Anti-Semitic Remarks on CNN Slip Under Currently Elevated Racism Radar

Photo of Noel Sheppard.

CNN’s Kyra Phillips invited comedian Paul Mooney and radio talk show host Roland Martin on to “Newsroom” Tuesday to discuss the Michael Richards (“Kramer”) issue (hat tip to NB member MyKindaSpam). During the conversation, both guests made what many would perceive as being rather anti-Semitic remarks.

This was Martin’s:

Another piece is when you really examine what he said, he not only said 50 years ago we'd have you hanging upside down from a tree. Well, guess what, 50 years ago, Michael Richards would have been in some oven in Germany being baked because he's also Jewish.

Yikes. Mooney must have felt he needed to top that, for later in the discussion, he said:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Excuse me. He's not a Jew. He's not a Jew…So people make that mistake. He may look it, but looks are deceiving.

Double Yikes. Now, both of these comments could easily be perceived as the same caliber of anti-Semitism that got Mel Gibson in trouble. Yet, this happened on national television four days ago when both of these folks were seemingly sober and not being arrested. And, this is likely the first most people are hearing about it.

Taking this a step further, we can’t say Mooney’s remark is acceptable because he’s a comedian, or that would let Richards off the hook. And, Martin is a radio talk show host, as well as the author of “A Black Man’s View of America.” One certainly wouldn’t envision Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, or Michael Savage getting away with these kinds of statements.

As such, what gives these men a pass for such comments?

What follows is a partial transcript of this segment.

PHILLIPS: Well, many who were appalled before are still appalled, apology or no. Joining me from the Laugh Factory in Los Angeles, where Richards is no longer welcome, comedian Paul Mooney. And from Chicago, radio talk show host Roland Martin. He's also executive editor of "The Chicago Defender."

We just lost Paul. We had an IFB connection issue. We're getting that hooked up, Roland.

Paul, can you hear us now?

PAUL MOONEY, COMEDIAN: Yes.

PHILLIPS: OK, good. I've got you both. I was watching it from off there on the camera, I saw that you got hooked in. You heard the whole apology on Letterman, right, Paul?

MOONEY: Yes.

PHILLIPS: OK. And, Roland, you heard it, too.

ROLAND MARTIN, RADIO TALK SHOW HOST: Yes, I did.

PHILLIPS: Let's start with you, Paul. Your reaction to the apology?

MOONEY: Weak.

PHILLIPS: Why weak?

MOONEY: It's not enough, because it doesn't match what he did. I saw the video. I think on David Letterman's show, they should have showed the video. They should have showed it in freeze frame and went step by step. That would have been good therapy for him, because he was like a raving maniac, and he had a complete nervous breakdown on stage. He outed himself. I think that's really his feelings.

PHILLIPS: So...

MOONEY: He said it on stage, now you know how I feel.

PHILLIPS: Interesting. So, Paul, you don't think he got kind of caught up -- you know as a comedian, you get into your schtick. MOONEY: Yes, he didn't get caught up, no.

PHILLIPS: OK, this was the real deal?

MOONEY: You don't do that. If you're going to be funny, you're funny, racially or otherwise. You have a punch line and you deal with the situation right there, right then. You don't walk off stage. You don't do that and leave the audience. The audience is the -- I mean, come on, we're needy. Comedians are needy. We need that love. That's who you love. You don't walk away from people you love.

PHILLIPS: Roland, your reaction?

MARTIN: Kyra, Paul is correct when he says it was a weak apology. First and foremost, the "Letterman" show was the wrong forum for that kind of apology. He was not going to get the kind of questioning that he needed. If you heard the audience, they were laughing. They weren't quite sure whether to laugh at what he was saying, to be serious. And it was Seinfeld who had to say, hey, guys this isn't funny.

Not only that. Another piece is when you really examine what he said, he not only said 50 years ago we'd have you hanging upside down from a tree. Well, guess what, 50 years ago, Michael Richards would have been in some oven in Germany being baked because he's also Jewish. He also said that in his comments, that I'm a white man. I can go get the cops and have you arrested. And so, his comments went beyond that.

But Kyra, we're also making a very big mistake. He has said -- he said, he was heckled. In fact, the people who were there say he was not heckled. There was a large group that was talking. He was angered by them talking. Then after he addressed them, then a couple of the guys said, hey, my boy doesn't think you're funny. Darryl Pitts, who is from Chicago, who was on CNN on Sunday, he gave an eye- witness account. And so, trying to say, well he was being heckled when in fact he wasn't. He was angered because they were talking.

PHILLIPS: All right. Just to step aside for a second, I want to ask you about the 'N' word for a minute. Paul, I remember ...

(CROSSTALK)

MOONEY: Can I say something before you say this. Excuse me. He's not a Jew. He's not a Jew.

MARTIN: OK.

He's either Catholic or atheist or something. He's not that. And as far as blacks and Jews are concerned, I don't think that two men in a burning house have time to argue. That's my point.

MARTIN: I agree.

MOONEY: So he's not a Jew. So people make that mistake. He may look it, but looks are deceiving. Bush looks like he's sane, but anyway go ahead, ask what ...

PHILLIPS All right. I knew Paul had to get something in there. I was waiting for the ...

MOONEY: Of course.

PHILLIPS: all right, hold on. We'll step aside from that for a minute. I'm seeing two issues here. I want to get back to the 'N' word in just a second. But, let's get back to the anger part. Let's start with this. Sinbad talked about the issue, about what Michael Richards should do. Let's take a listen.

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Sure, I'll jump right in. Wh

Sure, I'll jump right in.

Why do Mooney and Martin get away with this? Probably because no one really cares what they say about the issue. Does the average person even know who they are? It's not news.

Balboa

B,

Is that why they were being interviewed by CNN -- because nobody cares what they say? Moreover, are you suggesting it's acceptable for unknowns to make racist remarks? That's an interesting standard there, Balboa?  ns

Noel

I'm not sure why CNN picked these two. Not because of their notoriety, that's for sure.

Nowhere do I suggest that it's OK for anyone to make racist remarks. I'm saying why these statements are not going to cause huge waves in the news.

Balboa

B,

These folks are not as unknown as you make out. Paul Mooney is a very popular and somewhat controversial comedian. He used to be the head writer for the Richard Pryor Show, wrote for Sanford and Son and Good Times, and was the head writer for the first season of In Living Color. Take a look at his credits: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Mooney#Television.

FYI - Greta interviewed him on Wednesday about this issue. As such, though you may not have heard of him, many have...including me.  :-)   ns

Noel

I know who Mooney is (only because I'm--as has been documented-- a pop culture freak). I'm just not sure the general public is going to be fired up by a headline containing "Paul Mooney" and "anti-semitic."

"Kramer" blows up? Lots of interest. Mooney? "Who's Paul Mooney?"

Balboa

B,

How about: "Former 'SNL' Writer Makes Anti-Semitic Remark on CNN"?

I think what you're missing here is the climate, which is odd for someone so concerned with global warming. :-) 

This is quite an environment we're in right now. And, since these guys were invited on to discuss racism, don't you think it's news that they made racist remarks during the interview?  ns 

Noel

Again, I don't think the general public is too concerned about comments made by a former writer from SNL.

Now, there may be some backlash against him, but I don't think it'll occur in the media.

I believe balboa makes a poin

I believe balboa makes a point though.

Richards is someone who is more instantly recognized, where these two arent.  The media only seems to attack those with a lot to lose. Mooney is one of the biggest racists in the business today, but since in the mainstream he is still relatively unknown (except to the chappelle show crowd) He wont get beat up for them.  Plus you have to take in account the MSM's bias towards what race makes the jokes. They certainly will not call a minority on making a racist joke.

I personally hate racist jokes and racial divides. We are all Americans and that should be enough. 

This nation will remain the land of the free only so long as it is the home of the brave. 

The liB standard

The B lib standard;

" I just don't think the general public is going to be fired up.."

And of course, they cannot be when the news media gives them no reason to be. Won't report complaints, will allow the open double standard without stopping it, pretending nothing is here wrong.

That's the whole answer: " The public is not fired up.."

They never will be, unless the media fires them up about it. The media will take the bashing by these two as matter of course run of the mill statements and make sure everyone "sees" them as such, and therefore the one way standard may continue.

 " No one is fired up, so our massive left wing media bias has done it's job.."

Yeah, it has.

"How about: "Form

"How about: "Former 'SNL' Writer Makes Anti-Semitic Remark on CNN"?"

Hmmm....Sounds about like, "Fox News gives more (fawning) coverage in one H&C interview to racist 'Reverend Bacon' than the combined airtime they gave to an entire political party during this macaca-macaca-macaca over & over instead of anything-remotely-new election-cycle," to me, Noel. Of course, we all know I'm blatantly-biased, and how...
JMR

It is a fact that white men

It is a fact that white men, and especially white, Christian, conservative men, have fewer free speech rights in this country than any other "group" does.

Paul Mooney, along with Richard Pryor and Eddie Murphy, have built successful careers doing exactly what Michael Richards did; making fun of skin color. Michael Richards gets crucified for it, but Mooney, Pryor and Murphy get rich and famous. What hypocrisy!

Also on H & C

I think the Mooney guys was also on Hannity and Colmes.

Two African-American "Comedians" were on H&C the other night and here are a couple tid-bits.

1- The guy on set with H&C said that 90% of Whites think in their heads what Richards said but are too afraid to say it.  Yes he said 90% of Whites are overt racists.

2- He wants to oppress people for a couple-hundred years to see how it feels.

3- H&C have no right to discuss the issue nor have they an understanding of the issue since they are white oppressors.  They rule the world.   Somehow the fact that he looked pretty wealthy and somehow made it to a very succesful show was lost on him.

4- He never let the other guest speak who seemed a little more grounded.

5- Hannity said he never thought stuff in his head like Richards said and didn't know anybody who would.  The guy called him a liar.

6- He said it was good what Richards said, it was "Out in the open now" and more people should talk like that so we (meaning him) would know who they are.  He wants to talk more like a racist himself, and sees no problem with it.

In other words ExLib, 90% of ...

In other words ExLib, 90% of caucasions are " white crackas" and in fact might as well call them "white devils" in the line of Elijah Mohammed and the Muslim Farakahn crowd.

Yeah, I get it, 90% of the whiteys are evil.

Does that mean 90% of the blackies think this is true ? Well 90% of the blacks vote for demorats, for that very reason as far as I can tell most of the time. So, yes, at least on the blackie side, it seems that is the prevailing stance. Once again, the lib left can point the finger real well, while their own side is the guilty party, by standard evidence.

that fag needs to change his

that fag needs to change his last name im not down with him havin the same last name as me......POS

but i don't really think Kramer really feels that way I'm sure (as Tim McVeigh said: "I'm not a racist but i dont mind a few n*gger jokes every now and then") but seriously, that was rock bottom for Kramer he hasnt had successful Stand Up like Jerry has and his shows get cancelled he was just a barrel of gunpowder and that was the match...
Paul Mooney is just a POS and yes Richard Pryor was one of the greatest comedians of all time even though he's a crack addict (setting himself on fire...whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat)
People in my generation wouldn't know him if it wasnt for dave chappelle
im surprised he's not muslim....maybe he is.....fag

It seems that unless someth

It seems that unless something demands immediate attention, like a building blowing up, or other objects being destroyed, TV reporting about other things seems to lag 4 or 5 days after happening. Michael Richards made his remarks on a Friday (did his act at the same place on Saturday). This incident blew up in the MSM on the following Tuesday, 4 days later.

Now this story of anti-Semitic remarks occurring on an MSM show 4+ days ago and little mention in the MSM. How often have we heard a report on the MSM and thought why is this news? I read about it on the computer days ago.

(By the way Michael Richards has “grown”. Richards will be appearing on the Rev. Jesse Jackson’s radio show. "He is embarrassed. I think he wants to recover from the pain he now feels and the pain he's caused others," said the Reverend Jackson. (http://www.breitbart...) Maybe Paul Mooney and Roland Martin should go on the show too and atone for their remarks.)

Black Racists...

Unfortunately, and this includes the impotent Fox News, the truth about racism and prejudice in America won't ever be discussed honestly. No one is willing to sit down and have discussions because the outspoken blacks want it said and believed one way and one way only...which is whites are racists and bad and unless some BLACK person gives them the nod of approval in life they have to accept from birth the tag of white racist. Sadly this lust for black community approval by whites has thoroughly spread into all of society. This racial shame and acceptance of black racist philosophy against whites goes unchallenged. Why? Of course, if it is challenged the outspoken blacks will once again claim you are a racist for even bringing it up. Well, all I can say to the blacks in this country is this...you are getting your wish but it has consequences. When you silence the truth about your own racist hatred toward whites you can, for a while, control public dialogue but at some point what you are hiding and denying builds up and explodes and produces resentment, hostility and then eventual collusion by the victims of YOUR racism against whites to cut you OUT of the very pie that civil rights gave to you. Sorry, but civil rights doesn't include pretending you are a victim of slavery, you aren't. You are free and have been for quite some time. Get over it. But have it your way, all you do is create more resentment and more racial isolation for blacks. You perpetuate the very problem you claim to want to make go away.


I am a member of LSCA (Lazy Spell Checkers Anonymous).

Guy,I think you're absolutely

Guy,

I think you're absolutely correct in your observations!  You've explained this scenario better than I ever could.

I honestly believe some people are horrified to leave the comfort of their supposed "victim" status.  This would entail more personal responsibility for their behavior and success in life.

But what do I know...I'm just a racist cracker!

liberals

Only Republican white men are racist homophobes. Everyone else is just a comedian. RIIIGHT

NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal

Rrright--we are accused of be

Rrright--we are accused of being homophobic simply because we view unnatural relations as being well, unnatural.  People who put a sexual perversion as the most important issue before any--is very silly.  That's why they leave me cold as I analyze their credibility.   

Never relent.

They can call me homophobic a

They can call me homophobic all they want. I know its not right and I wont support it.

This nation will remain the land of the free only so long as it is the home of the brave. 

Everyone knows that it is imp

Everyone knows that it is impossible for a black man to be racist.......PC rules only apply to white men.