Update added at bottom of post.
President Bush is taking questions from the White House press corps about the Iraq report. I'll be live-blogging it. Hit refresh for updates. We may post some video later with highlights (or is it lowlights?). All times below are Eastern.
Helen Thomas, Hearst newspapers columnist, 10:45: Presses Bush on bringing in UN peacekeepers to Iraq. "Don't you understand, you have brought al Qaeda into Iraq," she insisted.
unidentified reporter, 10:48: "Mr. President, you're facing a rebellion from Republican senators" on Iraq.
unidentified female reporter, 10:50 on changing course on the Iraq war: "why are you so resistant to that idea, and how much longer" will the President continue with the surge before changing course.
[10:52: President Bush noted how the media reported earlier that Anbar province was "lost" but that that the province has improved markedly in the past few months]
Martha Raddatz, ABC News, 10:54: "Are you willing to keep the surge going, no matter what Gen. Petraeus says, if there's not substantial Iraqi political progress by September.
[Bush]
Raddatz, whining: "But there's been no substantial political progress..."
Jim Axelrod , CBS News, 10:56: "Have you ever entertained the idea that at some point" Congress could take away the president's powers as commander in chief.
Axelrod, 10:56 follows up with hypothetical about what Bush would do if Congress passes such legislation to limit his powers.
David Gregory, NBC 10:57: asks why the American people shouldn't conclude President Bush has been "stubborn" or "in denial" about Iraq?
Gregory follows up question by rephrasing his question, 11:00
female reporter, 11:03: "What evidence can you present to the American people" that the "same people" responsible for 9/11 are working in Iraq.
female reporter, 11:04: Asks if Bush still believes the Iraq prime minister is still the right man for the job.
male reporter on Scooter Libby case, 11:06: asks about the morality of "leaking" Plame's name and if he spent time talking with his aides about it, now that the legal proceedings are concluded.
Wendell Goler, Fox News, 11:07: "why should the American people feel you have the vision for victory in Iraq, sir?"
male reporter, 11:13: "why can't we counter those messages and obviously not withdrawal precipitiously but begin a gradual withdrawal...?"
male reporter, 11:15, on Chertoff's "gut feeling" in the face of no solid evidence of imminent attack: "Sir, what is your gut telling you?" about terror threats this summer.
Ed Chen, LA Times, 11:20: "has the U.S. military deployment to Iraq reached the ceiling" or would the President consider adding more troops.
Chen, 11:22: "how hard is it for you to conduct the war without popular support?"
Raddatz, 11:27 presses Bush on report saying al Qaeda is as strong as it has been since pre-9/11/2001.
[Bush emphasizes report says stronger than anytime since 2001 but that al Qaeda is not as much as threat as it was on Sept. 10, 2001, and that it is not stronger than it was pre-9/11]
# # # End news conference at 11:30 EDT # # #
Update (12:30 EDT): I first saw this on Time's "Swampland" blog, but apparently President Bush demurred on a joke about the Washington press corps when he opened the newly renovated Brady briefing room yesterday. The New York Times' "The Caucus" blog carried a photo of the prepared remarks resting on the podium with the joke crossed out. It read:
“And there’s no truth to the rumor some of those new seats can be ejected by pressing a button at Tony’s podium.”
I wouldn't have joked about that either. I'd have joked about trap doors to a piranha tank.
—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Why does the President even r
July 12, 2007 - 09:59 ET by BEGRUNTWhy does the President even respond to that troll, Helen Thomas? Hasn't she been in the press corps since the Lincoln administration? I've never heard a bunch of stupid, ill informed, brainless questions from supposedly inteligent people in my life. The 10:50 reporter, "how much longer"? Uhhh, September stupid, that was in the parameters of the surge. God these people are stupid!!!!!
The President's response sho
July 12, 2007 - 10:11 ET by Hero SquadThe President's response should be, "That's not a question, Ms. Thomas."
Next.
*****
"I'm sorry, you must have mistaken me for a clown that gives a damn!" - Sticky the Clown
Isn't she looking more and mo
July 12, 2007 - 10:24 ET by Gat New YorkIsn't she looking more and more like Yoda? Or maybe the Wicked Witch from the West.
Please, do not insult Wicked
July 12, 2007 - 10:29 ET by kathleenirishPlease, do not insult Wicked Witches in such a demeaning way!
Anyone who says they support the troops but not the mission is a liar.
Maybe the Wicked Witch on the
July 12, 2007 - 11:13 ET by BeowulfMaybe the Wicked Witch on the Crispy Creme diet. Washed down with gallons of vodka...
The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers
And a much lower IQ
July 12, 2007 - 11:27 ET by Free StinkerAnd a much lower IQ
No
July 12, 2007 - 13:56 ET by cvgbuckeyeIf the fairness doctrine was inacted and applied in a purely true and honest way, every member of the White House press corp would be instantly emulsified like farts in a hurricane and President Bush would be left, standing alone in the room, talking to the janitor.
Press conferences aren't an o
July 12, 2007 - 10:06 ET by KC MulvillePress conferences aren't an opporunity for the president to lay out a policy, or address specific issues. Rather, they're simply vehicles for the press to communicate to the president what their own views are. And they aren't much interested in what the president's answer is.
Lately we have a new twist. They're angry that the president doesn't agree with them, and they're demanding obedience. Does the new press room have a pew for the president to kneel to the reporters?
"What evidence can you p
July 12, 2007 - 10:06 ET by Free Thinker"What evidence can you present to the American people" that the "same people" responsible for 9/11 are working in Iraq.
Oh I don't know, how about their own statements and videos you have already reported on?
And I agree with previous post, I would not even acknowledge Helen Thomas, she is crazy.
The American LMSNM ... The 21
July 12, 2007 - 10:13 ET by drillanwrThe American LMSNM ... The 21st Century Spanish Inquisition
Noo ... Nooo, not the comfy
July 12, 2007 - 11:14 ET by Dan The Man 2Noo ... Nooo, not the comfy chair.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark. -- save my gun, shoot a liberal.
After watching a couple of mi
July 12, 2007 - 10:40 ET by dscottAfter watching a couple of minutes, I had to turn it off. These people are so rude and disrespectful in the manner they ask their inane questions with false premises that it makes me extremely angry. My hats off to W for putting up with this juvenile/immature behavior from the press corps. If anyone needed proof of MSM lib bias, you have it on tape just in this press conference. Disgraceful, it's no wonder they are losing market share to Fox News and New York Post. I may not be happy with W due to the immigration issue, but you have to hand him some respect when it comes to dealing with these agenda driven propagandistic antagonists who are no more than mouth pieces for the Dem Party. Let me simmer down a few minutes and I'll tell you how I really feel.
“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
You're absolutely right. T
July 12, 2007 - 11:26 ET by motherbeltYou're absolutely right. They view a press conference as an adversarial process....an opportunity to badger and insult.
From Helen Thomas' "Don't you understand",..... it went downhill....
Here's a sampling of the "tone" of the questions:
"why are you so resistant to that idea,
"Are you willing to keep the surge going, no matter what Gen. Petraeus says
Someone asks why the American people shouldn't conclude President Bush has been "stubborn" or "in denial" about Iraq?
What evidence can you present to the American people..."
Someone asks about the morality of "leaking" Plame's name and if he spent time talking with his aides about it,
"why should the American people feel you have the vision for victory in Iraq, sir?"
This is what passes as inquiries seeking information??????
They should be ashamed of themselves. They are failing in their duty to disseminate informataion; they are in it for their own self-aggrandizement.
communication
July 12, 2007 - 11:34 ET by AgnosticBush has been constantly insulted for his inability ot articulate and inform the public and for good reason but looking at the litany he has to face when he tries to communicate it is no wonder that he doesn't try very hard. Even when he just gives a speech, you get 30 minutes of speech and 90 minutes of why he is wrong and what should be done to stop him. Of course, you would never actually see an opposing plan of action.
I have never been a fan of Bush but he has taken it on the chin through most of his presidency (a brief support time after 9/11 no withstanding) and has shown considerable restraint. It amazes me that the same people that make all this accusations and insulting comments cry about the Patriot Act and the Rights they fear they are losing.
Jim Axelrod , CBS News, 10:
July 12, 2007 - 10:49 ET by motherbeltJim Axelrod , CBS News, 10:56: "Have you ever entertained the idea that at some point" Congress could take away the president's powers as commander in chief.
Axelrod, 10:56 follows up with hypothetical about what Bush would do if Congress passes such legislation to limit his powers.
Doesn't Axelrod understand the separation of powers? The Congress no more has authority to take away the President's powers as Commander-in-Chief than the President has the authority to take away the Congress's power to legislate.
Good grief! Did this guy go to any school besides journalism school?????
assumption
July 12, 2007 - 10:51 ET by LionKingI think you are making an assumption in your last sentence.
In theory some of the powers
July 12, 2007 - 11:18 ET by Dan The Man 2In theory some of the powers could be limited and have been by legislation backed up by SCOTUS approval. But I dont think Axlerod was thinking of it that way. SCOTUS is the big power these days and thats why it is of the utmost importance to get some judges with their heads on tight.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark. -- save my gun, shoot a liberal.
I'm sure he wasn't thinking
July 12, 2007 - 11:58 ET by motherbeltI'm sure he wasn't thinking of it that way..he's not that complicated.
And he didn't say "limit", he said "take away" the President's powers. I think he figures the Congress can just take a vote, decide the President
isn't the CinC any more, the Congress is, and Pelosi and Reid can start running the war.
At least, that's what he's wishing were true....
Here's my standard, "Pis
July 12, 2007 - 11:46 ET by SoftRightHere's my standard, "Piss off the liberals" answer whenever they come up with some completely stupid thing that violates the Constitution or when the Constitution stands in their way.... like banning guns, or limiting talk radio, or taking away the Commander and Chief of the Armed forces powers from the President...
Sure, Congress has that power, just get 2/3rds of the House and Senate, plus 3/4ths of the State Legislatures to agree and follow Article V of the Constitution. It's called the Amendment process....... ...and yes, it was made so difficult to keep you morons from doing it!
Thank You! James Madison. The Constitution, its a beautiful thing!
Unless Axelrod was actually
July 12, 2007 - 13:22 ET by KC MulvilleUnless Axelrod was actually referring to changing the president's constitutional authority, which I hope Axelrod knows that Congress can't change, I presume that Axelrod was referring to the specific Iraq bill that authorized Bush to use force in Iraq. Remember, not long ago some senators were popping off about "rescinding" that authorization. It ought to be pretty clear that once the troops were committed to the field, that bell can't be unrung. Congress has the power to declare war or authorize it, but they have no constitutional authority to manage it. That's strictly the president's role as commander in chief. The only authority Congress has is the power to de-fund the war, which they won't do for purely political reasons. You can't deny ammunition to soldiers once they're in the field.
motherb - my question exactly
July 12, 2007 - 11:32 ET by BeanManmotherb - my question exactly! Jim Axelrod doesn't seem to have the brains of a wamprat.
Has he never in his life read the constitution?
Pres.Bush Press Conference
July 12, 2007 - 11:33 ET by merlin61He still has "class"!!! He doesn't get rattled, and I was so proud when he said he is not going to rule by polls. He
doesn't care what the MSM says. He doesn't care if the
don't love him. He can still face himself in the mirror when
he retires to the ranch.
that's right he doesn't care
July 12, 2007 - 14:55 ET by katleethat's right he doesn't care -----about anything but his corporate buddies
Hello Dolly!
July 12, 2007 - 15:00 ET by Free StinkerHello Dolly!
That's a pretty easy Lie to
July 12, 2007 - 15:01 ET by MightyMouthThat's a pretty easy Lie to tell, isn't it? Thanks for the insight, direct from KOS and DUmmie land.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Does anyone get the sense tha
July 12, 2007 - 11:40 ET by sembyDoes anyone get the sense that democrats in Congress are feeding these reporters questions?
vice versa?
July 12, 2007 - 11:43 ET by Agnosticor is the the media planning the Democrats Platform for them? Afterall, the Democrats have never shown an ability to create one of their own.
Check out the polls.....
July 12, 2007 - 11:49 ET by SoftRightCheck out the polls..... The MEDIA ARE Democrats, 90+%.
We could balance the budget if they would auction off the chance to verbally (physically?) slap down every reporter that asked the President a stupid or insolent question....Hell, I'd dip into my 401k..........
Ques: How hard is it for yo
July 12, 2007 - 13:00 ET by JayTeeQues: How hard is it for you to conduct the war without Popular Support..?
ANS:: The same way Congress conducts their Business with an EVEN LOWER Approval Rating and almost no Popular Support.
What good is a Free Press, if it is a False Press ? David Foote GoE
Reid/Tapper/abc
July 12, 2007 - 18:08 ET by bigtimerHere is some more about the war with the latest with Harry Reid, Jake Tapper and abc news....
This is really interesting for a change...
I could not believe the posts that I read below....I was very very surprised.
I think the dems and the Fearless Leader are in for a long hard ride coming up.