Don't feed... I think you're right.  I'm convinced the msm hires people for their looks, polically correct agenda--not for character, educaiton, experience or possessing a complete content.  And as long as they do that, their being a reliable source of anything is suspect.  We'll continue to be treated to the American version of Pravda in most outlets.   

Never relent.

"...Will the table ever tip? How long before the tides turn?..."

The liberal Boomers are in control of the MsM, and it will only get worse as long as they are in.  They know how to argue, agitate and create strife, but they don't know how to lead or get anything done.  They moved in early (see Bill Clinton) and will hang on as long as possible (well beyond their tenure) because they don't believe that any rules apply to them (its in their DNA), that's the bad news.  The good news is that the New Media mitigates the MsM to the degree that it is relied upon by the public.  And slowly but surely (over the next 25 years or so) the public should begin to consume other forms of media.  The bad news is that the Liberals are moving into the New Media as well, see YouTube. 

Well it's plenty disturbing that the media can cover-up for Murtha for so long, until they finally decide it's in their own best liberal interest to hack the lifeline and save their glorious grandma san fran from the trouble of a democrat culture of corruption.

 I'd sure like to see one elected democrat that steps up and I don't wind up finding out that they are a nam sleazer that doctored up, embellished, and twisted their own service for fake vote points. In Kerry's case there is evidence that was his plan all along, provided by a Rear Admiral. So now this other mouse-eyed moron has a hidden record he won't release, won't talk about his medals, and has a book out on "the military service". Three different running stories about his medals, with some long ago detractors, one he spilled the beans to during Abscam.

 Wow, how the media manages to sleaze along with these jerks is beyond me. I'm wondering how many more democrats are in congress that have unknown criminal brushes painted all over them, and the media has silently covered it up for them.

 There's something fishy as well about how congress can manipulate service records for elected senators. I've heard that often enough to know they have some procedure to doctor up whatever they feel the need for, secretly. Surely the House elected aren't left out of that.

 I recall when Kerry said publicly that he was talking to the Navy records guy and arguing that some of what was in his record didn't belong there. I took that to mean Kerry has some skeletons he needed purged and was looking for some obscure law, reg. or code or some manipulation a lawyer or friend in the bureaucracy could work for him so he could present a "clean signed 180" release. The skum was so thick I could taste it. Murtha has the same problem, seeing his answers to the fellow who wrote the letter about the corner admission talk in congress, and his complete " this is an attempt to talk about me not the troops" BS line. Skum, thick skum. 

 I guess the media has taken the place of J Edgar Hoover and his "secret dirt list" I have heard about, but now the media has one ten times that size but never has to report about it. The dirty dems are putty in their hands, knowing the axe can be dropped whenever they see fit.

Don't forget, the other major goal of the MSM is to get McCain the GOP nomination. They seem well on their way to it for him.

Protect Hillary.

Damage anyone who threatens Hillary’s nomination.

I wonder about this. I think the MSM really wants Obama in there. After all, a black muslim as president would just scream diversified tolerance. The fact that it might be a crippling blow to America (if Obama is true to his religion) means nothing to the elite MSM.

DSG