The Washington Post's Michelle Boorstein penned a front page story on two Northern Virginia Episcopal parishes preparing to vote on whether to formally sever ties with the denomination and to submit to the authority of a more conservative Nigerian Anglican bishop.
Boorstein gets off to a biased start by labeling said Nigerian bishop as "controversial." No such label was assigned Episcopal Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefforts-Schori, although her theology is far from congruent with historic, orthodox Christianity.
What's more, one of Boorstein's sources, Diana Butler Bass, was presented merely as "a U.S. church historian."
"What will win now? This politicized culture, or that old Anglican, spiritual way of being in the world," Bass told Boorstein, practically casting biblically orthodox Episcopals as rabble rousing radicals within the denomination.
That shouldn't be surprising given Bass herself is a liberal Episcopalian, a fact Boorstein doesn't clue us into.
A look at Bass's Web site suggests she harbors contempt for politically conservative, and more importantly theologically orthodox Christians:
I travel a lot these days. When sitting on an airplane, a seatmate will inevitably ask me what I do. “I’m a writer,” I usually reply. “Oh, that’s interesting. What do you write about?”
I hesitate. Do I really want to answer? Finally, I blurt it out: “Religion. I write about religion.”
My seat companion looks askance—almost as if he is sitting next to some sort of fanatic. He obviously worries that I will spend our cross-country flight trying to convince him to accept Jesus in his heart, join an evangelical megachurch, vote for a local religious right candidate, or that the world was created in six 24-hour days. I quickly add, “Not that sort of religion. I don’t write about narrow, right-wing religion.” He looks relieved. “I write about mainstream and progressive Christianity—churches that base their message on God’s love for all people and God’s vision of peace and justice for the world.”
[...]
Although many people have not yet noticed, there is a quiet revival going on in American religion in its least likely quarters—among moderate and liberal “brand name” Christian congregations, folks like the Presbyterians, Episcopalians, Congregationalists, Lutherans, Methodists...
...These Christians practice their faith with renewed enthusiasm, are experimenting with new forms of worship and service, and are, by their insistence on friendship, justice, and diversity, reforming the structures and traditions in which they find themselves. They are NOT the religious right. And, frankly, they do not like the fact that the media depicts most—if not all—American Christians as card-carrying members of suburban megachurches and Focus on the Family.
—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
could somebody please remind
December 4, 2006 - 23:21 ET by MrSnugglescould somebody please remind me when gay marriage and abortion became "mainsteam" christian values?
MrSnuggles.."when gay
December 4, 2006 - 23:38 ET by ww thumperMrSnuggles.."when gay marriage and abortion[baby murder] became..." They have NEVER been CHRISTIAN values! Maybe EPISCOPAL values , but never Christian ! .....Political correctness when dealing with Islam will kill america....ww .....
I went to an Episcopal serv
December 5, 2006 - 06:42 ET by zhombreI went to an Episcopal service once, out of curiosity. It was like a Catholic Mass, only without any people there.
Excellent work on Bass ther
December 5, 2006 - 10:05 ET by Christopher FotosExcellent work on Bass there, Ken.
I, too, was going to write about that story over at PostWatch, but there was an evidently good reason to describe Akinola as "controversial"--according to Boorstein and some other accounts I found, he supports a new Nigerian law that could throw gays in jail for a variety of acts including, far as I can determine, public displays of affection. I haven't been able to get a full, reliable account about exacty what Akinola said, but the law is unnacceptable and personally I couldn't object to Akinola being tagged on that basis.
That being said, I don't think Boorstein did a good job of describing the institutional context of this battle. As far as the aspirations of Schori are concerned, her group may well be the majority in the U.S. but internationally, they're in the minority. Most of the worldwide Anglican Communion regards Schori as an irritation to be tolerated at best and a schismatic at worst. That's what a non-Episcopalian reader won't understand, if relying solely on Boorstein's account.
Again, super work.
Christopher Fotos/
PostWatch
Yeah, I agree that Akinol
December 5, 2006 - 12:51 ET by Ken ShepherdYeah, I agree that Akinola's support of the anti-gay law merits him the tag "controversial." Of course his motive for doing so may well be to guard the Christian community in Nigeria against violence from radical Muslims. Of course the better part of valor would be for him to stand up and say that his faith teaches that homosexuality is a sin but that Christ would not approve of such a law. These sort of sexual sins are best dealt with by God at His judgment seat. After all, Jesus also taught that lust in one's heart is as adultery, an offense punishable by stoning in the time of Christ, and most certainly an offense a good number of Nigerian Muslims have run afoul of under Christ's righteous standard.
We really nee ot understand w
December 5, 2006 - 12:58 ET by Dan The Man 2We really nee ot understand what secular christians (I used a little c indicating not a true Christian) are all about. Most dont understand Jesus's message is salvation and everything else is subordinate to that. The want to forget that important part and focus on the minor aspects. Jesus and true Christians understand that with acceptance of the Holy Spirit and salvation comes those other things Christ mentioned. But as Christ also said there is nothing without salvation.
Secual christians abound and they will quote the convienient passages such as forgive your enemies, thou shall not murder and others to say this is what Jesus says. They will say Jesus said one who is without sin throw the first stone but will leave out the other part where He said go and sin no more.
Pearls to Swine.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark. -- save my gun, shoot a liberal.