CBS’s "The Early Show" followed the other morning shows on June 28 to basically give free air time to the Edwards campaign. Anchor Harry Smith, who rarely, if ever, gives Republicans or conservatives a free ride, ran a largely softball interview to Elizabeth Edwards and her recent confrontation with Ann Coulter.
At the start, Smith labeled Ann Coulter a "conservative political commentator," but no label in front of Elizabeth Edwards.
The CBS anchor did ask a few mildly challenging questions such as using Coulter as a fund raising ploy, and why she called in and not Edwards. However, as Mrs. Edwards called for "speaking out against the language," Smith did not ask why she did not speak out against the hateful language of her own campaign staffers. Back in February, when questioned by Wolf Blitzer about his anti-Catholic blogger Amanda Marcotte, Edwards dismissed the criticism as coming "particularly from the far right."
Also, notable is that "The Early Show," while pounding Ann Coulter, never mentioned some of Rosie O’Donnell’s extreme statements.
The entire transcript is below.
HARRY SMITH: Conservative political commentator Ann Coulter is known for making outrageous comments. This week, she said Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards should be killed in a terrorist assassination plot. We'll explain that more in a second. During a cable talk show, Edwards' wife Elizabeth decided to call Coulter on her comments.
ELIZABETH EDWARDS: I'm asking you politely to stop -- to stop personal attacks --
ANN COULTER: How about you stop raising money on your web page then?
EDWARDS: It did not--
COULTER: No, you don't have to because I don't mind --
EDWARDS: It did not start with that. You had a column a number of years ago.
COULTER: The wife of a presidential candidate is calling me asking me to stop speaking?
SMITH: Elizabeth Edwards is here to talk about that heated exchange. Elizabeth, good morning.
EDWARDS: Good morning, Harry.
SMITH: Good to be with you. Let me just explain a little bit. Because Coulter was on a talk show earlier this week, on a morning show. And basically, when she was being asked about this lame joke she had made about your husband earlier this year, kind of an inference about him -- him being gay or something, Coulter comes back and says, well, "Bill Maher was not joking, saying he wished Dick Cheney had been killed in a terrorist attack, so I've learned my lesson. If I'm going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I'll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot." So later in the week then, she pops up with Chris Matthews. I guess you said you were not going to stand still anymore and you decided to call in. What point were you trying to get across?
EDWARDS: Just that we have an obligation to the political process, to our children, that there were a lot of young people listening to that show that day, to Chris Matthews. And we had an obligation to speak out against this change in our political dialogue. It didn't used to be all right for people to call names, to say these hateful kind of things but we've allowed it to happen. And as a participant in the process and as a parent, I objected. I know, you know, I object as a mother. You and John were both fathers of the year this year, congratulations, and I know that you care about the political atmosphere in which your children are raised. I think we have to speak out.
SMITH: What she said then is how can you be making this criticism if you then used some of the sound -- her own words on your website to help raise money? Is there a -- are you applying a double standard?
EDWARDS: Well, I think that we're trying to do is to say we have a choice here as an American public. We can choose this. And we say that this choice is this kind of language. And, yes, we do -- we do show you what it is we're asking you to reject, or you could embrace a campaign of ideas.
SMITH: Right.
EDWARDS: And this is really a call for people to be engaged in the process, either by speaking out against the language, by getting engaged in campaigns, ours or other campaigns, campaigns of substance.
SMITH: The other question that comes up is why didn't John call in?
EDWARDS: Well, you know, I don't know whether -- we've both been dancing as fast as we can at the end of the fund-raising quarter. I don't know whether he heard what Ann Coulter said. But honestly, I wrote a letter -- which I wish I'd sent in 2003, objecting to a column she wrote making fun of the death of Charlie Dean, poking fun --
SMITH: Your son, yes.
EDWARDS: -- At the Gephardts and their son's cancer. Making fun of Ted Kennedy and his murdered brothers.
SMITH: We got to go --
EDWARDS: And poking fun of Wade, my son who died.
SMITH: And enough is enough, alright. Mrs. Edwards, thank you so much. Take care.
EDWARDS: Absolutely, thank you.
SMITH: We'll be back.





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Ok, first of all Liz, Ann Cou
Thu, 06/28/2007 - 11:54 ET by HypocriteHaterOk, first of all Liz, Ann Coulter is not an elected official. So even if Edwards were to win the presidency, Ann isn't going away and she won't stop speaking the way she speaks, no matter how much money you raise using her name.
Secondly, have you seen even a fraction of the vicious vitriol that's written and spoken about our current president and do you ever see Laura out there whining about it on Fox News? No.
So, once again, Balboa doesn'
Thu, 06/28/2007 - 12:03 ET by Chris NormanSo, once again, Balboa doesn't get the chance to learn if Mrs. Edwards was offended by comments from the bloggers on her husband's campaign staff. I'm just certain she'll express it someday.
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
I have no respect , nor sympa
Thu, 06/28/2007 - 12:22 ET by mattmI have no respect , nor sympathy for Mrs. Edwards any more. She is allowing herself to be used as a sympathetic player in a politically motivated character assassination campaign which is based on deceit. She is either complicit in the deceit or she is a blooming idiot.
The concern of those who are using Mrs. Edwards is not really the "colorful" nature of Coulter's commentary, but with its content and persuasiveness. They can't counter her with facts, so they try to destroy her personally. Their whole crusade against Coulter is a hypocritical lie.
This smells of the Clinton Machine, if you ask me....
mattm,After seeing the Liz Ed
Thu, 06/28/2007 - 13:24 ET by drillanwrmattm,
After seeing the Liz Edwards's picture on this thread and the thread before it (ABC) I wonder why the campaign managers didn't have her dressed in her "sick" robe and looking weary from all the stress this victimhood has caused her ...
"It didn't used to be al
Thu, 06/28/2007 - 20:05 ET by Republic1"It didn't used to be all right for people to call names, to say these
hateful kind of things but we've allowed it to happen. And as a
participant in the process and as a parent, I objected."
Ah, yes. I remember well her objections to the hateful and inaccurate comments by Bill Maher, Al Franken, Howard Dean, Keith Olbermann, Jon Stewart, Chris Matthews, George Clooney, Barbara Streisand, any reporter from the NY Times, LA Times, or WaPo (just name one), Alec Baldwin, Michael Moore, Al Sharpton, Rosie O'Donnell, Joy Behar, Richard Gere,...etc, etc, etc. Oh, hang on a second-- she's been silent as all these folks spewed their bile. Apparently, saying hateful things isn't a problem if a liberal does it. I do have some sympathy for her though. She's married to a man too cowardly to face a debate moderated by Fox News. That can't be easy.
"Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him." -Muhammad