It’s approaching two weeks since an Air Force Airman was shot by an anti-war protestor in Willingboro, New Jersey.
Yet, apart from an Associated Press article which conveniently ignored the apparent motives of the assailant, a New York Post op-ed by Michelle Malkin, and a mention by Glenn Beck on CNN's Headline News, not one major mainstream media outlet has reported the horrific event in print or on the air.
Not one.
To set this up, the Associated Press reported the day after the shooting (h/t NB reader CSM Robert E. Wilson, currently serving in Iraq):
An airman from McGuire Air Force Base was in critical condition after being shot by another man who then turned the gun on himself and committed suicide, officials said.
According to the Burlington County Prosecutor's Office, Matthew J. Marren, 22, of Pennsauken, drove to the Willingboro home that the airman, Jonathan Schrieken, 22, was renting at about 5:30 p.m. Wednesday.
Marren got out of his vehicle and shot Schrieken, who was outside the house, one time in the chest, using a small-caliber firearm. Marren then turned the gun on himself.
Schrieken was transported to Cooper University Hospital in Camden, where he was in critical condition Thursday, said Angel Lopez from the McGuire public affairs office. She said Marren was not affiliated with the military.
Schrieken is a loadmaster with the 6th Airlift Squadron based at McGuire, officials said.
As noted by Patrick Poole at the American Thinker July 9, the AP “never mentioned Marren's motive for shooting Schrieken.”
On July 6, PhillyBurbs.com reported the incident, and the piece got picked up at MSNBC.com:
The Pennsauken man who shot and wounded a member of the U.S. Air Force before killing himself left suicide notes that indicated he was “angry at the government and wanted to make a statement” on Independence Day, one of the man’s relatives said yesterday.
[…]
Marren’s aunt, Terina Henderson of Trion, Ga., said she spoke to Marren’s mother yesterday who told her Marren left two notes, one in his home and one in his car, indicating he was upset with the government.
She said she did not know the exact wording in the notes, but said Marren was “mad at the government and wanted to make a statement … that’s why he did what he did on the Fourth of July.”
So, AP ran a piece on this July 5, with PhillyBurbs.com and MSNBC.com the following day connecting an anti-war element to the shooting. Yet, no major print or television press outlet deigned to report the matter.
Three days later, on July 8, Charles Johnson reported at Little Green Footballs that he received a message from a reader that included the following about this subject:
My son’s best friend, Jon, who’s in the Air Force stationed in New Jersey at Fort Dix/McGuire Air Force Base was shot by a crazed anti-military white guy on Independence Day and he remains in critical condition. He had been on leave here in Ohio and got back to his home off base and was unpacking stuff from his car when this 22 year old guy walked up to him and asked him if he lived in the house. When Jon said yes, the guy said “not any more” and shot him point blank in the chest. He tried to shoot him again, but his gun jammed. Jonathan made it into the house. The guy then shot himself.
Still no major print or television media focus.
Finally, on July 11, the New York Post published the following op-ed by Michelle Malkin which (emphasis added):
Now, imagine the scenario flipped: What if a soldier had attempted to murder a peace activist over the holidays in order to “make a statement”? The Times would be holding front-page vigil, and Katie Couric’s brow would be furrowed for a week. The yakkity yaks on The View would be clucking their tongues about the culture of violence bred by the military — and who knows what Rosie O’Donnell would be dressing her poor child in to exploit the story on her website.
Funny how the Root Causes crowd becomes so incurious about the root causes of crime when the suspects are anti-military nutballs and antiwar protesters. To the extent leftists pay any attention at all to this attempted murder, you can expect it to be downplayed as an isolated incident.
Never mind the pro-fragging comments made by troop-bashing academic fraudsters like Ward Churchill; the iconic banners that proclaim “We support our troops when they shoot their own officers” and “Don’t impeach Bush . . . execute him”; the countless acts of vandalism against military recruitment offices nationwide since 9/11; and the burning of soldiers in effigy by hate-filled peaceniks.
The next day, Glenn Beck said the following on his CNN Headline News program:
There`s a devastating story involving a 22-year-old senior airman with the 6th Airlift Squadron by the name of Jonathan Schrieken. On July 4th, he had gone outside of his house. He was shot in cold blood by Matthew Marren in the chest. Marren then turned the gun on himself and saved the taxpayers, quite frankly, a lot of money. His suicide notes reportedly said that he was angry at the government, and he desired to make a statement on the Fourth of July.
Well, an anti-government maniac makes a statement that almost kills a military man on the most patriotic day of the year and you haven`t heard the story? How is it even possible? Outside of some local media and Michelle Malkin, who wrote it in her column, the story has almost been invisible. Let me ask you this question: Would that have been the case if a crazed soldier had killed a peace activist to make a statement? I doubt it. We`d still be talking about it today.
Yes, Glenn, we would. Yet, it appears that of all the reporters in the major media, only you and Michelle thought Airman Schrieken deserved the courtesy of having his story told.
How utterly graceful.
For those interested, AT’s Patrick Poole included the following update to his post:
Readers wishing to send Airman Schieken a get-well card and thank him for his service to our country can reach him at:
Jonathan Schrieken
Room 720 by the doorCooper University Hospital
1 Cooper Plaza
Camden NJ 08103
Godspeed, Airman.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
How do you guys know this
July 17, 2007 - 11:28 ET by waka wakaHow do you guys know this "protestor" was anti-war? Maybe he was mad at the government because he thinks Bush has been too soft on Iraq. Maybe he thinks his taxes are too high. I find your hysteria over something that's so ambiguous highly amusing.
Reality has a well known liberal bias.
Daisy Chains and Laughs...
July 17, 2007 - 15:26 ET by reasonsjesterHey Fozzie Bear, just because you sit around in an echo chamber listening to liberal platitudes bounce around in your skull all day long doesn't mean there isn't a whole big bad world out there that doesn't take the tripe seriously (including jihadists, mind you). You can take your Nietszchian refabrication and repackaging of reality and stick it in the mismatched sock drawer of philosophical failure along with other antequated ideas of attempting to control men's minds, like socialist realism and the Gramscian seizure of public institutions, An empty parroting sock puppet like yourself has no business on our forum, and I suggest you go back to Starbucks with all your self-righteous haiku-writing wannabe hippie buddies and do a mental circle jerk over a copy of The Nation. Leave the security and welfare of the America people to the grownups and go run along now.
Oh btw - fascist.
I am always ready to learn although I do not always like being taught. - Churchill
Wow
July 16, 2007 - 11:22 ET by kd5463This story has deffinitely been buried. I live in NJ and keep up on all sorts of news and I have not seen or heard a peep about this. It makes you wonder what else the MSM has buried.
Liberal Bias Includes What Stoires Not Printed
July 16, 2007 - 11:24 ET by kwBiggest bias in the news today are the stories that you don't hear. Thanks Newsbusters for the blog on this story. What a shame, what a tragedy. Followed by the tragedy of not reporting the story.
Not the best example of "
July 16, 2007 - 11:28 ET by kwNot the best example of "if the shooter was in the military", but this one from today. Admittedly the man's military and sniper background is relevant to this particular story, but you know what I mean. Anytime some Police, Military, or Boy Scout is involved with a dispecable act...the headlines read "Ex-Military Shoots Boy"
In addition to trying Marren
July 16, 2007 - 11:25 ET by GalvanicIn addition to trying Marren for attempted murder, this would make a good test case for hate-crime legislation. Airman Schrieken was clearly targeted not for any personal reasons, but purely because he was a military member of the US Government, which Marren wanted to send a message to.
Can anyone tell me what makes Marren any different than an al Qaeda terrorist? Perhaps we can charge him under the same statutes that sent John Walker Lindh to jail.
}}----> Marren did us one favor
July 16, 2007 - 11:34 ET by Cool ArrowMarren killed himself and saved us the trial.
Doh! I overlooked that part
July 16, 2007 - 11:51 ET by GalvanicDoh! I overlooked that part when I got all worked up.
Well, let's put his carcass on trial anyway.
That's a good argument for wh
July 16, 2007 - 16:45 ET by HypocriteHaterThat's a good argument for why the hate crime legistation is bad law. The motive for this shooting was pure hate, yet this Airman is not part of the protected class of society that the libs have determined need protection more than others.
Can we say Animal Farm, ladies and gentlemen?
And they say that the media i
July 16, 2007 - 11:31 ET by ksimm81And they say that the media isn't liberally-biased.....that is sad.
Truly shocking and sickening,
July 16, 2007 - 11:46 ET by Sick-n-TiredTruly shocking and sickening, both at the same time. That is why I love Newsbusters---I wouldn't have heard the story otherwise. Thanks guys.
I heard sbout this last week
July 16, 2007 - 11:56 ET by danboI heard sbout this last week and looked for information on it. Even did a web search. The fact that so little has been told ia a sad statement.
As has been pointed out. If a member of the military had shot a peace activist it would reported non stop.
The media doesn't have and dosen't deserve the trust of the American people.
Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of truth and knowledge will be shipwrecked by the laughter of the Gods. Albert Einstein
I'm going to watch this story
July 16, 2007 - 12:24 ET by Challenger GrimI'm going to watch this story as close as I can because the LGF watch links to it with the title: "no hard evidence yet the perpetrator had a leftist conviction".
If hard evidence comes out saying the perpetrator of leftist convictions, I wonder if they'll self destruct.
Be sure to get your daily Fred Thompson Fact!
CG,These are the same brain
July 16, 2007 - 15:03 ET by Dave RCG,
These are the same brain-dead liberals who refuse to admit that Muslims have been behind so much (if not all) of the recent terrorist activities in Europe.
They somehow are more comfortable referring to them as "Asians," as apparently it is now verbotten in many liberal circles to describe terrorists as Islamic, even when they clearly are.
I'm suprised they haven't gone after Jihad Watch as being racists, as well.
Help Fred defeat the RINOs, along with the Hitllary-Obama Axis, & win the White House in '08.
I'll go one better. Just ha
July 16, 2007 - 13:12 ET by richflanjI'll go one better. Just have someone in the military simply suggest, in passing, that ANY peacenik or "journalist" should be shot. Then sit back and watch the months of coverage.....
Now, imagine the scenario fli
July 16, 2007 - 12:43 ET by Sergeant ROCKNow, imagine the scenario flipped: What if a soldier had attempted to murder a peace activist over the holidays in order to "make a statement"?
Better still... what if a veteran shot and killed a journalist???
Ohhhhh... the humanity!
...and what do we have with o
July 16, 2007 - 13:19 ET by ThisnThat...and what do we have with one shot journalist? ---- a good start.
(I know, old joke. Sometimes the keyboard takes over, and the fingers have no choice...)
Ha! Hilarious! But
July 17, 2007 - 11:32 ET by waka wakaHa! Hilarious!
But seriously, I'm pleased that one of you fascists finally came out and said what you're all thinking.
Reality has a well known liberal bias.
Unless it's a journalist yo
July 16, 2007 - 13:21 ET by BlameTheMediaUnless it's a journalist you agree with.
But your comment certainly advocates the very thing you are criticizing. Violence against anyone.
Shamefull.
Get a life.
July 16, 2007 - 13:26 ET by ThisnThatGet a life.
I can't believe it... but I t
July 16, 2007 - 14:21 ET by Challenger GrimI can't believe it... but I think I agree with you.
Though personally I would advocate not force, but either deportation (hey, America sux anyway according to them) or at least MAKE them go to areas where they are reporting. (in other words, toss a few more into Iraq)
Be sure to get your daily Fred Thompson Fact!
This is terrible. A traves
July 16, 2007 - 13:18 ET by BlameTheMediaThis is terrible. A travesty. I wish people wouldn't take out their frustrations on the soldiers. It's not their fault. They are only doing what they are told by the commander in chief of this great nation. It is the president and congress they should be writing letters to and phoning.
Violence only begets violence.
Violence - works every time!!!
July 17, 2007 - 05:25 ET by UnsaneBlame,
Per Robert Heinlein, I'm sure the Carthaginians would sure appreciate your thoughts on violence. Why not go to Carthage and let them all know?
Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.
"Violence only begets
July 16, 2007 - 13:30 ET by MightyMouth"Violence only begets violence."
And, ironically, violence also stops violence.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Obviously you're a
July 17, 2007 - 11:34 ET by waka wakaObviously you're a Christian.
Reality has a well known liberal bias.
Obvioulsy you're an
July 17, 2007 - 11:35 ET by MightyMouthObvioulsy you're an Idiot.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Obviously you're a Christian.
July 17, 2007 - 15:36 ET by vrwc1333"But whoever denies Me before men, I will also deny him before My Father who is in heaven. 34"Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. 35"For I came to SET A MAN AGAINST HIS FATHER, AND A DAUGHTER AGAINST HER MOTHER, AND A DAUGHTER-IN-LAW AGAINST HER MOTHER-IN-LAW; 36and A MAN'S ENEMIES WILL BE THE MEMBERS OF HIS HOUSEHOLD. 37"He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me; and he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me. 38"And he who does not take his cross and follow after Me is not worthy of Me. 39"He who has found his life will lose it, and he who has lost his life for My sake will find it. Matt 10
Life is full of irony. But
July 16, 2007 - 14:25 ET by Challenger GrimLife is full of irony.
But he's right, one thing left AND right ought to agree upon is that soldiers should NOT be blamed or made to suffer for following their orders (except in the most EXTREME of cases).
Be sure to get your daily Fred Thompson Fact!
What kind of trolling motor a
July 16, 2007 - 17:08 ET by Del DolemonteWhat kind of trolling motor are you using today?
Guy NOT Affiliated to Military Murders Some Airman: News at 11
July 16, 2007 - 14:37 ET by reasonsjesterI love the AP reportage on the incident the day after, which went a little something like this:
"Yesterday, out of the blue, some guy drove up in a car and shot some airman for apparently no reason at all. The man who shot him, amazingly, was not affiliated with the military, according to unconfirmed reports. Although normally we wouldn't even be reporting this at all, we wanted to make sure that it was embedded in people's minds that this incident had absolutely nothing to do with war protests and a crazy activist going off the deep end. OK, you ignorant people can go one with your pathetic little lives now."
Of course, I'm slightly paraphrasing.