George Will turned heads yesterday with a brutal column on Senator-Elect Jim Webb, scouring him for being rude to President Bush at a reception, and then -- in a critique sure to outrage Webb, the literary lion in his own mind -- assaults Webb's hyperbolic use of English, as in saying the rich are "infinitely" richer than the poor. Will proclaimed Webb is a "subtraction" from civility. But perhaps Will should have used a disclaimer: before the election, Will aided this "subtraction" by scouring Sen. George Allen (he "makes no secret of finding life as a senator tedious") in a Post column seven days before the election. As with the Weekly Standard and their George Allen-bashing cover this fall, when you help make the “Macaca majority,” then you should look in the mirror before despairing over the man you helped usher in.
It's debatable that Webb's prickly party routine is somehow a graver assault on the civic-mindedness of the Republic than his (and the Washington Post's) sleazy personal campaign against Allen from August to November. Will's outrage seems awfully situational coming after the election, as if he's exhaling after kissing the ring of his Post bosses on a race in which they very much had a favorite. He wasn’t anti-Allen at all in 2005 as he favorably assessed his presidential suitability.
I have been a fan of Will's thoughts and prose for a long while, and have a pile of his column collections in my little library. Whether you think it's good or bad, Will is not a party man or a "movement" man. He keeps his distance from, well, "entangling alliances," if we want to quote Founding Fathers. Except, its seems, for his Post family. The column saying the Mark Foley scandal is the cherry on the "Democrats' delectable sundae of Republican miseries" is rather unforgettable, even if his beginning, shellacking the religious right with Sinclair Lewis's "Elmer Gantry," is incredibly tedious. There's also the column hailing Bob Woodward's book as "Katrina between covers." Does anyone hear what one columnist once famously described as the "arf" of a tinny lapdog?
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I haven't read the Will col
December 1, 2006 - 06:50 ET by sarcasmoI haven't read the Will column in question, and I've never been much of a fan (I think he's a dim-bulb compared to William F. Buckley, to be honest, and always have) but it's interesting to see a mention of the book Elmer Gantry. I've been seriously thinking of re-reading that one, considering recent events...
JMR
I've always advocated that George Will write about baseball.
December 1, 2006 - 07:12 ET by acaiguanaI've always advocated that George Will write about baseball.
That's what he is good at doing. He should stick to it. He is one of the most overrated 'conservative' columnists out there. This comes as no surprise that he would talk using both sides of his mouth.
ACA
...
Acaiguana says: "Ya can't win if ya don't play."
acaiguana,I totally agree. I
December 1, 2006 - 09:14 ET by msh1973acaiguana,
I totally agree. I have never understood the hype over Will. Laura Ingraham has him on every once in awhile and I turn him off. His comments are about four weeks late. Thanks George for the insight.
It is news to George the good
December 1, 2006 - 08:38 ET by Andrew H.It is news to George the good people of Virginia elected a borish personality to the Senate. Many of us kind of felt that way before he somehow got himself elected, George--he is confused and goofy enough to become a democrat. The good people of Virginia will probably be served poorly. This is only the start of what very likely will be a six year embarassment.
Never relent.
Let's just recognize George W
December 1, 2006 - 11:50 ET by CaringwhiteguyLet's just recognize George Will for what he is, a snooty, PC writer that loves the Washington social scene. GW = GT (George Will equals Georgetown). He's lucky he wears a bow tie. If he wore a "real tie" it would be a lot easier for "real conservatives" to strangle him with it.
For whatever reason, Will fee
December 1, 2006 - 13:08 ET by eddiebearFor whatever reason, Will feels the heat from people like Bob Novak, Joe Scarborough, Chuck Hagel and Lindsey Graham as the token conservative invited to Sally Quinn's cocktail parties. I think that's why he was especially rough on the GOP this most recent election cycle. I get the feeling Will, who brags about being morose and a pessimist, actually enjoys being in the minority.
Novak is just a curmudgeon.
December 1, 2006 - 15:46 ET by CaringwhiteguyNovak is just a curmudgeon. Scarborough is a wannabe. Hagel and Graham are the worst kind of opportunists in the McCain mold. And Will feels he's intellectually superior to the lot. That may not be saying much.