NBC's Today Highlights Fox's O.J. Fiasco, But Today Host Gumbel Was O.J. Apologist

Photo of Rich Noyes.
  • Bookmark and Share

This morning, NBC’s Today led the broadcast by highlighting Fox’s decision not to air their smarmy interview with O. J. Simpson about how he “would” have killed his wife “if” he had committed the crime, which, of course, most Americans believe he did, only to escape a double-murder conviction in a circus of a trial. But while NBC seemed to be enjoying Fox’s pain today, back in the ’90s, their Today show was perhaps O.J.’s most sympathetic venue on TV.

This morning, co-host Matt Lauer talked to the late Nicole Brown’s sister Denise in both the 7am and 7:30am half-hours about the awfulness of Fox’s deal with O.J., which News Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch scuttled on Monday, saying it was an “ill-considered project” — perhaps the understatement of the decade.

Lauer asked Ms. Brown: “‘An ill-considered project.’ Is this too little, too late on the part of Fox?” For her part, Denise Brown thanked the American public for being loud enough in their outrage to kill the whole venture.

But during and after the infamous trial, Lauer’s predecessor Bryant Gumbel was perhaps the biggest O.J. booster on TV. A couple of gems from our archive:

"Two weeks after his acquittal, we'll see how O.J. Simpson is still being treated as if he were guilty." — Bryant Gumbel, October 16, 1995 Today.

"Why do you suppose it is that one year after his acquittal, most white Americans at least, cannot accept the idea that he's out walking around free, refuse to let him live his life?" — Bryant Gumbel to O.J. Simpson lawyer Johnnie Cochran in part one of three day interview series, September 30, 1996 Today.

"Do you think O.J. will ever get a fair shake in this country? Will people ever let him live out his life and accept the fact that he was acquitted?" — Some of Gumbel's questions to Cochran on Today, October 2, 1996.

Fox’s scheme to give a probable murderer a couple of hours of prime time to fantasize out loud about how he “would” have slit his wife’s throat is morally repugnant, and Murdoch’s decision to cancel the show is correct. But NBC’s headlining of Fox’s fiasco neatly overlooks how their own star was a key member of the O.J. fan club, and how NBC let him use their airwaves to blast those who would not give Simpson “a fair shake.”

And it reminds us how there weren’t very many media heroes as that long and sordid story played out a decade ago.

—Rich Noyes is Research Director at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

FOX demonstrated in it's de

FOX demonstrated in it's decision that public interface is an important factor. It's past time for the public to heed such.

Amazing how much influence cable, internet, and conservative radio have had on general public.

JDW

Kerry: "You know, education, if you make the most of it ... you can do well. If you don't, you get stuck in Iraq."

Bryant Gumbel is perhaps the

Bryant Gumbel is perhaps the best dressed, well-spoken racist in television news today.

Gumbel Grumble

"......Today Host Gumbel Was O.J. Apologist"

But of course he was.  And for the same reason some on the jury just had to acquit.  No rocket science here, this has nothing to do with tight gloves........It's all very black and white.

my incorrect poltics

I'm convinced that ordinary racism, the feeling-- is natural, a part of everybody's pshyche.

It's racial injustice; discrimination and hatred which ought to be challenged and stamped out. THAT's what human brotherhood means to me. There's no such person as a "color-blind" one. That would be absurd.

I consider myself to be col

I consider myself to be color-blind. While I think it is natural to find friends with similar culture and things in common, I do not have a problem with people of a different "race". I put race in quotes because I believe we are all part of the human race, we all came from Adam and Eve, we are all equal under God. As such I am against affirmative action, I am against giving anyone special treatment because of their race, handicaps, religion, sex, whatever. I judge a person based on their actions.

me too

Yet we know when persons of another ethnic origin are in the room with us. We accept their perfect right to be in that room. If they are committing such an outrage that we have them bounced from there, it isn't because of their color.

Once in the 50's a pal asked me: "Yeah; but would you let one marry your sister?" At the time I was a boy; and I had no clue what to say. Here's my answer, 50 years later:

If he only wishes to score on my Sister, he'll be confronted with force. Nobody has that right.

If he loves my sister or my daughter, and she loves him, let them say so. I won't be offended. And even if I were, it would be none of my damn business. They're adults and they love one another; and they're FREE.

My brother did marry a hisb

My brother did marry a hisbanic, we lover her completely, and don't see her color. My other brother married a hawaiian...she is part of the family is anyone. Our foster daughter is hawaiian...and she was loved like any niece (grandaughter) as anyone, and she wasn't even adopted yet. Your test is a good one, because it does expose those people who are racist.

Didn't the jury contain 9 bl

Didn't the jury contain 9 black females? Aquit OJ?...uhhh no duh!

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

murder

Murder is an injustice to humanity.

NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal

"Murder is an injustice

"Murder is an injustice to humanity."

True, but in this case it seems blatant racism trumps murder.

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

you prove my point

You say: in this case it seems blatant racism trumps murder.

No-- racial injustice added to murder. Certain jurists added their own racial discrimination to the murderer's injustice. A travesty of justice that wouldn't have become so if everyone were fair and impartial.

That's sort of what I said.

That's sort of what I said.  Thanks for the addendum.

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

"Do you think O.J. will

"Do you think O.J. will ever get a fair shake in this country?

In the 1850's O.J. would have been horsewhipped or hanged for looking at a white woman.

In the 1930's O.J. would have been lynched for talking to a white woman.

In the 1950's he would have been harassed, beaten and possibly even shot for attempting to date a white woman.

In the 1960's he would have been ridiculed, harassed for attempting to date a white woman.

In the 1970's he would have been treated like family if he had married a white woman.

In the 1980's he would have been considered a pioneer in race relations for marrying a white woman.

In the 1990's he get's off scott free after murdering a white woman (and a white man)...

And now he's trying to make a buck off of his despicable crime!

Fair shake?  Huh, Bryant?  Fair shake???  Are you insane?

Lethal Injection would be too merciful for O.J.

 mattm      I always th

 mattm      I always thought O J should have gotten 30 days in the electric chair........ww .....    

Regan is not mentioned here

Regan is not mentioned here yet she, like Bryant, had an allegiance to Simpson.

JDW

Kerry: "You know, education, if you make the most of it ... you can do well. If you don't, you get stuck in Iraq."

NBC was always partial to O.J

NBC was always partial to O.J.  In fact, Norm McDonald was fired from SNL because a higher up at NBC was offended at all of his O.J. jokes on Weekend Update.

CNN: Broken Media

Speaking of humor: Some of th

Speaking of humor: Some of these are pretty lame, but some are pretty good.