On Troop Withdrawal, Matt Lauer Demands: 'If Not Now, When?'

Photo of Geoffrey Dickens.

Picking up where last night's Nightly News left off, NBC's Today show continued the "tipping point" line of attack on pushing for troop withdrawal from Iraq. Opening this morning's Today show, NBC's Matt Lauer greeted viewers with the following question: "Good morning, if not now, when? The White House says it's not considering pulling U.S. troops out of Iraq right now but with sinking approval ratings and defections from his own party is it just a matter of time before the President changes course?" Then, teasing an interview with White House press secretary Tony Snow, Lauer all but declared defeat:

Ann Curry: "Today marks the six month anniversary since the President announced a surge of nearly 30,000 troops into Iraq and Afghanistan."

Lauer: "You remember it was the President's attempt to gain control of a very unpopular war. On Monday, the White House said that a troop withdrawal was not in the cards right now. This, despite a steady drip of defections from members of his own party. And according to the Associated Press this morning, a new progress report out this week will find that Iraqi government officials have failed to meet any of the key benchmarks that were put in place as part of that surge. So how long can the President ignore calls to bring the troops home? We'll talk to White House press secretary Tony Snow about that coming up in a couple of minutes."

Right before the Snow interview, NBC's Andrea Mitchell, in her set-up piece, continued the drumbeat of defeat as she decided: "If there were any doubt about the surge it ended with the continuing death toll from Iraq. The country is weary of the war and angry, according to all polls...You can call it redeployment or phased withdrawal but the question no longer seems to be whether but when."

After the Mitchell piece it was time for Lauer to lay into Snow. While Snow insisted the surge had just begun and pointed out there were already successes, Lauer wasn't having any of it, as virtually all of his questions to the press secretary were geared towards getting the troops out of Iraq. The following is the full transcript of the exchange as it occurred on the July 10th Today show:

Matt Lauer: "Tony Snow is the White House press secretary. Good to see you, good morning."

Tony Snow: "Good morning, Matt."

Lauer: "There was a front page story in the New York Times, yesterday, that basically said this, that there is intense debate going on, right now, within the White House over ideas of bringing the troops home or some troops home from Iraq right now. You were asked about it at your briefing yesterday and you said the following, quote, 'There is no debate right now on withdrawing forces, right now, from Iraq,' end quote. And I'm curious as to why. Why isn't there debate at the White House right now on every possible scenario on an almost daily basis?"

Snow: "Well there are debates, Matt, there are a lot of discussions about everything but what's interesting is we are now two weeks into having the surge operational. The first thing we want to see is whether it is working. Just a couple of months ago, Congress passed a law, said, 'Okay we're gonna approve of a surge. In July we want a snapshot at the starting line. We're at the starting line, right now, Matt. And in September we want another snapshot that gives us a sense of whether we're succeeding, how we're succeeding and asks for recommendations on what to do next."

Lauer: "Yeah but Tony, this isn't just members of the press who are, who are running off saying this isn't working. You've got some stalwarts of the Republican Party, Voinovich, Domenici, Olympia Snowe, Richard Lugar, saying, 'No, Mr. President it's time, right now, not in September, right now to think about changing the plan.' Why are they wrong?"

Snow: "Actually, actually. Well I think you're misconstruing some of their comments. What you had with Richard Lugar is somebody who says, 'Look we,' I think Richard Lugar first says, to the idea of withdrawing right away, 'No.' To the idea of withdrawing finances-'"

Lauer: "Not right away, but-"

Snow: "-he says no. He talks about the importance of getting into the position that we've been talking about since January. I think what's frustrating for us, Matt, is that we have been talking since January of trying to get American forces into a position that's a lot like what Andrea Mitchell is describing and all of a sudden people are saying, 'It's a new, different way of looking at things!' No, it's not. It's what we've been talking about for a very long time."

Lauer: "But what are the signs, Tony?"

Snow: "And all of a sudden it's getting spun up into, suddenly, a radical shift. We need to give our forces time to show what they're doing."

Lauer: "But what are the signs we're getting to that position?"

Snow: "Well some of the signs are pretty clear. Number one, you take a look at Anbar province and, by the way, I'd encourage people, also, to listen the briefings that come out of Baghdad. Because what you're hearing is that, for instance, Sunni tribal chiefs have decided they've had it with al Qaeda in Iraq and they have been fighting, effectively, against them. That is now beginning to happen in other provinces as well. We are starting to see within Baghdad, the government asserting its own might and leverage against the Shia militias. In other words, the kinds of stuff that we've been talking about, is beginning to take place. Is it perfect? Of course not. We are at the very beginning stages of an effort to try to create the space so the Iraqis can stand up for themselves."

Lauer: "When the President, six months ago, announced this surge in, in, in addition to the surge of troops there were these benchmarks. They've been talked about, actually, for years with the Iraqi government. But that they had to meet certain benchmarks so that the U.S. commitment would continue. An AP report this morning says quote, 'A progress report on Iraq will conclude that the U.S. backed government in Baghdad has not met any of its targets for political, economic and other reforms.' Ryan Crocker, the U.S. ambassador to Iraq said in an interview in the New York Times this morning, 'The longer I'm here, the more I'm persuaded Iraq cannot be analyzed by these kind of discrete benchmarks.' So as we start to hear from the President on Sunday, is that an attempt by Mr. Crocker, Ambassador Crocker, to downplay or lower expectations on those benchmarks?"

Snow: "No, because what you're going to see, Matt, is that the Iraqis and the U.S. forces have met some benchmarks and they haven't met others, at the starting point here. I think what Ambassador Crocker say is he's gonna try to find even more nuanced ways of trying to measure success. But, on the other hand, you know, the impression from the AP story is, all is doom and failure. It's not the case and when people see the report, they'll figure that out."

Lauer: "John McCain, just got back from Iraq. He's set to speak about what he saw there in terms of the surge, I think on the floor of the Senate, maybe tomorrow, a speech later in the week. Have you had any advance notice from John McCain or his people as to what he's gonna say about the surge?"

Snow: "No, don't know what he's gonna say."

Lauer: "Are you curious about it?"

Snow: "Of course. We were curious, we were curious when Joe Lieberman came back and said it was a success. We were curious when he heard Jack Reed say that he saw some signs of success, even though he takes a different view of the matter than we do. What's interesting, Matt, is that people who have come back recently will, at least, concede that some of the military operations have been proving successful. They also know we got a long way to go."

Lauer: "If, if and you hate hypotheticals, I know, so hate me later. But, but, if a John McCain comes back and joins the ranks of some of those other key Republicans who say, 'It's time to rethink this strategy,' how big a blow is that to the President, considering how supportive John McCain has been to the strategy?"

Snow: "You've got to understand that for the President, although politics is clearly important in building public support, succeeding is the most important thing of all. The, if we fail in Iraq and this is something Ryan Crocker was pointing out as well. If you have failure in Iraq you are gonna see consequences that are gonna be extraordinarily dire in the region, throughout the world and for the United States."

Lauer: "And real quickly, Tony, about a year ago there was a lot of debate and to be honest we found ourselves in the middle of it here at NBC, over what to call what's going on the ground in Iraq right now. We called it a civil war, you disagreed with me on the air. What's it called now? Is it a civil war or something else?"

Snow: "I don't think it's a civil war. Again, what you're not seeing, is you're not seeing Sunni, Shia armies massing up. As Baker-Hamilton said, in some cases you have things that appear to have characteristics of a civil war. But the sectarian violence has gone down in recent months."

Lauer: "Tony Snow at the White House. Tony, thanks for your time this morning."

Snow: "Thanks Matt."

—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

What is it about the concept

What is it about the concept of victory that the MSM does not understand?  Oh, everything.  My bad.

Libs have a real problem with

Libs have a real problem with commitment and responsibility don't they...?

They always feel the need to pull out...

How many fatherless countries has Matt left by the wayside to fend for themselves over the years?

He's the consumate deadbeat dad, man...

BTW we are talking about liberating oppressed people, right...?

They are not talking abou

They are not talking about "ending" the war. The war won't end if we leave. They are talking about "withdrawing" from the war; in other words, giving up and going home.

While there are differing opinions on whether or not our troops should stay, and reasonable people can disagree on that (I myself have mixed feelings), at least let us be honest about what we are discussing: staying or giving up.

It's their defeatist attitude

It's their defeatist attitude that is the problem, because terrorists feed off of division and uncertainty.  We never appear to be unified in our path as a nation, and other countries and groups, such as Al Qaeda, view this as a weakness...especially when all they need to do is go online or flick on a T.V. and they can read all about how our country sucks and how this war is a "bumpersticker" and how this is the White House's war and how our servicemen and women are dying "needlessly"...the enemy feeds off of this, and it makes them more galvanized in their mission to destroy us.

I don't mean to sound callous, but we've been fighting this war for over 4 years, against the most brutally vicious and oppressive enemy the world have ever known, in some of the most rugged and intimidating settings you could imagine, and yet we've lost less than 4,000 soldiers.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the Vietnam war last less than 4 years, and we lost like what, 60,000, or 70,000 soldiers?  Sorry If I'm way off, I'll need to double check, but still...we've lost less than 4,000 soldiers in over 4 years.  Granted, we wish none of our soldiers would die, but to come out like the media has and call this war lost, to question our leadership, to question our integrity, to question the mission at hand...it's treason.  They are giving aid and comfort to our enemy.

and the spineless Republican

and the spineless Republican members of Congress need to start calling the MSM on their  behavior, rather than caving in to the Dims. Write your Congressmen. I do all the time.

To me, it's as if there was a

To me, it's as if there was a significant population of people in this country that never wanted us to win this war, because then they would have to give credit to President Bush, and quite literally, it seems as though people would rather be subjugated into slavery than to admit that President Bush did something right.  It has never been about winning to most in the MSM...it's been about trying to make the President and his party look bad, at any cost.  Problem is, the cost in this case could be the loss of our freedoms, our way of live, and our country.  I'm not willing to put those things ahead of my own ego and professional ambitions...although there are plenty of people that will, and they should be tried for treason.

They don't have a lousy eco

They don't have a lousy economy to hang around Bush's neck, so they will go with the war. If that ends up a success, they have nothing. That's why they are invested in, and hoping for, defeat. And if they put their own ambition before the country's good, then yes, I do question their patriotism.

Jpatch

I had to chuckle while reading that, Jpatch...  Although, it's sad and VERY true.  sigh

Oh GAWD! not Dave mathews band....   NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

*Running to change XM satelite staion*

What the MSSM doesn't report can kill you.

Switching Sides

When the reporters wrote about things going wrong we were told to ignore politicians. When reporters write about things going right we're told to pay attention to the politicians. Ignoring the New York Times recent accounts by John Burns in favor of weak kneed politicos seems to be a case in point.

First to answer Matty's que

First to answer Matty's question, "If not now when?"

Well little guy, when the war fighters say the warfightin' is over and done with, and as many jihadis have been sent express freight to their buddy Allah.

The MSM, Liberals, PrOgressives or whatever that crowd of baby boomers, emphasis on baby, call themselves these days are one thing, and one thing only.......PRO-GENOCIDE!!!!

preaching

I am aware that I am preaching to the choir, here, but I'll forge ahead anyway.

With me and all believers, it is GOD, Family, Country and World.

With the MSM and the left it is NO GOD, Latest Family, Hate Country and Socialist World.

There are huge differences in our values and we must not diminish the value of Conservative Coalitionism. That includes our President.

It's pretty simple.  In orde

It's pretty simple.  In order to achieve something, you need to visualize it first.  In order to solve a problem, you need a solution.  This country is hellbent on being shortsighted when it comes to our future, and belligerent when it comes to working together to solve problems.  With no vision, and no solutions, what do we have? 

A recipe for disaster.

It's pretty simple.  In orde

dup.

don't you just love it when m

don't you just love it when matt lauer refers to the war in iraq as an "unpopular war" ... as if it is some high school homecoming event.  it's almost a subliminal message to say that americans generally enjoy a good war.  i wonder how "popular" world war II was to those on the homefront?  

can anyone imagine lauer reporting kasserine pass, tarawa, peleliu, saipan, anzio, normandy, the ardennes, okinawa or iwo jima?  scrutinizing the operation, the planning, the leadership and the strategic direction of the war ... all from the comfort and safety of his office desk chair in rockerfeller plaza. 

sadly, this troll and his pathetic peers are today's replacement for ernie pyle, carl mydens and robert capa ...

That's the worst part of this

That's the worst part of this all...when we have to see them sitting there, with makeup on their faces, smiling and laughing, all the while they're undermining the mission at hand, giving aid and comfort to our enemies, and generally disrespecting the efforts that our servicemen and women have been putting forth since the creation of our great nation.  These people know little or nothing about the sacrifices that our soldiers are making, nor do they understand or respect our leaders, our decision-makers who are forced to do these "unpopular" tasks.

Katie should have been there

Katie should have been there to keep Matt in line. :-)

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

The US Congress and Iraqi g

The US Congress and Iraqi government have something in common now to build on. Both have failed to meet their "targets for political, economic and other reforms".

Questions for Matt

Tony should have asked back(I know he is too much of a gentleman): Well, Matt, since your ratings have plummetted, when do you plan to get out?  With most of America totally tuning you out, when are you gonna change your view of things?  Do y'all really use bottled water, the small plastic bottles, or do you have the big jugs that set on the cooling/heating machine?  And how come you take so many vacations/day off?  Heck you're gone more than the President or Ms Pelosi.  Finally, what's your carbon footprint? 

Matt Lauer, you are an idiot

Mr. Lauer,

Have you noticed that after winning World War II, the United States still has troops in Germany, Italy, and Japan?

Didn't think so.

Sincerely,

Free Stinker

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Fred Thompson and Ann Coulter walk into a bar. The bar is instantly destroyed because that much awesome cannot be contained in one building.

How could they have known R

How could they have known Rush would be the bartender!

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

Drive-thru War

Further proof of the drive-thru war mentallity the libs have.

"Are we THERE yet?"  Hey Matt,  Grab a rifle and start fighting, you liberal POS.

What the MSSM doesn't report can kill you.

Snowe and Lugar - stalwarts o

Snowe and Lugar - stalwarts of the Republican party???

I guess in Lauer's La La land, the only stalwarts in the GOP are the RINOs...

I wish Tony would have been less polite...

troop withdraw...

Well maybe at some point Lauer or some other lib media pinhead can ask when American troops will leave places that are NOT Iraq. When will you demand that American troops leave & close up shop in Europe & Asia. Surely we don't need our men & women stationed in far away places like Germany &  in South Korea. WW2 has been over for a few years now, these nations can defend themselves now after several decades, can't they? When I hear the MSM start talking about that, I might be a little less critical of them over this issue.

"A goverment big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away"        Barry Goldwater

I know progress is being made

I know progress is being made in some areas of Iraq.But unless the Iraqis get their act together and stop the senseless sectarian violence it's going to be difficult for us to hold it all together.

We can't be there forever. Japan and Germany aren't good analogies because our troops there weren't fighting an insurgency for 60 years.

If some significant progress isn't made by the next election you can bet there will be a greater loss of support as people continue to wonder why our soldiers are dying to keep the sunnis and shiites from each others throats.

Nobody wants to see genocide so I hope the Iraqis can work out their differences and get past their tribalism.

Troops

The Iraqi government will never get it's act together if they continue to listen to the Sean Hannity types in this country. Hannity and his ilk on the far-right have done more to destroy the Republican Party and the Bush administration than Hillary or John Edwards could ever wish for. John McCain offers the best hope for our troops and the GOP.

McCain is done JNaught.Haven'

McCain is done JNaught.

Haven't you heard?

Thompson/Hunter '08

Thompson

Fred Thompson (and his non-record) is about as exciting for the GOP as are the latest Nielsens for "Law and Order" on a Friday night.

Thompson's got a record. &

Thompson's got a record.

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

Plus JN....Here is a danged s

Plus JN....Here is a danged smart reason why he has not announced yet....

Plus some people do find him exciting....young to-boot.

Put that in your pipe and smoke it!

Afternoon Mighty...Just wante

Afternoon Mighty...

Just wanted to thank you for that link...that is a keeper to be used when need be...lol

no problemo bt, glad to be-

no problemo bt, glad to be-o-service :-)

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

That is your opinion JN....I

That is your opinion JN....

I think you will find it much different when he announces...heck he already is number one is some polls before he announces.....

LMAO!

Joe Lieberman made a great fl

Joe Lieberman made a great floor speech this morning concerning Iraq and the troops....too bad the RINO's and the leftists want defeat just for their own personal political agenda's...

I have a name for these people...cut and run defeatist traitors...(I hope people call their Senators when the votes come up within the next two weeks about this war, let alone never forget at the polls in '08)

They make me sick...

Btw...the last of the surge being put in place isn't even but two weeks old yet...that is really giving Victory a chance now isn't it..plus the time we need let alone all the Iraqi's to replace us..these people keep volunteering too, even in the face of daily loss of life for them and their families.

If not now, when?

My answer to MattBoy's question:

You cannot turn back the clock to pre-911!!!

Grow up and smell the coffee!

If not now, When?

Matt Lauer is a broken record.  A boring "Hate Bushie" !

Matt, we cannot turn back the clock to pre-911, no matter how much you keep beating that drum!

Grow up, man.