Depending on which newspaper you read Tuesday morning, the wildfires in the Lake Tahoe region of California and Nevada were either caused by global warming or environmentalists.
I kid you not.
In Northern California, just a few hours from the devastation, the number one paper in the region, the San Francisco Chronicle, chose to blame the fires on overdevelopment in Tahoe, and, of course, global warming (emphasis added):
From Gold Rush clear-cutters to modern home-builders, people have brought changes to the Tahoe basin that have fueled the intensity of the 2,500-acre Angora fire near the town of South Lake Tahoe. By Monday night, 178 homes had fallen casualty to the 2-day-old blaze, which was only 40 percent contained.
Ecologists and local residents said they saw such a disaster coming.
[…]
Just letting nature handle the recovery isn't an option after 150 years of human activity and mismanagement.
And, of course, this:
The Forest Service's Safford noted that even the climate has come under human influence, as evidenced by global warming and increased forest fires in a dryer, warmer West.
Not surprising, right? However, what is a bit shocking is that a town meeting was held Monday night in Lake Tahoe where citizens voiced their views on the subject as reported by the Los Angeles Times Tuesday (emphasis added throughout):
In all, a crowd of nearly 2,000 people descended on the South Tahoe Middle School auditorium Monday night, wanting to be heard in the face of their losses.
And if there was an object of scorn in the crowd, it was the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, a powerful bi-state environmental land use agency charged with managing the resources of the basin.
Remember when Sheryl Crow blamed the recent Los Angeles fires on global warming? Well, listen up, Sheryl:
They said they were angry at bureaucrats and environmentalists who made cutting of trees and clearing of land difficult. There was always too much red tape, they said, and now it was too late.
[…]
A common sentiment Monday was expressed by Jerry Martin, a bartender at the Horizon Casino Resort, whose house was still standing, although eight others around it had burned to the ground. He said U.S. Forest Service rules regulating the harvesting of dead trees were too stringent for those living next to government land.
"I hate to get political, but environmentalists wouldn't let us cut down the dead trees," he said.
The amount of fuel in the Tahoe Basin has reached critical levels after years of discord among environmentalists and government agencies over how to thin forests and reduce the fire threat. And it has led to predictions of a devastating wildfire because the basin is one of the areas with the most fire starts in the Sierra Nevada.
Interesting, wouldn’t you agree? Yet, for some reason, although Bay Area residents are much closer to the fires, the major paper serving the region didn’t mention this town hall meeting, nor did it present the arguments by residents concerning environmentalists.
Instead, people in the Bay Area were led to believe that the fires are all due to overdevelopment in Tahoe, and the media’s favorite culprit for every problem on the planet, global warming.
What a disgrace.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
I'll take environmentalists f
June 26, 2007 - 11:39 ET by bassndudeI'll take environmentalists for 100 please.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
I'll GIVE you the environment
June 26, 2007 - 12:03 ET by FastEdI'll GIVE you the environmentalists for FREE, thank you.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
The SF Chronical should stick
June 26, 2007 - 11:43 ET by ThisnThatThe SF Chronical should stick to its reporting of the Great Water Bottle Ban in SF offices, and the chronicalling of the queer parades, and leave the real reporting duties to others who are more competant.
The global warming farce does
June 26, 2007 - 11:44 ET by BEGRUNTThe global warming farce doesn't have anything to do with this. It is the fault of the tree huggers, and moonbat enviro nuts. The same problem occurred in southern California in the Big Bear area. Too many dead trees and under growth that the enviro nuts wouldn't let be cleared. Their "green" policies have come back to bite them.
I agree. It's the environment
June 26, 2007 - 11:55 ET by danboI agree. It's the environmentalist. As for warming? It looks like it's been cooling at Tahoe since about 95-98.
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.” H.L. Mencken
I correct myself. I counted t
June 26, 2007 - 12:05 ET by danboI correct myself. I counted the dots. Looks like cooling since 93. It's been cooling for 13 years. Guess Global Warming missed Tahoe?
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.” H.L. Mencken
If you live in a forest, you
June 26, 2007 - 13:37 ET by Michael NewsIf you live in a forest, you might be subject to a forest fire, you think? Still 500 houses unburnt. Maybe Tahoe got so warm it caught fire. (No, the report says it was caused by human activity.) Poor humans.
- Michael from The US Desk at TheNewsRoom.com
Their "green" policies have c
June 26, 2007 - 14:15 ET by taznarThat sums up the history of the environmental movement. In my opinion the radical environmentalists have done more to exacerbate damage to the environment due to their inflexibility in searching for real-world solutions, than they have to limit the damage to the environment.
If my memory is correct. the
June 26, 2007 - 14:24 ET by danboIf my memory is correct. the native americans used to burn the praries to get rid of the dead growth and spur new growth.
They may have been better for the enviroment than the environmentalist.
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.” H.L. Mencken
Late June here in NE Ohio ...
June 26, 2007 - 11:46 ET by drillanwrLate June here in NE Ohio ... Gonna be 90+ today. I'm heading over to my DOD's pool and drink in the rays and temperate pool water. Ah! Global warming! What a life!
It'll be a great memory to keep me warm during the 2007 NE Ohio winter in a few months.
Hey, drill. Heard Dick Goddar
June 26, 2007 - 14:39 ET by QueenMumHey, drill. Heard Dick Goddard comment on yesterday's weather that there were record temperatures here in Ohio - over the 100 degree mark - at this same time of year in the 1950's. Now, how far back do the GW faithful claim that things began getting out of control?
We are not interested in the possibilities of defeat. - Queen Victoria
A similar situation happened
June 26, 2007 - 12:31 ET by mattmA similar situation happened in the Boundary Waters area along the Canada/MN border.
There was a public debate as to whether or not roads should be built so crews can enter the BWCA and do fire prevention/control work. I'm not sure what the status of the debate is, although the local media has been pretty balanced about it for the most part.
Seems like the do-gooders did
June 26, 2007 - 12:34 ET by SnowWhiteSeems like the do-gooders didn't do so good. Environmental eediots!
Here in San Diego County ba
June 26, 2007 - 12:38 ET by rx4musicHere in San Diego County back in October 2003, we had a little thing called the Cedar Fire. It consumed 280,000+ acres, 2,200+ homes, and 15 lives... I followed it with my video and still cameras from 7:00am until it started to mellow by 6:00pm. It came to within 100 yards of my home. In my little town we lost 56 homes. Within 1 mile of my home they lost over 250 homes. Due to a little critter called the "gnat-catcher", people in the county have been fined for clearing brush and dead trees off of their own property. Even after the fire, people who clear their property face stiff fines. Apparently the gnat-catchers habitat is more valuable than the potential loss of life and property. Anyone who has ever witnessed a demonstration of a Christmas tree being ignited and going up in seconds will understand the ferocity of the fires in Tahoe. A little common sense should tell the environmentalists that when there is a bomb waiting to go off, somebody should be allowed to de-fuse it... My heart goes out to the people who lost their homes in Tahoe and my respect and appreciation goes out to the brave men and women who put their lives on the line to fight those fires.
"I used to be disgusted, but now, I try to be amused..."- E. Costello
What do you call a person w
June 26, 2007 - 12:53 ET by sixlbs9ozWhat do you call a person who hugs dead trees?
An environmental necrophiliac.
FEMA?
June 26, 2007 - 12:55 ET by Some GuyOk ... why is no one blaming FEMA for this? Sheesh ... they should have already been there ... and what about Bush. He must hate people from Nevada and ....
You know what ... something is always someone elses fault. If you take that stance everyone must be perfect.
"An environmental necrop
June 26, 2007 - 12:56 ET by MightyMouth"An environmental necrophiliac"
Wouldn't that be a person who humps dead trees? :-p
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Hmmm
June 26, 2007 - 12:57 ET by Some GuySomeone told me once that they put up less resistance ... the dead ones.
Yeah, but the bark is all d
June 26, 2007 - 13:06 ET by MightyMouthYeah, but the bark is all dried out, too much chafing.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Ah
June 26, 2007 - 13:19 ET by Some GuyNo Pain No Gain right?
lol
June 26, 2007 - 13:06 ET by shannon20lol
Sorry, all you global warming
June 26, 2007 - 14:04 ET by MikeBSorry, all you global warming/climate change alarmists: wildfires have been occuring since before history began...even without the influence of mankind. If you research the history of the Yellowstone area, you will find that there have been fires there that burned several hundreds of square miles. This is the way that nature forces succession of flora. For that matter, many species of pine trees cannot reproduce without a fire occurring. The pine cones are coated with a thick waxy substance that must be melted before the cone can spring open and disperse the seeds.
In a scenario where mankind is absent, the dead trees and underbrush build up until there is a lightning strike or spontaneous combustion. Once this occurs, the land is burned clear and other plantlife begins a cycle of succession. Nature is never static, so the attempts of the environmentalists to preserve nature at a certain point in its cycle are useless at best, or harmful at worst. The Tahoe fire is just an example of this misplaced belief in an optimal state of nature. Global warming has nothing to do with this fire. If the enviros want to maintain the Tahoe area in a parklike condition, then dead trees and underbrush overgrowth must be cleared, and roads to facilitate firefighting must be built.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
If the enviros want to mainta
June 26, 2007 - 14:24 ET by bigtimerIf the enviros want to maintain the Tahoe area in a parklike condition, then dead trees and underbrush overgrowth must be cleared, and roads to facilitate firefighting must be built.
Plus Mike...think of all the poor animals that die or lose their home, these endangered species lovers could care less...these tree huggers are nothing but destruction with an agenda...always have been.
Law-suits get filed, regulations and other laws the the property owner depending on the state make it impossible for some to do what needs to be done on their own property...
This banning or clearing and thinning for decades without a huge fight is nothing but sad...especially if you live in areas that you see everyday that needs to be taken care of....
Fire breaks and roads witha access are a must...but ....noooooo, we can't have that, makes to much sense....I could go on and on....
Noel S....You just got mentio
June 27, 2007 - 12:32 ET by bigtimerNoel S....
You just got mentioned on Rush as a good buddy of Rush's from NB's with this blog of yours! (I am paraphrasing here...naturally)
Hooray....excellent work....heheheee
BT
June 27, 2007 - 12:34 ET by Noel SheppardBT,
Just got an e-mail about that. How much of the article did he read? ns
Noel....What I heard was quite a bit
June 27, 2007 - 12:46 ET by bigtimerNoel....
What I heard was quite a bit of it....in fact a caller and him are talking about it right now.
I say thank you to you and him...as I live in these conditions.... we watch with sadness, plus anger as beetles and such destroy whole forests...and yet not being able to cut them out...let alone clear adn thin underbrush.
Plus I worked on the huge fores here about 97'...devastating and a lot of things happened that I could of wrote a book on....a lot of the spread of that fire could of and was stopped from spreading by locals...we were told to cease adn desist to cut to the chase.
Being from a logging family for over 30 years and working in the woods myself....what has been done is disgraceful.
wrong....the wildfires growth
June 26, 2007 - 14:29 ET by vrwc13wrong....the wildfires growth (WG) where caused by GW, GW is caused by (GW) Bush, (GW) Bush causes GW by controlling the weather, and the weather is controlled by Karl Rove's WG - weather gadget (machine)!
WG>GW>GW>WG
Yeah, logic, reason, facts play less of a role now in the way we make decisions in America. – Al Gore
Ah! That makes it so clear.
June 26, 2007 - 14:55 ET by MikeBAh! That makes it so clear. What could I have been thinking?
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan