On Tuesday's Countdown, MSNBC host Keith Olbermann used his latest "Special Comment" to call on President Bush and Vice President Cheney to resign because of the commutation of Scooter Libby's prison sentence, contending that President Bush is only president of a "rabid and irresponsible corner of the Republican Party." Olbermann further accused Cheney of being "without conscience" and compared the two to a "ventriloquist" and "dummy." After calling on Congress to "pressure, negotiate, impeach," Olbermann concluded: "Display just that iota of patriotism which Richard Nixon showed, on August 9, 1974. Resign. And give us someone, anyone, about whom all of us might yet be able to quote John Wayne, and say, 'I didn't vote for him, but he's my President, and I hope he does a good job.' Good night and good luck." (Transcript follows)
Olbermann opened by reciting John Wayne's words about wishing well of President Kennedy even though he had voted for Nixon. The Countdown host soon moved to argue that Bush is unworthy of that sentiment as he accused the President of "stabbing this nation in the back." Olbermann: "George W. Bush took our assent, and re-configured it, and honed it, and sharpened it to razor-sharp points and stabbed this nation in the back with it."
Regarding Bush's decision to commute Libby's prison sentence, Olbermann accused the President of merely representing the "rabid" corner of his party. Olbermann: "In that moment, Mr. Bush, you ceased to be the President of the United States. In that moment, Mr. Bush, you became merely the President of a rabid and irresponsible corner of the Republican Party."
Olbermann listed out several accusations against the President, including "lying this country into war," "fabricating" a "false implied link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11," "causing in Iraq the needless deaths of 3,586 of our brothers and sons and sisters and daughters and friends and neighbors," "subverting the Constitution," "creating the very terror you claim to have fought," and "handing part of this Republic over to a Vice President who is without conscience."
The MSNBC host compared Bush and Cheney to a "ventriloquist" and "dummy" as he referred to the Libby commutation as "crossing the Rubicon." Olbermann: "You both crossed the Rubicon yesterday. Which one of you chose the route no longer matters. Which is the ventriloquist, and which the dummy, is now irrelevant. But that you have twisted the machinery of government into nothing more than a tawdry machine of politics, is the only fact that remains relevant."
Olbermann tied in the July 4th holiday for its celebration of America standing up to its king, as he called for the impeachment of Bush and Cheney, whom he tagged as "perilous to our democracy." Olbermann: "We of this time -- and our leaders in Congress, of both parties -- must now live up to those standards which echo through our history -- pressure, negotiate, impeach -- get you, Mr. Bush, and Mr. Cheney, two men who are now perilous to our democracy, away from its helm."
Olbermann concluded: "Display just that iota of patriotism which Richard Nixon showed, on August 9, 1974. Resign. And give us someone, anyone, about whom all of us might yet be able to quote John Wayne, and say, 'I didn't vote for him, but he's my President, and I hope he does a good job.' Good night and good luck."
Below is a complete transcript of Olbermann's "Special Comment" from the Tuesday July 3 Countdown on MSNBC:
KEITH OLBERMANN: Finally tonight, as promised, a "Special Comment" on what is, in everything but name, George Bush's pardon of Scooter Libby.
"I didn't vote for him," an American once said, "but he's my President, and I hope he does a good job." That, on this eve of the 4th of July, is the essence of this democracy, in 17 words. And that is what President Bush threw away yesterday in commuting the sentence of Lewis "Scooter" Libby.
The man who said those 17 words, improbably enough, was the actor John Wayne. And John Wayne, an ultra-conservative, said them when he learned of the hair's breadth election of John F. Kennedy instead of his personal favorite, Richard Nixon, in 1960. "I didn't vote for him, but he's my President, and I hope he does a good job."
The sentiment was doubtlessly expressed earlier, but there's something especially appropriate about hearing it now in Wayne's voice: The crisp matter-of-fact acknowledgment that our form of government has survived, even though for nearly two centuries now, our Commander-in-Chief has also served, simultaneously, as the head of one political party and often the scourge of all others. We as citizens must, at some point, ignore a President's partisanship. Not that we may prosper as a nation, not that we may achieve, not that we may lead the world, but that merely we may function. But just as essential to the 17 words of John Wayne is an implicit trust, a sacred trust: That the President for whom so many did not vote, can in turn suspend his political self long enough, and for matters imperative enough, to conduct himself solely for the benefit of the entire Republic.
Our generation's willingness to state "we didn't vote for him, but he's our President, and we hope he does a good job," was tested in the crucible of history, and far earlier than most. And in circumstances far more tragic and threatening. And we did that with which history tasked us. We enveloped our President in 2001. And those who did not believe he should have been elected, indeed those who did not believe he had been elected, willingly lowered their voices and assented to the sacred oath of non-partisanship.
And George W. Bush took our assent, and re-configured it, and honed it, and sharpened it to razor-sharp points and stabbed this nation in the back with it. Were there any remaining lingering doubt otherwise, or any remaining lingering hope, it ended yesterday when Mr. Bush commuted the prison sentence of one of his own staffers. Did so even before the appeals process was complete; did so without as much as a courtesy consultation with the Department of Justice; did so despite what James Madison, at the Constitutional Convention, said about impeaching any President who pardoned or sheltered those who had committed crimes "advised by" that President; did so without the slightest concern that even the most detached of citizens must look at this chain of events and wonder to what degree was Mr. Libby told: "Break the law however you wish, the President will keep you out of prison"?
In that moment, Mr. Bush, you broke that fundamental compact between yourself and the majority of this nation's citizens, the ones who did not cast votes for you. In that moment, Mr. Bush, you ceased to be the President of the United States. In that moment, Mr. Bush, you became merely the President of a rabid and irresponsible corner of the Republican Party. And this is too important a time, sir, to have a Commander-in-Chief who puts party ahead of nation.
This has been, of course, the gathering legacy of this administration. Few of its decisions have escaped the stain of politics. The extraordinary Karl Rove has spoken of "a permanent Republican majority," as if such a thing, or a permanent Democratic majority, is not antithetical to that upon which rests our country, our history, our revolution, our freedoms. Yet our Democracy has survived shrewder men than Karl Rove. And it has survived the frequent stain of politics upon the fabric of government. But this administration, with ever-increasing insistence and almost theocratic zealotry, has turned that stain into a massive oil spill.
The protection of the environment is turned over to those of one political party, who will financially benefit from the rape of the environment. The protections of the Constitution are turned over to those of one political party, who believe those protections unnecessary and extravagant and quaint. The enforcement of the laws is turned over to those of one political party, who will swear beforehand that they will not enforce those laws. The choice between war and peace is turned over to those of one political party, who stand to gain vast wealth by ensuring that there is never peace, but only war.
And now, when just one cooked book gets corrected by an honest auditor, when just one trampling of the inherent and inviolable fairness of government is rejected by an impartial judge, when just one wild-eyed partisan is stopped by the figure of blind justice, this President decides that he, and not the law, must prevail.
I accuse you, Mr. Bush, of lying this country into war. I accuse you of fabricating in the minds of your own people, a false implied link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11. I accuse you of firing the generals who told you that the plans for Iraq were disastrously insufficient. I accuse you of causing in Iraq the needless deaths of 3,586 of our brothers and sons and sisters and daughters and friends and neighbors.
I accuse you of subverting the Constitution, not in some misguided but sincerely-motivated struggle to combat terrorists, but instead to stifle dissent. I accuse you of fomenting fear among your own people, of creating the very terror you claim to have fought. I accuse you of exploiting that unreasoning fear, the natural fear of your own people who just want to live their lives in peace, as a political tool to slander your critics and libel your opponents. I accuse you of handing part of this Republic over to a Vice President who is without conscience, and letting him run roughshod over it.
And I accuse you now, Mr. Bush, of giving, through that Vice President, carte blanche to Mr. Libby, to help defame Ambassador Joseph Wilson by any means necessary, to lie to grand juries and special counsel and before a court, in order to protect the mechanisms and the particulars of that defamation, with your guarantee that Libby would never see prison, and, in so doing, as Ambassador Wilson himself phrased it here last night, of you becoming an accessory to the obstruction of justice.
When President Nixon ordered the firing of Watergate special prosecutor Archibald Cox during the infamous Saturday Night Massacre on October 20, 1973, Mr. Cox initially responded tersely, and ominously. "Whether ours shall be a government of laws and not of men," he said, "is now for Congress, and ultimately, the American people."
President Nixon did not understand how he had crystallized the issue of Watergate for the American people. It had been, to that point, about the obscure meaning behind an attempt to break into a rival party's headquarters; and the labyrinthine effort to cover up that break-in and the related crimes. But in one night, Nixon transformed it. Watergate instantaneously became a simpler issue: a President overruling the inexorable march of the law of insisting, in a way that resonated viscerally with millions who had not previously understood, that he was the law. Not the Constitution. Not the Congress. Not the Courts. Just him.
Just, Mr. Bush, as you did yesterday. The twists and turns of Plamegate, your precise and intricate lies that sent us into this bottomless pit of Iraq; your lies upon the lies to discredit Joe Wilson; your lies upon the lies upon the lies to throw the sand at the referee of Prosecutor Fitzgerald's analogy. These are complex and often painful to follow, and too much, perhaps, for the average citizen. But when other citizens render a verdict against your man, Mr. Bush, and then you spit in the faces of those jurors and that judge and the judges who were yet to hear the appeal, the average citizen understands that, sir. It is the fixed ball game and the rigged casino and the pre-arranged lottery all rolled into one, and it stinks. And they know it.
Nixon's mistake, the last and most fatal of them, the firing of Archibald Cox, was enough to cost him the presidency. And in the end, even Richard Nixon could say he could not put this nation through an impeachment. It was far too late for it to matter then, but as the decades unfold, that single final gesture of nonpartisanship, of acknowledged responsibility not to self, not to party, not to "base," but to country, echoes loudly into history. Even Richard Nixon knew it was time to resign.
Would that you could say that, Mr. Bush. And that you could say it for Mr. Cheney. You both crossed the Rubicon yesterday. Which one of you chose the route no longer matters. Which is the ventriloquist, and which the dummy, is now irrelevant. But that you have twisted the machinery of government into nothing more than a tawdry machine of politics, is the only fact that remains relevant.
It is nearly July 4th, Mr. Bush, the commemoration of the moment we Americans decided that rather than live under a king who made up the laws, or erased them, or ignored them, or commuted the sentences of those rightly convicted under them, we would force our independence, and regain our sacred freedoms. We of this time -- and our leaders in Congress, of both parties -- must now live up to those standards which echo through our history -- pressure, negotiate, impeach —- get you, Mr. Bush, and Mr. Cheney, two men who are now perilous to our democracy, away from its helm.
And for you, Mr. Bush, and for Mr. Cheney, there is a lesser task. You need merely to achieve a very low threshold indeed. Display just that iota of patriotism which Richard Nixon showed, on August 9, 1974. Resign. And give us someone, anyone, about whom all of us might yet be able to quote John Wayne, and say, "I didn't vote for him, but he's my President, and I hope he does a good job." Good night and good luck.




When President Nixon ordered the firing of Watergate special prosecutor Archibald Cox during the infamous Saturday Night Massacre on October 20, 1973, Mr. Cox initially responded tersely, and ominously. "Whether ours shall be a government of laws and not of men," he said, "is now for Congress, and ultimately, the American people."









Comments Policy
Good Lord! In the picture
July 3, 2007 - 23:52 ET by BondPlainBondGood Lord! In the picture with the story, Mr Olbermann appears absolutely apoplectic! Run! He's gonna blow!
Mr Olbermann reminds me of so many of the early-morning callers to CSPAN's Washington Journal. Some of the things those callers say, as Mr Olbermann's "Special Comment" above, are so outrageous they are beyond the realm of absurdity.
Do you believe this is his personal thought or is MoveOn spoon-feeding him?
Run! He's gonna blow!Isn't
July 3, 2007 - 23:58 ET by dahliatraversRun! He's gonna blow!
Isn't it great? Let's think of other things President Bush can do to keep pushing Olbermann's button.
I can't think when I've seen
July 4, 2007 - 00:31 ET by lnthompI can't think when I've seen a picture of Olbermann when he didn't appear apoplectic.
Lee T.
U.S. Navy (ret.) / Vancouver, Washington
The history of the race, and each individual's experience, are thick with evidence that a truth is not hard to kill and that a lie told well is immortal.-- Mark Twain
And another thing..
July 4, 2007 - 10:15 ET by goldenthroatBPB,
You are absolutely correct - this man seems to ooze hate from his pores! The rage on his face should be no surprise as this is the normal MO for this left-coast, bleeding-heart, 'do as I say, not as I do' pathetic excuse for a news commentator.
The Prez must be doing something right if Mr. Congenitality rants and raves about him ad nauseum.
Never dance on an empty stomach unless it's a liberal.
Olberman Calls of Bush to Resign
July 4, 2007 - 20:52 ET by brewski01What ever you think of Keith Olbermann, it's a given that less than 20% of Americans still support Bush. Most Americans would like to re-wind history and erase the giant mess that the Bush White House has put our country into. Resigning is too easy. I recommend an extended "time out" for Mr. Bush in the morgue at Dover AFB. Perhaps there he will have an epiphany (hope this word isn't too big for you boys) and spend the remaining time in office making ammends. Oh, wait! I forgot, Bush doesn't run the country, Cheney does!
That said, let's hear now from all you ExxonMobil-sponsored pin-heads. Time to put down the remote, get dinner cooking before the wife comes home from work, hide the porn, and make fun of ol' brewski who is most likely a just a "liberal looser who never was potty trained". Oh, did I steal some of your fun.
Kudos to the few brave souls who dare to post the truth on this playground of a disinformation website.
What color is the sky in your world?
July 4, 2007 - 20:58 ET by Free StinkerThat said, let's hear now from all you ExxonMobil-sponsored pin-heads.
What color is the sky in your world?
I wish I was sponsored by ExxonMobile. I could use the extra $$$s You see, we have High Property Taxes in DEMOCRAT controlled New Jersey.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Fred Thompson and Ann Coulter walk into a bar. The bar is instantly destroyed because that much awesome cannot be contained in one building.
ExxonMobil Sponsor
July 4, 2007 - 21:23 ET by brewski01You ignorant boob! The owner of this website has received more than $202,500 from ExxonMobil since 1998 to enguage in a campaign of disinformation. It's a matter of public record. Don't you care enough to even find out who you are shilling for, or do you just pretend not to know?
Credible cite, please? Key wo
July 4, 2007 - 21:26 ET by Del DolemonteCredible cite, please? Key word: CREDIBLE
While you're at it, give us some credible cites of the "disinformation" NB has pumped out over the years. Key word: CREDIBLE.
The MRC site itself lists Ex
July 4, 2007 - 22:03 ET by bunnytoesThe MRC site itself lists Exxon/Mobile as a donor. That for me is good reason not to trust this site!
Then why are you here?Onl
July 4, 2007 - 22:12 ET by Free StinkerThen why are you here?
Only a fool would go somewhere they don't trust.
I was only trying to answer t
July 4, 2007 - 22:31 ET by bunnytoesI was only trying to answer the above question about who funds this site.. do you deny it? As to to reason I read this site..well it's just so much fun!
Well, nevermind the facts, ne
July 4, 2007 - 22:37 ET by botgWell, nevermind the facts, nevermind the links, nevermind the articles. The site gets some advertising revenue from Exxon - - - - that's proof enough for me I'm a brainwashed moron!
Hey ijit, many shows on PBS get funding from Exxon and other oil companies lets start a boycott
“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” -Chief Justice John Roberts
Why read this site
July 4, 2007 - 22:37 ET by brewski01I agree. Reading this site is my comic relief for the day.
I don't come here because
July 4, 2007 - 22:39 ET by Free StinkerI don't come here because of who funds this site.
But, I don't suppose you would understand anything about thinking for yourself. I'll just bet you even believe in Global Warming.
Then you would bet wrong! But
July 4, 2007 - 22:45 ET by bunnytoesThen you would bet wrong! But I don't believe that oil is some infinite resource that comes from the bowels of the earth as has been stated here.
I don't believe that oil is s
July 4, 2007 - 22:54 ET by botgI don't believe that oil is some infinite resource that comes from the bowels of the earth as has been stated here.
Must have missed that article, where is that stated here?
It's a rhetorical question we know you made it up! Anyway i have some festivities to attend so dealing with nonsense won't be in my evening
“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” -Chief Justice John Roberts
botg, you really need to keep
July 4, 2007 - 23:04 ET by bunnytoesbotg, you really need to keep up. It was a few months ago. Someone here started saying that all the oil could not possibily come from dinosaurs, that it bubbles up from the earth's core. Sorry, I cannot remember the name of the poster so I guess you win.
bunnytoes,Oil does not come
July 4, 2007 - 23:08 ET by Dave Rbunnytoes,
Oil does not come from the gargantuan reptiles that once roamed this planet. That is an undeniable fact.
As I recall, the person who forwarded the assertion that oil did, in fact, come from said reptiles was one of our more liberal members.
Help Fred defeat the RINOs, along with the Hitllary-Obama Axis, & win the White House in '08.
Umm, why is it an undeniable
July 4, 2007 - 23:16 ET by bunnytoesUmm, why is it an undeniable fact? Dinos were around for millions of years... that's a lot of dinos!
bunnytoes,I apologize most
July 4, 2007 - 23:24 ET by Dave Rbunnytoes,
I apologize most profusely.
The term "fossil fuel" is a misnomer. I didn't realize that you attended a government school.
My mistake.
Help Fred defeat the RINOs, along with the Hitllary-Obama Axis, & win the White House in '08.
Dave R,You're right! What was
July 4, 2007 - 23:55 ET by bunnytoesDave R,
You're right! What was thinking by careing that NB is funded Exxon....who cares! It's just that my feelings have been hurt by Blonde making fun of my screen name... rabbitdigits indeed!
bunnytoes,LOL-Okay, And I t
July 5, 2007 - 00:09 ET by Dave Rbunnytoes,
LOL-Okay, And I take back, for the time being, anyway, what I said about you attending government school. :-O
Besides, I've been called everything in here but a "child of God." Debra (met her yet?) even said I was going straight to hell. Dear me.
-Gotta have a pretty thick skin in here.
Help Fred defeat the RINOs, along with the Hitllary-Obama Axis, & win the White House in '08.
Exactly why does it matter th
July 5, 2007 - 00:12 ET by mikejExactly why does it matter that Exxon gives money to MRC?
How does that change the fact that Keith Olbermann pops off incessantly ranting and making stupid uniformed statements like he had just come from a party at the Kennedy compound?
Personally, my Exxon stock I got for $38/share is doing great and I hope it keeps up. I also hope that Exxon keeps paying those oil rig works 6 figure salaries, which I thought is what liberals want corporations to do. Pay their employees a living wage? Which Exxon more than does, plus provide them with outstanding benefits, which Exxon does as well.
So what's the problem?
mikej,So what's the problem
July 5, 2007 - 00:28 ET by Dave Rmikej,
So what's the problem?
But....but....Exxon/Mobile is....is a b...b....big.......eeeeevil, mean oil conglomerate. I....I mean....they murder defenseless penguines in Alaska.....don't they?
Help Fred defeat the RINOs, along with the Hitllary-Obama Axis, & win the White House in '08.
Dumb Bunny
July 4, 2007 - 23:13 ET by BlondeThis lame response to botg coming from a new poster named bunnytoes?
Sheesh! That is too rich for words.
Try to keep up yourself, young rabbitlydigits.
Free, Perhaps we should beg
July 4, 2007 - 22:54 ET by Dave RFree,
Perhaps we should begin exploring all the far left organizations and individuals who help fund all those supposedly "objective" lib web sites. I mean, like George Soros' invlovement in Media Matters, for starters. Then we could move on to PBS, Daily Kommies, the Dummies, etc., etc.
Think bunnytoes and brewski here are up for it?
BTW-(psst) Did you get your pvt. email from Exxon/Mobile about the topics that are off-limits this week? :-^)
Help Fred defeat the RINOs, along with the Hitllary-Obama Axis, & win the White House in '08.
Did you get your pvt. email
July 4, 2007 - 23:45 ET by Free StinkerDid you get your pvt. email from Exxon/Mobile
Yes, they said we're doing a great job, but we should focus more on discrediting Kucinich & Dean. ;-)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Fred Thompson and Ann Coulter walk into a bar. The bar is instantly destroyed because that much awesome cannot be contained in one building.
Free,Cool. Mine said to sta
July 5, 2007 - 00:01 ET by Dave RFree,
Cool. Mine said to start promoting the idea that the Exxon-Valdez was, in fact, torpedoed by the Rainbow Warrier crew in retalliation for the sinking of their ship.
Psst-They also said, confidentially, of course, that French commandos really didn't sink Greenpeace's ship, but a special team of demolition experts, trained by Halliburton under the direction of Dick Cheney and funded by Exxon, are the real culprits. Supposedly, it was all blamed on the French because, as we all know, they are such wussies they wouldn't do anything about it, anyway.
Help Fred defeat the RINOs, along with the Hitllary-Obama Axis, & win the White House in '08.
While you're still here, cou
July 4, 2007 - 22:16 ET by dahliatraversWhile you're still here, could you please point to one or two inaccuracies that would substantiate your distrust of NB?
ExxonMobil
July 4, 2007 - 22:35 ET by brewski01Let's start with 2006, right from the ExxonMobil corporate report: http://www.exxonmobil.com/Corporate/Files/Corporate/gcr_contributions_public06.pdf
If you want I start posting for all previous years as well.
Cool link, did you see all th
July 4, 2007 - 22:44 ET by botgCool link, did you see all the other places you can't trust (like UT?)
“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” -Chief Justice John Roberts
If you want I start posting
July 4, 2007 - 23:52 ET by Free StinkerIf you want I start posting for all previous years as well.
Please do! We want to make sure our Sugar-Daddy gets the credit it deserves! :-p
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Fred Thompson and Ann Coulter walk into a bar. The bar is instantly destroyed because that much awesome cannot be contained in one building.
Congress In Waiting
July 4, 2007 - 21:13 ET by PawpawNWell, old chum, is all of Congress with its ratings well below that of the Pres already there and waiting??
Congress
July 4, 2007 - 21:30 ET by brewski01The Democrats in Congress would gladly wait at Dover if Bush would stop with all the signing statements and vetos.
Brewbrain,What vetos? Hell,
July 4, 2007 - 23:16 ET by Dave RBrewbrain,
What vetos? Hell, up until the terrorist-supporting dems managed, through lies and deception, to get their cowardly asses in control of the congress, there weren't any vetos.
Help Fred defeat the RINOs, along with the Hitllary-Obama Axis, & win the White House in '08.
"this playground of a
July 4, 2007 - 21:14 ET by Jerry"this playground of a disinformation website..."
Hoooboy! A liberal complaining about disinformation! That's rich! That's like Bill Gates complaining about Gandhi's oppulent lifestyle.
What's next? A liberal complaining about paying too much in taxes? A liberal disgusted by the killing of babies? A liberal actually willing to defend freedom?
When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment
vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any
President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).
Disinformation
July 4, 2007 - 22:46 ET by brewski01Listen to yourself - "killing babies". You call your tirades arguments? You employ the name calling because it is a means of demonizing liberals and cutting off reasoned debate.
Brewbrain,When you (quite l
July 4, 2007 - 22:59 ET by Dave RBrewbrain,
When you (quite literally) tear an un-born child (what your ilk refers to an "unviable cell mass") from its mother and it is no-longer living, what else do you libs call it? Life deprived? Prematurely extinguished? Convenience restored?
What?
Help Fred defeat the RINOs, along with the Hitllary-Obama Axis, & win the White House in '08.
"Reasoned debate" a
July 5, 2007 - 10:32 ET by Jerry"Reasoned debate" according to brewski01...
"Oh, wait! I forgot, Bush doesn't run the country, Cheney does!"
"Reading this site is my comic relief for the day"
"You ignorant boob!"
"let's hear now from all you ExxonMobil-sponsored pin-heads"
"Time to put down the remote, get dinner cooking before the wife comes home from work, hide the porn,
That's just on this thread.
We are humbled by your intellectual contributions to reasoned debate.
When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).
Both thumbs up Jerry. I'm gla
July 5, 2007 - 13:04 ET by BeowulfBoth thumbs up Jerry. I'm glad I read thru the posts before I replied, as I was going to pretty much say the exact same thing.
Doncha just frikkin' LOVE these liberal morons who troll along, post inane rhetoric without a shred of credibility, call people names, ignore challenges, then accuse anyone who disagrees with them of hyperbole? Brewbrain and Rabbitfeet are probably both members in good standing of our elite MSM - they certainly have the rhetoric down-pat...
The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers
I know Beowulf, it's gettin
July 5, 2007 - 18:27 ET by JerryI know Beowulf, it's getting ridiculous.
Lying is so imbedded in their politics, they have to re-package it (ie. spinning) to make it more palatable, yet they run around screaming "Bush lied, Bush lied" and they can't even cite an instance of lying (don't give me that no WMD crap).
The Clinton administration was rife with corruption, from illegal campaign contributions from commies to perjuring yourself before a federal judge, a grand jury, Congress, and the American people, and yet it is the Republicans who have a "Culture of Corruption" because Foley sent inappropriate messages to an intern.
They implement policies that totally destroy black families and culture and yet they get away with painting Republicans as the anti-Black party.
When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment
vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any
President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).
Josephf, is that you?Speaking
July 4, 2007 - 21:24 ET by Del DolemonteJosephf, is that you?
Speaking of "disinformation websites", tell us again why your side's counterpart to this site, the brilliant satire site "Media Matters", has a regular page solely dedicated to CORRECTIONS.
Must be tough ...
July 6, 2007 - 00:56 ET by Com_n_senseMust be tough being a "bushit" these days. What with bush tripping all over the law, losing not one but two wars, being more hated than binLaden, longest sustained lowest approval rating than any modern president, as more Republicans abandoning him every day, and watching as his bad check writing economy comes to a halt, while gas prices hit record highs, and he puts the lame in the duck.
This I do know, this much failure cannot go on. The falsehood that is the center-piece of this administration will have to collapse like all things built on deceit and when that happens it will be a joyful day for all true Americans.
You really should read this
July 6, 2007 - 01:40 ET by RESTLESS 1You really should read this , this,
and this
Just because you say it, doesn't make it so. The economy is looking very strong.
This will show you how the Dow has climbed for the past four years. It seems you are just ranting and don't know what you are talking about.
Com_n_sense, I'm glad you lef
July 6, 2007 - 15:38 ET by BeowulfCom_n_sense, I'm glad you left out some letters in your handle. Since it is obvious you have no common sense. Or are the two missing letters U and E?
Name one of the two wars Bush "lost". Hated more than Bin Laden by whom (besides you libs suffering from either turret's or dementia)? Where is the economy halting? What record gas highs?
Not one accusation you've made here has a shred of validity. Talk about lame. You really should go back to hanging out with your DUmmy buddies...
The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers
Com n...this is really reachi
July 6, 2007 - 15:44 ET by bassndudeCom n...this is really reaching even for you. Have you always been demented, or is it a recent event in your life that drove you insane? Evidently, you do not, or is it cannot(?), read the news and finance sections.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Hey, nonsense. Last we heard
July 6, 2007 - 15:44 ET by QueenMumHey, nonsense. Last we heard from you, you were headed out of the country. That was a quick trip. I'll be you were on the no-fly list and had to cancel your plans.
We are not interested in the possibilities of defeat. - Queen Victoria
His flight was snowed in from
July 6, 2007 - 18:57 ET by dahliatraversHis flight was snowed in from global warming, QueenMum.
I call on Keith Olbermann t
July 4, 2007 - 00:03 ET by marvlI call on Keith Olbermann to resign, for being a stupid, empty-headed arse. Does he honestly think anyone gives a damn for his playground opinions?
If you can predict what an
July 4, 2007 - 00:04 ET by FairlightIf you can predict what any given reporter will say, down to the last period, then that person has lost their credibility, if ever they had any.
He is hopelessly insecure, no
July 4, 2007 - 00:09 ET by Atomic CrusaderHe is hopelessly insecure, no doubt about it. This guy, Al Gore, Hillary, Nancy Pelosi, Howard Dean, Shumer, Reid, Kerry, John Edwards, Ted Kennedy, the people who work at NBC, CBS, ABC, PBS, NPR, the spoiled protesters who waste their lives marching in the street...hmm..who else? Jimmy Carter and all his dictator friends, and unfortunately for me, my Mom...these people are completely hysterical. Utterly irresponsible and totally untrustworthy. Its just a simple sad fact. The folly of man, the human condition and the cycles of history are unknown to them.
Just who does he think he is talking to exactly? You can see just how dumb this guy is if you catch the interview with him on CSPAN from last year. A total lightweight airhead and shallow as a sheet of paper. Pathetic.
Olbermann does have a knack
July 4, 2007 - 00:12 ET by LighthouseJOlbermann does have a knack ignoring facts and sensationalizing it all like Bush choking on a pretzel is the crime of the century. His "special comments" are just the current nexus of liberal thinking, sensationalized into an easy-to-chew capsule in a massively magnanimous delivery, for Bush, Cheney or the Republican punching bag of the week, to resign or at least another. It's made for the liberals that still feel cheated in 2000 and think that the election rules should be changed to accomodate Gore. Again, Olbermann uses those big words to set himself and his elitist audience up above the unwashed masses (those that don't swallow what he feeds them).
Keith Nailed It
July 4, 2007 - 00:16 ET by takingmyconstitutionalKudos to Mr. Olbermann for "telling it like it is" so eloquently. Of course some members of the "rabid and irresponsible corner of the Republican Party" may not fully share that sentiment.
Wanting, needing...a Big Nanny
July 4, 2007 - 00:20 ET by Unsane...this comment from one who aches for a big American Nanny State, and hates Bush because he stands in the way of his dream Nanny State.
MAKE WAY FOR THE SAN ANTONIO SPURS!!! THE 1999, 2003, 2005, AND 2007 NBA CHAMPIONS!!!!
Actually, the only "rab
July 4, 2007 - 07:37 ET by dahliatraversActually, the only "rabidity" here is being demonstrated by Keith Olbermann and anyone else hyperventilating over this commutation.
Were you equally concerned about the pardons bestowed by Bill Clinton? How does Libby's crime contrast and compare to those committed by the 150 people pardoned by Clinton?
Heir Olberman Minister der globalen Propaganda
July 4, 2007 - 00:17 ET by Lame CherryAh the moon was full three score and ten years ago when another propagandist for a far off reich was pulling down elected governments for a globalist pet named Hitler to join another charmer named Stalin.
Heir Olberman using John Wayne is like Bill Clinton carrying a Bible, ne'er the twain shall meet. In Olberman's case, it is a good thing as even 100 year old John Wayne would kick this shill's esel über dem mond.
Olberman knew in selling his soul he would attach himself to attacking media giants like O'Reilly and Limbaugh and thereby make this Soviet pip squeak "a superpower too", since the media flushed their favorite son Don Imus. Olberman also knows all he is saying is bogus, but when his mentors of propaganda were twisting tales about Churchill, the French, Jews and the Gypsies........well when you have an audience of regressives the facts do not matter.......only the hatred.
For a moment, let us just give Olberman what he wants along with Dave High and other liberals who hate George Bush and Dick Cheney. Poof they are gone.......Nance Pelosi is now president, a woman who has so screwed up Congress that it now has an 18 point approval rating. A woman who screwed up diplomacy in the Middle East by telling Syria something Israel did not even tell her and a woman who being a product of affirmative action is running Congress like her unused kitchen.
Tomorrow Heir Olberman and other regressives, China moves on Taiwan, Russia cuts off all oil to Europe and demands they join the new Soviet bloc, OPEC cuts off all oil to America and for a nice finale the American economy busts and all your lovely border busters burn down the major cities in support of socialism.
Ok now what are you going to do Heir Olberman? Hand America over to your comrades? Nance is not up to anything she has proven besides picking out her clothes for the day.......so what are you going to do with your fruition of policy of finally getting rid of Bush and Cheney and the nation torn apart?
That is why you are where you are Heir Olberman, a shill for your bosses who once they get what they want.....they will just like in Germany and Russia round you up along with all the other marching in step regressives to die in slave labor camps.
God forgive you people for all the deaths you have caused, all the misery you are causing and all the dead in attacks and wars you have set the world up for.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
Out of curiosity Lame Cher
July 4, 2007 - 00:30 ET by shawn228Out of curiosity Lame Cherry, what do you think this Republican President would do if China attacked Taiwan?
I have eaten cherries. I as
July 4, 2007 - 00:39 ET by Dave HighI have eaten cherries. I assume a lame cherry is one with spots of mold or fungus? Please help me understand the concept of a lame cherry. On second thought, don't. Keep it to yourself, lame cherry. Your secret should always stay with you.
DH
Olbermann, the statesman.
July 4, 2007 - 01:03 ET by maggieqpublicOlbermann, the statesman. He is so remarkably retro.
Lame Cherry…
“and a woman who being a product of affirmative action is running Congress like her unused kitchen.”
You clearly have the historical fix on the “Speaker”. I have followed her local ordinariness since the mid-1970’s. Sounds like you’re a native spectator as well.
lahme ente
July 4, 2007 - 07:32 ET by kafkakaeferLame cherry,
If you want to show off your cheap propaganda in a fashionable manner and put Olbermann in a corner with Hitler, Stalin and their likes, then you should try to learn german in the first place. Please! This is horrible.
"Hegel says somewhere all great events and personalities in world history reappear in one fashion or another. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce."
The Eighteeenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (1852) sect. 1, Cf.
It astonishes to me that desp
July 4, 2007 - 00:25 ET by Dave HighIt astonishes to me that despite the entire nation being in agreement that Bush has failed his office and the American people entirely; there is still a certain 21% that demand to follow Bush blindly over the cliff. I think noted conservative thinker Howard Dean wrote about this. Is it possible that ya’ll have a gene from the lemmings line of animals? Naww, couldn’t be. That would involve evolution; something you don’t believe in.
Yikes you guys are scary, scary. Dave High
I thought MediaMatters was
July 4, 2007 - 00:27 ET by FairlightI thought MediaMatters was closed after 5.
Ah, so it's a horrible thing
July 4, 2007 - 00:33 ET by Mike BrattonAh, so it's a horrible thing that President Bush's approval poll rating is 21%?
Since the latest Gallup poll shows the Democrat-controlled Congress' approval poll rating at 24% (plus-or-minus 3 percentage points), do you have similar remarks for the Democrats that want to follow their Congressional leadership in lemming-like fashion?
If one takes polls seriously, one has to take them all seriously, or else run the risk of appearing to be hypocritical.
--Mike
www.thebrattonreport...
I thought i had seen 14 per
July 4, 2007 - 00:46 ET by Tidy Bowl ManI thought i had seen 14 percent bandied about.
My mistake--a typo jumped in
July 4, 2007 - 00:57 ET by Mike BrattonMy mistake--a typo jumped in there. Your correction makes the lamenting of President Bush's approval poll rating even more interesting. Thanks.
--Mike
www.thebrattonreport.com
Dave, I have said this before
July 4, 2007 - 01:07 ET by TexasOptimistDave, I have said this before, and I will say it this time, but no more. Most of us in the conservative movement dislike much about President Bush. We disagree with him on many things. Immigration. Federal spending. Global warming. Education. Even Iraq, believe it or not. We have many reasons to dislike his actions as president. Dislike is too weak a word, perhaps. As I state in my signature, he is not a full-fledged conservative, and he irks us on many occasions. You are the one that proves yourself to be a lemming. You refuse to recognize that we view a lot of the Bush agenda with contempt, not with mindless admiration and support. You are the lemming that foolishly accuses us of being robots that thoughtlessly cheer for every policy, every viewpoint, every piece of legislation that comes out of the White House. You are the lemming, plain and simple. That is all.
George W. Bush is not a full-fledged conservative, but I still support his presidency. (Although I am rethinking this position daily!) Still, I'd rather have him as president than ANY of the Democrats.
Merry Christmas 2007.
Congress' approval rating i
July 4, 2007 - 05:21 ET by motherbeltCongress' approval rating is even lower.....oh, that must be because they won't impeach the President.
I have no use for polls, myse
July 4, 2007 - 10:48 ET by HypocriteHaterI have no use for polls, myself. You could put a turd on a pedestal and it would get at least a 10% approval rating. I also have no use for knowing "what's hot and what's not" in deciding what I like and dislike. If polls were to suddenly drop off the face of the earth tomorrow, I couldn't be more apathetic.
Sometimes I agree with the president's decisions, sometimes I don't. I suppose that goes for many people. So his 21% approval rating is not always going to consist of the same people "follow(ing) Bush blindly over the cliff". I mean that's such an obvious one there, I shouldn't have to point that out to you.
Mr. Olbermann, it is incumben
July 4, 2007 - 00:26 ET by Mike BrattonMr. Olbermann, it is incumbent upon those who presume to sit at the table of ideas to have brought something of substance to the table. Since your only regular contribution is a fact-free puddle of emotions, why should any sober-minded individual be at all concerned about your limp accusations?
And "Good night, and good luck"? Being Murrowesque (for what that's worth) hasn't exactly proven to be your strong suit. Perhaps you should have closed your giddy harangue with "Courage," since your disdain for the facts is more Ratheresque. It's still a shame you left ESPN; when it came to sportscast hosting--which is no mean feat, by any stretch--you weren't in over your head.
--Mike
www.thebrattonreport.com
I didn't even know Edward R
July 4, 2007 - 05:38 ET by motherbelt"Good night, and good luck"?
I didn't even know Edward R. Murrow, but I will say this: Mr. Olbermann, you are no Edward R. Murrow.
And staring into the camera with that oh-so-somber look on your face, while you drone on, enamoured of the sound of your own voice, won't make you into him.
Talk about delusions of grandeur......
Bush is Mr Popular .............
July 4, 2007 - 00:44 ET by Tidy Bowl ManPresident Bush is a veritable Mr. Popular compared to the 14% approval rating of Congress.
Thanks Nancy, thanks Harry.
Olbermann probably thinks t
July 4, 2007 - 05:42 ET by motherbeltOlbermann probably thinks their rating is so low because they are too chicken to impeach the President...oh, and Cheney, and Karl Rove (I wondered how long it would take for him to drag Rove in.) Of course, Cheney has to go too, or Her Speakerness wouldn't be next in line. Come on, Keith, let's hear how it will take a woman to clean the White House!!
KEITH OLBERMANN: Finally toni
July 4, 2007 - 01:01 ET by GalvanicKEITH OLBERMANN: Finally tonight, as promised, a "Special Comment" on what is, in everything but name, George Bush's pardon of Scooter Libby.