ABC's Karl: Why Should the Iraq Study Group Report Outweigh Military Advice?

  • Bookmark and Share

On Wednesday morning, the highly anticipated report from the Iraq Study Group [ISG] was released to the public. The ISG’s report contained seventy-nine recommendations for the United States in its effort to lessen the violence in Iraq and protect American forces. One of the major recommendations of the panel was a call for the withdrawal of most U.S. combat troops by early 2008.

During an 11am press conference Wednesday, Jonathan Karl, ABC’s senior national security correspondent asked the panel pointedly why their recommendations should outweigh the advice President Bush receives from military commanders on the ground:

Jonathan Karl, ABC News: "You're certainly a group of distinguished elder statesmen, but tell me why should the President give more weight to what you all have said, given that, as I understand, you went to Iraq once–with the exception of Senator Robb, none of you made it out of the Green Zone–why should he give your recommendations any more weight than what he’s hearing from his commanders on the ground in Iraq?"

It was a refreshing question that challenged the ISG, which seems to have been deemed by the media as the most important source for determining how to resolve the situation in Iraq. Around 11:40 am Wednesday, during ABC’s live coverage of the ISG’s press conference, White House correspondent Martha Raddatz emphasized the importance of the ISG recommendations over the advice of other institutions:

Martha Raddatz: "One thing that I was thinking today, Charlie. He has all these other commissions. He has the National Security Council, he has Peter Pace, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, also working on strategy recommendations. But these are the same people, essentially, who have been working on the Iraq problem for almost four years. So the pressure is even greater now for the President to look at this bipartisan commission, these new ideas, not those coming from within the White House."

On Wednesday’s Good Morning America, Claire Shipman hyped the importance of the ISG report:

Claire Shipman: "It is finally crunch time at the White House. The men and women tasked with finding a solution to Iraq in the West Wing laying out their recommendations. Among them, huge pressure on the Iraqi government, a threat to remove troops and money if specific benchmarks are not met. Imagine the scene around the table, President Bush handed a failing grade on the war that defines the presidency and offered unwelcome fixes by ultimate elder statesmen James Baker and Lee Hamilton. And hovering over the process, the judgment of the father and former president."

ABC’s Jessica Yellin wondered on GMA December 1 whether President Bush would "listen" to the ISG’s purported call for troop withdrawals and fretted that the administration was sounding "resistant" to the proposal:

Jessica Yellin: "Those recommendations will be out in a matter of days, and the question is, will the President listen and make plans to bring the troops home?...But the administration is already sounding resistant, insisting when it comes to a withdrawal--"

Condoleezza Rice: "I think we have to have it dictated by when the Iraqis are capable of taking these, these responsibilities on."

It should be noted that in response to Karl’s question at the press conference, ISG co-chair Lee Hamilton stated the panel recognizes that its report is only one of many, and that there will be many recommendations and suggestions for the President and the military to consider.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Bet Mr, Karl is on his way ou

Bet Mr, Karl is on his way out.  ABC only has room for one intelligent employee, and that spot has been filled by John Stossell.

How dare he question the smar

How dare he question the smartest people in America (other than Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden)?

Yes, why should he listen t

Yes, why should he listen to a bipartisan committee made up of a bunch of know-nothing has beens such as James A. Baker III , Lee H. Hamilton, Lawrence Eagleburger, Vernon Jordan, Edwin Meese III, Sandra Day O'Connor, Leon Panetta, William Perry, Charles Robb and Alan Simpson? What could this group possibly know about foreign relations, the role of the US in the middle east or how the US could resolve this international nightmare of a war that is quickly declining into a civil war meltdown, or a country overrun by terrorists in spite of a US military presence. Yes, why should he listen to this group? He certainly didn't want to listen to Donald Rumsfeld's last recommendations. Fortunately, it appears that Robert Gates is a voice of reason and agrees that we need a new direction in Iraq. Maybe even the President will start to listen to the voices of reason. Any chance the extremists on this forum will see the light? I think not. The average individual here dosn't think global warming is real and the world is flat! C'mon guys, get your heads out of the sand or wherever you have it parked, and realize that it is ok to use the brain that God gave you. Do not fear intelligence and logic. Knowledge can be your best ally if you stop resisting.

That's a nice discertation th

That's a nice discertation there, but the original question posed is still a reasonable one.  Why should the president listen to the advice of this panel over that of military personnel who have actually been on the ground in Iraq for an extended period of time?  Nobody here insinuated that the ISG should be ignored (except for you in your hasty and insulting post).  Obviously, it was a good question, since a member of the panel replied that its recommendation was only one source of information for the president. 

I think its his responsibilit

I think its his responsibility to listen to them. Just as he should listen to anyone else who is in a position to offer reasoned advise. Then decide on the best course of action. As you say, don't ignore it, but don't accept it as necessarily the best option.

Keep in mind, unlike the MSM, I understand that just because you don't follow the recomendations, doesn't mean you didn't listen and carefully consider them. Too many people seem to equate "listening" with "doing".

Anyone know what Jessica Simp

Anyone know what Jessica Simpson thinks about it?

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

She thinks you should order

She thinks you should order the new WingStreet spicy wings from Pizza Hut and watch Dukes of Hazzard on your new TV with HD satellite service.

Jessica Yellin said: "..

Jessica Yellin said: "...those recommendations will be out in a couple of days...will the president listen and...bring the troops home" thus proving the MSM doesn't need facts from which to draw conclusions. 

She concluded that the report would recommend a withdrawl of troops and suggested a policy change and suggested the president was resistant to it, even though nothing had been reported at that time. 

Now that the report has come out, it apparently contains nothing new and recommends nothing decisive.  So now what should Bush do?  Obviously he should defer to the MSM and let them handle it from here on...

Well now, seeing as how I have traveled across northern Louisiana on Interstate 20, I feel that I am NOW fully qualified to make 79 recommendations to the White House to improve New Orleans Katrina problems.

If elected, I vow to repeal the 17th Amendment, change the
minimum military enlistment age to the minimum drinking age and push for term
limits for all politicians in federal government.

Jonathan Karl is so fired!

Jonathan Karl is so fired!