Have you noticed online the factual data coming out is like and avanlanche compared to the sand spit of GlobAL Gore on this earth warming nonsense?

After billions spent on pushing this on everyone from our kids in school to the average spud head, the majority has it figured correctly it is just a natural cycle.

With all of the honest assessments now coming out even at the UN and the UN being exposed for skewing data, the prostitutes for profits like Galen McKinley out of the University of Wisconsin are becoming the shrill minority being exposed as money grabbers and cranks.

This begs the question, "Is the global warming funding drying up as it is not working for the globalists as way to rape economies in high fuel prices for their bank accounts and are they now putting their propaganda bucks elsewhere for a "new science" to scam the public?"

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

Kevin Trenberth, an advisor to the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 

DUDE!!! Now you tell us??????  What is this another Sheryl Crow one square tp I was kidding joke???  WE ARE NOT LAUGHING.

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius

What's even stranger is when the data isn't skewed, but the authorities spin it anyway, and few people take notice.

The EU has failed to meet its Kyoto goals, and in fact, its GHG production is increasing at a rate three times faster than the US's (We didn't sign Kyoto, remember).  To put it another way, the EU trend isn't a decreasing curve toward Kyoto numbers; it's an increasing curve away from Kyoto.

Yet, the EU Green gurus insist that they are on track to meet the Kyoto goals.  American greens take those lies, and assert that if the EU can do Kyoto,  we can too.  

No one wants to do the math anymore, I guess. 

Because they never use the word "prediction" they are not engaged in prediction. They only use "what if" projections that are based on certain senarios.

Wow! I'm glad they cleared that up. I was beginning to think that the UN didn't know what was going on and were not in total control of it.

Trenberth: "Who me?  Who the UN IPCC?  We weren't perpetrating 'THE GREAT HOAX'.  That's not what we said.  Everyone misunderstood us."

Like rats fleeing a sinking ship.

So are people who say that IPCC claims the oceans will rise so high. And tempertures will rise so much. As Crow, Bill Nye or the Union of Concerned Scientist. Well are they lying? Are are you lying when you  say the IPCC doesn't make predictions? Either way. Someone is lying.

Or are you using Bill Clintons school of language. Where "I did not have sex with that woman", does not mean oral sex. Or it depends on your definition of the word "IS".

So if you admit there's a bunch of lying going on. So much for all the projections. And the scaring. And the 95% certain. And the "consensus", and all the other BS.

Thank you for this gem.

"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.”   H.L. Mencken

I just wish someone would tell me once and for all how many squares of toilet paper I am supposed to be using.

Steve M is on to them and maybe the IPCC is doing some Damage control before the (Shiite) hit the fan.

Once again, here’s what they were deleting and what they felt was“inappropriate”
to show the public - the post-1960 decline in the Briffa index. (I’ve
shown the IPCC TAR version here but the same deletion is made in AR4).
By deleting the adverse segments, they enhance the rhetorical
impression of the remaining series. Any mining promoter that did this
would be in trouble with the securities commissions.

http://www.climateau...