Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 11, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Mark Finkelstein's blog
  • Barbara Walters, Shameless Hypocrite: Hits Kennedy Mistress for Greed, Tells Her She Should Have Stayed Quiet
  • MRC's Bozell Scolds Media's Reluctance to Cover HHS Birth Control Mandate
  • Chris Matthews Excoriates: Rick Santorum Is a 'Theocrat' and Franklin Graham Is a 'Disgrace'
  • Time's Mark Halperin Concedes: GOP 'Would Be Creamed' by Media for Not Passing a Budget
  • CNN Reporters Call CPAC a ‘Conservative Petri Dish’
  • Chris Matthews Reacts to JFK Mistress: Kennedy a Hero Who 'Still Arouses the Country'
  • Covering Up JFK’s Roguish Behavior for 50 Years Not Long Enough for NBC’s Viewers
  • Bozell: It's 'Hilarious' CNN Suspended Roland Martin for Inoffensive Tweet; Maybe 'Lefty Loons at MSNBC' Can 'Scoop Him Up' Now

On 9-11, Hillary Too Savvy To Swing at Lauer's Anti-Bush Softballs, Lets Fly on CBS

By Mark Finkelstein | September 11, 2006 | 08:00

Change font size:  A |  A

Matt Lauer gave it the old college try, doing his best to lure Hillary Clinton into some Bush-bashing on the fifth anniversary of 9/11.  But demonstrating savvy political instincts, or at least those of her advisers, Clinton held fire, not deigning to swing at the anti-Bush softballs Lauer served up on this morning's 'Today.'

Lauer: "Are we safer today five years after the attacks of 9-11?"

Hillary: "I think it is fair to say we are safer but not safe enough. We have a lot of work to do."

Lauer lobbed a couple questions inviting Hillary to suggest that our war on terrorism has made things worse:

"I am curious how you feel about this. Do you think there are more or less people today, more or fewer people today who want to bring harm to the United States than there were in the days prior to 9-11 and the actions we have taken post 9-11?"

And then: "Our response to 9-11 - has it created more enemies?"

Hillary's answers were guarded: "There are probably more.  I think first of all, the copycat effect always happens. There is some kind of a tragic event, from our perspective tragic. From the enemy's perspective, explosive for worldwide attention. People want to be in that category unfortunately. I think also that we have seen actions take place in countries like our own, Britain, Spain and other places where are lots of local groups that share the idealogy.

Hillary couldn't resist a mild swipe: "I think there is certainly a very strong case to be made that in Iraq, people are now turning into suicide bombers. The insurgents and the Jihadists terrorist have learned a lot. They have acquired skills they didn't necessarily have before. We have seen suicide bombings in Afghanistan, something we never saw before. So the source of the hatred, the source of the conflict has probably spread beyond Al-Qaeda."

Lauer: "The president announced something most of us thought for a while. That the CIA had secret sites where they detained terrorists suspects and used alternative questioning methods. Are you comfortable that the United States did not break the law in conducting that kind of interrogation in those secret sites?"

Clinton was non-committal: "We just don't know. We are trying to learn more. What I am interested in is what is effective."

Hillary refused to give a stock liberal answer even when Lauer asked "do the ends justice the means?

Clinton: "It depends. We don't know what the ends are or what the means have to be."

No one should be fooled by Hillary's demure responses.  She knows that while there will be places and times to give full throat to her condemnation of all things Bush, 9/11 is not one of them.

UPDATE:  In answering similar questions on this morning's Early Show, Hillary was less restrained in her Bush-bashing:

CBS: "Has the country done enough, with the fighting in Afghanistan that has re-escalated. The Taliban has reconstituted itself in numbers even greater than before.  How can that be five years later?"

Clinton: "We took our eye off the ball. We diverted resources and attention to Iraq and we didn't finish the job. That, to me, is one of the great missed opportunities"

CBS: "You were among those who advocated going to war in Iraq. We are in Iraq now, more than 2,500 americans have died there, there is still an unbelievable lethal situation on the ground day-to-day for Iraqi civilians. The president said this is the centerpiece in the war on terror do you believe that is true?"

Clinton [indulging in some creative revisionism]: "I did not advocate that. I voted to give the president authority to have the United States congress behind him when he went to the U.N. To put inspectors back in to figure out what Saddam Hussein had. That would not have been the choice, in my opinion, that we should have pursued at that time. But I thought it was reasonable to give him that authority."

Mark Finkelstein lives in the liberal haven of Ithaca, NY. View webcasts of Mark's award-winning TV show 'Right Angle' here. Contact Mark at mark@gunhill.net

Share this

About the Author

Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters Senior Contributor. Click here to follow Mark Finkelstein on Twitter.
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • 2008 Presidential
  • Foreign Policy
  • War on Terrorism
  • George W. Bush
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Matt Lauer
  • NBC
  • Today
  • Mark Finkelstein's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

 

  • The cynical and self-contradictory Gospel of Obama (Krauthammer)
  • Video: Protesters at CPAC admit they're being paid to protest (Daily Caller)
  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)
  • Jay Carney gets snippy about Super PACs (Verum Serum)
  • Where are the blacks for Roland Martin? (NRO/Media Blog)
  • Turkish Islamists turn church into mosque (Commentary)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Try a Sweater Vest, Mitt
more cartoons
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.