They seem to have no problem with the Sulzburgers using the NY Times to promote their liberal ideology. They have no problem with the recent study that found that journalists donate to liberal organizations 9:1 over conservative organizations thus providing yet another data point to prove that the media is seriously tilted toward leftist ideology (as if there were more needed). Yet they have a problem with a conservative Murdoch.

I posit that it is because the left-wing leadership knows that they have no editorial control over any of Murdoch's media outlets and they are scared that they are about to lose their almost total control of the media.

So...what do left-wing leaders who preach tollerance do in this situation? Why, they engage in personal attacks and defamatory editorials to try and demonize the one they see as their opponent. How very "big tent" of them.

If only President Bush would ask ol' Rupert to make an offer on PBS...

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised if a circus breaks out.

He's the little kid trying to rationalize his own sordid deeds by pointing the finger saying :  "Mommy he did it too"

As LBJ's Press Secretary, he defended the Democrat war in Vietnam and told J. Edgar Hoover to dig up homosexual dirt on Barry Goldwater.

In much the same manner that Dems revere Castro for his longevity as a (now) benevolent dictator, and Jimmy Carter as an elder statesman (though he is really a clear thinking antizionist), Dems love Moyers for his hard hitting liatribes against America.

Lysdexics untie!

Moyers and a couple handful of others of our country's enemy's within, must be assassinated. It's that simple. When the enemy is found they have to be killed. And if anyone here thinks I'm sounding like the wackos at moveon.org, wait a couple more years when the situation is doubly worse than now, and you'll think I wasn't such a nut case after all. When a cancer is found and recognized as such, you kill it quickly before it can metastasize further, or does one wait until it kills it’s host, and only then attack it? Remember Germany in 1934, Stalin, Mao, and others.

What's so utterly hilarious about this whole Bill Moyers circus is that the fever swamps of the Moyers-worshipping left are giving this guy a free pass for many things that they would never give to someone from the "dark side". Just goes to show that George Orwell was right-some of us ARE "more equal" than others!

After all, Mr. Moyers was picked up in the liberal haven of Vermont in 2002 for DUI, and the liberals in charge let him cop a plea to a lesser and far less serious charge of "negligent driving". Can you imagine the outcry if someone from the "dark side" had gotten similar treatment?

In 1964, Moyers, as President Johnson's Chief of Staff, allegedly ordered J. Edgar Hoover to investigate Barry Goldwater's staff for signs of homsexual activity. This was after Johnson aide Walter Jenkins had been arrested in a men's room in DC doing the same thing. If Moyers' counterpart from the "dark side" had been accused of the same thing, the howls of indignation from the leftists would drown out all other noise on the planet.

And speaking of Lyndon, Moyers was the right-hand man for a crook who had been in bed with Halliburton for three decades (at the time). LBJ's long tie to that company makes Dick Cheney's association pale in comparison.

Perhaps it was all that boozing that got DUI Moyers brain into atrophy, but he is the Jimmy Carter of nut case.

I have written of him absolutely looking orgasmic listening to Jon Stewart prattle on like Stewart is delivering the Sermon on the Mount in every burp. Moyers is a man so uncomfortable in his own skin he is suffering from psychosis. Perhaps it is age in being serious about this sick mind or it is being without God's Peace and into liberalism, but the hatred Moyers have for certain people is pathological.

He is no longer thinking, but reacting like Pavlov's dog to names like Cheney, Bush or now Murdoch. People who are simply people and nothing more.

For Moyers to lurch into calling Murdoch, satan, apparently is the new wave of "religion" which uncomfortable liberals going to hell have decided they too like Carter can talk about God, but act like their demonic influenced selves in spewing hatred at "all not their kind" like literal nazism. That is interesting in the past Mario Cuomo tossed about "nazi" labels at people like Pat Buchanan as the low of the low, now regressive Bill Moyers has got "nazi religion" and just like Hitler is spewing the same kind of semitic hate at others in calling people satan.

Oh well, Happy 4th Bill, but honestly your waking up every day having to be you is nothing you will ever be happy about in being lost without a Christian compass to guide you.

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

I find myself in an awkward position. But if I do not post that which I know about the topic of Rupert Murdoch, then I am no better than the main stream media who refuses to be their own persons even if it means at times that they disagree with their own.

So, with the utmost respect, I say the following:

Rupert Murdoch truly is a scoundrel of the worst degree. Most know about him owning FOX, but many do not realize his ties to Pornography, as in he has porn channels (see this WND article). Many also do not know that he is the owner of HarperCollins, which is a parent publishing company that owns many others publishing companies. One of the companies owned by HarperCollins, Zondervan owns the North American rights to the NIV, which many people believe to be a translation, though it is an interpretation and does not claim to be a translation either. (The NIV was commissioned for one reason only, to tap into the money made on the Bible.) Another publishing company that HarperCollins owns puts out the Satanic Bible. If you go to, www.HarperCollins.com, and type in a search on the site for Satanic Bible, you will see it come up.

Nelson books is also owned by HarperCollins. Nelson books owns Promise Keepers and Women of Faith, both are organizations that are using Christianity to sell books. Women of Faith will not even speak against homosexuality, has Dr. Phil's wife as a speaker and promotes her book. (Dr. Phil and his wife had no problem with their son marrying a woman who poses in suggestive porn with her two sisters who she is a triplet with.)

Rupert Murdoch is in control of the main news source that most believe to be conservative, FOX, yet he is clearly anything but conservative. It does not surprise me that Hillary and Bill Clinton would be getting in with Rupert Murdoch. I would think that they are fully aware of the control that Rupert Murdoch has over the conservative media. And I am sure that they seek to use it.

There is only one thing better than destroying the enemy, and that is gaining control over him. Think about it. Rupert Murdoch in a large way owns his enemy, by owning the largest source of conservative news. This is why we see such compromising happening on FOX news. He has his top employees by their livelihoods. Most are not willing to lose their jobs in order to do what is right. He gives them just enough rope so that people watching the news will believe the news to be conservative, but he runs the show.

Do any of you recall the book that O.J. Simpson had written? I believe it was covered here on NBs, the day that Rupert Murdoch fired a top employee for having published the book, AFTER the huge public outcry from both sides of the political coin. AFTER thousands of books had gone to print, and an interview with the high-up in his company had been aired, Rupert Murdoch offered his sacrifice, the employee, by firing her. It was no surprise to Rupert Murdoch that the book was published by HarperCollins. HarperCollins is his baby. Are we really to believe that he did not know prior to the public outcry? He knew full well that it was being published. He only changed his mind and fired the woman after the outcry in order to gain his standing with the public. Had there not been the huge outcry, that book would have stayed on the market and the woman would have been promoted to an even higher position than she already had.

Oh, one more TID-BIT, the WND article shows another interesting bit of info. Rupert Murdoch's church is none other than "Saddleback Church." The church pastor is Rick Warren. Why is this interesting? This is the same church that Obama has spoken at. See this WND article.

Debra...

If it weren't for Fox News, the media would pass off Murdock as "colorful" or "eccentric".  But because he owns Fox News, he must be consigned to the hottest fires of hell, as far as the libs are concerned.

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

SICKO!  

I mean this guy does exactly what Murdoch and yet PBS is not privately owned it's owned by the government and also private donations.

Another LEFT WING NUT CASE to medicate!