One of the standard liberal memes on immigration is that everyone who is opposed to laxer immigration laws is a racist. Normally, this is just an undercurrent in elite media reportage, not so in this New York Times article which portrays helpless Senate Republicans beset by a racist mob:
The recipient was Senator Mel Martinez, Republican of Florida, who has been a leading advocate of the proposed legislation for changing the immigration system. His offices in Washington and across Florida have received thousands of angry messages in recent weeks, but nothing as alarming as that letter he received at his home.
“I’ll turn it over to Capitol police, and we’ll go from there,” said Mr. Martinez, who declined to elaborate on the nature of the threat.Story Continues Below Ad ↓
On the eve of a crucial vote on the immigration bill, the Capitol Hill switchboard was deluged again Wednesday as thousands of citizens called their members of Congress — and, perhaps, someone else’s — to weigh in. Not since the impeachment of President Bill Clinton, several Senate aides said, have the lines been so jammed by a single issue.
Republicans who support the immigration bill are facing unusually intense opposition from conservative groups fighting it. This is among the first times, several of them said, that they have felt the full brunt of an advocacy machine built around conservative talk radio and cable television programs that have long buttressed Republican efforts to defeat Democrats and their policies.
While the majority of the telephone calls and faxes, letters and e-mail messages have been civil, aides to several senators said, the correspondence has taken a menacing tone in several cases.Story Continues Below Ad ↓
That fig leaf is a little snug, isn't it?
Senator Richard Burr, a North Carolina Republican who is undecided on the final immigration bill, said his office received a telephone call recently that “made a threat about knowing where I lived.” Mr. Burr passed it along to the authorities. “There were enough specifics to raise some alarm bells,” he said.
Senator Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican who is one of the architects of the immigration overhaul, said he also had received threats in telephone calls and letters to his office. Mr. Graham said several other senators had told him privately that they also received similar messages.
“There’s racism in this debate,” Mr. Graham said. “Nobody likes to talk about it, but a very small percentage of people involved in this debate really have racial and bigoted remarks. The tone that we create around these debates, whether it be rhetoric in a union hall or rhetoric on talk radio, it can take people who are on the fence and push them over emotionally.”
And now, the obligatory talk radio fearmongering:
At the heart of the opposition rests conservative hosts on talk radio and cable television, which often are a muscular if untamed piece of the Republican message machine.
Several senators said Wednesday that they did not care to be identified speaking critically of the broadcasters, fearing the same conservative backlash that befell Senator Trent Lott, a Mississippi Republican, this month when he declared: “Talk radio is running America. We have to deal with that problem.”
Republican Senator Lindsay Graham gets in on the act, condemning amnesty opponents:
As Mr. Graham walked back to his office on Wednesday, he said he doubted that senators would be deterred by any threats. “I’m sure a lot of the people who have taken a high-profile position on this have been threatened, but what are you going to do?” he said. “You saw what happened to Senator Daschle.”
Mr. Graham was referring to Tom Daschle, the former Democratic majority leader from South Dakota, whose office received a mailing of anthrax in 2001. The case remains unsolved.
“One of the requirements of public service in modern America is dealing with a few voices that are full of hate,” Mr. Graham said. “And our discourse and the way we politic, the way we engage each other, brings that out.”
—Matthew Sheffield is the creator of NewsBusters and its Executive Editor.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Is it possible that the NYT i
June 28, 2007 - 10:46 ET by FastEdIs it possible that the NYT is on the offensive in this matter because they have many "undocumenteds" on their payroll? Just asking.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
It's possible, FastEd, but I
June 28, 2007 - 11:04 ET by GalvanicIt's possible, FastEd, but I would suspect it has more to do with its liberal agenda. The editors living in their Upper West Side homes reside 'above' the public, not in it. Not only don't they understand the animosity that the majority of Americans have for this bill, they don't care! For them, deporting illegals merely means paying more for nannies and house maids.
And typically, they play the Race Card against opponents of the bill as deftly as Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton wields it. Nevermind that the opponents of the bill are against amnesty for illegal immigrants, and that not one major spokesman against the bill has even suggested that we reduce the number of legal immigrants we permit into the US each year, thus disproving charges of racism.
BTW, this morning I heard Sen. Sessions on C-Span Radio discuss the prospects for today's anticipated cloture vote. He cited a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) study of this bill which found that if fully-enacted, it would only reduce illegal immigration by 13%, and that we would acquire about 8 million additional illegals by the time the bill (as law) was fully implemented!
In other words, IT'S BROKEN. That ain't racism -- it's just doin' the math!
Lack of balance in the news
June 28, 2007 - 11:13 ET by JDWLack of balance in the news media?
JDW
News media: Scoreboard for terrorists
Excuse me if the conspiracy s
June 28, 2007 - 11:15 ET by pocomocoExcuse me if the conspiracy side of my brain has become activated and believes that the so called “angry” messages received by Senators Graham, Finestien, Martinez and others were a put up job by George Sorros and his minions.
These people are incapable of writing or speaking a three word sentence without using a four letter word in it.
Once again they insult me. I
June 28, 2007 - 11:34 ET by HadEnoughOnce again they insult me. I am not a racist. I am however a strong believer in the rule of law. Period. I dare them to say this to my face. It is painfully clear that they themselves don't care for the illegals but only are looking for voters because, you know, they care so much. These aholes that spew and believe this crap are only interested in ther own self interest and what the party can do for them, disgusting, they could care less about us in fly over country who quietly make this country work. I'm sorry to ramble but....my vein's popping agian...
The racism/xenophobia charge,
June 28, 2007 - 11:51 ET by mattmThe racism/xenophobia charge, which is being used by Pelosi, Reid, Kennedy and even some Rinos, is a clear indicator that the Amnesty crowd has no legitimate argument.
As pointed out by another NBer, "If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither on your side, pound the table." - old legal axiom.
It's also the view that helps
June 28, 2007 - 11:58 ET by Chris NormanIt's also the view that helps justify the vision that they are so much more sophisticated, educated, moral, and just downright superior to those who disagree with them. It's a view of some very insecure people.
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
Typical liberals, resorting t
June 28, 2007 - 11:30 ET by rbosqueTypical liberals, resorting to the race card to try to quash debate. Very childish. Hey NYT, I'm Hispanic and hope the bill catches fire on the Senate floor! Am I a "racist" because I want all people to respect the rule of law? I am offended that people who force their way here, refuse to leave, burn my flag then tell me I and others are racist because we don't want them to be citizens??? Maybe it's because they don't do things the right way. Where is humility among these law-breakers? Where is common sense ?
"Nobody likes to talk ab
June 28, 2007 - 11:48 ET by MikeB"Nobody likes to talk about it, but a very small percentage of people involved in this debate really have racial and bigoted remarks." Sen. Lindsay Graham. A very small percentage. That is undoubtedly true. But, the very large percentage of people involved in the debate are not racial (sic) (I think he meant "racist") or bigoted, we just want secure borders, and rule of law.
Wasn't it Graham who told an interviewer that he wasn't going to be "intimidated" by his constituents calling, faxing, and/or writing in? Perhaps what he considers a "racial" or bigoted remark is one of his constituents calling in and telling him, "Listen up you d*****t, if you vote for cloture or vote for this bill, I won't vote for you again." Lindsay probably feels offense for d*****ts everywhere. The problem, Lindsay, is that "d*****t" is not a race.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
Mike B, Actually it was Voi
June 28, 2007 - 12:24 ET by BEGRUNTMike B,
Actually it was Voinobitch.
My mistake. All those RINOs
June 28, 2007 - 12:30 ET by MikeBMy mistake. All those RINOs look alike to me.
"Programs! Get yer programs. You can't tell one RINO from another without yer programs."
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
No sh*t.....LOL
June 28, 2007 - 12:38 ET by BEGRUNTNo sh*t.....LOL
Dems are now playing the Bu
June 28, 2007 - 11:50 ET by JDWDems are now playing the Bush card: Reid said it was a catastrophic defeat for him.
JDW
News media: Scoreboard for terrorists
You know, this is the same cr
June 28, 2007 - 12:22 ET by BEGRUNTYou know, this is the same crap that Voinovich, Kennedy and Reid have been spouting for a while. The REAL racists are the illegals, and groups like La Raza, (The Race), not the average american. I'm so utterly disgusted with the likes of Voinovich, et al, I could puke. And speaking of Voinobitch, he is an embarrasment to all of Ohio, the pompous ass.......he should be run out of the Senate on a rail!!!
Well once again the people
June 28, 2007 - 13:38 ET by happyuscitizenWell once again the people have spoken and not let the phonies in the Senate ram down our throats a useless piece of legislation. This was grassroots activism and we the people beat them at their own game, hence the smears of bigotry and xenophobia.
It's not over yet, what needs to be done now is to pound to those in the Senate and in the House that we want the laws already on the books enforced. The borders need to be secured along with the incredible backlogs of legal visa applications cleared.
This next election cycle the candidates that need to be considered are those that are serious about securing the borders and enforcing the laws in the interests of the American people and not those of foreign agents and entities.
"I'm just a big fat hairy American Winning Machine!" - Ricky Bobby
'Liberal wolf in Conservative's clothing'
June 28, 2007 - 13:41 ET by Ten7sWho's running against Lindsey Graham in the Republican primary, and where do I send the check? (I'm not even from his state, but this guy definitely doesn't need to be in Washington, especially as a Liberal wolf in Conservative's clothing.) Same goes for Trent Lott.
....So does Gordon Smith (Ore
June 28, 2007 - 13:49 ET by bigtimer....So does Gordon Smith (Oregon) and Lugar (Indiana)...
Judd Gregg NH, McCain Az. and Spector....Martinez (Florida), Bennett Utah and Craig...Idaho.
I think all are up for re-election with the exception of Spectoid...could be wrong about a couple others...too danged lazy to look it up at the moment.
To say Graham is a disappoint
June 28, 2007 - 13:50 ET by NCConservativeTo say Graham is a disappointment is an understatement. I remember Graham when he was back in the House working on the Clinton impeachment, and I had the greatest respect for the guy. I don't understand what happened to him.
The Senate most certainly does not agree with him. He (rightly) has been getting skewered here on local talk radio since the market also includes SC. I might cross the border and actually volunteer for the campaign of his primary opponent!
Hi NC....Graham changed when
June 28, 2007 - 13:58 ET by bigtimerHi NC....
Graham changed when he hooked up in the Senate with Mccain....
Period.
It was and has been maddening and sad to watch...he was great in the House.
He joined up with some arm twisting from McCain on his No-torture bill...he also joined the Gang of 14 with the SC judges ect....became a RINO and sell-out all for the adoration of the msm too.
....this morning did it for me completely with his little hysterical fit on the floor....I will never forget it...or forgive him....
I hope they get him replaced by a real conservative.
What a foolish man.
BT, I believe you are absolut
June 28, 2007 - 14:06 ET by NCConservativeBT, I believe you are absolutely right. I would have hoped that an elected Senator would have more backbone than to cave into peer pressure and bend over backwards to be accepted by the "cool kids" (a la McCain) on the playground.
Unfortunately, or perhaps fortunately, I wasn't able to watch the debate today. I will most certainly track that down somewhere. I had also forgotten about that "Gang of 14" business. That you for the refresher.
I take small comfort in the fact that I have some family members in SC who can vote against him when the time comes.
Hi NC...Plus there were rumor
June 28, 2007 - 14:29 ET by bigtimerHi NC...
Plus there were rumors here and there that he would be McCain's running mate...soooo...take it from there....lol.
Here is a great site about this mornings WIN for the American people.....scroll Down to the skull....I loved it....plus lots of info and a great map right at the top and the senators that voted how ect....great remarks there too about Little Lindsay....IMO.
Hi bt,This is truely a great
June 28, 2007 - 16:18 ET by BEGRUNTHi bt,
This is truely a great day for americans. Great site btw. As far as McCain is concerned, I thought that ship sunk along time ago, and with what happened today, he will never be taken seriously again. We can only hope.
"I don't understand what
June 28, 2007 - 14:04 ET by vrwc13"I don't understand what happened to him"... $$$
Men stumble over the truth from time to time, but most pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing happened. -Winston Churchill.
First of all, immigrants are
June 28, 2007 - 13:54 ET by BeowulfFirst of all, immigrants are not a race, so how could someone who is anti-immgration be a racist? Secondly, this bill is not drawing its opposition because of immigration. It is drawing opposition because of amnesty (read: "path to citizenship") for ILLEGAL ALIENS. And BTW, ILLEGAL ALIENS aren't a race either.
What playing the race card does clearly show me, however, is that those vehemently supporting the bill are only interested in one specific group of "immigrants" - Hispanics. And why might that be? Can you say "STEADILY INCREASING VOTER BASE"?
Finally, focusing on the admittedly tiny number of threatening callers instead of the deluge of civil opposition demonstrates the complete arrogance of those we have put in office. They are attempting to divert attention from the vast majority of Americans to focus on the tiny minority who are threatening.
Sorry Congress-Critters, t'aint working! We see you blatantly ignoring the will of the people, and none of you may be able to wiggle out of pissing off so many of your constituents this time. I know for a fact that the vote you cast on this bill will bear a very strong influence on my future votes in the polling booth...
The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers
Lindsey Graham
June 28, 2007 - 16:29 ET by pocomocoIf there is a South Carolina entrepreneur reading this post, might I suggest that you create the following bumper stickers for the 2008 election:
“Lindsey Graham happens!”
“This racist will not be voting for Lindsey Graham in 2008!”
Any other suggestions?
"No Amnesty, No Grahamne
June 28, 2007 - 21:50 ET by NCConservative"No Amnesty, No Grahamnesty"
Grahamnesty
June 28, 2007 - 21:57 ET by Cool ArrowYou know, I thought this kid had promise during the Impeachment procedings. Now I'm pretty sure this idiot will get voted out next time around. He fell for the spiel, now he needs to slink away.