Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 12, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Dan Riehl's blog
  • Santorum Nomination ‘Completely Terrifies’ Economist Magazine’s Economics Editor
  • Evan Thomas and Chris Matthews: Jackie and Serial Adulterer JFK Had a 'Good' and 'Full' Marriage
  • Bozell Column: Another Fleeting Failure for NBC
  • Martin Bashir Implies GOP Too Racist to Have Marco Rubio as VP Candidate
  • Barbara Walters, Shameless Hypocrite: Hits Kennedy Mistress for Greed, Tells Her She Should Have Stayed Quiet
  • NY Times Writers Rush to Obama's Defense Like It's Their Job
  • Rachel Maddow Trumpets Inane 'Amish Bus Driver' Analogy for Obama Contraception Rule
  • MRC's Bozell Scolds Media's Reluctance to Cover HHS Birth Control Mandate

The WSJ Does Democrat Propaganda?

By Dan Riehl | October 22, 2006 | 00:15

Change font size:  A |  A

In what looks to be a rather misleading piece of information, reporter Jeanne Cummings of the Wall Street Journal has an article touting the fiscal responsibility of Democrats when it comes to campaign finance management, but the facts don't seem to support that case.

via Three Sources it appears that DailyKos, among others, are picking up the theme, perhaps as a way to assure voters that Liberals aren't the poor fiscal managers and tax and spend legislators history has proved them to be.

If you scroll down at the WSJ link you'll find a prominently featured pie chart which actually suggests Democrats have kept operational expenses down. The chart does lend that impression, as it relies on raw expenditure dollar amounts, but everyone, especially the Wall Street Journal should know that those numbers can't be analyzed as raw data. They need to be looked at as percentages of the gross number of dollars raised.

Those percentages are below, showing just the opposite of what the article suggests and highlighting the inefficient waste one might expect from bad management of big government.

While the RNC kept Operational expenses to 28.5 % of $137 Million dollars raised, the DNC expended over 40% of dollars raised on pure overhead. The NRCC versus the DCCC comparison is even worse. The NRCC kept operational expenditures to 12.7 % of budget, while the DCCC nearly tripled operational expenses as a percentage of dollars raised.

Et tu WSJ?

The numbers also reveal some other interesting observations, perhaps explaining why BushCo may be more comfortable where things stand. While the DNC has invested much more on the web in propping up the information flow, the RNC has been more engaged in telephone outreach. Not everyone gets their politics fed to them through the Internet, at least not yet.

As a minor point, the travel/gifts number should probably be taken with a grain of salt, given that Red States tend to be geographically larger, necessitating more travel for the RNC and it tends to not place as much focus on large cities with dense populations.

RNC 137 million raised

Operating exp 39 million 28.5 %
Consultants 7.9 mil     5.7 %
Travel/gifts 14.6 million  10.7 %
Telemarketing 14.9 mil  10.9 %
Legal 3.9 mil  2.8 %
Advertising 439,844  .3 %
Web 381,560  .27 %
Direct mail 56 mil  41 %

DNC 79 million raised

Operating exp 32 mil  40.5%
consultants 3.8 mil  4.8 %
travel/gifts 4 million  5%
telemarketing 3.3 mil 2.4%
legal 993,744 mil   1.2%
advertising 840,210  1.1 %
web 5.6 mil  7 %
direct mail 29.7 mil  37.6 %

NRCC 79 million raised

Operating exp 10 million 12.7 %
polls 1.8 mil 2.3 %
consultants 2 mil     2.5 %
travel/gifts 4.1 million  5.2 %
telemarketing 44.5 mil  10.9 %
legal 342,387 .4 %
web 153,912 .2 %
direct mail 15.7 mil  19.9 %

DCCC 37 million raised

Operating exp 11.8 million 32 %
polls .94  mil 2.5 %
consultants .174 mil     .45 %
travel/gifts 2.1 million  5.7 %
telemarketing 6.9 mil  10.9 %
legal 790,408 2.8 %
web 1.8 mil 4.9 %
direct mail 11.8 mil  32 %

Share this
  • Wall Street Journal
  • Dan Riehl's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

 

  • Chuck Colson, cardinal, and rabbi oppose HHS mandate (WSJ)
  • Idea of the Democrats better than the reality (Wisc. State Journal)
  • The cynical and self-contradictory Gospel of Obama (Krauthammer)
  • Video: Protesters at CPAC admit they're being paid to protest (Daily Caller)
  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)
  • Jay Carney gets snippy about Super PACs (Verum Serum)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Try a Sweater Vest, Mitt
more cartoons
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.