A day after CBS's Katie Couric delivered a softball interview with Democratic Congressman John Murtha, in which she skipped questions about his ethical improprieties, painted him as a victim of attacks after he called for withdrawal from Iraq and cued him up, “Did you feel vindicated last Tuesday?" (NewsBusters item), NBC Nightly News looked at Murtha's possible abuse of his office. NBC's story by Lisa Myers, however, aired only after Democrats favoring Steny Hoyer over Murtha for House Majority Leader, raised Murtha's past. Myers cited how Speaker-to-be Nancy Pelosi promised “the most honest and open Congress in history,” but Myers noted how “some Democrats and ethics experts say that promise was undercut when Pelosi endorsed this man, John Murtha, for the number two leadership position in the House." Referring to liberal speech suppression activist Fred Wertheimer, Myers relayed how “critics claim Murtha has amassed power in part by handing out taxpayer money to special interests, including to clients of defense lobbyists who give him big campaign contributions." In addition, Myers raised ABSCAM as she showed 1980 video of Murtha saying he was “not interested -- at this point” in a $50,000 bribe from an undercover FBI agent.
Myers concluded with Murtha's “Swift Boat” defense: "Murtha has repeatedly denied wrongdoing and says these charges amount to Swift-Boating, the same kind of unfair charges that helped defeat John Kerry. Murtha also now supports ethics reform.”
Before the Myers story, NBC Nightly News had eagerly promoted Murtha's political cause. As documented by NewsBusters at the time, when Murtha urged withdrawal from Iraq, Brian Williams led his November 17, 2005 newscast:
"Good evening. When one Congressman out of 435 members of Congress speaks out against the war in Iraq, it normally wouldn't be news, but it was today because of who he is. Congressman John Murtha, a Vietnam veteran, a Democrat from Pennsylvania, is a 37-year veteran of the U.S. Marine Corps, who voted for both gulf wars. Vice President Cheney once called him one of his strongest allies in Congress back when Cheney ran the Pentagon. Today, John Murtha said the U.S. must get out of Iraq.”
Then, as recounted in a May 17 NewsBusters item:
On the six month anniversary of Democratic Congressman John Murtha's successful publicity stunt call for the U.S. to withdraw from Iraq, the NBC Nightly News jumped on the chance to highlight Murtha's charge that last November some Marines deliberately killed more than a dozen innocent Iraqi civilians. But in treating Murtha as some kind of authoritative figure making “new allegations,” NBC ignored how the charge is old and has already been widely-reported -- including on the March 20 NBC Nightly News.Brian Williams touted: "There are disturbing new allegations tonight from the Congressman and decorated Marine veteran who stunned the Bush administration about six months ago with his call for U.S. withdrawal from Iraq.” Following a rundown from Jim Miklaszewski of the allegations, Williams trumpeted Murtha's credibility and relevance: “Jim, we should go over again, why is it significant that John Murtha is the one saying this?" Miklaszewski responded with Murtha's argument that the event bolsters his political point as to why the U.S. should leave Iraq, preceded by the misnomer that Murtha had “recently” turned against the war: “It's important because as somebody who recently turned against the war, Murtha held this up today as one of the reasons the U.S. military should get out of Iraq as soon as possible."
The MRC's Brad Wilmouth provided a transcript of the November 14 NBC Nightly News story:
Brian Williams: "On the House side of the Capitol building, it hasn't been such smooth sailing for the new Democratic majority. Provided Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi of California has the Speaker of the House job sewn up, the fight is on for the next job, the Majority Leader position. Pelosi is supporting John Murtha, the decorated 37-year Marine veteran from Pennsylvania who wants the U.S. out of Iraq. The other candidate in the race is Maryland Democrat Steny Hoyer, a veteran party whip in the House. Late today, I spoke to Congressman Hoyer, who says he is confident he has the votes to win. Some of that confidence may be a result of questions that others were asking today about a part of John Murtha's record. Our report on that tonight from NBC's Lisa Myers."
Lisa Myers: "In her first interview after Democrats won control of the House, Nancy Pelosi made a sweeping promise."
Nancy Pelosi, House Minority Leader, in November 8 interview with Brian Williams: "To turn this Congress into the most honest and open Congress in history. That is my pledge. That is what I intend to do."
Myers: "But some Democrats and ethics experts say that promise was undercut when Pelosi endorsed this man, John Murtha, for the number two leadership position in the House."
Fred Wertheimer, ethics reform advocate: "Representative Murtha has basically been on the wrong side of public integrity issues during his career."
Myers: "Critics claim Murtha has amassed power in part by handing out taxpayer money to special interests, including to clients of defense lobbyists who give him big campaign contributions."
Undercover FBI agent in blurry black and white video from 1980: "Each packet contains $10,000 in $100 bills."
Myers: "Then there is this video from an FBI sting in 1980 known as ABSCAM. An undercover FBI agent offers a $50,000 bribe to Congressman Murtha, who is sitting on the right."
Undercover FBI Agent: "I got, I went out and I got the $50,000, okay? From what you're telling me, okay, you're telling me that that's not what you, you know, that's not what you-"
Rep. John Murtha (D-PA): "I'm not interested."
FBI Agent: "Okay."
Murtha: "At this point."
FBI Agent: "Okay."
Murtha: "You know, we do business for a while, maybe I'll be interested and maybe I won't, you know."
FBI Agent: "Okay."
Myers: "Murtha refuses the cash and talks about his need to be cautious because of his ambitions. As his supporters point out, that was 26 years ago."
Rep. Martin Meehan (D-MA): "Not only is it ancient history, the fact of the matter is Jack Murtha was never charged with anything."
Myers: "The House ethics committee also did not take action against Murtha. Murtha has repeatedly denied wrongdoing and says these charges amount to Swift-Boating, the same kind of unfair charges that helped defeat John Kerry. Murtha also now supports ethics reform. Lisa Myers, NBC News, Washington."
The online version of the Myers story, as posted on MSNBC.com
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





"Good evening. When one Congressman out of 435 members of Congress speaks out against the war in Iraq, it normally wouldn't be news, but it was today because of who he is. Congressman John Murtha, a Vietnam veteran, a Democrat from Pennsylvania, is a 37-year veteran of the U.S. Marine Corps, who voted for both gulf wars. Vice President Cheney once called him one of his strongest allies in Congress back when Cheney ran the Pentagon. Today, John Murtha said the U.S. must get out of Iraq.”
Lisa Myers: "In her first interview after Democrats won control of the House, Nancy Pelosi made a sweeping promise."













Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Definition of swiftboating
November 14, 2006 - 22:01 ET by nkviking75"Swiftboating" (n.) An especially egregious form of political smear tactic in which a Democrat is discredited by some embarrassing, well-documented fact from his or her past. </sarcasm>
NK,Or in John F'ing's exceedi
November 14, 2006 - 22:03 ET by BlondeNK,
Or in John F'ing's exceedingly bad french accent....
Those pesky facts jump up and bite one in the a** again!
Pauvre petit moi!
Did I hear right that Nancy P
November 14, 2006 - 22:40 ET by NazarethDid I hear right that Nancy Pelosi is privately backing off from recommending Murtha? If that's true- it doesn't surprise me the MSM is making a last ditch effort to save Murtha's tarnished image by switching focus to the evil Republicans who point out the facts. oui bon appatite
http://sacredscoop.com
Murtha - I heard the same thing, BUT....
November 14, 2006 - 22:45 ET by Eric TurnerI heard the same thing, but you might want to read these first...
http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/14/murtha-to-pro-hoyer-dems-stop-swift-boating-me/
http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/14/abramoff-fingers-6-to-8-seriously-corrupt-democratic-senators/
Funny Stuff
November 14, 2006 - 22:46 ET by ownedIn case anyone missed it..............I present the new Speaker of The House
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJlapQWgDyI
Hmm... YouTube "down rig
November 15, 2006 - 00:42 ET by Indiana JoeHmm... YouTube "down right now." For "maintenance." (2341 CST)
Drudge reports " MURTHA ' I have the votes' "
November 15, 2006 - 23:28 ET by SportPoliticsDrudge reports " MURTHA ' I have the votes' ".
Democrats knew what they were getting into when they supported mr cut n run - who came out whining because the White House didn't return his tlephone call to it for surrendering.
They played it for all it was worth for months and months, and now I hope they get stuck with mr. bribery ethics abscam million dollars in my friends bank man.
He didn't just want 50 grand to get the Shiek oillord into the USA, he wanted at least a million bucks in one of his campaign contributors banks. Or, a rescue for some mining operation in his state.
Frankly, any real Shiek would have preferred just paying the 50 grand a couple of times, instead of loading up the local banks with oil dollars and dumping millions into Murtha's mismanaged local business interests.
But, Murtha became a RAT, and then had the committee diddled and the prosecutor resigned in protest. Democrat "protectionism" for the corrupt congressman.
Heck I watched Murtha whine that he wouldn't have said much "but the White House didn't return my call." Then, " I was so surprised and taken aback by the massive press rallying and calling me, I just had no idea something like this would happen."
And then sensing the advantage Murtha poured on the coals " We need to get out now - we are the target over there ! "
He went on and on, blabbing it up for the effect he was getting, and saw an opportunity he never thought would come to him...
Now mr longtime swindler and shadey backroom million dollar banking dealer and Shiek immigration workaround man has a chance to be a leader he never has been, and frankly, was caught up in the press whirlwind that loved his first weak anti-Iraq statement, and christened him the demo man of the howl.
Yes, I sure do hope he has the votes, the dried up sad sack of mice eyed whining - that would be a great addition to san fran nan, who would sound more of a man than the crybaby Murtha. I fully expected him to launch into tears a couple of times.
" We're a target over there, They are shooting at us, we're the target ! " < HOW AN EX LIB MARINE EVER THOUGHT THAT THE USA TROOPS WOULD NOT BE A TARGET IN AN ONGOING WAR IS BEYOND ME.
I guess he wee-wee'd his drawers when he found out our troops were a target in the war zone...
Could anyone be so absolutely stupid ? I want to see him cry like a baby on the podium when he assumes power.
"Swiftboating" (n.)
November 15, 2006 - 00:38 ET by Indiana Joe"Swiftboating" (n.) An especially egregious form of political smear tactic in which a Democrat is discredited by some embarrassing, well-documented fact from his or her past. </sarcasm>"
Hey, nkviking75, I wouldn't put the </sarcasm> there. I think you just defined a valid new word. It's an "evolving language," right? So WTH, I'd say just go with it. New words are coming out all the time. You might even get credit. .. ;^)
Clarity
November 15, 2006 - 05:50 ET by nkviking75I was trying to make it clear that I didn't really believe that telling the truth about a Democrat was unfair or a smear tactic. That's especially true of the real Swift Boat Vets. Their book on Kerry was as rational and unemotional as you could get.
Abramhoff has info on Dem. senators, whisked away to prison
November 14, 2006 - 22:56 ET by nkviking75Here's an interesting item from Brian Ross and Rhonda Schwartz in Tuesday's "Blotter" on ABCNews.com. Jack Abramhoff is being sent off to prison over the objection of prosecutors, who need his help to continue investigating corruption in Congress. Among those whom Abramhoff was ready to spill the beans about are what he apparently described as "six to eight seriously corrupt Democratic senators". A federal judge in Florida ordered him to report to prison tomorrow (Wed.) The judge did allow him to be imprisoned in the closest facility to D.C. If the corrupt senators in question were Republicans, do you think this story would be out a week after the election?
The only name mentioned was &
November 14, 2006 - 23:08 ET by ownedThe only name mentioned was "Rove"..........no Dem senetors mentioned. Ross is a POS.........I think he sat on this info. I betcha Reid is one of them<<<<<<<<<<
Thanks ArmyVet- I'll give tho
November 14, 2006 - 23:18 ET by NazarethThanks ArmyVet- I'll give those a read a bit later- The dems are changing their minds so fast it's making me dizzy- gotta lay down for a bit (actually I think I'm comming down with somethign lol- but it might be a secret democratic virus that eats away at all sensibilities lol)
Yeah I read somethign about that Viking- Hopefully He'll spill the beans- time to clean otu the scum that Nancy was refering to when she mentioned the swamp- she just had the wrong party in her statement- lol after stating the swamp thing- I pop over to hotair quick from link form ArmyVet & they're talking about the swamp too- Great minds think alike I guess lol
http://sacredscoop.com
Correct, Rove is only name me
November 15, 2006 - 00:50 ET by Indiana JoeCorrect, Rove is only name mentioned. Otherwise, "six or eight" Democrats. Well, is it "six" or is it "eight?" And WHO are THEY?
(not holding breath....)
Any idea if the judge who ord
November 15, 2006 - 08:47 ET by paperheadAny idea if the judge who ordered him to prison was appointed by Clinton?
"Murtha has repeatedly d
November 15, 2006 - 01:49 ET by Republic1"Murtha has repeatedly denied wrongdoing and says these charges amount to Swift-Boating, the same kind of unfair charges that helped defeat John Kerry. "
This is the kind of garbage we all talk about when it comes to claiming media bias. Myers could have made this sentence neutral by not inserting the word "unfair", but chose to take a position that the Swift Boat adds were without merit and somehow maligned Kerry. We all saw those adds, and they were made by his fellow Vietnam vets in response to Kerry wrapping himself in the flag and trying to bury his past as an anti-war protestor who compared his fellow vets to war criminals. If a Democrat is involved, bringing up his record (or videotaped testimony) is apparently "unfair". Myers just couldn't bring herself to report on Murtha's ethical lapse without trying to make him look like the victim of a smear--a benefit of the doubt that Republicans rarely receive.
Some of you may be interested
November 15, 2006 - 07:14 ET by Dave RSome of you may be interested in this. Pretty interesting piece on our favorite fromer marine congressman.
And hasn't the MSM been telling us that Nanny Pelosi was going to clean up corruption? I'll say her methods are, shall we say, original.
Thank You Nancy
November 15, 2006 - 07:20 ET by Guy Arthur ThomasJust a word of thanks to you, Nancy Pelosi. You are on the path to insuring a Democratic loss and Republican win in '08 with Murtha as your choice. Yes, Murtha has the goods on you and however many others so you probably have no choice, but thanks anyway. Now, if only the Republicans aren't stupid enough to think Jeb Bush is a good choice or that Sen. John Mc"Dole" is their man in '08.
I am a member of LSCA (Lazy Spell Checkers Anonymous).
It seems to me like all the
November 15, 2006 - 09:45 ET by JasonCIt seems to me like all the Dems have to do in the next two years is whip up a proposal for Iraq that doesn't involve complete withdrawal, leave taxes alone, and drop the smear tactics on respectable Republicans (under which label I would include the president) and they would have little trouble getting any candidate elected in 2008. Whether or not they will actually have the restraint necessary to do this is another thing entirely. 50/50?
"The right-wing intellectual refers to the mere existence of the given order as an argument for it." -Slavoj Zizek
The winning strategy IMO (e
November 15, 2006 - 09:56 ET by sarcasmoThe winning strategy IMO (even if they slightly raise them, which is likely) is to simplify taxes. Considering the complexity of the tax code, it shouldn't be that difficult, but considering the industry which literally depends on said complexity, I'm not sure they'll find the fortitude.
JMR
Much easier said than done with Dems
November 15, 2006 - 10:52 ET by Guy Arthur ThomasIdealistically the Dems will realize this and accomplish it, realistically they will produce the kind of "Keystone Cops" governing for which they are famous and stand dumbfounded as to why they were benched again so quickly. So far the Murtha choice sets them on course for rejection in '08...so what does someone as corrupt as Murtha have on Pelosi and her "cirle of fiends"?
I am a member of LSCA (Lazy Spell Checkers Anonymous).
Myers: "The House ethics
November 15, 2006 - 08:10 ET by GalvanicMyers: "The House ethics committee also did not take action against Murtha."
Since it was a corrupt Democrat-controlled House of Representatives at the time (Wasn't Jim Wright still Speaker at the time?), this should come as no surprise to anyone.
To avoid media bias you can r
November 15, 2006 - 09:16 ET by ding7777To avoid media bias you can read the transcript of the Murtha's "sting". Beware: the transcript shows that:
1. Mutrha did not take any money
2. Murtha repeatedly told the "stinger" he did not need to pay for what the "stinger" wanted (Asylum for the Shah torture victims)
3. Murtha wanted the "stinger" to invest in jobs for Murtha's district (Johnstown then had a high unemployment rate)
If this is what the FBI had, no wonder the Justice Department did not proscecute Murtha - sheesh!
Murtha and Integrity
November 15, 2006 - 09:21 ET by Sua Sponte 75Undercover FBI Agent: "I got, I went out and I got the $50,000, okay? From what you're telling me, okay, you're telling me that that's not what you, you know, that's not what you-"
Rep. John Murtha (D-PA): "I'm not interested."
FBI Agent: "Okay."
Murtha: "At this point."
Yep, no integrity issues there. And I'm sure he ran right out and reported all of this following the meeting.........oh that's right.......he didn't.
"You're either part of the solution or part of the problem"
In the (slightly-modified)
November 15, 2006 - 09:27 ET by sarcasmoIn the (slightly-modified) words of Ding: If this is all the FBI had, it's no wonder the Justice Department named him an unindicted co-conspirator.
JMR
Correct, I know that he was n
November 15, 2006 - 09:32 ET by Sua Sponte 75Correct, I know that he was not charged with anything and that there was nothing on him. What strikes me is that the intent was there for a future working relationship. Had the operation been allowed to continue, based on Murthas response, there is little doubt.......All the medals in the world won't make up for an integrity issue.
"You're either part of the solution or part of the problem"
Sua Sponte - "the intent
November 15, 2006 - 09:57 ET by ding7777Sua Sponte - "the intent was there for a future working relationship" if the "stinger" provided jobs for Murth's district. Sounds like Murtha was trying to string him along for the good of his district.
Where "his district&qu
November 15, 2006 - 10:12 ET by sarcasmoWhere "his district" actually-means "his crooked brother's 'earmarked' contracts" I might be able to agree, even...
JMR
sarcasmo - what's "ear
November 15, 2006 - 23:06 ET by ding7777sarcasmo - what's "earmarks" have to do with this. The "stinger" was representing a private person
Ding7777 - I agree. As long a
November 15, 2006 - 10:53 ET by Roger the ShrubberDing7777 - I agree. As long as it's good for the district, it does not matter if it's unethical, illegal, bad for the country, or just plain stupid.
Don Young's $200 million "Bridge to Nowhere" in Alaska should fall into this category, too.
Sorry Rog, but Ding's not g
November 15, 2006 - 11:15 ET by sarcasmoSorry Rog, but Ding's not going to see this. You see, I've "cloaked" you...
JMR
Damn. I hate when that happen
November 15, 2006 - 11:17 ET by Roger the ShrubberDamn. I hate when that happens.
Roger the Shrubber - re: the
November 15, 2006 - 23:11 ET by ding7777Roger the Shrubber - re: the bridge to Nowhere: your comparison is way off since the bridge was funded by tax dollars not by a private investor (the "stinger")?
Exactly what is unethical, illegal, bad for the country about a private investor investing in a district?
Ding Ding anyone home? I wo
November 15, 2006 - 13:34 ET by Dan The Man 2Ding Ding anyone home? I work in government and know when someone is trying to bribe me. I know that you dont have to use the words bribe. I have had a few blatent bribes offered and a few more sutle ones. I always reported them to the authorities for my protection. Murtha did not so he was thinking about taking it. He is dirty as they come possibly even dirtier than teh Clintons.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark. -- save my gun, shoot a liberal.
dirtier
November 15, 2006 - 13:39 ET by misterbillI have no solid proof, but I felt and still feel that the Clinton's are the dirtiest to ever enter the White House. They impress me that both are totally amoral and can adjust their views and their consciences (if any) to the situation which will result in the most personal gain. I really think they don't care about anyone.
All the medals in the world
November 15, 2006 - 11:31 ET by Jack BauerAll the medals in the world won't make up for an integrity issue.
Ask Randy Cunningham. He was more bemedalled and heroic than Murtha.
Now he's a resident of the Gray Bar hotel.
Proud member of the all-powerful and vast
militarist/industrialist/capitalist/zionist-bagelist complex
Jefferson, the Democrat with
November 15, 2006 - 11:42 ET by Hunter12Jefferson, the Democrat with the cool cash got 30% of his district's vote and is in a run-off as the MSM ignored his transgressions, since they couldn't be sure that one-seat margin might not be required. The last MSM story I could find was in May. Cunningham, the Republican is doing time. Murtha is in line to be the number two man in the House. What's the byline of this blog?
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Sir Winston Churchill
Hunter -- that's because th
November 15, 2006 - 11:47 ET by Jack BauerHunter -- that's because the press is in the tank for the Democrats. That simple.
I don't think ANYONE in power should get a pass for proven corruption. The other side don't agree.
Proud member of the all-powerful and vast
militarist/industrialist/capitalist/zionist-bagelist complex
I tried to argue with my frie
November 15, 2006 - 11:54 ET by Hunter12I tried to argue with my friends about the last election results and got nowhere. When I asked where had they gotten their information, the response was, "Don't you watch the news?". The fact that they are not stupid people makes this very frightening to me.
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Sir Winston Churchill
Looks like the MSM and the
November 15, 2006 - 09:25 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsLooks like the MSM and the democrats, true to form, are eating their own.
DSG