Facts, Reasoning Out The Window In Dumb LA Times Editorial


An editorial in Friday's Los Angeles Times (7/6/07) is one of the dumbest in quite a while - and that's saying a lot.

Writing on the recently disclosed affair of Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, a Democrat, the Times ridiculously opines that "it seems that Democrats' sexual shenanigans do more damage to their political careers than Republicans' do." The Times cheekily writes that the "political bible" states, "Thou shalt not commit adultery, unless you're a Republican." (All emphasis mine.)

Oh, really? Just looking at the Villaraigosa affair, the Times' editorial conveniently fails to consider a few things:

  • Just today (Sat. 7/7/07), the Times wrote, "[V]oters can be very forgiving, as Villaraigosa himself proved by winning election [as mayor in 2005] despite admitting a separate affair in 1994 that nearly ended his marriage." So ... Where was the "damage" there, LA Times?
  • According to this LA Daily News article, Antonio's wife, Corina, "had been battling thyroid cancer" during the 1994 campaign. (See also this.) So ... Where's the "damage," LA Times?
  • Even with this brand-new revelation, an affair with a reporter who covered him on television (!), what "damage" has been done to Villaraigosa's career? Except for some embarrassment, absolutely none, as far as anyone can see. The mayor still retains his job.

In other words, there's no "damage" to Villaraigosa for the Times to be talking about, except ... The real damage in all of this, as this excellent article from LA Daily News' Chris Weinkopf stated, is to Villaraigosa's wife and his two growing children. (See also this.)

As the Times rightly points out, affairs have damaged, and not damaged, the professional careers of politicians of both parties. (Gavin Newsom, the Democratic mayor of San Francisco, still remains popular despite his recent affair.) But the Times fails to consider that the real "scandal" is not often the affair itself. Politicians get into real trouble when they publicly lie or attempt to obfuscate their situations (e.g., Henry Cisneros, Gary Hart, Bill Clinton).

The Times' opinion that "Democrats' sexual shenanigans do more damage to their political careers than Republicans' do" is just plain dumb.

—Dave Pierre is the creator of TheMediaReport.com and a contributor to NewsBusters.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Has anyone with the resourc

Has anyone with the resources to do it (hint-hint, MRC....) gone-back and looked at this journalist's work as the romance progressed and before she was taken off the mayor story figuratively, if not literally. ;)
JMR

Bob Livingston - intersting angle.

Bob Livingston - an intersting angle to this issue.

From CNN (my bold).

WASHINGTON (AllPolitics, December 19) -- House Speaker-elect Bob Livingston, reeling from the admission of his own marital infidelities, stunned Washington Saturday by announcing he would not run for speaker when the 106th Congress convenes next month and will quit the House in mid-1999.

[..]

On the House floor, Livingston urged President Bill Clinton to resign, drawing a chorus of "boos" and shouted calls of "You resign!" from Democrats. Then he shocked the chamber by saying he would set an example and step down himself.

"I must set the example that I hope President Clinton will follow. ... I will not stand for speaker of the House on January 6 but rather will remain as backbencher in this Congress that I so dearly love," Livingston said as the House fell silent.

The real scandal

The real scandal is that a reporter that is supposed to cover the mayor fairly was having an affair with him; think coverage has been skewed a bit? I will leave to others the inevitable jokes about other types of "coverage"...since this is a family website ;D