Shawn,

Could you do us all a favor? Whenever you cut-and-paste DUmmie and/or DKos talking points, we would all appreciate it if you would provide the link to the posts and/or diaries. It actually makes it much more entertaining for us.

Thank you in advance.  :-)   ns

shawn228,

Ok, lets assume that you are correct, that Fox News didn't make a simple mistake.

That means that someone in the chain of command at Fox made the conscious decision that their evil deed of the day would be to try to trick it's viewers into thinking Foley was a Democrat... something that a five year old could verify is incorrect.

While they were at it - you know - saying things that anyone watching any other news show would know wasn't true - why not say that Foley was a Democrat and a two headed troll that eats children?

Wow. If that's the extent of Fox News ability to trick it's gullible viewership, then you guys who disapprove of Fox so much have nothing to worry about. Their attempts at deceit are nowhere at the level of ... say ... CBS and their fancy forgeries.

Katie Couric is new at this and will only get better with more experience.

She could hardly get worse.  If it makes you happy, you watch her.  No one else seems to be overjoyed by Katie's non-performance after achieving this great journalistic milestone.

"I would also say that despair is not a method." ~Gen. John P. Abizaid, CENTCOM, in response to an idiotic, grand-standing statement by Hillary Clinton.

I think the quality of the crack you are using is poor and probably you should find a more reputable dealer. Couric...get better...hahahahahahahahahaha. Listen, there is no feat here, this is a minor leaguer wrongly brought up to the majors. Couric has already bombed and her numbers continue to drop, she is at best a spokeswoman for dependent and syncophantic housewifes from the Today Show. I give her credit for one thing, taking mediocre talent and bamboozling a lot of people with a lot of nothing, but hey, her audience is comprised of "asleep at the wheel Crybaby Boomers and their offspring" so in this day and age it requires little depth and little substance to even appear jounalistically legitimate. But then you probably think Nancy Grace is quality television and The Lifetime Channel is a winner...hahahahahahahahahaha.

I am a member of LSCA (Lazy Spell Checkers Anonymous).

"Katie Couric is new at this and will only get better with more experience..."

CBS sure is paying out a boat load in salary to someone who needs more "experience". Hell of an anchor training program they're running there. Where does one pick up an application?

The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.

- Arabian Proverb

Shawn, you guys gotta be proud of the fact that Pelosi is the first female Spear of the House. Funny though, you didn't seem to give a damn about Dr. Rice being the first ever black female as Secretary of State. And yes, I believe my position is true. Lexus Nexis has 476 articles touting Nancy's "historic" win, yet only 77 articles about Dr. Rice being the first black female Secretary of State. Nice "fair and balanced" for you idiots on the left, huh? But then again, I guess it truly is an extreme achievement for any liberal to succeed at anything - like completely escape Abscam indictment. Heh.

Oh, something I also noticed about "shawn:" In one comment, he completely knows how to edit, punctuate, and capitalize "I;" yet in others, his punctuation is spotty (at best), and his capitalization is crap. Just an abservation.

So sham228, you don't remember claiming FoxNews NEVER made certain inquiries ?

Secondly, when you claimed Foxnews was the MOST BIASED you mentioned the word " Foley" but said you wouldn't get into "it" , meaning of course an explanation of massively most biased Foxnews. Now, in order that you can "prove" you didn't debate with facts but golly darn "very well can", you made a series of "fact statements", the first of which is incorrect, and the rest of which relate exactly "how" to the " most biased Foxnews with the "foley" thing you "aren't getting into"... ?

 I ASSume you won't understand a word of this either, because the "way you debate" is to "make a whole new series" of opinionated statements (at least TWO of which are wrong), and "abandon entirely" your prior statement with the "factless" problem that was pointed out prior. Right BOZO ?

So we have your yet to be addressed prior Foxnews fakery, and now you want a wholly different debate, and of course will continue shaming yourself with insults in the future here, in all  likelihood, while creating more false interim "claimed facts".

[ Fact  Rob Ney is going to Jail soon. ] < INCORRECT - a fact is not something that MAY occur in the future. There's one bonehead.

[ Fact WMD were never found ] < INCORRECT some is not none. A little is not ZERO.

So, two more STRIKES against you.

Also, I consider this statement of yours to be rife with STUPIDITY and likely error:

[ I have seen the error of my way SportPolitics, I only hope I can live up to your standards ]

You denied the error of your ways, excusing your kissing up to Noel even as you made personal attacks while decrying others who do it. I quite DOUBT you have seen the error of your ways.

FURTHERMORE, you likely do NOT understand my standards, but let me give you a good little outline. If you are going to pretend everyone else needs to stop "personal attacks" when indeed you are initiating and engaging in them as well, then you have a REAL PROBLEM. Just pretending to be the pure virgin doesn't make you one, moron. If I get something as wrong as you have, I expect to be properly derided, remember that.