“Private” must be the new cuss word, because “CBS Evening News” sure made it sound dirty on July 16.
“It was the winter of 2003, when Congress, in the dead of night, overhauled Medicare … [Medicare Advantage] and it put a large part of a government-run program into the hands of private insurance companies,” said investigative correspondent Armen Keteyian.
A little bit later Keteyian continued to explain the “problem:”
“Private Medicare Advantage offers as many as 50 different plans, causing untold confusion over coverage, premiums, copays, provider networks.”
Yes, and I’m sure going to a restaurant that served only chicken would be less confusing than a restaurant with a full menu of options: salads, soups, appetizers and entrees. But I’d personally rather make the choice for myself.
The CBS segment promoted government run health insurance by scaring seniors about Medicare privatization. Keteyian relied on Bob Hayes of the Medicare Rights Center which fields “thousands of calls from seniors scared to death they’ve made the wrong choice.”
But Keteyian never stated that the Medicare Rights Centers is against all Medicare privatization and advocates Medicare for everyone – can you say universal health care?
CBS barely included the perspective that choice can be good. The head of Medicare, Leslie Norwalk was given about ten seconds to express that point before Keteyian attacked the potential profit insurance companies are making from the program.The CBS correspondent called the plans "expensive" to taxpayers.
The report featured one disgruntled senior, Aaron Cohen, who didn’t get home therapy paid for for his broken leg. However, CBS used that anecdotal evidence to suggest all seniors who chose private plans are unhappy.
But according Wall Street Journal reporters, the Medicare Advantage provision in the 2003 legislation is extremely popular.
“Hundreds of thousands of seniors are signing up for a type of privately run Medicare plan that delivers traditional benefits without the usual restrictions on access to doctors and hospitals,” said the Journal on Aug. 29, 2006.
—Julia A. Seymour is an assistant editor for the Business & Media Institute.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Only time choice matters
July 17, 2007 - 18:31 ET by regimeofterrorChoice is only appropriate when discussing abortion. Didn't you get the memo?
Saddam Hussein and terrorism. The rest of the story...
http://www.regimeoft...
Choices are everywhere
July 17, 2007 - 18:34 ET by Mica the MagnificentDon't forget other choices that confuse us all: All the channel choices on satellite, all those damn words I have to choose - and in the right order! - in the english language.
And don't get me started about all those career choices, education choices, and cough medicine choices.
Waaaaa! I WANT THE GOVERNMENT TO CHOOSE FOR ME!
P.S.- CBS News has seen its future.
And its future is:
"CBS News is made possible by your tax dollars and donations from viewers like you."
choice is not part of socialism
July 17, 2007 - 19:36 ET by Pragmatic-ManChoice is indeed a dirty word, when you come from a socialist mindset.
Socialized healthcare is our future.
July 17, 2007 - 19:47 ET by Dave RJulia,
Back when GWB was proposing allowing us to place just 2% of our SS witholdings (confiscations?) into the investments of our choice, much of the media here, particularly the AJC, began producing one person after another that was opposed to this idea because they simply didn't want to be bothered with having to make a decision.
Socialized healthcare in our future is a 100% certainty. There are just too many Americans who are terrified of real freedom to prevent it.
Help Fred defeat the RINOs, along with the Hitllary-Obama Axis, & win the White House in '08.
Ugh! So true!
July 17, 2007 - 21:34 ET by Scout FinchToo many people would rather have government make a lousy choice for them than dig deep and make a wise choice for themselves. In other words, stand for something, or you'll fall for anything!
I guess we sheeple can't
July 18, 2007 - 01:24 ET by rbosqueI guess we sheeple can't make informed choices. I am sure glad liberals are around to tell us what to do.
Marxist jerk-wads.
It turns my stomach to
July 18, 2007 - 08:46 ET by The Wicked ConservativeIt turns my stomach to think people actually fall for dem talking points. They'll never be happy until the entire nation is completely dependent on them and all elections will be a sham. Choice does not exist in socialism. Merely take all their current talking points and imagine applying them all unilaterally. You would make an appointment at the "free" clinic for your twisted ankle three weeks in advance, but abortions are on a walk-in basis. Poverty would no longer exist because wealth has been abolished through taxation, except for the plutocracy, but hey they're doing the peoples work. The "bible" will be sanitized of all it's hate speech but the Quran will be required reading in grade school. No more trees will ever be cut down so we'll be living in huts made from mud. Animal products will be banned from the populace and the rights of animals will exceed some humans. Democrats are my worst nightmare. There's so many more...
You can't save the Earth unless You're willing to make other people sacrifice. Dogbert the Green Consultant summing up the elite left.