Here's one of Phyllis' articles.

A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.
Author: 

This is troubling to people in all three countries. It looks like our sovereignty is truly on-the-line here, and that all three countries may not have a public say in this. Pressure your Representative to demand an open debate on this issue!!!

Well, just one more step towards formation of the NAU...now we are headed to
a North American air traffic control structure. (h/t WorldNetDaily)

[Shhhhh...don't tell unsane that its not a conspiracy. unsane sleeps better by denying the facts. ]

If conservatives are RIGHT, then liberals must be WRONG.
Thompson/Rice

Wow...this is interesting. I am a Cheney fan, but his denial is interesting.

"The administration is not engaged in a secret plan to create a 'NAFTA super highway'"

I think the key word is 'secret'...the cat is out of the bag.

If conservatives are RIGHT, then liberals must be WRONG.
Thompson/Rice

What's happening and what's been happening:

"This is a WorldNetDaily http://www.worldnetd...

Monday, May 21, 2007

…

Late author Peter Drucker saw Mexico, Canada, U.S. integrating so fast, nothing could stop

...While even in 2007 many express skepticism ... 14 years ago, one of world's most celebrated economists and management experts said it was already on the fast track – and nothing could stop it.

Peter F. Drucker, in one of his dozens of best-selling books, "Post Capitalist Society," published in 1993, wrote that the European Community, the progenitor of the European Union, "triggered the attempt to create a North American economic community, built around the United States but integrating both Canada and Mexico into a common market."

"So far this attempt is purely economic in its goal," wrote the Presidential Medal of Freedom honoree. "But it can hardly remain so in the long run."

… Also of interest is where the movement began.

"What makes this so important is that the impetus for the North American economic community did not come from the United States; it came from Mexico," he writes. "Yet for over 150 years, ever since Mexico was unified under the presidency of Benito Juarez, the goal of Mexican policy has been to put as much distance as possible between its country and its pushy and totally alien neighbor to the north. No two contiguous countries in the world are as different as Mexico and the United States in language, in religion, but above all in culture, values and tradition. Yet Mexico had to accept in the end that the 150 years of isolationist policy had ended in failure; in order to survive as a country and civilization, it has to integrate itself, at least economically, with the huge, dangerous and alien neighbor to the north."

It all began with a plan to establish common customs procedures between the three countries, he wrote.

"The treaty which the Mexican government has proposed to establish a customs union between Mexico and the other two North American countries, the United States and Canada, may fail to go through," he explained. "But the economic integration of the three countries into one region is proceeding so fast that it will make little difference whether the marriage is sanctified legally or not."

… 

Most of those denying the drive toward integration, or for a North American Union, point out that it has not been debated in Congress – that no legislation has been introduced for actual merger. But Drucker pointed out 14 years ago that political and economic inertia was already so strong, the formalities of legislation would not be necessary to achieve the goals.

That's not to say there aren't officials working overtime on integration.

In March, WND uncovered a State Department cable of Commerce Secretary Carlo Gutierrez pressing to implement major trilateral initiatives to help "capture the vision of North American integration."

The cable was among some 150 pages of State Department SPP documents …

Here are some excerpts from an interesting article by Wes Vernon about a recent debate on this topic:

"Opponents of U.S. sovereignty plan to sneak their agenda around Congress…Wes Vernon Wes Vernon July 9, 2007…

It will not happen overnight...multinational corporations, politicians, and academic one-worlders envision "evolution by stealth" — i.e… patterned after the manner in which the European Union was established…

There was an interesting debate here ... Sponsored by Judicial Watch ... arguing for full disclosure of plans ...

… [opposed by] Dr. Robert Pastor — … American University, …and David Bohigian, Assistant Secretary of Commerce in the Bush administration…

… actions undertaken … are eerily reminiscent of how the European Union (EU) came into being… not all at once, but step by step over forty years.

… Bohigian even went so far as to say, "I don't see anything frankly in this SPP that would even rise to the level of legislation — let alone a treaty." Ergo, no need to get the OK of a Congress elected by the people. How convenient.

 … Phyllis Schlafly … put it this way: "… people getting together somewhere in Mr. Bohigian's offices and working on and changing our administrative law. And we don't think it should be done that way. Any changes in our regulation should be posted in the federal register so we can comment on it and pass on it…"…

Author and scholar Jerome Corsi says the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) — … (Kissinger, et al) — plans to submit a report to the White House and Congress by September 30 on the supposed benefits of the three-nation "integration."…

… Dr. Corsi says, "The plan is to present [as] fait accompli to Congress — an admitted 12 million illegals to cross the border — about ¾ of them under [George W. Bush] — and then tell us there's nothing we can do but to pass a law that legitimates their effort to stay... Same with [Homeland Security Secretary Michael] Chertoff saying he can't enforce the laws unless he gets new ones..."…

Both Phyllis Schlafly and Rosemary Jenks made the point that if SPP were doing something to be proud of, why has there been no publicity about its workings? Bohigian shrugged his shoulders, in effect saying that's out of his hands.

Having been a journalist for decades, I was not about to let that one stand... The government is loaded with well-paid flaks whose sole responsibility is to see to it that word gets to the media...

The Red China angle... Corsi's fact-filled tome is that "China stands to gain most ..."

That much we surmised, given (1) that the Chinese have invested in huge deep-water ports on Mexico's west coast … (2) that through the Chinese-controlled firm Hutchison-Whampoa (… controls … Panama Canal), … deeper and wider... permit megaships … directly to Gulf ports and East Coast ports … ports along the Mississippi River ...

… a system of sensors to track the shipments of containers once they are within North America... remotely ... across the U.S. from Mexico to Canada.

 … The Chinese-controlled Hutchison interests … own 49 percent of the Lockheed-Martin subsidiary that worked on the technology project with NASCO

Can China be trusted?  The late Constantine Menges, PHD — with national security experience at the White House and the CIA — warned that China (a) can launch nuclear weapons that in 30 minutes could kill 100-million Americans; (b) defines the U.S. as its main enemy; (c) through espionage, has stolen designs for nearly all U.S. nuclear warheads and many other military secrets; (d) buys weapons systems from Russia designed to sink U.S. aircraft carriers; (e) has threatened to destroy American cities if the U.S. helps democratic Taiwan; (f) is a leading supplier of weapons of mass destruction to rogue and/or terrorist states such as North Korea and Iran...

We would get results from Congress in a hurry if Americans were as focused on this issue as they were on the immigration debate. That requires publicity…"

http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/vernon/070709