Noel -

I am completely aware that you ended your last two pieces with Amen ... (another trend on your part?)

Delicious!

LOL!!!

Looks like the income produced by AGW for AlGore is about to dry up. Or would that be "sizzle away"? At any rate, at least someone said something about the ignorance of the report.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

Just like American "media" is at it's roots influenced and literally run by the Rockefeller banking cartels, the BBC is run by the European mirror image of the Rothschild dynasty.

It was these globalists along with Gorbachev who decided that "global warming" would be the religion of the next century in 1990 meant to syphon off all remaining money from western free nations and so burden them that they would not produce and then be defeated in that manner to join the communist and socialist hordes of Eurasia. By this "religion", the west would be defeated without a missile being fired as in a real war the globalists would be ruined again.

So the BBC does not have time for facts as global warming is not about earth in the first place. It is all about enslaving the world to a few elites families who will then dictate how long a citizen is useful before they are disposed of. Probably in a James Wolsey bio oil refinery like in Soylent Green as it was Wolsey who published a few years ago they had worked out "just how many quarts of crude oil a human body could be processed into".

No one seemed to question that as why in God's green earth a government agency was looking at a ghoulish policy like that, but Wolsey was saying it with a smile and as he works for the Rockefeller cartel it is what they are counting heads about.

This might sound off the BBC subject, but it all ties in. These cartel people are apparently working and preparing for wars where billions of people die and in order to not have all these people polluting in death their "park of planet Earth" they are going to turn them into billions of gallons of crude oil to drive their Mercedes around with.

So the BBC doesn't care about the sun as this is not about global warming, but propaganda so the cartels can seize control, seize wealth in high fuel prices as there is more than enough earth generated crude oil for the world for 200 years ,but just like DeBeers in diamonds they have a chokepoint on distribution and are driving fuel prices up.

Now ask yourself with this cartel which the BBC and most media are propaganda wings in their continual chant of no resources, earth is dying, people are the problem.....will this not foment a new Eurasian world war which it appears the Middle East is the first staging point when they pollute the oil reserves there with radiation leaving only Russia to blackmail the west....which will cause huge friction and a massive war.

So they are building war to destroy nation states just like World War I destroyed the world empires, leaving only powerful world states which World War II destroyed all nation states except two in Russia and America. The final war in III is designed by this secular global warming to Balkanize the world leaving vassal states and one united police force with their earth worship or "illuminated thought" as the only religion allowed controlling all the resources.

That is why America is being destroyed and why the BBC's only reports are anti American rants peppered with this global warming nonsense which people are getting wise to. It appears though the BBC and MSM ruse has worked long enough as the Middle East is armed and about to go up in smoke and Russia today pulled out of the missile treaty which means a new hot assassination and Cold War arms race until the big war breaks out.

David Whitehouse should have written the above article for the Telegraph as that is what the BBC is really up to. They are so weakening the west with all the policy issues keeping people focused on the nonsense that when it hits the chattering nabobs will only blame America again and Bush for the war in carbon footprints.

The BBC is not interested in fact. They are interested in the promised power offered them by the cartels if they spread this propaganda now.

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

And while we're on the subject of global warming, isn't the news below a "glass is half empty/glass is half full" situation?

Yes, the ice in certain areas of the planet is melting, taking away some of the habitat of the polar bear.  But the polar bear is beginning to adapt to new habitat.  Isn't that good news?  Al?  Cameron?  Leonardo?

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601082&sid=aQNqPcMioN2Q&refer=canada

Wait a second ... the SOURCE of "global warming" (the sun ... no sun, no heat people) has nothing TO DO with "global" warming?!

How stupid can an intellectual idiot get?!!

IF there was any "global" warming, THE SUN is going to be the primary, if not exclusive, cause.

Look out people ... here comes GLOBAL HUMIDITY ... and it could destroy all life on earth in 10 years ... and we have to institute the Tokyo Protocol, create a boron tax, and start selling boron credits if we're going to save the planet!!!

I work at Goddard, the Vatican equivalent to the AGW religion. That's where all of the top AGW scientits hold court every day. I can tell you that the enthusiasm has crested, and the ebb tide is in effect. It crested when the UN report came out, and has been dwindling ever since. The straw on the camel's back was when the 'political' report was deemed as a 'scientific' publication by the top chairs at Goddard.

Within the realm of scientists (the true scientitsts), journals of science are distinct from political publications. That is why National Geographic is not considered a science journal. Interesting to note, it was this technicality that caused the as yet complicit scientists to allow their upper chair colleagues to continue their game of charades.

I would liken it to a fight breaking out at a rugby match over improper player substitution during match play.

The struggling glacier finally calved when the NASA director publicly questioned Hansen's standings on global warming. At that moment, the rats with names to protect found ropes and ran down them, albeit silently, but in haste. You will find many scientists worldwide that differ with Hansen, but you will find far greater numbers, throughout the ranks, that will NOT support Hansen, and there is a difference. It is the difference between standing up to a bully and simply avoiding the offensive bloke altogether.

Noel The update, Did you get a message from Lindzen on this? If so. I'm greatly impressed.

Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of truth and knowledge will be shipwrecked by the laughter of the Gods. Albert Einstein