Writing about Lester Holt, I've more than once praised the NBC host for his level-headed professionalism. I may have to re-evaluate after his performance on this morning's "Today." Interviewing Joe Wilson about the Libby commutation, Holt seemed to seek to throw gasoline on the fire with leading questions, while obfuscating an important fact. Later, Meredith Vieira interrupted Bill Kristol to offer a heartelt defense of Wilson.
Holt began by reminding Wilson of his recent statement that the Libby sentence demonstrates that "this remains a nation of laws, not men."
Holt then lobbed in this question.
NBC HOST LESTER HOLT: Do you still believe that this morning?
Wilson knew just what to do with the hanging curveball:
JOE WILSON: I believe the President has utterly subverted the rule of law and the system of justice that has undergirded this country of ours for the last 220 years. I couldn't give a rat's patootie about the fate of Scooter Libby [yeah, right], other than he was convicted of a jury of his peers; that sentence was reaffirmed by a court of appeals yesterday. What I care about is the President of the United States is short-circuiting our system of justice, and for what reason.
Later, Holt obfuscated the facts surrounding the case.
HOLT: This case began as a hunt for whoever violated national security laws by leaking your wife's name, yet no one was ever charged with that crime. As you know, Scooter Libby was charged and convicted of perjurty. Is your anger over the sentence being commuted, or as you say, an obstruction of justice in the case, or the fact that the prosecutor never really got to the root of this case?
The prosecutor never got to the root of the case? Sure he did. He knew all along that the leaker wasn't Libby, but Richard Armitage over at the State Department.
View video here.
It got worse.
WILSON: The prosecutor made it very clear at the time of the indictment, and you might want to go back and report on that [could Wilson possibly be more pedantic and condescending?], that justice would be served whatever the crime under which Mr. Libby was convicted. There are lots of reasons for his not having being charged with the underlying crime, including the aggressive efforts on the part of his defense team to do what they call "greymail," in other words, insist that the government decide how much classified information it wanted to release relative to the importance of the prosecution. So there're lots of reasons. Al Capone was convicted of tax evasion, but that doesn't mean he was a mobster.
I anticipated Holt's retort. Surely he was going to remind Wilson that the fundamental reason that Libby wasn't charged with leaking was that he was not the leaker. But no, Holt let Wilson go with a "thanks so much."
That's not the kind of journalism I'd come to expect from Holt. Lester, what happened?
BONUS COVERAGE -- Meredith Rides to Wilson's Defense
In the succeeding segment, Meredith Vieira stuck up for good ol' Joe. Interviewing Bill Kristol of the Weekly Standard, Vieira asked whether in not pardoning Libby but only commuting his prison sentence, Pres. Bush had not done enough to satisfy his conservative base. Kristol, who would have wanted a full pardon, nevertheless expressed satisfaction with the commutation, pointing to the fevered reaction to the commutation.
WEEKLY STANDARD'S BILL KRISTOL: Scooter Libby deserved better, but President Bush did the right thing. In politics sometimes you have to take good, and not great, and this was a good decision by the president, a courageous decision. Look at all the screaming and yelling, look at Joe Wilson's ridiculous comments just now, look at Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, look at the New York Times, the Washington Post, the president showed . . .
A clearly incensed Vieira interrupted.
TODAY CO-HOST MEREDITH VIEIRA: Why do you say ridiculous, sir? There are many people who feel that this was a travesty of justice. So those who believe that are ridiculous?
An unperturbed Kristol countered.
KRISTOL: Yeah, I think if they look at the facts, the notion that Scooter Libby should spend 30 months in jail for having a difference in recollection about a conversation with Tim Russert, which is the only thing he was indicted or convicted of is, I do think, ridiculous.
View video here.
Contact Mark at mark@gunhill.net
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
How about these
July 3, 2007 - 07:19 ET by PawpawNDid they even mention any other commutations: http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/pardons6b.htm
Excellent rhetorical questi
July 3, 2007 - 07:20 ET by Mark FinkelsteinExcellent rhetorical question.
Leftwing Heads Exploding
July 3, 2007 - 07:19 ET by P.J. GladnickMeanwhile leftwing heads are exploding over this commutation at the Democrat Underground:
DUmmies Go BERSERK Over Commutation Of Libby Prison Sentence
Civil cases have a way of une
July 3, 2007 - 07:20 ET by Gat New YorkCivil cases have a way of unearthing facts that may not be as easy in criminal cases. I am hoping that Wilson and Flame bring their civil suit because apparently that is the only way these two opportunists and political operatives will be exposed for their deception and lies throughout this matter. I will always be disappointed that Bush did not have Wilson investigated for possible criminal wrong doings in his dealings over Niger.
To do so would be to invite m
July 3, 2007 - 07:32 ET by dscottTo do so would be to invite more charges of cover up by intimidation or reprisal.
“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
Any chance Libby has a civil
July 3, 2007 - 11:06 ET by maggieqpublicAny chance Libby has a civil cause of action against Wilson and Plame (if his appeal succeeds)?
I can't see how. It was the
July 3, 2007 - 11:47 ET by GalvanicI can't see how. It was the government that prosecuted him. Wilson was actually pointing fingers at Rove.
It makes sense to me why Bush
July 3, 2007 - 07:29 ET by dscottIt makes sense to me why Bush had to commute Libby’s sentence, Libby was denied bail while out on appeal. The reason why Bush has of yet not outright pardoned Libby is he believes the legal system will eventually exonerate Libby upon Appeal. Why waste political capital when not necessary in defending yourself against more baseless charges of political cronyism? Basically, a judge by denying bail forced Pres. Bush’s hand to erase the sentence by commutation until such time Libby’s appeal is heard and hopefully exonerated.
Maybe the better question for Holt to ask is who was the judge on the DC Circuit Court who denied Libby bail while out on appeal? Libby is not a flight risk, so in my mind what was the harm or risk? Is this judge known to have political leanings as in being a left over Clinton appointee?
“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
Why waste political capital w
July 3, 2007 - 07:34 ET by drillanwrWhy waste political capital when not necessary in defending yourself against more baseless charges of political cronyism?
I wouldn't play poker with him! LOL!
Ok, Judge Reggie Walton was t
July 3, 2007 - 08:10 ET by dscottOk, Judge Reggie Walton was the judge who did the deed here, he was a Bush appointee, most disappointing. Here is the legal discussion.
It wouldn't be the first time a less than conservative judge slipped through the vetting process, he presided over the Family Law Division in DC, i.e. Divorce Court before his appointment. In my book, Family Law Judges are known for being tough on males but not known for fairness. I'm giving Libby the benefit of the doubt as Walton by his past association with Family Law doesn't give me the warm fuzzies when it comes to an unbiased decision.
“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
Actually the better question
July 3, 2007 - 11:51 ET by GalvanicActually the better question for Holt to ask is: "Since Richard Armitage admitted that it was he who revealed Plame's occupation to Novak, and the Special Prosecutor never charged him with 'outing a covert intel operative,' is there any proof that a crime had even been committed?"
National Security??
July 3, 2007 - 07:30 ET by rhodydroo"This case began as a hunt for whoever violated national security laws..."
Maybe someday they'll try to figure out who leaked the telecom surveillance program and to the New York Times. Or maybe the they go after whoever leaked the financial tracking system we used to have in place. Becuase, you know, finding out who the terrorists are talking to and who are funding them has nothing to do with national security.
Why isn't Patrick 'Leaky' Lea
July 3, 2007 - 07:34 ET by Sergeant ROCKWhy isn't Patrick 'Leaky' Leahy in prison??? I remember seeing Bob Woodward on TV waiving around a 'Secret' document while touting his latest book. If I had done that, I'd be in prison!
Guys, you don't even have to
July 3, 2007 - 07:36 ET by drillanwrGuys, you don't even have to go that far back.
Sandy Burger should be in prison orange and sitting on a soft cushion right now, for pete sakes!!!
There's too many to list. I
July 3, 2007 - 07:46 ET by rhodydrooThere's too many to list. It's so frustrating that these talking heads try to tell us this is all about national security, but when something significant comes up and they can't link it to BushCo, they either ignore it or attempt to explain it away. They're willing to put Libby in jail for 30 months for purjury, but where are the treason charges when our own newspapers are telling our enemies how to avoid getting caught?
Remember when the gov't actually used to go after people who were leaking secrets to the Chinese? Ahh, those were the days...
Chinese? I thought the Klinto
July 3, 2007 - 07:48 ET by Sergeant ROCKChinese? I thought the Klintons and the DNC got away with that?
Before them. You know, when
July 3, 2007 - 07:58 ET by rhodydrooBefore them. You know, when the rule of law actually meant something.
This man and his wife have no
July 3, 2007 - 07:32 ET by drillanwrThis man and his wife have no bounds (or borders) to their MSM whoring.
But we all would expect this from them.
Now, one would think the wife (influential wife) of a former president who herself is running for the office and not only knows full well exactly who her husband granted clemency to or pardoned, but had a hand in it (Oh, PLEASE! YES she DID!) would make only this obvious and honest remark to what Pres. Bush did for Libby yesterday:
Hillary, if she really were the "smartest woman in the world" - While many of us do not agree with what Pres. Bush did for Libby, we all need to remember, the President has the power to do such things, and he is not the firt President to have done so.
`nuff said ... But, no, Hillary had to take the amnesia road. Why? Because she knows the MSM will NOT say Stop the bus ... Let's review what her hubby did ...
Repeat after me: "There'
July 3, 2007 - 07:39 ET by Sergeant ROCKRepeat after me: "There's is no liberal bias in the MSM!"
You mean like Dan Rather clai
July 3, 2007 - 07:42 ET by dscottYou mean like Dan Rather claiming he told the truth about W's national guard service record? He felt it was the truth in his heart so he went with his heart. Facts are so unromantic and unspontaneous.
“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
"I believe in staring in
July 3, 2007 - 07:45 ET by Sergeant ROCK"I believe in staring into the face of reality and denying it."
- Garrison Keillor (famous liberal)
LMAO
July 3, 2007 - 07:52 ET by dscottLMAO
ROCK,How's this one from cons
July 3, 2007 - 07:56 ET by drillanwrROCK,
How's this one from conservative radio talk host Jim Quinn out of Pittsburgh:
"Liberals stand on their heads and tell the rest of the world it's upside down."
LOL! That's hillarious! And D
July 3, 2007 - 08:00 ET by Sergeant ROCKLOL! That's hillarious! And DEAD-ON accurate!!!
What they, the rest of the pu
July 3, 2007 - 07:42 ET by FastEdWhat they, the rest of the pundants, the bloggesphere and dare I say most the NB'ers - this commutation was "pay back" for the demolib failure to pass the immigration bill. Part of the back room deal, between the WH, the blue cat repubs and the demoibs in charge, was the guarantee of "immigration reform and amnesty" to illegal’s, and the carrot was Libby.
This then is a total embarrassment for the demolibs, as Libby goes free due to their incompetence in running the senate - had they been able to get what the pres, and the mass orca wanted, Libby would be sitting in jail - however, since they couldn't deliver on such a simple task, Bush put it to them by making sure he followed through with his part of the deal. Remember, Libby was made into the poster child for all that was wrong with the administration - hence, if the all knowing and powerful Reid & Co., didn't have the juice, then the Libbster skates.
Shame on the demolibs for not fulfilling their part of the deal - it's their fault this happened, so stop with the crocodile tears, you knew it was coming.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
I doubt that Libby's fate had
July 3, 2007 - 11:59 ET by GalvanicI doubt that Libby's fate had anything to do with the failed immigration bill. The prison sentence was irrationally long, and needed to be shortened if not erased. Bush had nothing to lose and everything to gain by commuting the sentence; it was a msart political move. I don't think he's lost any of the support he had at this point, and he's probably recovered some of the conservative support he'd lost.
I also don't buy the explanation some Libs have offered, that Bush had to erase the entire prison sentence, because if Libby went to jail for even a month or two, he'd spill his guts to the press. Libby is a loyal little soldier who knew that at worst, he'd be in jail until Bush's last day in office, and he might have to serve a month or two for appearances. He would never betray Bush or Cheney.
Regardless, in two weeks of less, the Scooter story will have disappeared.
Bill Kristol ROCKS!!!Way to k
July 3, 2007 - 07:49 ET by drillanwrBill Kristol ROCKS!!!
Way to knock off Viera's tin foil hat, Bill!
wilsons
July 3, 2007 - 08:22 ET by jaywlThe worst thing about this, except that Libby didn't get a full pardon, is the we will see the insufferable "Ambassador" Joe Wilson being allowed to spew his nonsense on the MSM. It almost becomes a health issue (heart palipatations) when the so concerned interviewers fail to mention his near censorship for lying to Congress and the lovely Mrs. Ambassador's prevarications about his selection for the mission. An investigation into the true mission of this caper I believe would have led to a much different outcome. After this and the Berger theft I have to believe the dark, sinister forces controlling the world belong not to the right, but the left (or at least they have been better at keeping their mouths shut).
And in the end, it was Wilson
July 3, 2007 - 08:42 ET by jondelwicheAnd in the end, it was Wilson/Plame who forgot the most important issue in being "covert"Taken directly from the latest book, "Covert for Dummies"
Rule #1: Never write Op-eds on the NYT or WaPo;This may cause a loss or any real or imagined covert status.
The outrage from the left o
July 3, 2007 - 08:44 ET by WiggyThe outrage from the left over this is insane. They conveniently forget that Bill Clinton pardoned FALN terrorists http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_pardons_controversy and many other scum including Roger Clinton, Marc Rich and many others http://www.usdoj.gov/pardon/clintonpardon_grants.htm
They are showing the world just how petty they can really be.
Well.. just add this reaction
July 3, 2007 - 09:02 ET by Sergeant ROCKWell.. just add this reaction to all of their other reactions - like Katrina for instance?
The MSM forgot to report the
July 3, 2007 - 09:14 ET by AntiMediaThe MSM forgot to report the cost of this investigation. They never made that mistake with Ken Star.
We could be here all day pres
July 3, 2007 - 09:30 ET by Sergeant ROCKWe could be here all day presenting examples like yours! Good one.
Am I wrong or didn't Plame li
July 3, 2007 - 09:25 ET by paperheadAm I wrong or didn't Plame lie during her testimony while under oath to congress? Why isn't that being investigated? Justice should go both ways. I hope the truth final comes out in the silly civil suit the Wilsons are trying to bring forward. It would do them both good to be embarrassed publically, although I doubt with the MSM in their court, that will happen.
The law only applies to Repub
July 3, 2007 - 09:28 ET by Sergeant ROCKThe law only applies to Republicans.
Plame would only be held in c
July 3, 2007 - 12:01 ET by GalvanicPlame would only be held in contempt if the Senate or Hoouse chose to find her so. No chance of that happening now.
"The exercise of executi
July 3, 2007 - 09:31 ET by paperhead"The exercise of executive clemency is inherently controversial. The reason the framers of our Constitution vested this broad power in the Executive Branch was to assure that the president would have the freedom to do what he deemed to be the right thing, regardless of how unpopular a decision might be."
Former President Bill Clinton editoral, February 18, 2001 in the New York Times
Funny how the left is going apesh*t over this when Bush has pardoned far fewer than either Clinton or Carter. IMO, this whole episode was payback for the Clinton impeachment and the left thought they were going to bring down the entire administration. Now they have absolutely nothing to show for their efforts. Boo hoo, I guess Fitzmas is over!
hmmm, that's not what Mrs. Pr
July 3, 2007 - 19:16 ET by drillanwrhmmm, that's not what Mrs. President Klinton said yesterday ...
Lester Holt/Joe Wilson
July 3, 2007 - 11:47 ET by merlin61This whole case was a waste of our taxpayer money.
Scooter Libby was wrongly convicted and eventually
it will be proven. Hopefully the Pflamer's will go down
in flames.
Lester Holt/Joe Wilson
July 3, 2007 - 11:48 ET by merlin61This whole case was a waste of our taxpayer money.
Scooter Libby was wrongly convicted and eventually
it will be proven. Hopefully the Pflamer's will go down
in flames.