Chaos in Politics Today
I am always thinking of better ways to accomplish things and always finding ways to help even my own community in need. And I think about all the chaos in the world today. I do find it sad that in today’s world that some people want to live in the past as far as politics and war. No one likes war but there is always going to be some sort of war regardless of what it is to try to keep the peace as ironic as that sounds because ther eis always someone out there putting a glitch into it. But while during a time of war one would think we would do everything humanly possible to make things smoother and help one another. But instead there are some people determined to fight, argue and spend their time doing the evil duty of infecting us with the utmost negativity as possible and cause nothing but chaos.
Not everyone will agree on things and dissent is perfectly fine but what ever happen to respect and honor while dissenting? Some people take evil advantage of our freedom of speech and use it as an excuse to hurt, give hate speeches and twist facts and turn things into a three ring circus of destruction. Is that the kind of freedom of speech we actually want or better yet was that the kind of freedom of speech that was meant to be? I find it classless and embarrassing to be quite honest. Can’t we say what needs to be said without the craziness, disrespect and drama some like to seem to add to their so-called dissenting? It’s a real shame because for people who really do not know what to do and do not know what is going on in the world may follow this kind of disingenuous advice, especially when it comes to voting when they don’t know who to or what to vote for.
We also use to be able to depend on our media outlets but it isn’t anything like it used to be. They use to be all truth and actually spread news throughout the land. Today most of what they spread is half-truths that we have to decipher through ourselves to get to the truth. Another disingenuous façade and mostly in the name of money. Money is the root of all these evils. People blame it on religion but it’s the money. They only use the religion to hide behind it as a crutch. There is no religion that tells people to kill in the sake of any God. There is no religion that says let’s take over their land. There is no religion that says let’s make a deal. They are all excuses and nothing more.
We are fighting a different kind of enemy today than we ever did in the past. This isn’t Vietnam, WW1 or WW2; this enemy has no regard at all for human life or humanity in general. They want to take over the world as they have told us. They want to kill us period. They do not want negotiations; this isn’t that kind of enemy. You cannot sit down at a table with these people and say ok what do you want, what can we agree upon? It isn’t what they want, they want us and our way of life gone and most people don’t understand that. These terrorists will stop at nothing to get it if we don’t continue to stop them in their tracks as we have been doing. It isn’t easy but war never is and freedom is never free, unfortunately.
But do we fight the enemy here on our soil or keep it over there away from our children here? This is what people need to ask themselves because if we don’t continue to fight them over there, you can be absolutely assured they will come here on our soil to fight. You also need to remember that when we were attacked on 911 (or any other time), we were not in Iraq. We made no effort to attack anyone over there.
And there are those who say, well we found no WMD’s there and Iraq isn’t the ones who attacked us. Well first of all WMD’s was not the only reason we went into Iraq and did we not give Iraq chance after chance to comply with the 19 resolutions they agreed upon but broke? Did Bin Laden not say to us in the video he sent that Iraq was indeed the central front on this war? Did Saddam not fund the al-qaeda network that has been proven through the oil for food program? Saddam kicked our inspectors out of Iraq every time we got close to certain bunkers and then a few days later invited us back in but yet some people don’t find that ironic or choose to question that kind of behavior? Did we not investigate and negotiate with Iraq for 18 months before going into Iraq?
We gave them chance after chance to dismantle their missiles and it wasn’t until the last minute they started to do it and then it was too late. Did Saddam not use WMD’s to kill his own people and people in neighboring countries? So why would anyone not think that he did have them and not hide them? Just because we didn’t find them don’t mean they were not there. All evidence points to them being there at one time, obviously.
And then of course you have the run of the muck on ethics, morals and values between parties, which really should never be made political within a "whole" party, but it is and both parties have had their share of skeletons. These scandals and allegations should remain solely upon the person it pertains too. However I do find it hypocritical for the democrats to point fingers and play the blame game and the loathing political game of shame on you when they have the same problems if not more.
They have made such an issue out of Foley which yes, he did wrong and should get what he deserves but what about the democrats? What about what they have done? They put this Foley issue out there at a time when elections are coming up and have used it as their niche for political gain only. They could care less about anything but that and have no plan to do it but play dirty because it’s the only way they can do it. They can never win on the issues because they have no plans.
Let’s take a look at their skeletons, just a few at hand here. Former Democrat Congressman Gerry Studd’s (which he passed away this week) admitted to a sexual affair with a 17-year-old pageboy in 1983 (among other things) and defied the House's attempts to reprimand him. He then went on to serve five more terms. No big deal right?
Democrat Governor Jim MacGreevey of New Jersey governed over a highly scandalous administration that was finally toppled over by a scandal involving a gay 'mister-ess' who was given a post he had no business being in, subsequent extortion and an impending lawsuit. Sure, MacGreevey resigned but look what he's doing today? He's the darling spokesperson of the homosexual left which conveniently ignores (or is not concerned about) his admitted scores of anonymous and adulterous sexual encounters (lest we forget his admitted encounter with the man who brought his career down...which occurred while his wife was in the hospital...after delivering his baby!) No punishment involved
Democratic Jefferson is still working even though he was caught red handed with 90 grand in his freezer and still undergoing investigations and this is ok right?
House Democrat Barney Frank hired and befriended a male prostitute who then conducted a male prostitution ring from the home of Barney Frank. He was reprimanded but still serves today.
And then the king of all whoppers was the former President Clinton getting his rocks off every chance he got with his intern of only 19 years old and then had the gull and turned all the blame on her as if he took no part in it. Then if that wasn't bad enough he lied under oath and obstructed justice, which is the real reason, he was impeached not because he had an affair.
The point of all of this isn't to compare scandals to scandals or to excuse Foley's own sleazy behavior. It's to point out an obvious double standard that the democrats seem to have. Republicans have been fairly swift at cleaning out their house while Democrats more often than not want to deny or excuse their own members shortcomings. Duke Cunningham resigned in disgrace yet William Jefferson, with the power of racial tyranny backing him up, refuses to even make a token maneuver for his party.
Democrats can get away with things that Republicans can't...and that seems to be a good reason to be a Republican to me.
The people who to this day defend Bill Clinton despite the admissions of Bill Clinton waited no more than a few hours to try to destroy Dennis Hastert who thus far has not been implicated in anything! Democrats tried this method before with Karl Rove over the Valerie Blame fiasco. And I have yet to see one apology from anyone for their own disgraceful behavior in trying and sentencing a man erroneously based on partisan assumptions.
And isn’t it concerning to anyone that it isn’t the "what" that democrats are concerned with but the "who?"
The democrats are also very weak on security and even on the economy because they’ve spent the last 4 years trying to discredit he opposing party. They want to raise taxes too. Hilary is already speaking of raising taxes at the pumps here in NY, AGAIN. They have no plans because they are too busy making jabs at their opponents to get their own plans. Look at their voting records on several issues before you go to the polls please. It speaks volumes as well. It will be so scary if the democrats (as they are now) take over the house. If they do instead of buying happy Christmas gifts I’m buying gas masks and bomb shelter needs because the democrats want to take away all the needs in which to provide the current administration to catch these terrorists now.
Giving them power now will only increase the odds to vote down all the tools needed to provide us safety from these terrorists. And folks that is not a scare tactic, that’s a fact. And then you can guarantee that taxes will also be raised which will slow down the economy tremendously. So you decide…
Caring regards, MisticalIt’s pretty damn scary to me.