[This was first posted on June 28, 2006] Since its inception almost a year ago, MSNBC's Keith Olbermann has devoted a regular segment on his Countdown show to attacking various people who have gained the Countdown host's derision. The segment, titled "Worst Person in the World," is a strong measure of the MSNBC host's overwhelming bias against conservatives as the segment has served as a launchpad for attacks against conservative figures and positions at a dramatically greater rate than against the left. As reported by the latest Media Reality Check, by a staggeringly lopsided 8 to 1 margin, Olbermann has targeted conservatives, sometimes with substantial venom, while hitting a comparatively miniscule number of liberals.
Olbermann's "Worst Person in the World" segment normally features three nominees, although sometimes fewer, for the title of the same name, with the third place award labeled "Worse," second place labeled "Worser," and the first place award labeled "Worst." His targets have ranged from dumb criminals to politicians and public figures, many of whom have simply made controversial statements upsetting to Olbermann. MRC analysts examined every "Worst Person" segment, beginning with the first installment on June 30, 2005, and ending with June 23, 2006. The total number of nominees counted during the period was 592. Of these, 197, or about one-third, were politically salient figures. Out of these 197 nominees, there were 174, or 88 percent, that featured an attack on a conservative target or ideas, compared with 23 nominees, or 12 percent, that featured an attack on liberal targets or ideas. A list of all politically relevant nominees were compiled for the latest Media Reality Check.
If one focuses strictly on high-profile politicians -- those elected either to a federal or statewide office, including close aides -- the numbers are even more heavily tilted against conservatives. Attacks on Republicans outnumber attacks on Democrats by 25 to 2. Not only was it rare for Olbermann to nominate a liberal for the "Worst Person" dishonor, but he once even referred to former Democratic Senator Max Cleland as "one of the best" during a "Worst Person" segment in which he apologized for the fact that during the same segment the night before, his staff had accidentally displayed Cleland's photo while Olbermann was attacking right-leaning radio host Neal Boortz, whom the Countdown host labeled a "radio babbler" and a "racist."
Olbermann has used these segments to make a number of his more biting insults at conservatives. One of his most outrageous "Worst Person" installments blasted former First Lady Barbara Bush over a donation she made to a Hurricane Katrina relief fund because she required that some of the money be used by schools to buy a software program from her son Neil's company. Without noting that the Bush family had given additional donations to the Katrina fund without any requirement as to how they should be spent, Olbermann snidely took aim at the former First Lady: "You'd think if a woman has reached her 80th birthday she'd understand that if you make a donation to charity, then make the charity give the donation to your son, it's not a damned donation anymore! Barbara Bush, today's 'Worst Person in the World'!"
Although Olbermann once proclaimed that, while it's "naive and old-fashioned" of him, he felt that "you should reserve those terms like 'idiot' exclusively for men" (while defending his choice to call conservative columnist Michelle Malkin a "fool"), apparently he has no problem tagging females with other derogatory labels. After recently turning his "Worst Person" fire toward Malkin, in his first of two shots, he referred to Malkin as "crazier and dumber than we all thought," and on another occasion called her a "nitwit." Well, as Olbermann might say, at least he didn't call her an idiot.
Conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh has been a perennial target. The Countdown host has made multiple references to Limbaugh's prescription drug addiction, once quipping that "painkillers wipe out your memory along with your ethics." Olbermann has also taken to mocking the radio host as "comedian Rush Limbaugh." Olbermann also found time to label the American Values Foundation as "homophobes," accused a Utah woman of "bigotry" for opposing the showing of the gay-themed Brokeback Mountain in a local theater, and tagged intelligent design proponents as "the same people who brought you 'the world is flat, the earth is at the center of the universe, and let's burn a scientist at the stake today.'"
Olbermann has even targeted young conservative activists, once ridiculing a Young Republicans president in Pennsylvania for stating that America had eliminated the torture rooms in Iraq. Grotesquely implying a similarity between the treatment of prisoners by American troops to the horrific treatment of those jailed under Saddam Hussein's regime, Olbermann snidely quipped: "You might want to skip the 'eliminating torture' part." The MSNBC host was also alarmed that a conservative UCLA alumni group wanted to combat the problem of liberal professors trying to indoctrinate their students, as the Countdown host tagged the Brewen Alumni Association a "radical group" and wondered how its founder graduated.
The only three major public figures who were either liberals or were attacked from the right were New York Comptroller Alan Hevesi, for saying Senator Schumer would shoot President Bush if he could; Representative Cynthia McKinney for striking a police officer; and Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan for advancing the theory that the levees in New Orleans were blown up with explosives. Notably, each of these three nominees only scored the second place title of "Worser" while numerous conservative figures were dishonored with the first place title of "Worst."
During the past year, Olbermann found few on the far left that inspire him for inclusion in his "Worst Person" segment, while notably using the far left Media Matters for America as a frequent source to attack conservative targets. Other liberals escaping Olbermann's wrath were Democratic Congressman William Jefferson, who was caught storing cash in his freezer in a bribery scandal; and film maker/propagandist Michael Moore, who was recently sued by an Iraq War veteran for including a clip of him in Fahrenheit 9/11 without permission. In direct contrast to the Moore story, Olbermann once made room to attack the operators of the Republican National Committee Web site over an ad attacking anti-war Democrats because of the inclusion of music without permission that was composed by song writer and Iraq War critic Jim Capaldi. But when wounded veteran Paul Damon, a self-described supporter of the Iraq War, filed a suit against Moore for including a clip of Damon without permission to attack the war, Olbermann saw no need to include Moore in his dishonors list.
Olbermann has also made ongoing sport of attacking Fox News. FNC anchors, employees or the network in general have been nominees 66 times. Of those, 58 were on-air personalities -- including Bill O'Reilly, Brit Hume, John Gibson, Morton Kondracke, David Asman, and Geraldo Rivera. On one occasion, Olbermann even referred to FNC as the "Fox Naz-, uh, Fox News Channel."
This is especially notable considering that in June 2005, on his Bloggermann site, the MSNBC host scolded public figures who use Nazi references, saying, "There's no place for the reference in this culture," and that the analogies are "wrong, offensive and deeply hurtful." An ironic statement coming from Olbermann, a man who remarked in 1998 that former Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr reminded him of Heinrich Himmler, a Nazi war criminal; and who last March, appearing on The Colbert Report on Comedy Central, compared the harassment of some of O’Reilly’s callers by Fox security to tactics used in Nazi Germany. Olbermann: "Which is, you know, fascinating if, you know, we're living in, say, Nazi Germany, it’s a good idea."
Strikingly, as an illustration of how strong an anti-O'Reilly vendetta resides within Olbermann, 42 of the Countdown host's attacks on FNC personalities targeted O'Reilly. In fact, on one night Olbermann reserved all three slots for O'Reilly, whom Olbermann sometimes refers to as "the big giant head" or "Ted Baxter," an unflattering reference to a character from The Mary Tyler Moore Show. The MSNBC host once even ended the segment by bizarrely playing an audio clip of Stewie Griffin, the baby from The Family Guy, voiced by Seth MacFarlane, as the cartoon character said, "Bill, hold still. Allow me to soil myself upon you. Victory is mine!"
In the first of several attacks on another FNC host, Olbermann distorted the context of a comment from John Gibson in which Gibson was discussing the general principle of tolerating other religions on Earth and leaving it to God to decide which religion is right. But Olbermann twisted Gibson's words to portray the FNC host as intolerant, comparing him to "religious nutbag terrorists" and claiming Gibson had revealed "a very ugly side to himself." In a later show, the MSNBC host rationalized his "Worst Person" attack on Gibson by playing a clip of Gibson from the Janet Parshall Show, and compared the exchange with Parshall to "an all-access Al-Qaeda show on Al-Jazeera talking about infidels," before calling on the FNC host, whom Olbermann claimed was once a friend, to "leave the airwaves for good" because he has "forfeited his right to stay here." Perhaps the same could be said of Olbermann.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
OLBERMANN
February 15, 2007 - 20:42 ET by JOEL714NBC NEWS HAS ASSURED A GROWTH IN THE SAGGING AUDIENCE FOR "KATIE", BY THEIR HIRING THAT FOOL OLBERMANN. IT WILL ASSURE THAT MORE PEOPLE STOP WATCHING "PRETTY BOY" WILLIAMS AND GO OVER TO KATIE.
SHE MAY BE A LITTLE SOFT AND LOOSE, BUT COMPARED TO THAT PUNK OLBERMANN, SHE'S LIKE RICHARD NIXON.
Thank goodness for John Gibso
February 16, 2007 - 05:19 ET by Andrew H.Thank goodness for John Gibson, Keith. I don't watch you.
Liberalism is a convenient lie.
Hey Dave Pierre,You're bril
February 17, 2007 - 07:45 ET by SomerTeethHey Dave Pierre,
You're brilliant! You sound as though you're ready for a network executive position with a major network.
First of all, you can't accurately compare the shows by cherry picking numbers from June of 2006. That's far from an accurate representation of where the two shows compare today. Second, you have to look at growth trends, and the direction in which the shows are heading. The importance of looking at trends lies in the fact that O'Reilly has been on the air since 1996, while Olbermann has only been on since 2003. I think it's safe to say that O'Reilly had a significant head start on building an audience.
Of course O'Reilly has a bigger audience, he had a 7-year head start. There is wide margin between the two shows' total audience, but there's absolutely no doubt that they're trending in opposite directions (Olbermann = increase & O'Reilly = decrease). Will Olbermann ever catch O'Reilly in total audience? Probably not, but you'd have to admit that having a 7-year head start is a big advantage for O'Reilly.
Olbermann's January 2007 numbers are up 85% over January 2006.
You have to look at monthly numbers versus the same period the prior year to get an idea of the trens. As an example, if you compare October 2006 to October 2005, you can see that Olbermann increased his numbers by 67%, versus a 22% decrease by O'Reilly.
Countdown with Keith Olbermann
Total Viewers:
Oct. 2006 -- 637,000
Oct. 2005 -- 381,000 --- 67% Increase
25-54 Demo:
Oct. 2006 -- 233,000
Oct. 2005 -- 145,000 --- 61% Increase
The O'Reilly Factor
Total Viewers:
Oct. 2006 -- 2,081,000
Oct. 2005 -- 2,678,000 --- 22% Drop
25-54 Demo:
Oct. 2006 -- 470,000
Oct. 2005 -- 518,000 --- 9% Drop
Yeah, but it's not as brill
February 17, 2007 - 09:48 ET by Uncle JohnYeah, but that's not as brilliant as someone responding to a 7 month old post like it's new. Well done.
"It isn't that Liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so much that isn't so." - Ronald Reagan
Aunt John,The date of his p
February 17, 2007 - 14:33 ET by SomerTeethAunt John,
The date of his post is irrelevant to the point of my post. I noticed you didn't argue the actual content of the post. Obviously, it was a little too compIex noticed you didn't argue the actual content of the post.
So, somerteeth, you defend MSNBC or Olbermann?
February 17, 2007 - 14:44 ET by acaiguanaSo, somerteeth, you defend MSNBC or Olbermann?
I'm confused.
Let's say, just for argument, that Olbermann is 'growing' his audience.
Now, let's say for argument, that Olbermann is still the biggest loser in the ratings wars.
Now, let's say for argument that Olbermann bases his show on the late Joe Pyne.
Naw, Joe Pyne was a conservative.
OK, let's just say that Olbermann has an audience. I thought it was smaller, but obviously fans of Al Frankin have to go somewhere.
But to address your seeming concern that Olbermann's figures seem to be discounted here, we were worried that he had none at all and so any reference to his numbers should be seen as 'happy' feet news.
ACA
...
Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."
And Somer Not
February 17, 2007 - 17:48 ET by Uncle JohnOK, numbnuts, try this on for size. You're completely wrong about the poster "cherry-picking" numbers from June 27, 2006. June 28 is the date of the post, and those were the latest numbers available at that time. Duh. Given that in February 2007 you're citing one set of numbers from October 2006 and their predecessors one year earlier, the burden of proof is on you to show you're not cherry-picking them. Perhaps you should do an in-depth study of multiple data samples and report back to us. You know we'll all be watching for that with great anticipation.
Second, do you think that Dave Pierre is watching this blog 7 months later to see if anyone replies to his comments? Really, what did you think you'd accomplish? Wait, don't answer that, because I don't give a rat's ass. If anything, I think you were looking for a quick hit to feel like a big man because you knew he wouldn't respond, which somehow would make you the "winner".
I don't watch either show, and I wouldn't watch "Meltdown" if a gun was pointed at my head. And my viewing preferences are all that matter to me. Olbermann's a boob who's way out of his depth. Apparently he and heavily-medicated folks like you are so in love with him that his being an intellectual featherweight somehow doesn't matter. Enjoy the hate-filled wacko rants he gets off on, and rock on, "bro".
See ya, troll. You're dismissed.
"It isn't that Liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so much that isn't so." - Ronald Reagan
Chris, I agree. Personally
February 15, 2007 - 18:27 ET by Dave RChris,
I agree. Personally, I like Sean, but his questions often seem to be framed in a way that requires a yes or no answer and nothing more. I noticed that back when he was here at a radio station in Atlanta. I also feel he becomes visibly hostile way to early in the proceedings. He needs to learn from Neal, who most often will slowly let out the rope and when he's ready, pulls the noose tight. Sean seems to come out of the gate while wildly swinging a ball and chain. Good entertainment, perhaps, but a little on the crude side.
I hate newspapermen.....I regard them as spies.....If I killed them all there would be news from Hell before breakfast. -Gen. William T. Sherman
That is a very accurate char
February 16, 2007 - 10:39 ET by Hero SquadThat is a very accurate characterization of Hannity's approach, and why it can be frustrating at time to listen to him. He should do a little more noose loosening for his guests with opposing viewpoints.
As for Olbermann's 8-to-1 ratio ... I was actually surprised to hear that he did manage to pinpoint 23 liberals. I wonder, though ... how many of them were pinpointed for reasons not related to their political leanings. For example, if he names a Democrat because he's arrested for DUI, does it count?
*****
"Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine no possessions?'" - Elvis Costello
Chris Stop Hatin' On Sean
February 15, 2007 - 18:57 ET by emjem24Man, what is it with you guys and Sean Hannity? He's actually a really great guy. I've read his books, seen his show and listened to his radio show. Believe me, when Colmes speaks, I mute him and then when Sean speaks I turn the sound back on. Why do you guys hate him so much? He's not eloquent enough for you...I guess that would qualify Pres. Bush too in your opinion. Look, he's one of the few guys that will stand up for the military, actually cares what they say. I've met him in person and he's not faking it. He works hard at what he does, loves this family, and loves this country. I really resent when people on this site beat up on him and this isn't the first time. If it weren't for people like Sean Hannity and websites like this, Chris, I wouldn't feel supported at all as a military spouse. Believe me, there are conservatives and Republicans who have faked their support for the military (such as certan RINO's in the Senate and the House) but Sean isn't one of them. I actually feel that he's rooting for people like my husband but I don't get that from Colmes who is a cold, stony-faced cur.
The difficult we do immediately; the impossible takes a little longer. Air Force Motto
emjem says: When your brain's stuck on liberalism it self-destructs.
Hannity is the equivalent o
February 16, 2007 - 17:14 ET by SomerTeethHannity is the equivalent of a Chatty Kathy doll, where you just pull the string in the back. He has a limited vocabulary, limited intelligence, and his arguments generally come straight from the Republican talking points. If you take away his cue cards and teleprompter, he's hopelessly lost.
Hannity is paired with a gu
February 16, 2007 - 17:03 ET by SomerTeethHannity is paired with a guy who is NO match for him at all. He might
as well be paired with a hamster. I think the people who paired these
two must have chuckled to themselves.
You do know that Hannity is the Executive Producer of the show, right? He himself, hand-picked Colmes to be his whipping boy. You don't think he would actually pick somebody who would challenge him, do you? Besides, he's got enough ego to fill any empty suit he puts next to him.
...and that's... ok. ;-)*****
February 16, 2007 - 10:44 ET by Hero Squad...and that's... ok. ;-)
*****
"Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine no possessions?'" - Elvis Costello
Um.. guys.. I'm getting OD'
February 15, 2007 - 17:46 ET by rimskyUm.. guys.. I'm getting OD'd on the Olbie posts.. nomesayin?
rimsky... I have to agree
February 15, 2007 - 17:51 ET by Clear thinkerrimsky...
I have to agree on this one. The more we give him hell, the more popular he becomes. I for one want to just ignore the SOB!
help!
February 15, 2007 - 17:58 ET by bigtimerAm I finally in Twilight Zone?
Help me someone!
bt... I just noticed the J
February 15, 2007 - 18:01 ET by Clear thinkerbt...
I just noticed the June dates thanks to you, so no worries, it's not TZ for you yet ;-)
CT... ...Dang it all! ...th
February 15, 2007 - 18:05 ET by bigtimer...Dang it all!
...thought I finally made it to where the left lives...in an illusionary world.
La-la land shangrila.
bt... Sorry, I had no idea
February 15, 2007 - 18:09 ET by Clear thinkerbt...
Sorry, I had no idea you were looking forward to therapy!
I think Matt has been experimenting with the site trying to make improvements. So far the experiment is not going so well.
Thanks Ct... You know I was
February 15, 2007 - 18:13 ET by bigtimerYou know I was just kiddin'...I hope!
It has often been said that t
February 15, 2007 - 18:27 ET by saurusIt has often been said that the best way to treat a pest is to simply ignore him. In this particular jagoffs case that goes in spades.
He's a nobody pretending to be somebody important, like most of the media. Talking about them gives them empowerment.
Ignore the SOB and be done with it.
I agree Saurus, this is like
February 15, 2007 - 20:02 ET by terrigI agree Saurus, this is like the ANS nonsense. Why oh why do we keep on with him.
Flash back! flash foward, the
February 15, 2007 - 18:20 ET by upcountrywaterFlash back! flash foward, the same yesterday today and dang it tomorrow. TMO
Odd Man Out's List Of Targets
February 15, 2007 - 18:44 ET by emjem24When you take a look at the list, it really, really hits ya how insane this idiot is. This man is beyond contempt. He's a childish, immature loon not unlike most of the liberals in the media or the left-wingers who even have the gaul to appear on this site.
The difficult we do immediately; the impossible takes a little longer. Air Force Motto
emjem says: When your brain's stuck on liberalism it self-destructs.
The latest abysmal ratings fo
February 15, 2007 - 18:59 ET by TEThe latest abysmal ratings for Odormoronn's gameshow Meltdown with Keith Odormoronn:
8PM - P2+ (25-54)
O’Reilly Factor – 2,840,000 viewers (742,000)
Paula Zahn– 637,000 viewers (156,000)
Fast Money – 199,000 viewers (a scratch with 46,000)
Nancy Grace – 957,000 viewers (405,000)
Meltdown w/ Odormoronn - 825,000 viewers (308,000)
Olberman is an ANTICHRIST ...
February 15, 2007 - 19:32 ET by jonathanandersonOlberman is an ANTICHRIST ...
1 John 2:18
Little children, it is the last time [eschatos hora - the lowest, or trying, hour] : and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there MANY antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time [eschatos hora - the lowest, or trying, hour ... the hour of adversity].
But there is no reason to worry or fret ...
Jude 1:16-18
(16) These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their mouth speaketh great swelling words, having [wicked] men's persons in admiration because of [political] advantage.
(17) But, beloved, remember ye the words which were spoken before of the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ;
(18) How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time [eschatos chronos - at the appointed time ... during the time of greatest moral and political weakness], who should walk after their own ungodly lusts.
2 Thessalonians 2:7, 11-12
(7) For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth [speaketh lies] will let [speak them], until he be taken out of the way.
(11) And for this cause God shall send them [those that reject the truth] strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
(12) That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
Psalms 37:1-3
(1) Fret not thyself because of evildoers, neither be thou envious against the workers of iniquity.
(2) For they shall soon be cut down like the grass, and wither as the green herb.
(3) Trust in the Lord, and do good; so shalt thou dwell in the land, and verily thou shalt be fed.
Psalms 37:7-15
(7) Rest in the Lord, and wait patiently for him: fret not thyself because of him who prospereth in his way, because of the man who bringeth wicked devices to pass.
(8) Cease from anger, and forsake wrath: fret not thyself in any wise to do evil.
(9) For evildoers shall be cut off: but those that wait upon the Lord, they shall inherit the earth.
(10) For yet a little while, and the wicked shall not be: yea, thou shalt diligently consider his place, and it shall not be.
(11) But the meek shall inherit the earth; and shall delight themselves in the abundance of peace.
(12) The wicked plotteth against the just, and gnasheth upon him with his teeth.
(13) The Lord shall laugh at him: for he seeth that his day is coming.
(14) The wicked have drawn out the sword, and have bent their bow, to cast down the poor and needy, and to slay such as be of upright conversation.
(15) Their sword shall enter into their own heart, and their bows shall be broken.
Olberman will get his due.
ah geeezz ....
February 15, 2007 - 21:03 ET by saurusNo disrespect, but I personally can do without the proselytizing. I can go to church for that, thanks.
Hey, I can revile Olbermann
February 15, 2007 - 21:15 ET by Jack BauerHey, I can revile Olbermann as much as the next man. But anti-Christ?
Let's save that sobriquet for someone more deserving. Jar Jar Binks perhaps.
What!? Olbermann is liberal??
February 15, 2007 - 19:42 ET by waka wakaWhat!? Olbermann is liberal??? Next you'll tell me O'Reilly is right wing!
LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL LOOFA=FALAFEL
Reality has a well known liberal bias.
Good Grief! Four posts of Odo
February 15, 2007 - 20:35 ET by kevcadGood Grief! Four posts of Odormann on NB in one day!
Now that ought to be a record in itself!
I read most of the responses
February 15, 2007 - 20:47 ET by JABI read most of the responses to this post but not all. So, forgive me if I step on someone else's response. However, I read today MSNBC signed this moron up for another four years.
Yes, folks you have another four years to be educated by this absolute idiot.
"To bad Ignorance isn't painful to those too lazy to learn"
Good grief. You mean some p
February 15, 2007 - 20:49 ET by Jack BauerGood grief. You mean some poor schlubb had to sit through almost 200 sessions of that raving loon.
I'd rather scrape my fingernails down a blackboard for a week. And I really hate that.