In reality, it was only a matter of time before one of the online trading websites started a contract as to when Katie Couric would either be fired or resign her role as “CBS Evening News” anchor.
Yet, it doesn’t make it any less delicious to see it come to fruition.
Not one bit, in fact.
With that in mind, Intrade Prediction Markets announced Tuesday (h/t TVNewser):
The following specific rules apply to the Katie Couric market
The contract will expire at 100 if (including but not limited to)
There is an official CBS announcement reporting the resignation, retirement or departure of the named individual from CBS Evening News by the time / date specified in the contract or if the individual has factually departed the position noted above.The contract will expire at 0 if (including but not limited to)
There is no announcement or no such factual departure by the individual by the time stated in the contract specification i.e. on or before 11:59.59 pm ET on the date specified within the relevant contract.
As of 3:46PM EST Saturday, the contract (available here) has traded 16 lots, with a last price of 35.
In plain English, this means that traders are currently setting a 35 percent likelihood that a formal announcement about Couric’s departure will be made before January 1, 2008.
Stay tuned.















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Noelregardless of what commen
July 14, 2007 - 16:08 ET by botgNoel
regardless of what comments are on other blogs of yours this is delicious
"The more I study science, the more I believe in God." Einstein
So, I'm wondering if Predicti
July 14, 2007 - 16:25 ET by Space CowboySo, I'm wondering if Prediction Markets is planning to make a market in Bush/Cheney Impeachment contracts. With the polls at around 50% wanting both Bush and Cheney impeached, it could be a hot market.
Don't you love it when you can make money AND watch impeachment at the same time. You got to love the capitalist system.
LOL! Sorry, Ziggy, but online
July 14, 2007 - 16:43 ET by Del DolemonteLOL! Sorry, Ziggy, but online DU and DailyKos polls don't count. Can you cite us some credible polling to support your allegation that half of the country wants impeachment?
The only recent (last week) poll I can find totally blows your claim out of the water:
USA Today/Gallup Poll. July 6-8, 2007. N=1,014 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3.
.
"As you may know, impeachment is the first step in the constitutional process for removing a president from office, in which possible crimes are investigated and charges are made. Do you think there is or is not justification for Congress to begin impeachment proceedings against President Bush at this time?"
The results? Only 36% of those polled said impeachment was justified. 62% said impeachment was NOT justified. 3% were undecided.
http://www.pollingreport.com/bush.htm
Thanks for playing!
WorldNet posted a scientific
July 14, 2007 - 17:08 ET by Space CowboyWorldNet posted a scientific poll on impeachment July 6th done by the American Research Group that has 45% for impeaching Bush and 54% for impeaching Cheney:
The private American Research Group survey indicated 45 percent want the president impeached while 54 percent want the House to launch impeachment proceedings against Vice President Dick Cheney.
The breakdown of the 1,100 respondents, however, showed 38 percent were Democrats, 29 percent Republicans and 33 percent independents.
The poll indicated 69 percent of Democrats favored impeaching Bush while just 13 percent of Republicans showed support. Among independents, 50 percent wanted to impeach the president.
The study was based on telephone calls July 3-5. American Research Group said 933 of the people interviewed were registered voters.
An unscientific MSNBC poll got 88% in favor of impeachment:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10562904
American Research Group said
July 14, 2007 - 17:17 ET by drillanwrAmerican Research Group said 933 of the people interviewed were registered voters.
Yeah, that's what they say every election year in places like Chicago regarding their dead Democrat voters ...
Sorry, but ARG is just a sma
July 14, 2007 - 18:11 ET by Del DolemonteSorry, but ARG is just a small local polling firm located here in New Hampshire. They've been known to skew left.
As for "unscientific MSNBC poll", that's very funny, and makes you look even loonier. They admit:
"MSNBC's online surveys (Live Votes) may reflect the views of far more individuals, but they are not necessarily representative of the general population."
Even a Democrat website doesn't have much luck finding polls that go the way they want-their OWN polling show less than 50% want impeachment
http://www.democrats.com/bush-impeachment-polls
As you can see from the Democ
July 14, 2007 - 18:30 ET by Space CowboyAs you can see from the Democrat website, one of their complaints is that there aren't very many polls on impeachment. So, we have only two current ones, ARG and USA Today.
I just threw in the MSNBC poll because I came across it and thought it was interesting in that it was so high. Guess that qualifies as "looney" in your book.
Whatever.
Not more than the usual
July 14, 2007 - 18:38 ET by acumenGuess that qualifies as "looney"......
Get that alot, do ya? But no, not anymore than your usual dribble.
Slight problem...you're the o
July 14, 2007 - 21:29 ET by Del DolemonteSlight problem...you're the one, not me, who originally said that the polls (with an "s" added at the end, meaning more than one poll) said 50% of Americans favored impeachment.
At any one time some 10 or so different "polling organizations" are doing public opinion polls on things like Bush's job approval, etc.
http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm
The fact that only 2 have bothered doing polls on this "story" shows that it's a non-issue in their opinion.
Bush is only going to be President for another 18 or so months. The latest bogus calls for impeachment are totally irrelevant, as they are mostly in reaction to the Libby thing. If Bush was truly going to do something "impeachable" with Libby, he would have totally vacated the conviction, not made him pay the fine, etc. But he let those two stand. What a bastard, eh?
The VRWC "Repuglithans" who impeached Clinton in 1998 really had nothing to lose-at the time the campaign for 2000 hadn't started, so the impeachers had no real idea who their Presidential candidate would be two years later.
Unfortunately for the Democrats, the next Presidential campaign has already started. Any attempt by the Democrats to impeach in the middle of a political campaign will appear cheap and tawdry, and as a result will smear and possibly destroy the entire party, including its major candidates.
But please DO try to impeach Chimpy and Halliburton-boy. It will quite possibly drive BU$HCo's job approval numbers up.
"........Chimpy.........
July 14, 2007 - 23:13 ET by Scout Finch"........Chimpy............Halliburton-boy..........Bu$hco................."
Ha! DUmmie Funnie dogma! I love it!
Space
July 14, 2007 - 16:49 ET by Noel SheppardSC,
First off, you're not being factual with your 50 percent assertion. According to the most recent USA Today/Gallup poll available here, only 36 percent feel impeachment is justified.
Regardless, at this point, Tradesports has no such contract. However, you can trade where Bush's favorability numbers will be in the future if you'd like here.
Also, here's where you can suggest your impeachment contract. Frankly, I'd be fascinated to see what people would be willing to pay for this, for I would likely be shorting it. Please let us know if you make such a suggestion, and if they follow your advice. ns
Looks like we have dueling su
July 14, 2007 - 17:31 ET by Space CowboyLooks like we have dueling surveys.
And all this is a mute point as long as the Democrats have decided that impeachment is a "distraction" - read, they're going to work on winning the White House in '08 and not rock the boat.
However, here's where going long on the impeachment bet might pay off. A LOT of people are pissed about the excess encroachment on our rights, the excess assertion of an imperial presidency, and the disregard for law in general. Even conservatives. I mean, do YOU want to hand off to a Democratic president the powers that Bush/Cheney have accumulated?
I think the Democrats have made a smart strategic choice but they may be forced by their grass roots to address some on these excesses. For the sake of the Constitution and for future generations, it will be a crime if they don't.
The Congress is on a collision course with the White House and, as facts emerge, impeachment may be demanded by so many they will have to respond. As the Attorneygate story has shown, once you start tugging on one of these threads, all kinds of things come tumbling out.
But, give me good odds and I'll take the bet now.
A LOT of people are pissed ab
July 14, 2007 - 17:47 ET by Dave RA LOT of people are pissed about the excess encroachment on our rights,
Name even one.
And for a commie-lib like you to be complaining about government encroachment on our rights is laughable to the point of absurdity, given the sordid history of the Democrat Party in that area.
Help Fred defeat the RINOs, along with the Hitllary-Obama Axis, & win the White House in '08.
Dave R Stupid, you're back!Wh
July 14, 2007 - 18:04 ET by Space CowboyDave R Stupid, you're back!
Where you been, shinning your jack-boots and ironing your brown shirt?
You know, that little hair tuft under the nose look is coming back in style. Have you tried that yet? It's called "The Facist". Very hip. And, so appropriate as we turn our country over to the military/industrial/corporate complex.
Isn't this the moment you've been having wet dreams about?
1 more Saturday night
July 14, 2007 - 19:10 ET by acumenWoohoo, Saturday night - Cheap wine buzz starting to kick in or did you splurge on some spray paint?
"You know, that little
July 14, 2007 - 21:19 ET by ckc1227"You know, that little hair tuft under the nose look is coming back in
style. Have you tried that yet? It's called "The Facist". Very hip.
And, so appropriate as we turn our country over to the
military/industrial/corporate complex."
*Yawn* Please come back when you have some original material. Oh, FYI, you suffering from BDS is not gounds for impeachment.
Just curious...on your planet
July 14, 2007 - 21:55 ET by Del DolemonteJust curious...on your planet, it's perfectly OK for a Democrat who served for decades (not 8 years like Dick Cheney) as a US Senator, Vice President and President, to be in bed with the Halliburton firm and give them no bid contracts, but it's not acceptable when someone from the "dark side" takes a real life job with the same company? Pass the bong, man...
PS, is Kiwi still the best stuff to "shinn" boots with?
Spaced_out_pothead,I find you
July 14, 2007 - 22:14 ET by Dave RSpaced_out_pothead,
I find your fascist accusation highly amusing, as it is the Democrat Party that is currently trying to use the police power of government to regulate and/or censor speech on the airwaves. It is also you liberals that have brought speech-fascism (that's political correctness) into the world by trying your best to punish those who use words with which you liberals do not like. You alleged "champions of free speech" (my ass) liberals have routinely attempted to destroy the reputations, if not the very livelihoods, of those who have used terms that you have decided are offensive.
You lefties are the real fascists in this country.
BTW: Can you even define the term fascist? Bet you can't.
If you were a classical liberal, you would be outraged by this, but, alas, you are a government-schooled myrmidon of a modern liberal, which is why you have no problem whatsoever with the aforementioned concept of government censorship. After all, government knows best, right?
Hey, it worked for Stalin and Mao, eh, comrade?
As for wet dreams, if I were to experience one, I am quite positive you would not be a part of same.
-And you still have not enlightened we of the great un-washed faction here as to exactly what "rights" we have surrendered since Mr. Bush became POTUS.
Would that be due to the fact that there aren't any "rights" that have been taken from us? Hmm?
Help Fred defeat the RINOs, along with the Hitllary-Obama Axis, & win the White House in '08.
I think you mean "moot&q
July 14, 2007 - 21:47 ET by PeskyDaneI think you mean "moot" point. Learn how to use the language, ar-terd.
Your impeachment question is
July 14, 2007 - 17:05 ET by ThisnThatYour impeachment question is out of line. There is no comparison.
There's a reason for predicting Katie's departure -- she is not living up to the commercial expectations of CBS. She is losing viewers and market share. Advertising rates are linked to those numbers, and she simply isn't doing what she needs to do to justify continual employment.
On the other hand, impeachment has nothing to do with a President's poll numbers or popularity. Impeachment is spelled out very carefully in the United States Constitution. President Bush has not committed any impeachable offenses -- none, nada, zilch. Stupid Dims in Congress like to think so, but that's only because they are stupid Dims and don't seem to know the Constitution.
TnT -Not to mention his pay c
July 14, 2007 - 17:06 ET by drillanwrTnT -
Not to mention his pay check ain't no where near hers ...
But, the BENEFITS. You can'
July 14, 2007 - 17:16 ET by Space CowboyBut, the BENEFITS. You can't beat perks of the most powerful office in the world - start wars (that benefit your cronies), obey whatever laws you want (and also allow your cronies to do whatever they want with no accountability), be The Decider, and, oh, did I mention, help your cronies (see crony capitalism).
So? Run for the presidency an
July 14, 2007 - 17:20 ET by drillanwrSo? Run for the presidency and you too can have fun and help out all your cronies in the crack house business. Hell, you can even turn the White House into a crack house, massage parlor, and brothel all in one!
Hey, good idea. I can see t
July 14, 2007 - 18:10 ET by Space CowboyHey, good idea. I can see the Republicans, led by Sen. Vitter, lining up now.
But, not excited about providing that kinky diaper fantacy. EEwwww!
You really are oddly fixated
July 14, 2007 - 19:09 ET by drillanwrYou really are oddly fixated on that ... for some reason.
Anyhow, I suggested YOU run for president if you think it's such an easy job. But, just like a lib, you evade by bringing in other people in your place ... No, that's okay. I understand.
Keep throwing stones at Vitter, I guess. The list of EEwwww-ie democrats is coming (and yes, it exists). Hey, at least Vitter was a customer, and not the proprietor ... like Barney Frank (oh, and don't go pinning that on his butt-buddy ... barney was in on it too ...)
"...you can even turn th
July 15, 2007 - 12:37 ET by MikeB"...you can even turn the White House into a crack house, massage parlor and brothel all in one!" Drillanwr, that's already been done...by a Democrat. Comrade Bubba Clinton did that exact thing. And, let us not forget Bubba's selling of pardons to such characters as Marc Rich and Puerto Rican terrorists, etc.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
TNT
July 14, 2007 - 17:14 ET by Noel SheppardTNT,
I'm not sure I agree. When I checked Tradesports, I honestly thought there might be such a contract. Why not? There are all kinds of crazy contracts at TS.
In reality, I think the fact that there isn't is because nobody would be willing to pay much for it. It's one thing to wish for an event, and entirely something else to bet that it will happen. ns
Wont matter who they replace
July 14, 2007 - 17:31 ET by general companyWont matter who they replace her with if they continue with the same type of content.
<BLING-BLING-BLING> Y
July 14, 2007 - 17:39 ET by drillanwr<BLING-BLING-BLING> You've just won the Daily Double, gc!!!
"President Bush has no
July 14, 2007 - 21:33 ET by ckc1227"President Bush has not committed any impeachable offenses -- none, nada, zilch.Stupid Dims in Congress like to think so, but that's only because they are stupid Dims and don't seem to know the Constitution."
I disagree. The Dems in Congress know there is nothing to impeach over, but they also know their constituency, like spaced-out cowboy, is clueless on the subject. So, they shamelessly pander to them, vaguely hinting at something they know they can't deliver, in the hopes that their blind followers will never figure it out. Spaced-out cowboy is proof that they're probably right.
Sadly true, ckc. Stupid con
July 14, 2007 - 23:22 ET by Scout FinchSadly true, ckc. Stupid constituents make the best voters in Democratland.
To paraphrase The Wizard of Oz.............pay no attention to the voice on am talk radio and the Internet!
The big problem for Katie C
July 15, 2007 - 22:21 ET by SactoGuy88The big problem for Katie Couric is that thanks to 24 hour cable news channels and the public Internet, the younger generation no longer relies on the network evening news to get the news--you can now even get breaking news in near real time even on your cellphone!
Space Cowboy Says: So, I'm
July 14, 2007 - 17:19 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsSpace Cowboy Says: So, I'm wondering if Prediction Markets is planning to make a market in Bush/Cheney Impeachment contracts.
What will the charges be?
They are meanies?
They are neo-cons?
They aren't democrats?
Sheesh!
D
I don't support our liberals or their mission.
My guess is...
July 14, 2007 - 16:30 ET by goldenthroatHaving spent fifteen years in radio broadcasting doing everything from producing/hosting late night talk shows, public affairs programs to early morning shows, I can tell you that broadcast venues usually lower the boom just before a ratings period.
Kutie Katie's demise will come right before the fall Neilsen ratings begin - I would bet a steak dinner on it.
I believe that her network has already ran out of patience. Her newscast viewership is so far into the sub-basement and irreversible, I wouldn't be at all surprised if the Clinton Broadcasting System is already mulling over replacements for her - behind closed doors, that is!
Gosh, I'll miss that pompous, arrogant, self-absorbed legend-in-her-own-mind when she's gone.
"Yeah, that's the ticket!" - Tommy Flanagan
Oh, it's you Bob
July 14, 2007 - 19:05 ET by acumenGosh, I'll miss that pompous, arrogant, self-absorbed legend-in-her-own-mind when she's gone.
Dittos. But then we'll always have Bob Schieffer to fill in.....
IMO - CBS might be better off getting rid of all the producers and execs in the news department and keeping Katie. I'm wondering how much of this is the eye-candy's fault and how much is the content's fault. Either way, obsolescence is small quarters for a large ego and somethings got to give.
She clearly thinks presenting
July 14, 2007 - 19:53 ET by ThisnThatShe clearly thinks presenting the news is boring. She wants to turn it into an early morning format. What she doesn't understand is that the audience is very different between morning and evening. And, she can't quite grasp the fact that she has 30 minutes (minus commercials) to inform, not entertain. The morning format won't work here.
Not that the evening format is working well, but she doesn's seem to want to understand her audience, the customer. If the customer doesn't want the product, you've got to change something. She wants to change the customers....
TnT - I'll never forget the p
July 14, 2007 - 22:49 ET by Cape ConservativeTnT - I'll never forget the promo in Parade before she began. At the time I was struck by her comment that she wanted to explain the news to the audience, to tell them what they should think about the news she was "reporting" - right!!! At that moment I knew CBS would never be on in our house for the evening news...and it hasn't! Watch the local news on CBS and CLICK CLICK promptly change channels at 6:30!
Has anyone else noticed that now they just show her "leads" without any speaking from Katie...only a man's voice telling what's coming up on the evening news...all the while, she is looking down at some papers in her lap. Not even a full face to the camera...guess that is supposed to convince us she is serious. Nothing will do that! I knew from the beginning she would not work out. We watched one evening...the night Rush was on. As he said, he'd go back any time if they'd like their ratings up :-)
From the very beginning, nothing worked...not her attire (very non-professional) her behavior (sitting on the corner of the desk - we were waiting for her to cross her legs and swing her shoe as she always did on Today :-) Nope...the lady was not a good fit at all - attractive but I guess Dan R. said one thing I agree with...the show has been "tarted up" and no one watches the evening news for "tart appeal"
Okay, goldenthroat, by fall's
July 14, 2007 - 22:33 ET by dahliatraversOkay, goldenthroat, by fall's Nielsen ratings. We've written it down and will hold you to it.
(Though we superior vegans prefer seitan to steak ...)
You're on!
July 14, 2007 - 23:12 ET by goldenthroatdahliatravers,
We've written it down? Hmmm - sounds like you're ganging up on me!
I'll have the grill fired up - and don't forget the "Sweet Baby Ray's" hot and spicy BBQ sauce!
"Yeah, that's the ticket!" - Tommy Flanagan
Ten Four!
July 14, 2007 - 23:14 ET by dahliatraversTen Four!
I'm Pulling For Katie
July 14, 2007 - 16:33 ET by acumenI'm pulling for Katie staying on at CBS Noel.
If nobody is watching, how much damage can she do?
I mean, it is telling that people are less interested in what comes out of her mouth at CBS than what went in her other end at NBC.
keep couric
July 14, 2007 - 16:51 ET by Pragmatic-ManThree major networks, three major papers. If each one had a Couric as their mouthpiece, the job of a conservo would be much easier.
Keep Couric. She's delicious.
"trophy" journalist
July 14, 2007 - 17:09 ET by acumenKeep Couric. She's delicious.
Ha, Katie - the "trophy" journalist. To quote Frank Barone; "What contest in hell did I win?"
How so?
July 14, 2007 - 21:15 ET by goldenthroatP-M,
Kutie Katie is delicious? Maybe - but what flavor?
"Yeah, that's the ticket!" - Tommy Flanagan
Poor Katie.I really do feel s
July 14, 2007 - 16:39 ET by BlondePoor Katie.
I really do feel sorry for her, it must be horrible to be so publicly humiliated for her failures. I wouldn't be surprised in the least if she quits shortly.
Call me cold-hearted or whate
July 14, 2007 - 16:46 ET by mostlymoderateCall me cold-hearted or whatever, but I do not feel the least bit sorry for Katie. She has no talent, she talks down to her audience, she is biased in her views, and she is neither "cute" or "sweet" like some think. Get her out of their and give us somebody either worth listening to or ATLEAST worth looking at :-) Oh, and that money she makes is a mockery to anyone that actually earns their riches.
MM - Right on - on all points
July 14, 2007 - 22:51 ET by Cape ConservativeMM - Right on - on all points!!!! Just what we need, another sanctimonious know-it-all :-)
Is that the picture of her cr
July 14, 2007 - 16:47 ET by drillanwrIs that the picture of her crying after Bush won the 2000 election?
I mean, I know it was unprofessional of her, but it's nice to see how happy she was for W ...
Yo u know that she will soon
July 14, 2007 - 18:21 ET by Keith PhillipsYo u know that she will soon be gone, CBS put out a memo saying they had no intention of letting her go.
Keith,Great point. As I rec
July 14, 2007 - 23:24 ET by Dave RKeith,
Great point. As I recall, the management at CBS stood behind Danny Blather, right up to the point when they threw his ass overboard.
Help Fred defeat the RINOs, along with the Hitllary-Obama Axis, & win the White House in '08.
Remember another prima donna?
July 14, 2007 - 23:37 ET by goldenthroatDave R,
Remember Connie Chung's pathetic attempt at doing evening news? Wasn't that on the Clinton Broadcasting System, too?
goldenthroat,If you want to s
July 14, 2007 - 23:42 ET by Blondegoldenthroat,
If you want to see "pathetic" Connie....search on the videos here. There's one of her singing....rolling around on the top of a grand piano that will absolutely slay you.
It was from maybe a year ago. But too funny. Put down your beverages before viewing.
And it was awful!
July 14, 2007 - 23:47 ET by goldenthroatBlonde,
Just checked the network info about Ms. Chung - she was on Nobody But Clinton at the time...but still pathetic!
Yes, I have seen that video! Watching it made me want to reach for the barf bag...it was when her latest attempt at evening news credibility went into the dumper and it was her final night - what a tacky, tasteless performance!
If you REALLY want to watch this farce, here's a link:
http://www.ifilm.com/video/2745632/collection/18220
"Yeah, that's the ticket!" - Tommy Flanagan
golden....Well, in the immort
July 14, 2007 - 23:51 ET by Blondegolden....
Well, in the immortal words of Don Imus....
They don't call 'em "nappy media hoes' for nuthin!
LOL.
To clarify...
July 15, 2007 - 00:05 ET by goldenthroatShe and her husband Maury "Who's the Daddy" Povich were on MSNBC at the time this show was yanked - that's close enough to NBC!
}}----> Connie Chung
July 14, 2007 - 23:45 ET by Cool ArrowDidn't she run off with Larry King for awhile? Seems she was going to be Connie Chung King.
Oh, brother!
July 14, 2007 - 23:54 ET by goldenthroatCool One,
You have WAY too much free time!
Drill,They were all wearing
July 14, 2007 - 18:42 ET by JerryDrill,
They were all wearing black when Bush won, so this must be some other occasion. Maybe somebody said the "S" word... Sputum!
When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment
vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any
President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).
Katie Baby
July 14, 2007 - 22:21 ET by sergeant stogieI can't wait until it happens; the sooner the better. Not just because she won't be defiling my television screen, but because we will all then find out just how her downfall was ALL OUR FAULT. Because we are stupid, and ignorant, and not able to comprehend her attempt at educating us. WE weren't ready for a female anchor. She can't understand she sucks.
... are you talking about Kat
July 14, 2007 - 22:27 ET by dahliatravers... are you talking about Katie or Hillary?
}}----> dahlia
July 15, 2007 - 00:20 ET by Cool ArrowNear as I can figure, Katie Couric and Al Sharpton led a procession through Arlington Cemetery to bury "SPUTUM" alongside our soldiers.
SS - No No No - maybe we will
July 14, 2007 - 22:57 ET by Cape ConservativeSS - No No No - maybe we will have to share some fault...but most of it will fall on George Bush's shoulders! Don't you know by now that when someone's dinner is over(or under) cooked it was GWB's fault??!! Fall down the stairs, George's fault...hit your finger with a hammer, blame George!!!
P.S. If I had to depend on KC to "educate" me, I would run and hide til she was definitely gone!!! And yes, like so many in the false atmosphere of the limelight, she can't comprehend that she really does "suck" bigtime!
Odds
July 15, 2007 - 00:05 ET by HawthorneCall the "best" casino in Nevada and they will tell you the odds on the her extinction.
All networks are burnt toast.
Hail to the pamphleteer's and liberty.
To bad CBS. Stockholders take another hit, should have seen what was intuitively obviois from the start.
Cheers
Okay...as for Katie
July 15, 2007 - 10:26 ET by Guy Arthur ThomasOkay, as for Katie...it will NOT be before January 1, 2008. It will be after January 1, 2008. If for some reason it were to be done this year it would be done by September but more likely August. However, I do not forsee that happening. My loose prediction as of now is early 2008 and quickly after it is announced.
Shut up and blog! If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal. Go Rudy!
why even now her bosses are p
July 15, 2007 - 10:38 ET by botgwhy even now her bosses are probally hoping to have to fill in for her for health reasons
Since no body will say anythi
July 15, 2007 - 11:43 ET by Fred911Since no body will say anything nice about Katie, I will: For an old broad she is still "do-able"......at least this week.
fred911--"do-able"??
July 15, 2007 - 12:05 ET by misterbillfred911--"do-able"?? Katie "do-able"?? You are the first case on NB of the effects of a certain pill lasting longer than 4 hours --get thee to an emergency room!!!!!!!!
welcome back misterbill"
July 15, 2007 - 12:09 ET by botgwelcome back misterbill
"The more I study science, the more I believe in God." Einstein
thanks botg-- I had a grand vacation--
July 15, 2007 - 12:23 ET by misterbillthanks botg-- I had a grand vacation--I was in a blue state for a week--but -no harm--my kids are almost as conservative as I am.
On the obverse side, I spent the next week in a red state, but my friend is as liberal as they come. I did not discuss very much re:politics. She is completely sold on Gore's analysis of man causing all the problems. Her husband is quite the opposite--to my surprise, he started telling me how upset he is with the MSM. He said lies or no lies, the least the MSM could do is have a positive article on the air or in print , once in a while. He is so angry with the negativity that he doesn't even try to read or listen anymore. I gave him the URTL for Newsbusters.
Hallelulia!
and another thing misterbill
July 15, 2007 - 12:33 ET by botgand another thing misterbill
about this red state blue state: shouldn't the libs be the 'reds'
"The more I study science, the more I believe in God." Einstein
botg--yes--I get confused at times--
July 15, 2007 - 12:45 ET by misterbillbotg--yes--I get confused at times-- I wish they woukd use brown as a liberal color. I need say no more!!!!
Admiral: "Get me my br
July 15, 2007 - 12:49 ET by botgAdmiral: "Get me my brown trousers"