On the Thursday edition of MSNBC’s "Morning Joe," host Joe Scarborough slammed media outlets, such as AP and The Hill for misrepresenting what Ann Coulter said in her now famous on-air debate with Elizabeth Edwards. He also attempted to set the record straight by playing an extended clip of her appearance on the June 25 "Good Morning America," which started the whole controversy.
But first, Scarborough and contributor Willie Geist derided the misrepresentations of Coulter’s statements from various media outlets:
Joe Scarborough: "I want you to read, Willie, from The Hill, really quickly. Just read this line from The Hill. This is what The Hill and the Associated Press and what other wires are saying about what Ann Coulter said on GMA. Read it, Willie."
Willie Geist: "This week Coulter proclaimed, quote, ‘If I’m going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I’ll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot,’ end quote."
Scarborough then proceeded to replay Coulter’s comments, which were actually an attack on media double standards, in complete context.
A partial transcript of Coulter’s appearance on the June 28 edition of "Morning Joe" follows:
8:35am
Joe Scarborough: "Let’s bring on now the Edwards, really, biggest helper in the Democratic primary, Ann Coulter. Ann, thank you so much for being with us."
Ann Coulter: "Sure, anytime. Hello, Joe."
Scarborough: "Ann, you– First hour. Willie Geist and I made the mistake of actually suggesting that people should actually hear the entire GMA clip. And I swear to God, seriously, we got flooded with e-mails comparing us, you know, calling us basically Satan’s little helper. So– Ann, I want–"
Coulter: "Oh, you just did that to get higher ratings for your show."
Scarborough: "Well, actually, do we have the Paris Hilton– Ann, can I hold you right there? We have Paris Hilton right now in an elevator somewhere. Ann, let's start at the very beginning. That’s a very good place to start. Ann, talk about the GMA interview. Elizabeth Edwards called in and said she was very offended by your GMA interview because you suggested said the only time you would talk about her husband was when you were going to suggest that he was going to be killed by a terrorist attack, that he should be killed in a terrorist attack. Why would you say such an awful, awful thing about John Edwards?"
Coulter: "Yeah, that is how it's being reported by the AP, apparently all over NBC except on your show and Donny Deutsch’s. CNN, the AOL pop-up page, because liberals lie. I've written lots of books about it. And this happens to be a good example of it."
Scarborough: "Okay, but Ann, I think sometimes you give people too much credit. When you make references to Isaiah Washington at CPAC, from ‘Grey’s Anatomy,’ when you make references to Bill Maher."
Coulter: "I described the entire Bill Maher scenario in one sentence. If the ‘Good Morning America’ audience, which is pretty large and pretty broad, gets the joke and no one figured out a way to truncate that sentence until 36 hours later, I mean, it’s not like the liberal blogs weren’t, as they always do, watching my appearance and, and, and instantly posting from the moment I walked off ‘Good Morning America,’ all of their indignation, which apparently centered on my comparing George Bush to FDR because he’s great on foreign policy, lousy on domestic policy. Nobody even thought of how to lie about what I said for 36 hours. So don't tell me I was giving them ammunition. And if you want to go back to CPAC, I was speaking to a group of 7,000 college Republicans and no, I will not be arranging my words so that the stupidest person in the liberal blogosphere understands what I'm saying."
Scarborough: "Okay. Okay, so now this is what we want to do. What we want to do– I want you to read, Willie, from The Hill, really quickly. Just read this line from The Hill. This is what The Hill and the Associated Press and what other wires are saying about what Ann Coulter said on GMA. Read it, Willie."
Willie Geist: "This week Coulter proclaimed, quote, ‘If I’m going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I’ll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot,’ end quote."
Scarborough: "So if I’m reading this, I’m thinking that Ann Coulter is calling for the assassination of John Edwards."
Geist: "Of course."
Scarborough: "But then, I decide I’m actually going to see what Ann Coulter said. And this is what I’m saying, my friends, hey if you’re going to hate Ann Coulter, hate her for the right reasons. Now, let’s run the GMA clip that started this firestorm."
[GMA clip begins]
Chris Cuomo: "To begin with the tough words, some tough words for you by the three top candidates in response to what you had said, some were calling it a homosexual slur, you said it was a taunt. They all came out when you were talking about John Edwards and said this was wrong. We must deny it. Fair criticism of you, or a shift towards the tolerant among the GOP?"
Ann Coulter: "No, no, I was denounced all over. All over. I think the one that hurt the most was from ‘I'm a little girl in a pink party dress.com.’ Very upsetting."
Cuomo: "Why?"
Coulter: "Though about the same time, Bill Maher said– And, by the way I did not call John Edwards the F-word. I said I couldn’t talk about him because you could go into rehab for using that word."
Cuomo: "You said you were joking. You were joking."
Coulter: "Oh, yeah. Yeah. I wouldn't, I wouldn’t insult gays by comparing them to John Edwards. That would be mean. But about the same time, you know, Bill Maher was not joking and saying he wished Dick Cheney had been killed in a terrorist attack. So, I’ve learned my lesson. If I’m going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I’ll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot."
Cuomo: "So let's get off of you, but let's get your view on what’s going on with the party right now. You hear what the speculation is, you know what the poll numbers are."
[GMA clip ends]
Scarborough: "All right. So, actually– You know, go ahead ad cut that. Actually, Ann, we could have just shown three seconds before the quote in question, where, where three seconds before the quote that has been yanked out by the AP and everybody else, you bring up Bill Maher and the fact when I was on with Bill Maher, Bill Maher suggested that if Dick Cheney had be killed in an al Qaeda terror attack, the world would be a better place."
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Mornin Joe
June 28, 2007 - 15:14 ET by RJI saw this. The show did a good job of showing how virtually every major media outlet used Coulter's comments out of context.
Some were so obvious that they had to have been deliberate.
Scarborough said, scornfully, something to the effect of "go ahead and hate Coulter if you want, but at least do it intelligently."
The quotes have been taken
June 28, 2007 - 15:19 ET by balboaThe quotes have been taken out of context, that's for sure. It's just a sloppy, easier way to attract attention to a page/newscast.
Not sure if you mean that as a defense, bal
June 28, 2007 - 15:27 ET by RJNot sure if you mean that as a defense, bal. But even if used as a way to get attention, they haven't been following up with a clarification, making them dishonest.....and I'm shocked. ;^>
Not a defense, just how I t
June 28, 2007 - 15:33 ET by balboaNot a defense, just how I think they run things.
It's not sloppier and easier.
June 28, 2007 - 16:02 ET by GalvanicIt's not sloppier and easier. It would'e been easier for GMA to play the tape as it was recorded. People actually have to do some editing in order to create the out-of-context clip they aired. Nothing easy about that.
Hi RJ....One of those morning
June 28, 2007 - 15:28 ET by bigtimerHi RJ....
One of those mornings I happen to miss that...I usually flip it around a lot...may have slept in if it was on during the first hour which is four a.m. here...I stayed up too long on here...lol.
...anyway, I am glad to see somebody set this straight and let Ann have her say, even if it took Scarborough to do it...every once in awhile he may do something sane on msnbc...that is if he doesn't get fired.
Kind of kidding with respect to Ann...somebody was smart enough to know she is a rating getter that works for msnbc, and I know it couldn't be Mika.
The despicable msm will keep this BS up....I am already past sick of this now myself....
Seems there are other more important things happening in this country...oh well...nothing new with attention span of some.
Hi BT
June 28, 2007 - 15:34 ET by RJHi BT. Haven't been online much lately, so I don't know if it's been discussed, but the Edwards camp haven't been very good at keeping their story straight on this (i.e. they're a couple of lying pigs). It keeps me laughing at them, but I also recognize that many on the left suck it all in and believe every word....hence the spike in their donations.
(i.e. they're a couple of lyi
June 28, 2007 - 15:43 ET by bigtimer(i.e. they're a couple of lying pigs).
Sums it all up perfectly RJ.
I have written tons on it from day one...while Ann was on live I happened to be posting on here...I was describing some of the BS ect...
It hasn't stopped since Elizabeth made that phonier than hell set-up phone call....all planned and guided by her and Edwards, they also knew what the msm would do...both have used there sons death for campaigning since I can remember....numerous times.
Elizabeth is just a wanna be Hillary...via their husbands...she will do anything to see that he gets in whether she is sick or not....everyone knows her case is terminal...so what... she is still playing blood-sport and fooling only some.
Simple as that.
I even just posted somewhere here about a half hour ago about how I feel and summed it all up.
Do you know how insanely di
June 28, 2007 - 15:31 ET by mulerider24Do you know how insanely difficult it is to make Ann Coulter into the victim? That tells you the level of bias we're talking about here, where one of the most thick-skinned political figures in our country is getting defended on MSNBC.
It kind of reminds me of watching "Jerry Maguire" and finding myself feeling sorry for a sports agent.
"Ann Coulter said in her
June 28, 2007 - 15:35 ET by Dave High"Ann Coulter said in her now famous on-air debate with Elizabeth Edwards”
Scott:
Try to be honest in your writing. It was a very successful media ratings grab, not a debate.
Regards, Dave High
Truth is to conservatives as salt is to snails.
Try to be intelligent, dave high
June 28, 2007 - 15:41 ET by RJTry to be intelligent, dave high.
de bate: 2. To engage in argument...
Regards,
RJ
Dave High and intelligence do
June 28, 2007 - 15:46 ET by bigtimerDave High and intelligence do not mix.
IMHO...
Regards,
bt
RJ:I will concede the point.
June 28, 2007 - 15:52 ET by Dave HighRJ:
I will concede the point. It was primarily a very succesful media grab for ratings, though. I think we could both agree on this. No love fest here, just note when I am wrong, I concede.
Regards, Dave High
Thanks, dave
June 28, 2007 - 15:57 ET by RJThanks, dave...so noted.
It WAS a three-way ratings grab, and successful for all three parties. Even Coulter's book sales have spiked, in spite of the media playing her for the bad guy by deliberate misrepresentation.
Regards,
RJ
Dave,Why do you assume the tw
June 28, 2007 - 20:22 ET by Scott WhitlockDave,
Why do you assume the two are mutually exclusive? While what transpired was certainly an attempt to boost ratings and the fund-raising totals for the Edwards campaign, a debate certainly took place. There's nothing dishonest in what I wrote.
Scott: he was just being.....dave high
June 29, 2007 - 09:14 ET by RJScott: he was just being.....dave high.
Also notice that, even though he admitted he was wrong, he didn't apologize to you...and I'm shocked. ;^>
Regards,
RJ
What's really scary to thin
June 28, 2007 - 15:43 ET by ckc1227What's really scary to think about is there was a time in this country's history that nonsense like this went unchallenged, and the uninformed masses bought into everything they were told hook, line and sinker. One can only imagine how many lies were delivered to the American public during that time.
Some how I don't believe this
June 28, 2007 - 19:33 ET by general companySome how I don't believe this country has ever seen this kinda nonsense before. Folks used to have a conscious. Plus if the lies were so rampant, I believe we would have some pretty good example other then Rather's Bush documents
Just got this in email by A
June 28, 2007 - 15:59 ET by MightyMouthJust got this in email by Ann Coulter:
From now on, I'm attacking only serious presidential candidates, like Dennis
Kucinich.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Ann actually is wrong when
June 28, 2007 - 16:06 ET by balboaAnn actually is wrong when she says that "Bill Maher was not joking and saying he wished Dick Cheney had been killed in a terrorist attack." Bill never said that, in the same way that Ann never called Edwards a faggot. Bill said "I’m just saying if he did die, other people, more people would live. That’s a fact"
Well Ann did call Edwards a
June 28, 2007 - 16:11 ET by MightyMouthWell Ann did call Edwards a faggot and Maher did wish Cheney dead. What am I missing?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Balboa:I know how this all go
June 28, 2007 - 18:13 ET by stratmanBalboa:
I know how this all got started concerning John Edwards alluded to as a "faggot".
Based on a compilation ot actual events, imagine...
Jon Stewart: Welcome to The Daily Show. I'm your host Jon Stewart fresh from my yogurt colonic rehab stint in jolly old England. Tonight we have exclusive video of an interview with Mrs. John Edwards. I know you'll enjoy it, so let's roll tape.
(Video taped interview of Jon and Mrs. Edwards kibbutzing on her sprawling mansion's rear deck)
Stewart: Mrs. Edwards, you recently attended a function where you were the keynote speaker at the Alice B. Toklas Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Democratic Club to kick off San Francisco's Gay Pride Week. Kind of a coming out event for you to flex your campaign trail muscles, so to speak, huh?.
Mrs. Edwards: Why yes, Jon. Thank you for that lovely introduction. Mind if I use that on our website to help raise money for my husband's campaign?
Stewart: By all means, glad to help your cause any way I can. But let me get down to brass tacks. You were quoted as saying "John has been pretty clear about it, that he is very conflicted," and "I'm completely comfortable with gay marriage.''
Mrs. Edwards: Yes, "I'm completely comfortably with gay marriage."
Stewart: So John's conflicted but you're ok?
Mrs. Edwards: Yes, I'm completely comfortably with gay marriage.
Stewart: You, John and you, ...you're comfortable with gay marriage?
Mrs. Edwards: Yes, completely comfortable.
(muffled voice heard off camera, possibly from the next door neighbor forced to sell his property since the taxes went sky high after the Edwards' moved in)
Stewart: "Yeah, why isn’t John Edwards making this call?"
Mrs. Edwards: "I haven’t talked to John about this call. I’m making the call as a mother."
(end video interview)
Stewart: There you have it folks. John Edwards still conflicted and Momma Edwards calling the shots in whatever they call their marriage. We'll be right back after I smoke a fag.
(All italicized quotes are verbatim from Mrs. Edwards)
You know, the MSM is a busine
June 28, 2007 - 16:01 ET by drillanwrYou know, the MSM is a business for profit. They claim to be in the business of informing the people ... which is their product (hence, producers).
We wouldn't accept a misrepresented product, a defective product, a faulty or dangerous product. Companies are taken to court everyday for these types of consumer trust violations.
The MSM (especially the news programs) fit into everyone of those violations. I think it's time they were taken to court too.
Drill,I Like that idea! If
June 28, 2007 - 16:08 ET by ViperDrill,
I Like that idea! If 54M for a pants issue can make it to court, your idea should be a slam dunk! Where are the sharks when there is actually a productive thing for them to do?
drill,I wish everyone in the
June 28, 2007 - 18:57 ET by Chris Normandrill,
I wish everyone in the viewing public could read and be armed with the info found here on NewsBusters, then "let the buyer beware".
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
Wouldn't it be a beautiful wo
June 28, 2007 - 19:02 ET by bigtimerWouldn't it be a beautiful world Chris?
LOL...
Well at least it would help some anyway....
It's official
June 28, 2007 - 16:57 ET by c5thenThe far left moonbats have take over most of the old MSM outlets just as they have coopted the democratic party.
The true hypocrisy is that Edwards is using the misleading clip to raise money on his web site.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic
For all the good that will do
June 28, 2007 - 17:07 ET by Chris NormanFor all the good that will do him. Does he really think he stands a chance against the Clinton juggernaut?
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
Exactly, I hope all the Dems
June 28, 2007 - 19:46 ET by general companyExactly, I hope all the Dems send their cash to that a$$. Maybe that house of his will get so big he wont be able to find his way out.
Like the house in Stephen Kin
June 28, 2007 - 19:54 ET by Chris NormanLike the house in Stephen King's "Rose Red"? That was a mini-series where I looked madly for the remote so I could get out... :)
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
Knowing how much he likes to
June 29, 2007 - 08:31 ET by kathleenirishKnowing how much he likes to look in the mirror, maybe he already has a hard time getting out of that place. Much like a funhouse at a carnival.
Anyone who says they support the troops but not the mission is a liar.
I just caught up with the las
June 28, 2007 - 17:49 ET by Gat New YorkI just caught up with the last two days and saw that most of the posts had to do with Ann Coulter and the Edwards clan. Ann Coulter isn't running for President an Edwards doesn't have a chance in heck to even place second. So it's enough!
I think we should focus on more substantive issues like Paris Hilton. Does anyone see the humor in Paris feeling that she was violated because she had to take off her clothes in front of others in jail? How is that different than flooding the internet of yourself naked and having sex?
GNY...You have me roaring wit
June 28, 2007 - 17:54 ET by bigtimerGNY...
You have me roaring with laughter here!
...thanks...
Something just came to memory
June 28, 2007 - 18:05 ET by drillanwrSomething just came to memory. Setting up guests on Spitball is not unusual for Matthews to do. Back during the 2004 presidential campaigns Matthews invited Michelle Malkin on the show to discuss her newly released (at the time) book regarding the Japanese internments in this country during WWII.
Instead, he had invited the head Swiftboat Vet (Darn! I forgot his name) on whose also newly released book against John Kerry was making tidal waves. Matthews, instead of discussing Malkin's book with her, demanded she defend and justify the other guy's book. Yes, Matthews and his producers had gotten Malkin on the show under false pretenses.
Yep...I remember that well to
June 28, 2007 - 18:13 ET by bigtimerYep...I remember that well too drill...it was absolutely despicable.
This whole thing was a set-up and Matthews producer used to work for CNN too if I remember correctly...that set this up with the Edwards.
Her name escapes me at the moment but I know who she is...they had it on one of these blogs somewhere Tammy something...she has been around quite awhile...
That's why every conservative
June 28, 2007 - 19:00 ET by Chris NormanThat's why every conservative should think twice before accepting an appearance on Matthews' show - or for that matter, any show on MSNBC.
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
Chris: Well, at least until t
June 28, 2007 - 19:30 ET by Mica the MagnificentChris: Well, at least until the 'Fairness Doctrine' is applied to cable t.v. opinion shows, and Chrissy introduces his conservative counterpart for rebuttal : Eugene T. Ernhopple, a conservative, speech impaired Starbucks janitor from Moosebreath, Sasketchewan, Canada.
Fair and Balanced
She said, "John, first of all I want to thank you for serving in Vietnam, and secondly, if talk radio wasn't around I'd be picking new linens in the White House and would have become something other than a f**king catsup heiress! - - John Kerry's reason for introducing the Fairness Doctrine and the cause of his nightsweats
Mica,We discussed this yester
June 28, 2007 - 19:42 ET by Chris NormanMica,
We discussed this yesterday. I suggested that all conservatives and Republicans (not the same) stay off MSNBC, even though I knew that never would happen. Still, it would be an interesting experiment, to watch what they'd do without live material to beat up on. Matthews would be left sputtering with his all liberal guests until there was nothing left to talk about and no one to debate. It would expose what's the reality anyway: MSNBC is for Liberals - by Liberals.
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
stay off MSNBC?
June 28, 2007 - 20:44 ET by Cool ArrowConservatives are not cowards that they should fear a 3rd rate hack nest like MSNBC. God save us from being the cowering mindless lemmings Liberals are when it comes to perceived hostile territory.
We can stand up to Iraq, let's not hide from Matthews
Not a matter of being a cowar
June 29, 2007 - 14:36 ET by Chris NormanNot a matter of being a coward, CA. It's a matter of picking the best place to get the message out. Why waste the time going into a fight that no viewer is intersted in seeing you win? It's not a matter of being afraid, but exposing MSNBC for what it is. Tough talk doesn't change things.
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
Sounds like what the lefties
June 29, 2007 - 14:38 ET by florida_chadSounds like what the lefties are trying to do with FOX. I agree with Cool Arrow. Keep going on the program. R's should not fear a channel.
}}----> Chris
June 29, 2007 - 14:40 ET by Cool ArrowI like to believe every entrance into the MSM arena by Ann Coulter opens the eyes of a few listeners who see the truth and can no longer live with the lie that is Liberalism.
Setup???
June 29, 2007 - 01:31 ET by piniellaSetting up guests on Spitball is not unusual for Matthews to do.
There was no setup. Coulter was told that Elizabeth planned to call in and Coulter agreed to take the call.
SHUSTER:...So how did the Ann Coulter/Elizabeth Edwards confrontation happen? Before Tuesday`s HARDBALL appearance, MSNBC promoted that viewer comments and questions would be part of the program.
TAMMY HADDAD, EXECUTIVE PRODUCER, HARDBALL: The Edwards campaign called to ask if it was possible that Elizabeth could talk to Ann Coulter live on the air, and we told them yes.
SHUSTER: In turn, Haddad had a conversation with Coulter.
HADDAD: I talked to Ann before the show and told her that we had gotten a call from the Edwards campaign and that Elizabeth might call in. And she was fine with it.
SOURCE: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19482788/
HADDAD: I talked to Ann befor
June 29, 2007 - 10:38 ET by drillanwrHADDAD: I talked to Ann before the show and told her that we had gotten a call from the Edwards campaign and that Elizabeth might call in. And she was fine with it.
Yes, and Coulter is saying it was while she was on her way to her seat on the set ...
That's WHY it's called blind-sided because Mrs. Edwards had time to prepare for her [side] and Coulter had to fly by the seat of her thong ... and did beautifully (if Matthews could ever shut his mouth WHILE she was speaking ... He was capable of it. He didn't mumble a word when Edwards was flapping away with her I'm a very polite Southern lady victim crap ...)
}}----> Ambush
June 29, 2007 - 10:54 ET by Cool ArrowAmbush: Great name for Ann's next megamillion seller
Interesting to me is that this was Elizabeth Edwards at her prepared best.
And this was John Boy hiding behind his woman's skirt. Tell me this weasel isn't effeminate. (see also faggot)
cool,I was a kid in the 1960s
June 29, 2007 - 11:08 ET by drillanwrcool,
I was a kid in the 1960s. faggot was meant as you mentioned above. Heck, we even said it to someone while in ear-shot of grown ups! faggot back then did not call into question someone's sexual preference, but their lack of strength ... and at most times called into question nothing ... It just sounded nasty. Perhaps there was, at the time the homosexual meaning to the word, but us kids didn't know that.
As for the instance of Coulter calling Edwards a faggot ... Never happened. The meaning she was implying came on the direct heels of, (and was meant to smackdown the run off to rehab because someone doesn't like what you said), the black actor on Grey's Anatomy having allegedly used that word to another G.A. actor on the set who was gay. Again another example of Coulter not only being taken out of context, but the MSM and the like too stupid to hear and understand exactly what she was saying.
Yet, another instance of a certain group hijacking a word. Queer used to be used to describe how you felt just before something really bad happened while inside a dark haunted house. Gay used to describe being carefree and happy.
}}----> Cigarette
June 29, 2007 - 11:12 ET by Cool ArrowFaggot used to be a cigarette.
v to }}}--->>>
June 29, 2007 - 11:23 ET by vrwc13Hadn't heard of that one but there are many uses of faggot.
v
Men stumble over the truth from time to time, but most pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing happened. -Winston Churchill.
I had heard once that the ter
June 29, 2007 - 11:28 ET by drillanwrI had heard once that the term faggot became connected with homosexuals because they used to be burned at the stake when discovered (England). One of my dictionaries defines faggot as a bundle of sticks or twigs ... Which would explain nick-naming burning homosexuals as faggots, as they would be standing atop many bundles.
BTW, calling Edwards faggot w
June 29, 2007 - 11:30 ET by drillanwrBTW, calling Edwards faggot wouldn't be too far off. He's dumb as a bundle of twigs ...
Defelction, not double standards
June 29, 2007 - 01:28 ET by piniellaScarborough then proceeded to replay Coulter’s comments, which were actually an attack on media double standards, in complete context.
Coulter tried to defend her remark about Edwards by whining "But Billy Maher did it too!" Is she like 5 years old?
You whine."The urge to s
June 29, 2007 - 07:54 ET by danboYou whine.
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.” H.L. Mencken
True. The thing is, Coulter
June 29, 2007 - 08:23 ET by sarcasmoTrue. The thing is, Coulter's remark would have been funnier IMO if -- instead of invoking terrorists -- she'd invoked what actually killed Edwards' chances at the Presidency. That YouTube hairdo-video of him, combined with the $400 price of his haircuts. By comparison, a terrorist attack (unless successful) would actually help his campaign.
JMR
What is most offensive about
June 29, 2007 - 08:59 ET by Gat New YorkWhat is most offensive about Edwards and that whole skit is how he throws in his wife who has incurable form of cancer as a sympathetic figure with the specific purpose of painting Coulter as an evil witch. Edwards and that gas bag Matthews whould both be ashamed of themselves (but they're not).
I only wonder if Ann's goin
June 29, 2007 - 09:04 ET by sarcasmoI only wonder if Ann's going to be allowed to call in (well prepped, of course) in the next Edwards appearance on softball? Anyone making odds? I'd say this longshot's worth about 100 to 1...
JMR
Well you know it won't happen
June 29, 2007 - 09:23 ET by Gat New YorkWell you know it won't happen on FoxNews because of the Democratic trade embargo on anything to do with Murdoch and Fox. What I would like to see is Bill O'Reilly cold call Edwards and ask why he will not appear and do the same with all the Dem candidates. Put them on the spot.
Funnier yes but not any more
June 29, 2007 - 10:37 ET by DanKentonFunnier yes but not any more credible. Ann Coulter easily hurts the GOP with her infantile antics. The Democrats could not have asked for a better saboteur.
And Ann Coulter is announci
June 29, 2007 - 10:46 ET by MightyMouthAnd Ann Coulter is announcing her candidacy, when?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
No candidacy necessary. She
June 29, 2007 - 13:57 ET by DanKentonNo candidacy necessary. She simply becomes the unofficial voice of the conservative right and taints the entire party. Don't think so? Why does the MSM dedicate so much face time for her? It's not because of that cocktail dress I can assure you.
}}----> Ann Coulter
June 29, 2007 - 14:03 ET by Cool ArrowWhat was that she said on Oreilly about being more man than any of the Libs?
Much better than the voices o
June 29, 2007 - 14:05 ET by JerryMuch better than the voices of the (D) party... Cindy Sheehan, Larry Flynt, Rosie O'Donnell, Michael Moore, etc.
When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).
Actually the MSM doesn't gi
June 29, 2007 - 14:14 ET by MightyMouthActually the MSM doesn't give her much face time. She gets most of it from cable, blogs and some print media. She has her own little "nitch" so to speak amonst those who are more politically minded. The average ABC watcher probably doesn't have much of an opinion on her other than that she is controversial.
I think you would be hard pressed to prove that Rush has been de-throned as the "unoffical" voice of the conservative right and Ann put in his place.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
With the likes of Michael M
June 29, 2007 - 10:56 ET by sarcasmoWith the likes of Michael Moore around, credibility has become a relative term, in that familiar bipartisan way...
JMR
You seem to forget that the s
June 29, 2007 - 14:02 ET by DanKentonYou seem to forget that the scales are not balanced when it comes to ethics in politics. Yes, they all lie, cheat and steal but how many Democrats resign as a result of their actions? The "party of principles" never applied to the left.
Sounds like more "please like me" politics
June 29, 2007 - 14:09 ET by RJYour position on Coulter sounds like more "please like me" politics, as practiced by too many conservatives.
And the witless morons on the
June 29, 2007 - 09:47 ET by BeowulfAnd the witless morons on the left are spewing their "concern" about conservative talk radio? Why isn't DiFi stomping on her hanky about the "one-sided" reporting on this issue?
The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers
They want to be very selectiv
June 29, 2007 - 09:51 ET by Gat New YorkThey want to be very selective about who this pertains to which is only radio and leave out television broadcast news and the print media which are enormously left wing.
}}----> DiFi on fairness
June 29, 2007 - 11:22 ET by Cool ArrowThe argument Libs put up for "Fairness Doctrine" is evidence they don't understand.
Conservative Talk is big because We The People choose to endorse it. Libs want to create an artificial Demand for LibTalk as a means of steering We The People away from our beliefs and morals.
When Demand is artificially legislated, NAMBLA, American Nazi, and Al Jazeera have every right to claim it.
OK, Al Jazeera may not be a good example. It's redundancy with CNN and all.