The hubbub raised over six Islamic imams being removed from a US Airways flight in Minneapolis for suspicious behavior is the latest in a string of incidents underlining one consistent thread in the war on terror: Muslim terrorists have never given up on the tried and true idea of hijacking airplanes and blowing them up to kill and demoralize the infidels.
Police and witness reports suggest a list of suspicious activities and remarks. Some of the imams were discussing in Arabic about "bin Laden" and condemning America for "killing Saddam." Imams asked for seat belt extenders for the extremely obese, for no apparent reason. (Did you know such extenders even existed?) The imams spread out at all exits of the plane, two in front, two in the middle, two in the rear. Between the six imams, they had one piece of checked luggage.
There have been some seriously frightening moments since 9/11. Just a few months later, foiled "shoe bomber" Richard Reid was arrested on board American Airlines Flight 63 from Paris to Miami for attempting to light explosives hidden in his shoes. In court, he declared his allegiance to Osama bin Laden and was convicted in 2003 and sentenced to life in prison.
On March 5, 2003, Fazal Karim, an illegal immigrant from Pakistan, attempted to board an American Airlines flight from Dallas to Houston when screeners found in his luggage 32 razor blades concealed within a box containing a coiled belt. He was convicted of attempting to conceal weapons and making false statements about his immigration status and sentenced to five years in prison.
On June 29, 2004, journalist Annie Jacobsen complained about the very suspicious behavior of a group of Middle Easterners during a flight from Detroit to Los Angeles. When the plane landed, they were detained, and though the Department of Homeland Security would later report that they were a band of Syrian musicians en route to a gig in Las Vegas, Jacobsen learned that DHS also decided to classify the entire report. Why classify it if nothing was amiss?
On August 10, British authorities thwarted a plot to simultaneously blow up 10 aircraft heading to the U.S. using explosives smuggled in luggage, averting what police described as "mass murder on an unimaginable scale." Some plotters had already purchased tickets on a flight to stage a test run, with an actual attack planned for days later.
The national media have certainly paid attention to airline security issues since 9/11. But they can’t be expected to learn about and report every airline disruption, especially if no real act of terror occurs. Thus it begs the question: How many times, at how many airports, have there been these kinds of incidents that have not made it to the news desks? I ask because I’ve been a witness to one such incident, from a distance of perhaps three feet, which never made it on the news.
On October 14, I was in Grand Rapids, having boarded United 5832 to Chicago. It was one of those smaller commuter jets with two seats on either side of the aisle. The flight was perhaps one third full, giving sardined passengers the opportunity to move to the multiple open rows after the boarding process was complete. That’s when I noticed the two men, one a younger Muslim, the second an older black man, make their way from the back to the two seats behind the bulkhead on the right side of the plane, one row in front and across from me. Odd. If they wanted more breathing room, why were they choosing to sit together again in crammed quarters, given all the open rows? Why did they move at all? And if they remained together because they needed to visit, why didn’t they exchange a single word? I watched them as they just sat, staring straight ahead. And the plane also just sat by the gate, for a good fifteen minutes.
And then the hatch flew open and a half-dozen DHS/FBI agents rushed in, surrounded these two men, and flashing badges, ordered them off the plane.
Now stop for a minute. Imagine you were one of these two, and you were innocent. What would be your reaction if suddenly confronted by a small army of heat-packing federal agents demanding your removal? You might literally jump out of your seat belt in surprise. What? Me? Huh?! Why? What’s going on?! What’d I do? What’s the meaning of this? And the like. And that’s when it really got creepy. I watched as the two men stood up, and without a word, without a shred of emotion on their faces, calmly accompanied the agents off the plane. How else to explain this? They were expecting their detention.
The pilot would take to the intercom a few minutes later to explain what he could. Homeland Security had been running background checks on these two, and while nothing had registered on the computers, the flight crew was "just uncomfortable" -- as they had every reason to be.
Something is happening out there. And it’s not good.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Mr. Bozell,How many times do
December 5, 2006 - 21:59 ET by BlondeMr. Bozell,
How many times do you suppose this scenario has been repeated....about which the public has never heard one word? I'd suspect hundreds of times.
So you are correct, sir. Something is happening out there, and it's not good, not good at all. We are being tested, every day.
I applaud those passengers on the Mpls. flight....
Free movement around our country is a right, of sorts. But it's not a suicide pact. If I were to see threatening behaviour on an aircraft....I'd scream bloody murder.
If one is not ready to remove one's shoes, (how stupid is that?) and act in a neutral manner, one shouldn't be allowed on a public conveyance like an airplane. Any weird behaviour is grounds for having one's butt hauled off like a criminal. I wish they'd do that more often.
PC be damned. Profile, profile, profile. I am totally offended when I see a mother and her ten year old daughter pulled out of line for "secondary" screening. Just so a couple of jihadis, as in your example....can pass through security without having their civil rights violated.
What is wrong with this picture?
Thanks for the great post.
Amen to that Blonde
December 5, 2006 - 22:15 ET by terrigIt's funny, everytime I fly I always get singled out for "special consideration". The TSA has no sympathy for the fact that I have two small children, traveling alone & have to practically dismantle my stroller and keep my kids from running all over the airport without letting me get them because I am a dangerous person. On three of the seven occassions I have seen the Muslims being given a pass & watch as they snicker at those of us singled out. You better believe that if I am on a plane and anyone is acting like a fool I am going to speak out. I am afraid though that people will be afraid that they'll offend some overly sensitive Muslim or anyone else and may be quiet. That is what is scary. I think these guys did this on purpose and wanted to make a squak.
terrig,Do you remember "
December 5, 2006 - 22:28 ET by Blondeterrig,
Do you remember "Network"?
"We're mad as hell and we're not going to take it any more?"
I learned a little lesson last week flying home from Chicago. The euros are bloody line jumpers. However, my travelling companion was a NY crazy girl....and she shouted them down....get to the back of the line (me being a polite WASP watched in awe). Of course, they pretended not to understand....until I mentioned they'd separated me from my friend...at which point I heard a "pardon me, madame".
Lesson learned.....confront the a**holes.
As Americans, we have been trained to be polite, and respectful, and cognizant of others' feelings.....in other words, we've become a bunch of politically correct sheep.
No more. I am going to wear the personna of the Nasty New Yorker from now on in airports. (No offense...it's a compliment).
And if I see a creepy suspicious *person*, a la Mr. Bozell's description, I may just have to have a serious blonde episode.
Personal responsibility.
Blonde! Blimey! Are you
December 5, 2006 - 22:53 ET by ww thumperBlonde! Blimey! Are you going to have a "blonde moment" right there in front of GOD and everybody?? ;^} (bratt smile) :-) .....Political correctness when dealing with Islam will kill america....ww .....
You betcha!A blonde moment is
December 6, 2006 - 00:02 ET by BlondeYou betcha!
A blonde moment is usually something to behold.
At least, that's what my -ex used to say! LOL.
B..:-)))
December 6, 2006 - 00:07 ET by ww thumperB..:-))) .ww .....
Perhaps they're testing the s
December 5, 2006 - 22:21 ET by balboaPerhaps they're testing the screening process and security awareness. If they recruit caucasian members, we're screwed with profiling.
Are you praying on that plane
December 5, 2006 - 22:30 ET by BlondeAre you praying on that plane again, Bal?
Profile them anyway.
Or would you rather have your two year old niece strip-searched?
Well, until they DO "rec
December 6, 2006 - 01:17 ET by Indiana JoeWell, until they DO "recruit caucasian members," profile, PROFILE, PROFILE!
I've said all along that, if 9/11 had been pulled off by a bunch of balding, middle-aged Irish-Italians, I'd have NO PROBLEM being singled out for special attention. I would EXPECT it! Ditto if it had been a bunch of blue-eyed blonde Scandinavians. But it wasn't. It was bearded, Middle Eastern men of a certain age.
So THAT'S who you have to watch out for, political correctness be damned! This is survival we're talking about here!
But it wasn't. It was bearded
December 6, 2006 - 09:55 ET by deus_ex_machinaBut it wasn't. It was bearded, Middle Eastern men of a certain age.
You raise an interesting point. If you can stomach it, look at the pictures of the hijackers:
http://www.danzfamily.com/pictures/pictures02/hijackers.jpg
A few moustaches here and there, a feeble attempt at growing a goatee, but not a beard in the bunch. Not only that, but several of the hijackers could easily pass as Latinos, Greeks or Italians. It's curious that they didn't even bother to disguise their identities, but that's for another discussion.
It seems you've internalized the idea that terrorists look a certain way, but the fact is they come in all shapes and sizes. I've met swarthy Turks who are quite secular and pro-Western in their outlook, as well as blue-eyed Bosnians who make excuses for the 9/11 attacks. Add to that the fact that Muslim Albanians are among the most pro-American people you'll find in Europe, right up there with folks from the former Soviet bloc. Bottom line: ideology is not genetic.
..
December 5, 2006 - 22:27 ET by ww thumper.....Political correctness when dealing with Islam will kill america....ww .....
I listened to a lady on Han
December 5, 2006 - 23:26 ET by Wonder95I listened to a lady on Hannity's show last week who was on the flight from Miineapolis to Phoenix with the six Imam's (her name was Pauline or Paulina) and she gave her story in detail. She backed up all the details that have been given here on Newsbusters, and she made a couple of other interesting points. First, when the six nut cases were taken off of the plane, all of the passengers applauded. Second, when she got home to Phoenix, it was only two hours before a story was already posted on the Denver Post web site, and the imam's were making appearances with their attorney's at 5:00AM. So it looks like it was a setup; they were trying to make some noise, and they were all ready to whine and complain about it to the MSM (and the MSM, true to form, was more than happy to oblige).
I wonder how many people he
December 6, 2006 - 00:52 ET by sarcasmoI wonder how many people here have accidentally slipped a pocketknife onto a plane post-9/11? I keep doing it & getting away with it, even though my only intention is to get to my destination. I always carry a knife, and it's small enough that it passes metal detectors without incident, and these days I'm often in a hurry by the time an airline flight is through disrupting my life.
As to Islam and these Imams, maybe instead of trying to start such lawsuit-bait incidents at airports they should ask themselves why people like me interpret the words "Allahu akbar" as "I'm about to attack you" instead of as "God is great"? Maybe it's because senseless, inhuman violence, instead of any evidence of God's greatness, tends to follow such words. And since I'm admitting politically-incorrect thoughts tonight, I'll also admit I felt safer from Islamofascists (and other passengers on that plane were safer) because I'd accidentally kept that pocketknife on me.
JMR
Well that may be the one mi
December 6, 2006 - 02:09 ET by bulletproofWell that may be the one mistake that these snakes overlook should they ever get further than attempts have gotten them...a jetful of 2 inch blades coming their way! It's funny, yet comforting all at once! : )
Fact is, if our Government bends the knee to these "terrorists are mothers and fathers too" deathwishers trying so repulsively hard to shape public and government opinion, then we are gonna need a few armed traditionalists backing-up our wives and children in the skies.
I believe this may be the underestimation of terrorism. We descend from a philosophy of rebellion against oppression. Push us far enough and then we show them what it means to fight to live, not fight to die. Say, I'm getting wound up already!
Never use your gun to pistol-wip a Liberal. That could mar the finish
.
It's an easy thing for the te
December 6, 2006 - 07:51 ET by Dave RIt's an easy thing for the terrorist enabling media to gripe about the removal of the persons in question from that plane. They were not on it.
I have to admitt I haven't fl
December 6, 2006 - 08:06 ET by msh1973I have to admitt I haven't flown since 9/11 (can you believe it?) and this just reinforces my fear of flying. I guess I would fly in an emergency, but that would be it.
I think the story that Mr. Bo
December 6, 2006 - 11:37 ET by BruzillaI think the story that Mr. Bozell related is a perfect example of why such stories should never make it to the news desk. It is just another example of someone relating part of a story, i.e., "what I saw", without relating the other half, i.e., "what really happened". In most cases of these types of events someone sees something that they think is suspicious based on a very limited skill set, it's investigated and found to be nothing, and life goes on. If all of the people who thought they saw terrorists in every dark-skinned young man on their plane, or in everyone who prays on a flight, or heaven forbid opens a Quran in flight, had their stories reported we would have so many tales of "suspected terrorist investigated today!" that none of us would ever fly again.
Could the men in Mr. Bozell's example have been doing something related to terrorism? Maybe, but not likely. Could they have been wanted for some other crime? Maybe, but not likely. Could they have been used to getting profiled and taken for questioning? Maybe, but not likely. Could they have been from a country where the police are more forceful and where you do what they say and say nothing yourself? Maybe, and likely. Just because a person doesn't do what you would do in any particular situation doesn't make them a threat... it just makes them someone different than you.
As for the six Muslims pulled from the flight recently, I doubt that there's a single Middle Eastern/Muslim person, or one who could pass for one, in the U.S. who isn't aware by now that there is increased scrutiny and suspicion placed on them. It's true that maybe .0001 percent or less of Muslim/Middle Eastern men are terrorists, but about 98% of radical Islamic terrorists are Muslim/Middle Eastern men, so regardless of any "feel good" public statements about profiling.... you're going to be scrutinized. So for a group of six guys, who given their station in life would certainly have known better, to blatantly perform every act on the terrorist wannabe checklist, tells me they we're definately up to something... probably not terrorist-related, but something, and that's a story that should be reported.