OSS CEO Shares Information About 9/11 Truth Seminar at George Mason University (Arlington Campus) 10-5 Saturday 11 November 2006 WASHINGTON, Nov. 9 /PRNewswire/ -- Robert David Steele (Vivas), CEO of
OSS.Net, Inc., is sharing information about a 9/11 Truth Seminar taking
place at the Arlington Campus of George Mason University from 10-5 on
Saturday 11 November 2006.
"This Nation can neither win wars, nor govern itself ably, if our
politicians lie to us and to one another. It is in this context that I have
agreed to introduce Webster Tarpley, author of '9/11: Synthetic Terror Made
in the USA,' and that I strongly recommend this local 'truth seminar' to
one and all, but especially to young intelligence analysts who have not yet
been corrupted by the politicization and bureaucratization of intelligence.
Over 350 people can be accommodated this Saturday.
"The 9/11 Commission was a white-wash. In my view, there is ample
evidence with which to indict George Bush and Dick Cheney for high crimes
and misdemeanors not yet properly investigated.
"America has forgotten how to find, discuss, and share the truth about
anything. We have become a cheating culture, one that tolerates corruption
at all levels. All of our institutions have failed us including Congress
and the media.
"The 9/11 Truth Seminars, and the bloggers for truth, represent an
opportunity to re-engage with reality. There are no absolute truths, but in
the absence of sustained efforts to perceive the truth, there can be
absolute lies -- for example, that we live in an informed democracy that
nurtures moral capitalism.
"George Soros has it right when he suggests that Wall Street and the
central banks must made massive compromises with the people or lose it all.
The people are now armed with the Internet, with cell phones, with a
digital memory, and with the ability to follow the money around the globe.
"The 9/11 Truth Movement is not a threat, it is an overture."
Robert Steele is a career intelligence professional, and the author of
four books on intelligence reform including 'THE SMART NATION ACT: Public
Intelligence in the Public Interest,' with a Foreword by Congressman Rob
Simmons (R-CT-02).


















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Sadly, the UK is awash with Islamists, to boot!
November 22, 2006 - 19:18 ET by PlaceboSadly, the UK is awash with Islamists, as is seedy UE. Admittedly Blair and company backed the US in the war on terror and are paying for it politically as is GW. My better-half has been in London for the past month… better her than me… she is appalled but not shocked by how much the nation has eroded in the past two years. To boot, the anti-American sentiment runs deeply amongst a great cross-section of Britons …. Remember, the left there make ours seem centrist. However, they are beginning to see the ill of their ways; open door immigration and so forth.
When my son was living in London several years ago, I was more concerned of the Islamo-Fascists who have all but taken over.
Don't be upset, sport, just b
November 21, 2006 - 14:49 ET by libertyordeathDon't be upset, sport, just because joe has a sense of smell and you don't.
GFYA Proud member of the
November 21, 2006 - 14:51 ET by Jack BauerGFYA
Proud member of the all-powerful and vast
militarist/industrialist/capitalist/zionist-bagelist complex
Seconded.
November 29, 2006 - 15:03 ET by Uncle JohnSeconded.
Hey Death,Let's talk about yo
November 25, 2006 - 03:53 ET by NL207Hey Death,
Let's talk about your link to that lying bastard from Vermont, Senator Leahy. In particular, let's talk about the history of habeus corpus rights and prisoners of war in American Jurisprudence. I rule out only one conflict, that being the American Civil War, on account of the peculiar nature of the 'enemy' in that war. This still gives you 10 or 12 wars to play with. Show me a war in the past where habeus corpus was extended to POWs. Then show me a war in the past where habeus corpus rights were extended to illegal combatants.
Here are a few more conspirac
November 21, 2006 - 14:59 ET by libertyordeathHere are a few more conspiracy theorist nuts to slander.
Former high-ranking official for George W. Bush concluded that 9/11 was an inside job Former high-ranking Reagan official and very influential conservative finds the official story about 9/11 "flimsy and unbelievable" Former Two-Star general questions the attack on the PentagonFormer Air Force Colonel and key Pentagon official finds various aspects of 9/11 suspiciousCurrent U.S. Congresswoman, former senior CIA analyst, former Deputy Secretary for Intelligence and Warning under Nixon, Ford, and Carter, former US Ambassador and Chief of Mission to Iraq, former Deputy Director to the White House Task Force on Terrorism, and former US Department of State Foreign Service Officer (as well as a who's who of liberals and independents) jointly call for a new investigation into 9/11
Slander?
November 21, 2006 - 18:42 ET by UnsaneThey, and you, are all slandering themselves. Address the simple issue of logistics. I will even provide you a very simple list of questions to answer upon request.
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy." -Sir Winston Churchill, British statesman (1874-1965)
Ho Hum
November 22, 2006 - 00:02 ET by CGattonROTFLMAO!!
An economist, a treasury official, a forgotten major general accustomed to examining high quality surveillance photos who is now pontificating on grainy video footage, a not-so key former pentagon staffer who has no expertise in any area under discussion and whose complaints are about the size and efficiency of the government, and a list of people that reads like the founding members of fruitcakes anonymous!
Oh yes, a lot of truth, insight and expert opinion there.
Clyde
"...the aspirants to tyranny are either the...men of the state, who in democracies are demagogues,... or those who hold great offices, and have a long tenure.." - Aristotle, Politics, c350BC
A jackass, a nobody, a fool,
November 29, 2006 - 14:28 ET by libertyordeathA jackass, a nobody, a fool, and the real "list of people that reads like the founding members of fruitcakes anonymous": the NBs commenting on this post. Hey, when you get a similar career, then you can talk like you know something.
A 28-year career CIA official
November 29, 2006 - 14:31 ET by libertyordeathA 28-year career CIA official says 9/11 was an inside job
Former ambassador to Iraq is not satisfied with the official story
Statements by former German Defense Minister and current member of British Parliament
Statement by former Canadian Minister of Defense
Statements of two former MI5 (British intelligence) agents (19 minutes into video)
Statement of a high-ranking general and the former chief of NATO regarding bombs in the Twin Towers (in Danish)
Blah Blah Blah...And I bet NO
December 1, 2006 - 00:54 ET by UnsaneBlah Blah Blah...
And I bet NONE of them can tell me how that operation could have been pulled off without anyone knowing about it.
That damn pain in the ass logistics thing, AGAIN...
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy." -Sir Winston Churchill, British statesman (1874-1965)
Did you have a lobotomy as a
December 2, 2006 - 14:52 ET by libertyordeathDid you have a lobotomy as a child? Or are you just that naturally stupid? That is probably the best reasoning you Neo-Clones have for disagreeing with 9/11 truth (how could they do it without anyone knowing about it?). That is a false assessment, because if no one knew, where did the evidence for an inside job come from? All you want to do is talk about logistics (which is probably your field, since thats all you are willing to argue) because you cannot refute any information that I link. Keep crying about logistics!
loony information
December 2, 2006 - 15:33 ET by tumblerWhy should your loony info get a serious consideration? You've bought a spurious bill of goods, and here you present it for serious refutation? Your counterfeit conspiracy only deserves one reaction. Laughter. If we were face to face I'd laugh as I de-pants you and slap your lard-ass out into the street! Lol!
You do my work for me by disp
December 2, 2006 - 17:36 ET by libertyordeathYou do my work for me by displaying your childish behavior and ignoring the facts. I'll bet your thinking, "Oh yeah? Well my dad can beat up your dad!" Am I right?
Facts
December 2, 2006 - 23:49 ET by UnsaneOh, you mean facts like two 767s slammed into the towers, triggering catastrophic fires that brought them down?
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy." -Sir Winston Churchill, British statesman (1874-1965)
Such simple logistical questions
December 2, 2006 - 23:48 ET by UnsaneI cannot refute any information you link? I had the lobotomy? ME?
OK, genius, then you can explain the following:
1) How much explosive material was used to bring down the towers?
2) How was it placed in the building?
3) How much was used in what locations?
4) How long did this process take?
5) How many people were involved in that effort?
6) Where were they procured from? (That big an order for explosives had to attract attention and could not escape notice...)
7) Where were they stored before being staged (set up for application)?
8) Where did the staging take place?
9) How were those staged explosives transported to the towers and when?
10) What steps were taken to ensure no one noticed what was going on?
11) How were these explosives transported to the storage location?
12) How many transportation assets were used to accomplish this?
13) What modes of transport were used in all cases transport was needed?
14) Who handled these transportation arrangements?
15) You have to get clearances to transport these explosives no matter what mode is being used. Who secured them and with whom?
16) How long did it take to execute the planning for this operation?
17) When was the green light given for the go-ahead?
18) How long did it take to procure, store, stage, and deploy the explosives?
19) What steps were taken to ensure secrecy?
20) How on earth could you hide ALL OF THIS ACTIVITY from innocent onlookers, observers and passers-by at all stages of the conspiracy?
Yes, I will keep "crying" about it, because you cannot answer these simple questions. Neither can anyone in those "sources" you cited.
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy." -Sir Winston Churchill, British statesman (1874-1965)
All of these questions seem t
December 4, 2006 - 14:20 ET by libertyordeathAll of these questions seem to have one plausible answer. A company that provided security at the World Trade Center, Washington D.C.'s Dulles International Airport and United Airlines between 1995 and 2001 was backed by a private Kuwaiti-American investment firm whose records were not open to full public disclosure, with ties to the Bush family. Now, let me jump ahead to after you say "that's just a conspiracy theory" or "so what, that doesn't prove anything". It does mean that it should have been investigated, or at least admitted into the 9/11 Commission Report. But of course it wasn't, because after all we should trust out government fully and not ask questions or follow proper criminal investigation proceedings. The White House opposed an independent commission to investigate 9/11 until after the terrorism insurance protections and protections for security companies had safely passed Congress. It has also quietly intervened in lawsuits against United Airlines in New York, brought by relatives of the victims.
with ties to the Bush fami
December 4, 2006 - 14:30 ET by Jack Bauerwith ties to the Bush family.
What the frack does that mean?
TIES. You mean like the ties the Clinton family has in Dubai and the Ports Deal?
Those sort of "ties"?
How about the Clinton "ties" to members of the 9/11 Commission. Like Hillary Clinton's galpal Jamey Gorelick.
Or hired legal thug and Clinton butt licker Richard Benvensiste... how about those ties in the Clinton Resposibility for 9/11 Cover-Up.
How about the JImmah Carter "ties" to 9/11.
Sure, let's get all these "ties" out in the open.
Proud member of the all-powerful and vast
militarist/industrialist/capitalist/zionist-bagelist complex
I don't defend Clinton or Car
December 4, 2006 - 14:43 ET by libertyordeathI don't defend Clinton or Carter. You still don't get it.
I get it exactly..Name the
December 4, 2006 - 14:46 ET by Jack BauerI get it exactly. And I have very little time for President Bush on many issues.
Now... detail the "ties."
Proud member of the all-powerful and vast
militarist/industrialist/capitalist/zionist-bagelist complex
Why should I do it for you?
December 4, 2006 - 14:51 ET by libertyordeathWhy should I do it for you? The fact that you are too lazy and uninterested or just plain stubborn to even look for yourself, even if it is to learn about it and prove me wrong, means that you are an enemy of this country's future because you follow your masters mindlessly to whatever end.
What a wanker. Then I'll ta
December 4, 2006 - 14:53 ET by Jack BauerWhat a wanker.
Then I'll take it there are NO TIES.
And you're a liar. GFYA.
Proud member of the all-powerful and vast
militarist/industrialist/capitalist/zionist-bagelist complex
Marvin Bush joined Securacom'
December 4, 2006 - 14:57 ET by libertyordeathMarvin Bush joined Securacom's Board of Directors in 1993, as part of new management hired when the company separated from engineering firm Burns and Roe. The new team was capitalized by KuwAm, the D.C.-based Kuwaiti-American investment company. Bush also served on the Board of Directors at KuwAm, along with Mishal Yousef Saud al-Sabah, Chairman of KuwAm and also a Director on Securacom's (Stratesec's) board.
The World Trade Center and the Metropolitan Washington Airport Authority -- which operates Dulles -- were two of Securacom's three biggest clients in 1996 and 1997. (The third was MCI, now WorldCom.)
Stratesec (Securacom) differs from other security companies which separate the function of consultant from that of service provider. The company defines itself as a "single-source" provider of "end-to-end" security services, including everything from diagnosis of existing systems to hiring subcontractors to installing video and electronic equipment. It also provides armored vehicles and security guards.
I can go all day, tough guy. Remember that episode where you realized that the President was responsible for those murders and was a criminal? That was a good one.
You haven't addressed a singl
December 4, 2006 - 15:26 ET by NL207You haven't addressed a single one of Unsane's points. Nothing you have said on this thread thus far has been sufficient to indicate by whom, where or when any of the actions Unsane has listed as necessary to carry out the controlled demolition of the WTC might have been accomplished.
Moreover, in one of your earlier threads, we discussed a quote from YOUR expert, Jowenko, who said the prep to demolish the WTC would have taken one year. Bush was not even President-Elect one year prior to 9-11. Nor was it clear then that he would be elected at all. Therefore, you must find a CLINTON connection to have any credibility at all, and that still does not address Unsane's points. If this was an inside job, then the planning for it must stretch back well before any actual demolition prep was carried out. This dates the origins of your alleged plot to mid 1998 or perhaps even before. Who was President in mid 1998?
???
December 4, 2006 - 20:19 ET by UnsaneThank you for not addressing a single point and continuing to obfuscate. Go line by line and answer each question. It's not that hard.
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy." -Sir Winston Churchill, British statesman (1874-1965)
It's amazing how incompetent
December 5, 2006 - 15:03 ET by libertyordeathIt's amazing how incompetent you two are. Not to mention OBSESSED with Clinton. The argument always goes back to him no matter what the issue! One company, running all systems, maintenance, applications, installation, etc., in the years running up to 9/11, with a Bush on the board. Now tell me that Clinton's bj was more worthy of an investigation (a $100,000,000 one at that) you posers.
There you go letting the fact
December 5, 2006 - 15:16 ET by fosstenThere you go letting the facts get in the way of your invective again.
Clinton's bj wasn't the reason for the investigation, you kook. He attempted to use his presidential power to interfere with a lawful investigation that was directly related to a civil suit that he was the subject of. In doing so, he attempted to suborn perjury, and he perjured himself on the stand, earning a disbarment and a contempt of court citation.
So all that was totally unrel
December 5, 2006 - 15:21 ET by libertyordeathSo all that was totally unrelated to Monica Lewinski?
Are you really ignorant of th
December 5, 2006 - 15:26 ET by fosstenAre you really ignorant of the facts here?
Monica Lewinski surfaced because of tapes Linda Tripp had that implicated Clinton in suborning perjury. He asked Monica to lie to the attorneys about their relationship, and Tripp used the tapes because she was a witness for Paula Jones in the sexual harassment suit.
Everything was tied together.
Thanks for proving my point.
December 5, 2006 - 15:44 ET by libertyordeathThanks for proving my point. Directly or indirectly, the sexual exploits of Clinton were the underlying reason for the investigation and legal preceedings, which took a ridiculous amount of money to do.
sexual exploits
December 5, 2006 - 15:52 ET by Celumnazsexual exploits... rape... abusing position... forsaking vows...
meh, same thing
You have a short memory, Deat
December 6, 2006 - 16:46 ET by NL207You have a short memory, Death. Clinton was not investigated because of anything to do with either Monica Lewinsky or Paula Jones he was investigated because of his extensive involvement with criminals of all stripes.
(1) His equal partnership in the Whitewater Development Corp., which was a crooked land deal and front organization used to defraud the Madison Guaranty Savings and Loan Bank. He, Hillary and James and Susan McDougal were equal partnners in this sleaze. The McDougals went to jail for fraud and criminal contempt. The Clintons somehow skated.
(2) The Castle Grande real estate corporation. Hillary and Bill werre closely connected to this rip-off. Indeed, Hillary did some of the legal work on the actual fraudulent transactions used to defraud Madison. Jim Guy Tucker went to jail along with McDougal in connection to this one.
(3) James Riady.
(4) Jon Huang and the Loral sale to the PRC.
Items 3 & 4 are the stuff of treason, Death. The rest of it is just plain racketeering.
Illiteracy
December 5, 2006 - 19:32 ET by UnsaneIt's amazing how illiterate you are. Answer my twenty questions line by line please, and not with "oh, such and such landed an interview with such and such organization controlled by such and such government which is really controlled by such and such intelligence agency (see conspiracy theory #233) and therefore that explains everything". Additionally, I would SURE love to see where I mentioned the 42nd President in the post where I posted the question.
The fact is that you CANNOT answer the questions. You could, but the answers will not support this conspiracy of yours, so you cry, yell that I am incompetent, and accuse me of blaming #42 for everything. Do me a favor. Just answer the questions line by line please, paying close attention to the stricture I posted in the paragraph above.
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy." -Sir Winston Churchill, British statesman (1874-1965)
Connecting the dots is appare
December 6, 2006 - 14:40 ET by libertyordeathConnecting the dots is apparently a feat too challenging for you. I don't have to prove the details of how the setup was done. All you have to do is prove the existing evidence wrong (reports/video/eyewitness accounts of ground floor/basement explosions, a security firm with a Bush on the board, the highly irregular power down of the two towers one weekend close to 9/11, the recall of bomb-sniffing dogs, the shutdown of security cameras, the controlled demolition of WTC7, etc.), which CLEARLY warrants a REAL investigation. Tell me it doesn't, clone. Just go ahead and say you don't care about evidence that counters what you want to believe, or the people that died that day. That's what it seems to boil down to.
lod....You have to be kidding
December 6, 2006 - 14:50 ET by Clear thinkerlod....
You have to be kidding, nobody in their right mind beleives the conspiracy garbage of 911.
Ask yourself this question... What, am I stupid?
libertyordeath
December 6, 2006 - 14:59 ET by SportPoliticslibertyordeath, only one tower was powered down, not two. I thought we went over this before you moronic clucker. You conspiro nuts can't even get your own "research" stated correctly. It's a shame, because if you bags of lies actually could, you might make more truthers out of the populace. How the heck can you morons call yourself truthers when I catch you lying so often ?
You think I'm kidding ? You're the one who has just claimed impressive knowledge again, but you babbled out a big fat lie. Go check it out again, you'll see I'm correct.
See the problem is, you wackos expect perfect statements and writings and analysis from the federal government 24/7/365, and pick away at a single word or phrase one of our government officials may have used once in the course of years time. But when it comes to policing your own yappers, ANYTHING GOES, or rather- whatever comes out of them is ok with you folks, especially if you lie, exagerrate, obfuscate, or just plain repeat a mistake or rumor one of your own made up. Frankly, even if some portion of the government was "involved", it is easy to conclude you truthers lie twenty times as often as the government ever has.
How many of the wtc towers were powered down there, mr truther ? Ready to come clean, or should I consider you as dirty as you consider the gov ?
You got me you gumshoe, you!
December 6, 2006 - 15:12 ET by libertyordeathYou got me you gumshoe, you! You are probably going to be so proud of yourself for this, but: I was mistaken on that point. Tell all your friends. Now, go ahead and pull a Popular Mechanics and attack that straw man argument to prove that all "conspiracy theories" are phoney.
From: "Scott Forbes" <scottforbes2002@hotmail.com>
To: skylax@comcast.net
Subject: Official Verison of 9/11 - new info
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:35:12 +0000
To John Kaminski,
I was pleased to read your article "The Official Version of 9/11 is a Hoax"
... Please note some other facts. My name is Scott Forbes and I still work
for Fiduciary Trust. In 2001 we occupied floors 90 and 94-97 of the South
Tower and lost 87 employees plus many contractors.
On the weekend of 9/8,9/9 there was a 'power down' condition in WTC tower 2,
the south tower. This power down condition meant there was no electrical
supply for approx 36hrs from floor 50 up. I am aware of this situation since
I work in IT and had to work with many others that weekend to ensure that
all systems were cleanly shutdown beforehand ... and then brough back up
afterwards. The reason given by the WTC for the power down was that cabling
in the tower was being upgraded ... Of course without power there were no
security cameras, no security locks on doors and many, many 'engineers'
coming in and out of the tower. I was at home on the morning of 9/11 on the
shore of Jersey City, right opposite the Towers, and watching events unfold
I was convinced immediately that something was happening related to the
weekend work ...
I have mailed this information to many people and bodies, including the 9/11
Commission but no-one seems to be taking and registering these facts. Whats
to hide? Can you help publicise them?
Please feel free to mail me.
Scott Forbes
So on the weekend preceding the collapse of the Twin Towers security doors were not secured in the South Tower, security cameras were not operating, there was no lighting, air conditioning, no power at all. And there were many 'engineers' in the building who were not employees of WTC companies. (Naturally this raises the question: Was there also a 'power down' condition that weekend in the North Tower?)
So, Death, you would have us
December 6, 2006 - 17:11 ET by NL207So, Death, you would have us believe that a super secret team of demolition experts entered WTC2 on the weekend of 9/8-9/9, passed undetected through the first sixty floors of the building which DID have power, and did 6 months of demolition preparation work [as per Jowenko], all in that day and a half?
Do tell us, when did they prep the lower 60 floors? When did they prep WTC1? When did they prep WTC7? How did they accomplish what your expert says must take 1/2 year in just 36 hours? Why didn't these explosives go off when the 767 smashed into the tower?
The Grimm Brothers have more credibility than you do, LoD.
???
December 6, 2006 - 17:44 ET by UnsaneForget being in the buliding undetected! What about getting to the towers in the first place? Transporting the explosives to the towers? (and so on; reference my original questions and compress all those events over the weekend; oh, and DREAM ON...)
We can't let anything get in the way of Death's fantasies, can we?
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy." -Sir Winston Churchill, British statesman (1874-1965)
???
December 6, 2006 - 17:51 ET by UnsaneActually, I provided the dots and told YOU to connect them, so it is you clearly struggling in that arena, not I. And I hate to do this...well, not really, I kinda enjoy this...but you HAVE to prove YOUR theory right if it is an adequate substitute. Which means going down, line by line, and answering those questions I have posited for you, like an adult.
You have yet to provide any evidence to contradict what I and millions of Americans saw as having happened. If you answer those questions I set out like a good little adult (and credibly so), maybe i'll give your ideas some consideration. Until then...just keep blabbing away.
And it should be noted anyways that there isn't a single conspiracy theory you don't like. You must enjoy feeling totally, utterly powerless and like a pawn on a chessboard, huh?
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy." -Sir Winston Churchill, British statesman (1874-1965)
21) Where are all the dead
December 5, 2006 - 15:06 ET by fossten21) Where are all the dead bodies of the people that Cheney would have had to have whacked in order to cover this up?
The only significant person dying recently under mysterious circumstances was a Clinton associate.
Dang! Now I'VE GONE AND DONE IT! I mentioned Clinton! Dangit!
Hey what's wrong with fruitcakes?
December 1, 2006 - 01:07 ET by terrigHey Patrick Henry wannabe, fruitcakes are yummy if you know where to get them. See I got a connection in Texas & they're wonderful. Don't diss the fruitcake.
Heard they used an army of un
November 22, 2006 - 00:19 ET by ChemicalOperatorHeard they used an army of unicorns with pixie guns. Red riding hood was originally scheduled to carry out the attack but got lost in the woods.
If you believe that the US was behind 9/11 then you are a sick individual. There are no actual facts to support this at all. For every link you post I can post two in contradiction. Dont trash the memory of the victims due to your political bias.
This whole idea is disgusting and you theorists need mental help.
This nation will remain the land of the free only so long as it is the home of the brave.
ChemicalOperator - conspiracies
November 22, 2006 - 00:42 ET by misterbillChemicalOperator - conspiracies.
I am doing some research and I believe the San Francisco earthquake was caused by our government. President Theodore Roosevelt in his zeal to make America a more protected wilderness had decided that a natural seaport like San Francisco should not be populated by humans. It should go back to it's natural state. Major tons of dynamite were planted in the San Andreas fault and detonated by government agents. One of them was a man whose first name was Artemis. So, you can mock the conspiracy theories all you want, but they are true. BTW, I am fairly sure that half of my neighbors are triffids and plan to take over my town in the near future!
Remember the whole in the lev
November 22, 2006 - 00:49 ET by ChemicalOperatorRemember the whole in the levy in New Orleans during Katrina? Ya reports say Ted Kennedy was driving his car with a young lady in the passenger seat very close to there. I got that information from the Great Kazoo, he was nearby watching.
This nation will remain the land of the free only so long as it is the home of the brave.
Chem Teddy Boy
November 22, 2006 - 00:58 ET by misterbillSo, now I know who is responsible. Is there any truth to the rumor that the fellow in wisconsin who had sex with a dead deer was really Teddy using an alias??
Well... If we want to take a
November 22, 2006 - 01:04 ET by ChemicalOperatorWell... If we want to take a page out of the liberal playbook, sure.
We can deny all the facts and yell real loud he did it, over and over. I have a dog who I can say is a forensic expert. I have a stuft animal of Scooby Doo too, he can be an expert eyewitness. Then all we have to do is tell our story then end it with "But the government is trying to stop you from knowing the truth".
Add all those aspects and I think we got ourselves a prize winning theory.
This nation will remain the land of the free only so long as it is the home of the brave.
chem really, really funny
November 22, 2006 - 01:20 ET by misterbillChem-- I was rotflmao! Tell the truth, you must be a democrat to do all the things you listed above. (Stuff animal, etc.)
Mr. Bill...You are lucky, my
December 6, 2006 - 14:52 ET by Clear thinkerMr. Bill...
You are lucky, my town is overun by Klingons.
Dragons
December 2, 2006 - 17:54 ET by Jerry MackI have heard that the CIA started developing and training stealth dragons during the Clinton administration. This is what was used to cause the destruction at the WTC and pentagon. Have you seen the documentary "Jurassic Park"?
libordeath...Did you fall out
November 29, 2006 - 14:44 ET by bigtimerlibordeath...
Did you fall out of your crib as a youngster, hit your noggin' and never get right with any kind of semblance of reality?
What happened to you to make you so absolutely crazy...la la land?
Seriously.