 15:04 ET by Clear thinkerJust a little education for our liberal friends. Pay special attention to items #15 thru #45 of the "Communist Goals for American Takeover" that I have posted below. I consider it a recipe book for anyone wanting to encourage the collapse of the USA as we know it.
Communist Goals (1963)
Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35
January 10, 1963
Current Communist Goals
EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Thursday, January 10, 1963
Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.
At Mrs. Nordman's request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following "Current Communist Goals," which she identifies as an excerpt from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen: [From "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen]
CURRENT COMMUNIST GOALS:
A M E R I C A
1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.
2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.
3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.
4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.
6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.
7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.
8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.
9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.
10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.
11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)
12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.
13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.
14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.
15. Capture one, or both, of the political parties in the United States.
16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
18. Gain control of all student newspapers.
19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.
20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.
21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."
23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."
27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a "religious crutch."
28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."
29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."
31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.
32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture -- education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etcetera.
33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.
34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.
35. Discredit, and eventually dismantle, the FBI.
36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.
37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.
38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].
39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.
40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.
42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.
43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.
44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.
45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.
Clear Thinker
December 11, 2006 - 18:36 ET by BlondeCT,
Wow, thanks for your post.
I'd never read that before, but I shall save it for future reference.
It would be interesting to post each one of these goals on a daily basis here on NB, and invite the debate as to the level of accomplishment reached (with references, of course) over the last forty-three years.
'Tis possible - but rememberi
December 11, 2006 - 11:47 ET by FastEd'Tis possible - but remembering any revolution, the first "overthrow" is the media, in the past it was the Newspapers. From that point on, the "revolution" controls the "thoughts" of the people through the "ideas" of the press. If credence is given to the "News", and if that is the only source of info, then the "revolution" has been won - having gotten the hearts and minds of the common man.
Today, the "revolution" can use intimidation, and even with more "news" outlets, NOT saying anything is safer, hence, it may appear that the regime is in charge, in reality it is only because of the fist, while the hearts and minds of the people are longing for something else and staying alive. (my two cents)
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad
Bal,You did mean…seen in a
December 11, 2006 - 12:37 ET by JPR1Bal,
You did mean…seen in a less harsh light by liberals didn’t you?
Most (all) conservatives put a harsh light on communisim and see something to be destroyed. Completely! Because it sucks!
I think the list of revolutions that have produced lasting prosperity is rather short. The one that created this nation had some distinct advantages going for it; specifically, a few thousand miles of ocean. I’ll let the history experts here correct/support me.
Communists = War of Useful Idiots Led By More Equals
December 11, 2006 - 12:51 ET by PSPCplBalboa, if you have never read Animal Farm then please do. It very clearly captures the spirit of what happened in Russia and elsewhere. Very intelligent people with a penchant for power encouraged and led some very uneducated and naive people to believe that alike and equal are the same thing.
Once it became apparent that Karl Marx had failed to take into account the basic human desire and need to live a better life, Communism was doomed. The problem was that those in power liked being in charge and would do anything to remain the "dictatorship of the proletariat".
The reason why the "communist revolution" failed to take place in western Europe and the USA was due to the large number of educated people who saw it for what it was: the surrender of personal freedom and responsibility for Big Brother taking care of us for life.
That is the real evil of communism: once society surrenders personal responsibility and freedom to the party, then nothing the government does to "take care of you" is immoral or illegal.
Balboa, I think you're right
December 11, 2006 - 13:56 ET by Tim GrahamBalboa, I think you're right that liberals might see the right-wing dictatorship as a creature of some fascist generals, but see the left-wing dictatorship in romantic terms as "the people" or "the proletariat." But that doesn't match in practice when "the people" can't speak out or worship or have more than one child. When they're actual resorting to cannibalism, as they did during the Cultural Revolution. (See Nicholas Kristof on that one in "China Wakes" and here.) Real journalists who care about facts and not just revolutionary fancies ought to be more balanced on dictators like Deng.
I agree, of course, but per
December 11, 2006 - 14:30 ET by sarcasmoI agree, of course, but perhaps China's growing economic might also plays into this (not that it should, but that's the way of the world!). Also, considering the way Japanese schoolbooks treat historical Japanese atrocities (especially against the Koreans & Chinese, along with US POWs!) of WW2, I wonder how China's schoolbooks now treat the "Cultural Revolution"?
JMR
It is said by a good friend o
December 11, 2006 - 23:07 ET by UnsaneIt is said by a good friend of mine who devotes much time to Asian studies that the movie Hero is actually more or less a propaganda flick in the style of Sergei Eisenstein (okay, I'll spare people the Cyrillic for once) that seeks to justify the Cultural Revolution. Also, note that Mao's image is on EACH of the yuan bills, and is still to be found in abundance around China.
I also, out of morbidity, got a copy of the Little Red Book in English and Chinese while in Beijing, and could get one in virtually any language I desired (except Russian for obvious reasons). That give you any idea?
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy." -Sir Winston Churchill, British statesman (1874-1965)
Very true, Tim. Communism i
December 11, 2006 - 14:36 ET by balboaVery true, Tim. Communism is insidious, is it not, in its romantic notion of standing up for the working man? Of being for the people?
brainwashed
December 11, 2006 - 15:54 ET by iveseenitallBrainwashed!
NEVER NEVER trust a liberal
no-fair,no-balance
December 11, 2006 - 12:52 ET by foolnomoresouthern-drawl: "what we have Hear'r, is'a failure' to communiate"or was it some-thing you didn't like what i was say'n.. Hard facts are difficult to take for all of us, but until the commie' love'ers see first hand what the END game get's them, they will discount any attent for the truth to be shown. this "one world media" is the driving force, so sad, we'll be shipped out on the first bus ,( the movie: "Red-Dawn" comes to mind)
bless and support ALL the troops/liberalism "is" a mental disorder
Why can't everyone be like Trotsky
December 11, 2006 - 14:24 ET by Carl KolchakNow I'm sure the left wing MSM wants everyone to know about Pinochet and wishes everyone could be like Trotsky, because we all know that Trotsky treated his politcal opponents so well. The left wing MSM obviously does not want anyone to know about the Red Terror or the fact that left wing Trotsky was one of the major players in the Red Terror that killed countless political opponents and Russians, and that many Russians were facing starvation once Lennin and Trotsky came into power. Here is a link to Trotsky's role at Kronstadt. Checkout this quote from the below link. Most of the prisoners were killed at Kronsdat, and the others were shipped off to Siberia.
"It was Trotsky who led the assault on Kronstadt, with the ideological fig leaf that the Kronstadt mutineers were "White Guards." Trotsky ordered the wives and children of the sailors taken hostage" Now why is left wing Trotsky taken wives and children hostage? I thought left wing Trotsky was supposed to be the swellest leader of all time.
http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/bcaplan/museum/his1i.htm
Then, there was also the joke of his defense called the Dewy Commision. The following link totally rips apart the whitewashing of Trotsky. Checkout this quote from that link.
"Fallacy 3: Trotsky was worthy of being defended. "
That's right left wing Trotsky wasn't worth defending, because of his role in the Red Terror.
http://www.geocities.com/agarap/dewey/11173.htm
"I've always been crazy, but it's kept me from going insane" Waylon Jennings
Mass Murder, night stalker
December 11, 2006 - 14:33 ET by exLibthe other thing the leftists don't want you to know.
In many universities it is a matter of fact that the Christians have killed and murdered more people in the name of God than anyone. That's why it's an "evil" religion and only negatives can be talked about in class-rooms.
However, when you compare the multi-millions of people killed in the name of no relgion, namely as you pointed out Trotskies, Stalnists, Leninists (sp?), Mao, the list goes on, the amount of people killed by so-called Christians is miniscule. But you will never hear that on taught on campus.
The Libs/Leftists -media are in love with an ideal that can never be realized but they keep thinking, some day, some day. So they leave out the gory details of those who tried and failed.
moderns
December 11, 2006 - 15:59 ET by iveseenitallModern liberals/socialists/communists don't have "ideals". They want power and will say and do anything to get it and keep it. Yes, it is insidious.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
Don't forget Ceausescu from Romania
December 11, 2006 - 20:58 ET by Carl KolchakDon't forget about left wing Ceausescu from Romania. His own people executed him on Christmas in 1989. The left wing MSM doesn't talk much about him either. Also in regards to the left wing universities teaching about Christians and killing, keep in mind that Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Trotsky, Lenin, Ceausescu, etc. all attacked religion. In all honesty if you ever want to really study the world history of atrocities, you can find any group having atrocities committed against them, and that group committing atrocities against others. What the left wing college professors and the left wing MSM does it try to make sure you don't ever hear about the left wingers commiting atrocities. Each race, color, religion, nationality, etc. have their own history of commiting atrocities against others. I believe in being optimistic more than pessimestic, and hope that maybe we can learn about atrocities to somehow prevent them in the future. Remember the last thing to come out of Pandora's Box was Hope.
Checkout a book called "Stalin and His Hangmen." This will give you a good idea of the mindset of radical left wingers once they get into power. There is a tremendous amount of killing in the book though.
"There's blood in the streets, its up to my ankles" 'Peace Frog'
On Christmas 1989
December 11, 2006 - 23:13 ET by UnsaneChristmas Day 1989 was truly great, for if you tuned into CNN at just the right time that day, you would have seen Ceaucescu's freshly rotting corpse staring up into the camera. As a side note: I have heard through some sources that the last words his wife screamed while she was getting riddled with bullets was "My children!" If that is indeed valid, I find that quite amusing and illustrative, for it shows what Leftists think of everyone that isn't them, especially Communists.
Stalin and His Hangmen is in my "pipeline". I read Stalin: Court of the Red Tsar, however, and found that to be quite instructive as well.
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy." -Sir Winston Churchill, British statesman (1874-1965)
Anoither book to checkout
December 12, 2006 - 01:15 ET by Carl KolchakI haven't read this one yet, but it is on my to read list soon. Sounds pretty interesting. Kang Sheng was one of Mao's henchmen, and is responsible for countless killings.
"The Claws of the Dragon: Kang Sheng - The Evil Genius Behind Mao - And His Legacy of Terror in People's China"
"There's blood in the streets, it's up to my ankles" 'Peace Frog'