On Tuesday’s "Good Morning America," reporter David Wright narrated a sarcastic segment about Vice President Dick Cheney and his refusal to hand over classified documents to the National Archives. In order to amplify the portrayal of Cheney as dark and scary, Wright featured clips from liberals such as Jon Stewart, left-wing blogger Ana Marie Cox and the Comedy Central program "Lil Bush." The GMA reporter helpfully added that "the Vice President's noncompliance plays right into the perception that he's some sort of shadowy super villain." Video: Real (1 MB) or Windows (1.25 MB) plus MP3 (176 KB)
Of course, Wright never identified the liberal, anti-Cheney leanings of the above individuals. Instead, he framed the Vice President’s refusal to hand over the documents as indicative of an out of control politician who won’t listen to anyone:
David Wright: "Quick civics quiz for you: Is the Vice President part of the executive branch of government? You might think the answer is obvious, but apparently not to the Vice President. The man who is a heartbeat away from the Oval Office thinks that some of the rules that apply to everyone else who works here do not apply to him."
Whatever one thinks of the contention that the VP is not part of the executive branch, wouldn’t it make sense to have some sort of balanced discussion about the issue? Instead, Wright chose to highlight silly and childish attacks on Cheney from Comedy Central programming:
Wright: "On Comedy Central's ‘Lil' Bush,’ Lil’ Cheney is the spawn of Darth Vader. Jon Stewart casts him simply–"
Jon Stewart: "Don't you know I'm exempt? Waaa! Waaa! Waaa!"
Wright: "– as Batman's nemesis, the Penguin."
This isn’t the first time that GMA has touted "Lil Bush." On June 14, reporter Dan Harris previewed the show’s Move-On style characterizations of conservatives: 
Dan Harris: "That's Lil' George, the leader of the gang. There's also Lil' Rummy, Lil' Cheney, who barely talks and chews the head off chickens, and Lil' Condi, who has an unrequited crush on George."
Clearly, this is a program that piqued the interest of those inside ABC.
Finally, Wright’s segment looked at legislation being crafted by Democratic Congressman Rahm Emanuel that would cut funding to Vice President Cheney’s office. The ABC reporter treated the bill seriously and failed to note that it has zero chance of becoming law. It wasn’t until the next segment, with political correspondent George Stephanopoulos, that this salient point was mentioned:
Juju Chang: "Let's start with the bottom line. Is this just political theater, a political stunt, or will it really have an impact on the Vice President's power?"
George Stephanopoulos: "Oh, he's not going to lose funding for his office. Even if this passes the House, it wouldn't get through the Senate. The President would never sign it into a law."
In 1993, then First Lady Hillary Clinton had some executive branch issues. The major networks certainly didn't resort to citing cartoons to portray her as a power mad politician.
A transcript of the David Wright segment, which aired at 7:12am on June 26, follows:
Juju Chang: "We turn now to Vice President Dick Cheney, who is under fire in a high-stakes showdown with the Democratic Congress. One powerful Democrat is proposing a drastic and unprecedented measure, pulling the plug on the Vice President's budget, cutting his allowance of taxpayer money to zero. ABC's David Wright is at the White House with more. Good morning, David."
ABC Graphic: "Dems Move to Close Cheney’s Office: Battle Over Funding This Week"
David Wright: "Good morning, Juju. Quick civics quiz for you: Is the Vice President part of the executive branch of government? You might think the answer is obvious, but apparently not to the Vice President. The man who is a heartbeat away from the Oval Office thinks that some of the rules that apply to everyone else who works here do not apply to him. So almighty and elusive is this Vice President, the New Yorker once ran a cartoon in which theologians debated the existence of Cheney. Now, the White House is having its own bizarre version of the same debate."
Martha Raddatz: "Does the President believe he's part of the executive branch?"
Dana Perino (White House Deputy Press Secretary): "Look, I think that that is an interesting constitutional question and I think that lots of people can debate it."
Wright: "At issue, Cheney’s refusal to comply with a request from the National Archives to hand over certain classified documents. The Vice President insists that, unlike every other employee of the executive branch, the rule does not include him or his staff."
Ana Marie Cox (Washington Editor, Time Website): "Perhaps next he'll just say he's not subject to the laws of gravity either. He'll just float away to his undisclosed locations."
Wright: "The Vice President's noncompliance plays right into the perception that he's some sort of shadowy super villain. On Comedy Central's ‘Lil' Bush,’ Lil’ Cheney is the spawn of Darth Vader. Jon Stewart casts him simply–"
Jon Stewart: "Don't you know I'm exempt? Waaa! Waaa! Waaa!"
Wright: "– as Batman's nemesis, the Penguin."
[Brief "Batman" clip.]
Wright: "Meanwhile, on Capitol Hill–"
"Robin" from Batman: "Holy Merlin’s magician!"
Wright: "One of Cheney's archenemies is now crafting legislation that would cut the funding for the Vice President's office."
Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL Democratic Caucus Chair): "He's acting as if he's unaccountable, the wholly fourth branch of the government unto himself. And so, my view is, if you're not in the executive branch, we shouldn’t fund you in the executive branch."
Wright: "Now, the Vice President’s spokeswoman accuses Congressman Emanuel of playing politics. But when I asked her how many people might be affected if that bill were to become law, she wouldn't say because the size of the Vice President's staff is apparently classified. Juju?"
Chang: "Interesting answer. David Wright reporting live from the White House. Thank you."
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.















Comments Policy
Once again, they're incompete
June 26, 2007 - 11:04 ET by drillanwrOnce again, they're incompetent masterminds ...
And they say Talk Radio is fu
June 26, 2007 - 11:09 ET by mattmAnd they say Talk Radio is full of misinformation and hyperbole??? GMA is worse than a waste of valuable T.V. airtime, it's a blatant abuse of it.
Whatever happened to the stat
June 26, 2007 - 11:12 ET by drillanwrWhatever happened to the station test pattern ... ?!
Does this make the right good
June 26, 2007 - 11:16 ET by TruthMongerDoes this make the right look good or what:)?
what i like about the four
June 26, 2007 - 11:50 ET by treshanwhat i like about the four comments above is that none of them take at hand the issue: is Cheney's office above Congressional oversight committees? Just 4 rambling neocons. what do you actually think about cheney's lack of reporting to oversight committees? is that good or bad? and what is the precedent of the VP office to hold such an unchecked position? there is no precedent.
The way I see it, the issue a
June 26, 2007 - 12:09 ET by mattmThe way I see it, the issue at hand is how the media, specifically GMA, is spinning the story. After all, this website is designed primarily to critique the media...
Right. Much easier to attack
June 26, 2007 - 12:55 ET by waka wakaRight. Much easier to attack the messenger than the message.
It's funny how Dick claimed Congress' inquiries into his energy task force "interfered with the executive branch."
Reality has a well known liberal bias.
what message?
June 26, 2007 - 13:07 ET by bulbasaurWas there a message to critique?
The message was a montage of cartoon clips. Now I know that in the world of the lib, cartoons and comedy shows are an important source of deep thought. But in the grown-up world, they are not.
The name of this site IS News
June 26, 2007 - 13:15 ET by mattmThe name of this site IS Newsbusters, isn't it?
Besides, there are plenty of people here who are very adeptly disputing the content of "the message"...
Ignorance has a well known Liberal bias.
its called separation of po
June 26, 2007 - 12:48 ET by Conservative Voiceits called separation of powers.
Yes, and thank you! What th
June 26, 2007 - 17:02 ET by drillanwrYes, and thank you!
What the complainers above fail to see is this administration has had to state "separation of powers" over and over again throughout the last 6+ years, and to deaf ears.
And exactly who is the oversi
June 26, 2007 - 17:06 ET by drillanwrAnd exactly who is the oversight for Congress? Who do they answer to? And before you claim "the people ... the voters ..." Nah, not so much. And don't even try to give me the bullship they police themselves ... <pwaaahaaahaaa!>
Why people hate Congress and No one Watches Jon Stewart
June 26, 2007 - 11:20 ET by Lame CherryJon Stewart is the Don Imus of television who nobody watches and Rahm Emanuel is Hillary Clinton in dark suits as he was the original Clinton shill.
What is amusing in this is with America having real problems which Congress only is adding to in amnesty and cutting war funding....we have Emanuel cutting funding to the Veep while the Pelosi is spending more money than a woman with her husband's credit cards.........is why Americans hate Congress for playing these stupid games.
14 percent approval for democrats.........gee lower than Bush and not a peep from Jon Stewart.........
All there is, is making Dick Cheney even more a wonderful figure who no one can defeat in vanquishing all foes........a figure these dolts have created, because they are too inept at stopping "that stupid President George Bush".
If you happen to keep score, all the MSM, democrats and nuts, have tried to stop George Bush and Cheney and have not stopped him once...Teddy Kennedy actually is helping Bush. The only people who have stopped Bush have been Conservatives in Harriet Miers and this idiot immigration deal.
Love Darth Vader Cheney. Keep that scatter gun warmed up Dick as you are the thorn in their festering souls of misery. That is what winning looks like.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
Jon Stewart is the Don Imus
June 26, 2007 - 11:36 ET by balboaJon Stewart is the Don Imus of television
Don't even know where to start with that comment...
And Cheney does appear to hold himself above scrutiny by claiming certain rules don't apply to him, doesn't he?
Read the constitution balbo
June 26, 2007 - 11:42 ET by treshanRead the constitution balboa. The VP's office is the fourth branch of government chosen to act beyond the oversight of Congress or any other check on its power. Oh, but liberals don't read nevermind.
There's NO check on the VPs
June 26, 2007 - 11:47 ET by balboaThere's NO check on the VPs power?
nope. pick a side buddy, we
June 26, 2007 - 11:52 ET by treshannope. pick a side buddy, we're at war!
the people
June 26, 2007 - 12:47 ET by Conservative Voicethe people
No
June 26, 2007 - 11:54 ET by rimskyNo
So that whole "The Vice
June 26, 2007 - 12:06 ET by balboaSo that whole "The Vice President asserts that his office is not an “entity within the executive branch.” thing is completely normal.
Anyone?
June 26, 2007 - 12:37 ET by balboaAnyone?
Well apparently... maybe be
June 26, 2007 - 12:42 ET by MightyMouthWell apparently... maybe because we have never had Darth Vader as a VP before?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
So the VPs office isn't par
June 26, 2007 - 12:53 ET by balboaSo the VPs office isn't part of the executive branch?
Technically speaking, no, u
June 26, 2007 - 13:10 ET by MightyMouthTechnically speaking, no, until he becomes president by succession. His constitutional duties are breaking senate deadlocks. But since we don't expect our VP's to sit around with their thumbs up their arse, dubya gives him little "projects" to do. I would assume dubya provides oversight on the veep, you know, just to make sure he doesn't do anything dubya wouldn't do himself. :-)
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
I would assume dubya provid
June 26, 2007 - 13:23 ET by balboaI would assume dubya provides oversight on the veep
Oh now I feel better...
Good, you should feel bette
June 26, 2007 - 13:43 ET by MightyMouthGood, you should feel better. I just don't understand why all you moonbats think Bush and Cheney are always running their own little shell games on the side. Even if they are, isn't that SOP for Washington politics? You guys act like you have to know the details about EVERYTHING! Well, guess what you don't!.. so na na na... When the dems are in the white house We'll probably be crying just like you guys are!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
i think we're lucky enough
June 26, 2007 - 11:36 ET by treshani think we're lucky enough not to have Cheney in office long enough to attack Iran...or is he? An attack on Iran is Cheney's plan and sounds really good right now.
This is why I love Dick Chene
June 26, 2007 - 12:33 ET by Free ThinkerThis is why I love Dick Cheney, he does a better job of making the left feel guilty about themselves than anyone else in politics. They can't combat his power and reason so they resort to name calling and quoting cartoons and comedians as sources in attack pieces. I don't know whether to be angry or feel sorry for this poor chump who had to do this piece.
The 14% approval rating is f
June 26, 2007 - 13:06 ET by waka wakaThe 14% approval rating is for CONGRESS, not Democrats, you big dummy! Congress' approval rating started falling the minute they rolled over and gave Bush the money for the war. People started disapproving when it looked like Congress COULDN'T fulfill its mandate to stand up to the administration.
But there's plenty of time yet. Even Dick Lugar is ready to end the Iraq fiasco.
And no one watches Jon Stewart? Obviously you're referring to yourself, because it's clear from this - "not a peep from Jon Stewart" - that you've never watched the show. He rags on Dems all the time.
Reality has a well known liberal bias.
Right you are Waka Waka, ta
June 26, 2007 - 13:16 ET by MightyMouthRight you are Waka Waka, take the republicans out of the equation and the congressional approval rating soars to, what... about 7%?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
How high did the approval rat
June 26, 2007 - 13:16 ET by sunandsteelHow high did the approval rating get when the Dems were elected the majority? And what is it now, still with a Dem majority? Maybe the low ratings has to do with the fact that these clowns have done jack crap but bitch and moan about Bush this and Bush that and we cant win in Iraq. I say put up or shut up a-holes. Dems said they wanted change, so f-ing change already. "Non-binding resolutions" and strongly worded statements do nothing, and I think the political bystanders have seen that.
And, no, I DO NOT SUPPORT DEMOCRATS in any form or fashion. I am just saying if they had the balls to say they were gonna do something, then they ought to do it. But they dont have the balls to ACTUALLY do anything, so screw them.
Texas has a population of nearly 21 million people, all of whom are ashamed to be from the same state as the Dixie Chicks. (IMAO.com)
The Dems in Congress have pas
June 26, 2007 - 13:41 ET by waka wakaThe Dems in Congress have passed every bill they promised to. The Senate, where Democrats need 60 votes to prevent a Republican FILIBUSTER, is where Democratic legislation has gone to die. Talk to your obstructionist friends if you want to get things done.
Reality has a well known liberal bias.
wakawaka...."Congress&qu
June 26, 2007 - 13:44 ET by vrwc13wakawaka...."Congress" is both the House and the Senate, haven't you finished 8th grade yet?
Yeah, logic, reason, facts play less of a role now in the way we make decisions in America. – Al Gore
"Congress" is also
June 26, 2007 - 13:54 ET by waka waka"Congress" is also a colloquialism for the House.
Reality has a well known liberal bias.
Sexual intercourse.
June 26, 2007 - 14:10 ET by vrwc13my bad...although I had to dig pretty deep to find that use...also found this...
con·gress n.
1. A formal assembly of representatives, as of various nations, to discuss problems.
2. The national legislative body of a nation, especially a republic.
3. Congress
a. The national legislative body of the United States, consisting of the Senate and the House of Representatives.
b. The two-year session of this legislature between elections of the House of Representatives.
c. The act of coming together or meeting.
d. A single meeting, as of a political party or other group.
4. a. The act of coming together or meeting.
b. A single meeting, as of a political party or other group.
5. Sexual intercourse.
So could one say that clinton (wagging his finger at us) said "I did not have congress with that woman!"?
How about the obstruction of
June 26, 2007 - 14:32 ET by sunandsteelHow about the obstruction of the Dems since 94? Oh wait, they were standing up for what they belived in. I remember. And as far as the usual line about the "rubber stamp" congress, how many Dems went along with many of these measures, yet said they opposed it when asked. Check into that sometime.
Texas has a population of nearly 21 million people, all of whom are ashamed to be from the same state as the Dixie Chicks. (IMAO.com)
Iraq is a factor, but their
June 26, 2007 - 13:23 ET by Conservative VoiceIraq is a factor, but their stunts over illegal immigration is a stronger factor. And on Iraq, there are some who think Congress are snakes for not pulling funds...but even more who are upset that they were even thinking of pulling support on our troops and making this war a political one. Did we not learn anything from Vietnam? Let our military do their job...when politicians start playing general is costs us lives and ultimately the war.
What a collosal waste of tim
June 26, 2007 - 11:52 ET by rimskyWhat a collosal waste of time! I hope the people of Illinois are proud of their "Representative." GMA.. shame on you for devoting 10 seconds to this political load of c**p!
VP fear mongering
June 26, 2007 - 11:55 ET by Six String SpiffI am tired of the dullards in the MSSM who constantly assault Cheneny over..... NOTHING. I am sick to death of these whiney bastards in the MSSM who THINK they have a RIGHT to know everything about this country regardless of how damaging it could be to national security. We need a president with some balls to put these people intheir places. Balboa you are trying too hard on this one. Just admit the MSSM is biased on move on
Islam should have it's religious status revoked until it can prove it's not a hate group.
are you crazy? this isn't a
June 26, 2007 - 12:01 ET by treshanare you crazy? this isn't about the american people knowing everything, this is about congressional oversight committees knowing. otherwise, he would have to change his title to king cheney.
Civics Teacher
June 26, 2007 - 11:55 ET by allanfDear Civics Teacher David Wright of ABC News
You said in your report, critical of Vice-President Cheney's claim that he is a member of the Legislative Branch:
Teacher Wright (or is it Wrong) isn't it true that the Vice President has only one constitutionally specified duty? Isn't that duty specified Article I of the US Constitution? Isn't that the article which covers the legislative branch , not Article II, which covers the executive. branch?
Article I, Section 3
Isn't it true civics teacher Wright that the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi is two heartbeats away from the Oval Office? Isn't it true Teacher Wright that the President Pro-Tempore of the Senate is three heartbeats away from the Oval Office (That's Robert Byrd)?
Finally teacher Wright: How do you respond to those who say you are ignorant and ill informed?
you have to be insane to th
June 26, 2007 - 12:11 ET by treshanyou have to be insane to think that the framers of the constitution intended for their to be *NO* oversight over the office of the VP. that makes absolutely no sense to any political minded person. And the fact that Cheney has not been responsive to requests from oversight committees (completely different body from the american public btw) is exactly WHY they call it a SHADOW government.
Oversight of what? The veep
June 26, 2007 - 12:16 ET by MightyMouthOversight of what? The veep has but two jobs: president of the senate and real president, should dubya croak.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
maybe it does
June 26, 2007 - 12:23 ET by treshanmaybe it doesn't surprise me that you don't see any point in having oversight of Cheney's office.
Why would there be "ov
June 26, 2007 - 12:27 ET by MightyMouthWhy would there be "oversight" of an office that has no power unless the senate is deadlocked? And when you say oversight of the vp "office", do you mean like how many paper clips they buy?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
I guess if by "no power&
June 26, 2007 - 12:59 ET by waka wakaI guess if by "no power" you mean "an inordinate amount of power," we agree.
Reality has a well known liberal bias.
Waka - please expand of the p
June 26, 2007 - 13:01 ET by florida_chadWaka - please expand of the power he has, other than braking a tie in the senate.
the VP has oversight...its
June 26, 2007 - 12:44 ET by Conservative Voicethe VP has oversight...its us, the people.
that's like saying the eart
June 26, 2007 - 13:35 ET by treshanthat's like saying the earth has oversight over the sun. we can't do anything to stop how cheney deals with classified information, and apparently, neither can congress.
no thomas, because the ea
June 26, 2007 - 14:14 ET by Conservative Voiceno thomas, because the earth doesn't have influence over the sun, but we the people do have influence.
As far as Congress is concerned...it is called separation of powers. Cheney has the authority to do certain things, without oversight from Congress or even the President. As far as classified material is concerned, if the President felt Dick was breaking the law he could have him arrested.
The earth does indeed have po
June 26, 2007 - 17:12 ET by Dan The Man 2The earth does indeed have power over the sun, you ever hear of eclipses?
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark. -- save my gun, shoot a liberal.
Power over, not hiding from!
June 26, 2007 - 17:14 ET by ThisnThatPower over, not hiding from!
Insane
June 26, 2007 - 12:28 ET by allanfInsane is a strong and loaded word. Frankly I find it offensive (but its your privilege to be offensive) and not conducive to a good discussion.
Congressional oversight is not a constitutional duty. It is an assumed power, often used politically. The executive has asserted a doctrine of "executive privilege" to shield internal non-departmental communications. That assertion has great constitutional merit.
In this instance, Cheney is taking a position in a dispute with the National Archives. Cheney claims he is not subject to an executive order regarding the safeguarding of classified information. It is an interesting position.
The Vice-President is a separate and distinct constitutional office. The Vice-President's involvment with the President is purely at the President's discretion. The Vice-Presidents sole constitutional duty is to serve as President of the Senate. The President of the United States could completely ignore the Vice-President and not let him be privvy to any executive branch delibrations.
The fact that you describe
June 26, 2007 - 12:37 ET by treshanThe fact that you describe Cheney's position as "interesting" is certainly apt. From a purely constitutional standpoint, I am extremely uncomfortable with there being no oversight over the President of the Senate and how he handles classified information. I don't see this as a distinct advantage in any form. Our system is of government is based on checks and balances. If we have laws that regulate how the president, but no the VP handle classified info, that to me is a louphole in the system warranting a correction.
spooky ???
June 26, 2007 - 12:32 ET by LionKingWhat is amazing is that they are focusing on Cheney. The amount of time wasted on Scooter Libby.
Where is the outrage over Sandy Berger? He STOLE classified documents and then destroyed them...tantamount to treason. This guy barely gets slapped, but Scooter Libby is treated like he actually was the leaker. By the way, is Dick Armitage in jail? Of course not!!! No crime was committed because Valerie Plame was NOT covert...yet, Scooter Libby was prosecuted for obstructing an investigation into a non-crime...hmmmmm, I guess he prevented them from finding out what a bunch of losers they actually are.
Sandy Burglar has a 'D' after
June 26, 2007 - 12:38 ET by bigtimerSandy Burglar has a 'D' after his name LK.
Need I say more?
Past pathetic isn't it?
If anyone did not get to catch this...it is well worth the time if you ever have any for later when it comes to Sandy Baby..
Please, President Bush, pardo
June 26, 2007 - 12:40 ET by kathleenirishPlease, President Bush, pardon Libby and the border guards NOW.
Anyone who says they support the troops but not the mission is a liar.
Pardons are in order
June 26, 2007 - 12:42 ET by LionKingYes. These pardons are in order.
Why pardon Libby exactly?He l
June 26, 2007 - 12:43 ET by LeonWhy pardon Libby exactly?
He lied under oath. Last time I checked that was a big no-no in the American justice system.
Before you make the absurd claim that there was no underlying crime, I'll pre-emptively remind you, that matters not. Libby lied under oath. Period. The reason he was in court in the first place is irrelevant.
Furthermore, he got scapegoated by the administration, they hung him out to dry, and as far as I'm concerned, let him rot in jail. Lying under oath canNOT be tolerated.
PS Please don't respond with comparative analysis, saying things like, oh yeah, what about this guy, or that guy.
Did he lie? Or did the report
June 26, 2007 - 12:47 ET by florida_chadDid he lie? Or did the reporters lie? Or did they have better memories than him. One guy on the jury said the decision was paybeack for the Bush administration. Does that factor in?
Pardons will fly in 2008.
"Lying under oath canN
June 26, 2007 - 13:30 ET by Greagoir"Lying under oath canNOT be tolerated"
Unless your name is Bill Clinton (D-generate)
Lying under any kind of oath,
June 26, 2007 - 17:17 ET by Dan The Man 2Lying under any kind of oath, icluding a signed statejment sayinmg that teh aforementtionedis accurqate like in teh statements the congress has to sign. Seems some of them made some erroneous statements and had to ammend them. Should they be held accountable and in what way?
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark. -- save my gun, shoot a liberal.
Presidents don't like to gi
June 26, 2007 - 12:44 ET by sarcasmoPresidents don't like to give pardons until the end of their terms. It requires courage and character to do otherwise, and they're politicians. But believe me, there are numerous other cases he's been ignoring a just pardon on for a lot longer than Libby's...Expect a wait, and don't hold your breath.
JMR
Afternoon kath...... I Second
June 26, 2007 - 12:54 ET by bigtimerAfternoon kath...
... I Second your Motion....loudly!
Again with the Sandy Berger a
June 26, 2007 - 13:18 ET by waka wakaAgain with the Sandy Berger and Plame not being covert? Classic. Why don't you guys get some new material?
We can hardly keep up with the stuff coming from your side. Each week brings us another comical revelation about Bushco. Who'd have thought we'd actually be arguing whether the vice president is a member of the executive branch? What's next? Keep it coming boys!
Berger stole COPIES of documents -- the originals are still there -- and for the 10-millionth time, Plame WAS covert, at least according to the CIA and Patrick Fitzgerald.
I feel for you guys come Nov. 5, 2008. You're going to wake up with QUITE a hangover from this party you've been having for the last 8 years.
Reality has a well known liberal bias.
"Berger stole..."
June 26, 2007 - 13:21 ET by MightyMouth"Berger stole..."
And yet, Libby is in Jail... Riiiiight, no double standard here!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
My concern is what YOU GUYS a
June 26, 2007 - 13:25 ET by sunandsteelMy concern is what YOU GUYS are going to do when PRESIDENT BUSH finishes his term and leaves office. Who will be the new figurehead of your collective rage?
Texas has a population of nearly 21 million people, all of whom are ashamed to be from the same state as the Dixie Chicks. (IMAO.com)
My concern is what YOU GUYS
June 26, 2007 - 13:28 ET by balboaMy concern is what YOU GUYS are going to do when PRESIDENT BUSH
finishes his term and leaves office. Who will be the new figurehead of
your collective rage?
I'm thinking the Cleveland Indians, or maybe Colin Cowherd.
Nah, couldnt be the Cleveland
June 26, 2007 - 13:39 ET by sunandsteelNah, couldnt be the Cleveland Indians because that would mean oppressing a minority. I think they will follow him around in his private life, kinda like deadheads, only dumber. "Bush lied, weeds died!" Something like that.
Texas has a population of nearly 21 million people, all of whom are ashamed to be from the same state as the Dixie Chicks. (IMAO.com)
"and for the 10-millio
June 26, 2007 - 15:03 ET by ckc1227"and for the 10-millionth time, Plame WAS covert, at least according to the CIA and Patrick Fitzgerald."
Which explains the charges filed against the true leaker of her identity, Richard Armitage, who Fitzgerald discovered was the leaker on day one, well before Scooter was questioned on the issue.
Wait, there WEREN'T any charges filed against Armitage for being the leaker....
Perhaps the vice-president
June 26, 2007 - 12:34 ET by Hoosier DaddyPerhaps the vice-president hesitates to hand any documents over to the National Archives for fear that said documents would end up in Sandy Burglar's trousers.
Evolutionists have heard of Darwin; Creationists understand Darwin.
And if Al Gore had refused to
June 26, 2007 - 12:55 ET by fenderteleAnd if Al Gore had refused to hand over his office's documents and then proposed abolishing the National Archives all of you would have obviously jumped to his defense.
If Al Gore's refusal was beca
June 26, 2007 - 19:31 ET by zfIf Al Gore's refusal was because of issues of national security, than yes. But Al Bore didn't give a fig about security to begin with.
Why are the Dems so concerned
June 26, 2007 - 13:05 ET by sunandsteelWhy are the Dems so concerned with Cheney not handing over every piece of information that comes his way? It has nothing to do with the "good of the people", at least not all the people, or any b.s. like that. The only reason I see why they are so pissed off is because they cant get their hands on something that might be twisted to seem "damaging" to Bush and Cheney, or something they could use to promote their "torture, war is lost" crap, or something they could leak to the media. And why does the National Archives have the power to tell them they have to do what they say. I think it is about time for a nice round of "Go F*%$ Yourselves" to be applied to the Dems and the MSM.
Texas has a population of nearly 21 million people, all of whom are ashamed to be from the same state as the Dixie Chicks. (IMAO.com)
I don't think it's "ev
June 26, 2007 - 13:07 ET by balboaI don't think it's "every piece of information," it's following the guidelines that are in place, isn't it? Which he doesn't seem to want to do. So that would naturally raise questions.
I just think that, seeing as
June 26, 2007 - 13:20 ET by sunandsteelI just think that, seeing as how several pieces of information that were potentially damaging to national security have been leaked, a little discretion is in order. And if that means not turning over some documents, I can live with that.
Texas has a population of nearly 21 million people, all of whom are ashamed to be from the same state as the Dixie Chicks. (IMAO.com)
"Texas has a population
June 26, 2007 - 13:26 ET by fendertele"Texas has a population of nearly 21 million people, all of whom are ashamed to be from the same state as the Dixie Chicks."
Speak for yourself sunboy.
ok fendertele: 21 million min
June 26, 2007 - 13:35 ET by vrwc13ok fendertele: 21 million minus one or 20,999,999....
Yeah, logic, reason, facts play less of a role now in the way we make decisions in America. – Al Gore
OK Texas has a populati
June 26, 2007 - 13:35 ET by sunandsteelOK
Texas has a population of nearly 21 million people, all of whom (except for fendertele, but what does he know, he plays fenders and everyone knows they are not really guitars) are ashamed to be from the same state as the Dixie Chicks. (IMAO.com) Hows that? Better?
Texas has a population of nearly 21 million people, all of whom are ashamed to be from the same state as the Dixie Chicks. (IMAO.com)
"...but what does he kno
June 26, 2007 - 14:11 ET by fendertele"...but what does he know, he plays fenders and everyone knows they are not really guitars".
Proof that republicans know nothing about music let alone politics.
LOL I kid I kid. I like t
June 26, 2007 - 14:27 ET by sunandsteelLOL I kid I kid. I like telecasters myself, hope to get a '72 thinline sometime. Dont be so senitive :-P.
Texas has a population of nearly 21 million people, all of whom are ashamed to be from the same state as the Dixie Chicks. (IMAO.com)
isn't the site, imao.us, not
June 26, 2007 - 22:13 ET by amberisn't the site, imao.us, not imao.com?
Yes.Texas has a population of
June 27, 2007 - 08:14 ET by sunandsteelYes.
Texas has a population of nearly 21 million people, all of whom are ashamed to be from the same state as the Dixie Chicks. (IMAO.us)
I'm not sure the answer to
June 26, 2007 - 13:26 ET by balboaI'm not sure the answer to a faulty system is to circumvent the system.
You can live with it, sure, but it looks shifty and underhanded to many people.
Can't you look at it as &qu
June 26, 2007 - 13:31 ET by MightyMouthCan't you look at it as "thinking outside the box"? Why does it have to be "shifty" and "underhanded"? Really, the number of non-issues this adminstration has had tossed it's way is mind-boggling.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it."