With many internet companies such as Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft knuckling under pressure from the rulers of China to censor their content, it's refreshing to see it when one takes a stand against political censorship (h/t: Caine Starfire):
The founder of Wikipedia, the online encyclopaedia written by its
users, has defied the Chinese government by refusing to bow to
censorship of politically sensitive entries.
Jimmy Wales, one of the
100 most influential people in the world according to Time magazine,
challenged other internet companies, including Google, to justify their
claim that they could do more good than harm by co-operating with
Wikipedia, a hugely popular reference tool in the West,
has been banned from China since last October. Whereas Google,
Microsoft and Yahoo went into the country accepting some restrictions
on their online content, Wales believes it must be all or nothing for
His stand comes as Irrepressible.info,
a joint campaign by The Observer and Amnesty International for free
speech on the web, continues with the support of more than 37,000
people around the world. The campaign calls on governments to stop
persecuting political bloggers and on IT companies to stop complying
with these repressive regimes.
'We're really unclear why we would
be [banned],' Wales told The Observer. 'We have internal rules about
neutrality and deleting personal attacks and things like this. We're
far from being a haven for dissidents or a protest site. So our view is
that the block is in error and should be removed, but we shall see.'
said censorship was ' antithetical to the philosophy of Wikipedia. We
occupy a position in the culture that I wish Google would take up,
which is that we stand for the freedom for information, and for us to
compromise I think would send very much the wrong signal: that there's
no one left on the planet who's willing to say "You know what? We're
not going to give up."'