According to CNN’s Bill Schneider, Americans, hungry for change, have no problem with tax increasing Democrats. During Tuesday’s "Situation Room," the veteran reporter described a new poll that, according to him, demonstrated the confidence Americans have for the new Democratic majority. In the segment, he dismissed one of President Bush’s warnings this way:
Bill Schneider: "Despite President Bush's dire warnings, people don't think congressional Democrats will do anything to weaken national security. President Bush also warned-"
George Bush: "The Democrats are going to raise your taxes. No, I know they don't want you to know it."
Schneider: "Guess what? People know it but they voted for the Democrats anyway. Which means they must really want change. In the ‘USA Today’/Gallup poll, the number of Americans who call themselves Republicans is sharply down. But the number of Democrats hardly changed. More people are calling themselves independents. They're waiting to see what the Democrats deliver."
According to Schneider, the general public has "great expectations" for Nancy Pelosi’s Democrats.
Wolf Blitzer: "Democrats on Capitol Hill see Iraq as a centerpiece for their agenda for change when they take control of the House and the Senate next year. But the American people apparently are banking on Democrats to deliver in many more ways than one. Let's go to our senior political analyst Bill Schneider. Bill?"
Bill Schneider: "Wolf, how do voters feel a week after the midterm election? Well, to borrow a phrase from Charles Dickens, ‘They have great expectations.’ In other countries, it would be called a vote of no confidence in the government. At least one Republican heard the message."
John McCain: "That we, Republicans, have lost our way, that we came to Washington to change government and government changed us."
In addition to reporting about the glorious new Democratic regime, Schneider reiterated his "no confidence" jibe:
Schneider: "A ‘USA Today’/Gallup Poll taken after the election shows President Bush's job approval at just 33 percent. Sixty two percent disapprove. No confidence. But does the public have confidence in the Democrats? Apparently they do. By nearly 2-1, the public says they want the Democrats in Congress to have more influence over the direction of the country than President Bush. Voters expect Democrats to deliver."
Of course, Schneider didn’t mention that the poll he was referring to sampled only "1004 national adults," as opposed to registered or likely voters. Both of which, would have resulted in more conservative findings.
A transcript of the segment, which aired at 4:05p.m on November 14, follows:
Wolf Blitzer: "Democrats on Capitol Hill see Iraq as a centerpiece for their agenda for change when they take control of the House and the Senate next year. But the American people apparently are banking on Democrats to deliver in many more ways than one. Let's go to our senior political analyst Bill Schneider. Bill?"
Bill Schneider: "Wolf, how do voters feel a week after the midterm election? Well, to borrow a phrase from Charles Dickens, ‘They have great expectations.’ In other countries, it would be called a vote of no confidence in the government. At least one Republican heard the message."
John McCain: "That we, Republicans, have lost our way, that we came to Washington to change government and government changed us."
Schneider: "A ‘USA Today’/Gallup Poll taken after the election shows President Bush's job approval at just 33 percent. Sixty two percent disapprove. No confidence. But does the public have confidence in the Democrats? Apparently they do. By nearly 2-1, the public says they want the Democrats in Congress to have more influence over the direction of the country than President Bush. Voters expect Democrats to deliver. But can they? On the one hand--"
Harry Reid: "We have nine new Democrats in the Senate. So we're excited."
Schneider: "On the other hand--"
Reid: "When have you a majority of one, you shouldn't be gloating."
Schneider: "Mr. Bush is still President."
Ben Cardin: "Marylanders were concerned about a change in Washington and they wanted someone who stood up to President Bush and was willing to challenge his leadership."
Schneider: "House Democrats intend to do that. On the minimum wage, embryonic stem cell research, prescription drug prices and Homeland Security. President Bush may veto some of those measures. Democrats don't have the numbers to override a veto without Republican support. Despite President Bush's dire warnings, people don't think congressional Democrats will do anything to weaken national security. President Bush also warned--"
George Bush: "The Democrats are going to raise your taxes. No, I know they don't want you to know it."
Schneider: "Guess what? People know it, but they voted for the Democrats anyway. In the ‘USA Today’/Gallup poll, the number of Americans who call themselves Republicans is sharply down. But the number of Democrats hardly changed. More people are calling themselves independents. They're waiting to see what the Democrats deliver. Wolf?"
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Americans, hungry for change,
November 14, 2006 - 18:18 ET by Dave RAmericans, hungry for change, have no problem with tax increasing Democrats.
Oh, really? I am an American, and I have a huge problem with tax increasing dims.
Dave R Me too , a
November 14, 2006 - 19:03 ET by ww thumperDave R Me too , and all my family also :^) ww
But apparently you're in the
November 14, 2006 - 19:06 ET by balboaBut apparently you're in the minority right now.
I'm not worried about tax inc
November 14, 2006 - 19:11 ET by NeoConfirmedI'm not worried about tax increases on the rich. You know, those Beverly Hills types making 50 grand a year.
I don't know about that Bal,
November 15, 2006 - 00:14 ET by mattmI don't know about that Bal, the new Democrat Senator from my state ran on a middle class tax cut...
...
November 14, 2006 - 19:23 ET by JnobleYou and I weren't part of the select few interviewed, nor do we believe or think the way people inside of the MSM inner circle do, so therefore our opinions don't count.
Jnoble,
November 14, 2006 - 19:29 ET by BlondeNope, our opinions don't count....but we'd better be sure to mail the check on time!
Our opinions don't count beca
November 14, 2006 - 22:45 ET by TexasOptimistOur opinions don't count because we have never been involved in writing the tax laws.
Only those who have experience writing tax laws have any right to speak up on the matter! Otherwise, it's none of our business!
(If you've listened to Limbaugh the last two days, you'll get what I'm talking about!)
TDF
The Reagan conservative formerly known as Texaswolf77.
I am not a Trot, that was an act.
A fellow worker told me that
November 14, 2006 - 20:41 ET by Dan The Man 2A fellow worker told me that teh tax increase would affect the rich. I asked him what he meanty by rich and he avoided teh question
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark. -- save my gun, shoot a liberal.
The rich (according to the De
November 14, 2006 - 20:49 ET by Eric TurnerThe rich (according to the Dems) will be anyone who makes over $21,000 a year and with them raising the minimum wage that could mean all the teenagers who work...hey ya gotta broaden your tax base ya know. How else ya gonna give the whinny hippie baby boomer generation their retirement?
The only ones who won't be shafted with new taxes are guess who? illegal aliens, the unemployed and welfare recipients.
<<did anyone get the sarcasm in that?>>
To most liberals, the rich pr
November 15, 2006 - 06:48 ET by Dave RTo most liberals, the rich pretty much means anyone who has a job.
A fellow worker told me that
November 14, 2006 - 20:44 ET by Dan The Man 2Duplicae
Same here, Dave R. And I ha
November 14, 2006 - 20:57 ET by GalvanicSame here, Dave R. And I have yet to meet any citizen who welcomes higher taxes.
Afterall, the Dems didn't promise to raise taxes. They promised to raise taxes on the Rich, and left that label undefined. The assumption by middle-class voters is always that they aren't "rich," so it doesn't affect them, it affects the Rich Guy. But many of us learned a lesson with Bill "I Feel You Pain" Clinton and his tax boosts, which he referred to as "investments." The Dems are always smarter at investing our money than we are, so they help themselves to it.
The problem is, the rich are
November 15, 2006 - 06:49 ET by Dave RThe problem is, the rich are the ones providing the jobs. Have any of you ever been offered a job by a poor person?
Schneider is rich. He slams B
November 14, 2006 - 18:35 ET by chris_gillSchneider is rich. He slams Bush at every opportunity inspite of a record DOW..each week, in spite of steadily decreasing unemployment, in spite of most Americans being in favor of banning partial birth abortion, supporting wiretapping, and tax cuts.
Maybe the voters voted for Democrats because they were completely silent on the issue of tax cuts, and were dumb enough to assume the Dems would not raise taxes. People want change on the Iraq policy, not withdrawal. But the Dems will find out come 2008 when they get voted out of office
He is almost right. I have n
November 14, 2006 - 18:57 ET by Conservative VoiceHe is almost right. I have no problem increasing Taxes on Democrats
CV Hay I don't have a p
November 14, 2006 - 19:12 ET by ww thumperCV Hay I don't have a problem increasing taxes on dems eather, Like I said before" You get what you desurve when you vote for democrats. The Republicans didn't want the dimocrat agenda, some of them just got all pst off and threw a tantram. Unfortunately we will all get spanked for that ! ww I wish NB site had a spell checker I could use !! :^)
Start with Ted Kennedy, John
November 15, 2006 - 00:18 ET by mattmStart with Ted Kennedy, John Kerry's wife, Ted Turner, J. Rockerfeller, George Soros and so on down the line to the Hollywood crowd and then.... well, you get the point.
I believe that most people
November 14, 2006 - 19:04 ET by eucherI believe that most people think they are middle class and thus immune to the tax increases. They think only the "big corporations" are going to be affected by tax increases. That's where America is going to get hit hard -- in addition to their pocketbooks of course -- when they find out that THEY will pay more taxes too. Plus, there will be higher costs when the companies pass along the tax increases. And of course the economy will nose dive when all Americans have less disposable income.
Too bad our media didn't clue us in to THAT.
So, how is a media with a political agenda any different than a state-run newspaper, anyway?
"A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel." - Robert Frost
But the number of Democrats h
November 14, 2006 - 19:31 ET by FastEdBut the number of Democrats hardly changed. More people are calling themselves independents. Telling comment - 'publicans or independents are willing to think for themselves, while the demo-libs keep thinking the aprty line. And there are great expectations - will wait to see how the tax increses are viewed by the voters and the msm (Lsm). am courious though, how did the rest of the world, specifically the anti-us crowd, react to the demo-lib win, not much reported on that front. Seems the msm (Lsm) doesn't want us to know if the terrorists were dancing in the streets. Reporters? how's about a report.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad
Expectations will dampen when folks see bottom-line
November 14, 2006 - 19:51 ET by PlaceboBill, I hate Republicans, Schneider, as mentioned, is another one; not a peep about the economic growth or the DOW! Americans’ expectations and enthusiasm will dampen when they look at the bottom-line on their pay-check. Not to mention, all, the so called, Socialist perks the Dems have been playing with, for years will be devastating to the already pillaged middle-class: nothing comes free in this world. Sometimes it’s a hard lesson to learn… after all Schneider and his Dems still don’t get it!
PlaceboAnd did you see the cl
November 14, 2006 - 19:55 ET by BlondePlacebo
And did you see the clip of HRC....gleefully stating something loosely paraphrased as "Hillary Health Care is Back....bad news for some of you!"?
Disgusting.
I may as well be the first to say it here, but if she's elected in '08, I think I'll move out of country.
Jana and I will come with you
November 14, 2006 - 20:02 ET by Six String SpiffJana and I will come with you!
..cheaper flight 'n all
Stolen Election?
Spiff,You're on.
November 14, 2006 - 20:04 ET by BlondeSpiff,
You're on.
I wish they'd take take a pol
November 14, 2006 - 19:44 ET by NeoConfirmedI wish they'd take take a poll on how Americans feel about polls. Enough Already.
Schneider: "Guess what? People know it (Dems will raise taxes), but they voted for the Democrats anyway"
Cool, I didn't vote for the democrats which means that I don't have to pay any additional taxes. Right?
This is why these guys make
November 14, 2006 - 19:57 ET by Jack BauerThis is why these guys make the big bucks. Who can argue with logic like Schneider's...
"people don't think congressional Democrats will do anything to weaken national security."
Gosh it's all so clear now: because somebody thinks something won't happen, it won't. I think I'll live forever. Phew that's a weight off my mind!
The Democrats are going to raise your taxes says the President
Schneider: "Guess what? People know it but they voted for the Democrats anyway. Which means they must really want change.
So... now follow this...
Anytime an opposition party wins the election, it's because people want change...
Which really means they also want higher taxes...
Despite the fact that the party they voted for denied they were going to raise taxes, which would be an election pledge, and despite the fact that every poll shows people DO NOT want higher taxes...
But because no one believes the Democrats anyway, it's okay for the Democrats to break that pledge.
Got that?
In other countries, it would be called a vote of no confidence in the government.
No dimwit it wouldn't. A vote of no confidence in a parliamentary system is when the elected politicians vote against a leader over an issue raised in parliamentary proceedings. It's not when the electorate votes in an election. That's called the result of the election.
The trouble is people like Schneider are just so damned nuanced it difficult for schlubs like me to keep up.
Mind you he did get one complex fact right:
Schneider: "Mr. Bush is still President." Well done. You earned your seven figure salary for that alone.
Proud member of the all-powerful and vast
militarist/industrialist/capitalist/zionist-bagelist complex
Jack,Thank you for straighten
November 14, 2006 - 20:01 ET by BlondeJack,
Thank you for straightening all that out for me.
I may have to change my SN to Very Blonde.
No probs Blonde. Though I'd
November 14, 2006 - 20:11 ET by Jack BauerNo probs Blonde. These TV libz talk a weird code where nothing is as it seems.
Though I'd always thought the underlying theme of Great Expectations was NOT to expect something, because you're usually bound to be misled and disappointed.
Proud member of the all-powerful and vast
militarist/industrialist/capitalist/zionist-bagelist complex
Thanks, Jack.I'm sure you kno
November 14, 2006 - 20:21 ET by BlondeThanks, Jack.
I'm sure you know what you call a brunette in between two blondes?
.
.
.
An interpreter.
Ergo sum, you have dark hair! ;-0
Unfortunately Americans are t
November 14, 2006 - 20:13 ET by PantherUnfortunately Americans are too stupid to realize how much they already pay in taxes. Stop any American on the street tomorrow and ask them how much they paid in Federal, SS, Medicare, State, and local taxes last year. They won't have a freakin clue. Most of them think the government is actually giving them money when they get their tax refund.
Hey Mr. Schneider, want to see how popular taxes are? Stop federal withholding and start mailing Americans a tax bill every month.
Schneider's interpretation is
November 14, 2006 - 20:20 ET by SMGalbraithSchneider's interpretation is, dare I say, charitable to the Democrats.
He says:
(1) The public knew that the Democrats would raise taxes;
(2) The public voted for the Democrats;
(3) Therefore the public supports the Democrats raising taxes
But did the public in (2) vote for the Democrats because they were going to raise taxes? Nowhere does Mr. Schneider cite a poll where the public supports raising taxes.
I wonder why?
And just who is/was the sampl
November 14, 2006 - 20:36 ET by moabgoesboomAnd just who is/was the sampling of this "poll"? And how were the questions delivered?
For instance:
Q: It has been stated that the Democrats will raise your taxes once they take control. Will you support such a measure?
Q: Will you support the tax increase proposal by the Democrats if it means prosperity for everyone but the super wealthy or would you support a tax cut if it means a return to a recession and a loss to most middle class jobs?
While these questions may seem far fetched, they are not. I was polled here in Maryland during such a proposal by this liberally run state. The questions above were those that I was asked. The results were headline news two days later stating that a majority of Marylanders supported a tax increase.
Geee... I wonder how they reached that conclusion?
You can't suport the troops if you don't support the mission.
Bill Schneider is as blind to
November 14, 2006 - 20:37 ET by richardBill Schneider is as blind to reality, as his look-a-like, Mr. McGoo is to everything.
I think he's saying:1) The pu
November 14, 2006 - 21:46 ET by BricklayerI think he's saying:
1) The public knew that the Democrats would raise taxes,
2) The public despise tax increases,
3) In light of this, the public should have voted Republican (or Libertarian), but
4) Surprisingly, the public voted Democrat.
Inference: Something motivated the public to go against their best judgement and vote Democrat.
Conclusion: The public wanted change more than low taxes.
Of course, this is a ridiculously simplistic conclusion made by Mr. Schneider. It is possible that the public wanted change. It's also possible that specific demographics within the public decided not to vote, which swung the election toward another demographic.
The more interesting question is: If the public wanted change, what change did the public want? It's obviously not tax increases. So, what is the public so dissatisfied with? Mr. Schneider suggests they're dissatisfied with Bush. To me, that seems like an odd reason to vote out perfectly good Senators and Representatives. Then again, I'm not privy to the inner workings of the "Independent" and Democrat minds.
It is possible that the MSM h
November 14, 2006 - 21:57 ET by Dan The Man 2It is possible that the MSM hammered into their heads nothing is right so they said if nothing is right then its time for a change.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark. -- save my gun, shoot a liberal.
No no folks- CNN says MOST pe
November 14, 2006 - 22:43 ET by NazarethNo no folks- CNN says MOST people don't mind having their checks halved- so it must be true & if not true they're make it true by sheer wieght of constant reporting on the issue until we all submit and comply bu golly!
http://sacredscoop.com
Anyone that thinks their taxe
November 14, 2006 - 22:51 ET by lostmylegginsAnyone that thinks their taxes should be increased can increase their withholding now. They can give more from every paycheck to the government.
"Here's the lesson of the past three years: The UN kills." - Mark Steyn
Pay More
November 15, 2006 - 00:18 ET by allanfThere is no law that says Bill must take deductions he is entitled to, on his tax returns. If you believe in higher taxes, just say no to deductions Bill. Show me what a great guy you are.
If I were in congress I'd wri
November 15, 2006 - 01:06 ET by mattmIf I were in congress I'd write a bill for a "self-imposed" tax increase. The 1040 might look something like this:
Line 28. Your regular tax............................................................... ___________
Line 29. Self-imposed tax increase (enter any amount).......................___________
Total Tax. (Add lines 28 and 29)......................................................___________
A Schneider Rate?
November 15, 2006 - 07:20 ET by allanfWhy not a Schneider rate? "Check this box to pay a 70% flat rate income tax for the rest of your life. For those who care about others"
What kind of an idiot would w
November 15, 2006 - 07:56 ET by msh1973What kind of an idiot would want their taxes increased? It is just so upsetting. My husband and I work hard day in and day out, it is our money not Uncle Sam's. I don't mind paying my fair share, but not to help pay for someone elses share.
A Libereal
November 15, 2006 - 08:37 ET by allanfMen like Bill Schnieder. In a word "Liberals"
"A liberal feels a great debt to his fellow man, which he proposes to pay with your money"
A Libereal
November 15, 2006 - 08:37 ET by allanfMen like Bill Schnieder. In a word "Liberals"
"A liberal feels a great debt to his fellow man, which he proposes to pay with your money"
"Can Democrats Deliver?&
November 15, 2006 - 10:25 ET by Chris Norman"Can Democrats Deliver?"
I'm sure if one was patient, he could train Democrats to deliver, say, pizza...
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb