On Sunday's NBC Nightly News, reporter John Yang distorted Pat Buchanan's point about the level of crime committed by illegal immigrants as he impugned Rush Limbaugh for helping to “fan” such “ugly emotions.” Previewing the expected Senate vote Tuesday on whether to revive the immigration bill, Yang asserted that “the outcome is uncertain, largely because of the heated debate over how to treat people illegally in the country.” Yang charged: “On NBC's Meet the Press today, that debate turned ugly.” Viewers then saw a soundbite from Buchanan: “Many of them are child molesters or drunk drivers, they're rapists, they're robbers, they've got a variety of crimes but they commit a felony by being here.” After a clip of Democratic Congressman Luis Guttierrez, on the same show, condemning Buchanan for casting “aspersions” and reasonably insisting that “the vast, overwhelming majority of immigrants that come here to this country come here to work hard, sweat, toil, and make our country a better place,” Yang, presumably referring back to Buchanan, alleged: “Those emotions are being fanned by conservative radio talk show hosts, such as Rush Limbaugh.” Yang played an audio clip of Limbaugh: “They want low-skilled, uneducated, cheap labor in the country -- because that's their next class of victims.” Yang proceeded to segue to a clip, of Newt Gingrich, by adding: “And TV ads.”
Two major problems with Yang's presentation in which he tried to characterize conservative analysis as illegitimate: First, the soundbite selected of Buchanan suggested he was making a generalization about how most illegal aliens are criminals, but his previous sentence (transcript) made clear he was referring only to a sub-set who have committed crimes: “You go after, in deportation, the 600,000 who’ve been ordered deported who are now criminal felons who have stayed in this country. Many of them are child molesters, they’re drunk drivers...” Buchanan also cited “the gang members who don’t belong in the country,” a well-known problem to anyone in a major urban area. Second, the soundbite featured from Limbaugh hardly supported the contention Limbaugh and other conservative talk hosts have “fanned” irrational fear of illegal aliens. In the bite Limbaugh was clearly making a claim about the motivation of liberals.
And I could add as a third distortion, the soundbite of Gingrich in a television ad -- “This bill does not even allow convicted criminals to be deported” -- hardly is an “ugly” criticism of the bill.
The soundbite from Limbaugh is at least nine days old since he was on a golf vacation last week. In fact, I searched his site and found matching words on his June 11 program:
The real reason the Democrats want this -- I keep saying this, and I know this sounds harsh to some people, but -- is liberal Democrats don't like many of the traditions and institutions, the guardrails, the fences, that have made this country great. They want to tear down and rebuild the country in their image, and here you go. One of the things they believe in is a huge government and they want people dependent. They want low-skilled, uneducated, cheap labor in the country, because that's their next class of victims. As affluence in this country continues to increase -- and it is. I think one of the best kept secrets in the country right now is the strength of the economy and the overall affluence and prosperity and the opportunity to achieve it. It's never been better than it is today in this country. So more and more people are opting out of the total dependence cycle. I mean, it's impossible almost not to with Social Security. Fifty-one or 52 of the American people get a government check for something, but they're always out pushing. The food stamp program, they're advertising for more people to participate in that. Here you import these people that remain constantly dependent. They will need access to the safety hammock -- not the welfare net, but the hammock -- and that's made to order for raising taxes and redistributing wealth. You're right. Everything that liberalism is, is contained in this legislation. It's sort of like a big, concentrated dose. That's what's so frustrating about it, to see the Republicans just dive headlong into this as though they haven't the slightest clue what will happen to them and their party and the country, which is what we're concerned about.
This is the second time in just over a month that NBC News has maligned Limbaugh. The Tuesday, May 22 MRC CyberAlert, “NBC Impugns Limbaugh Over 'Barack the Magic Negro' Parody Song,” recounted:
On Monday, NBC's Today allowed itself to be used as a publicity machine for a left-wing attempt to whip up an Imus-style campaign against conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh for daring to air the parody song "Barack the Magic Negro" -- a parody inspired by a black writer who used that term in March in a Los Angeles Times op-d about Obama -- in which an Al Sharpton impersonator sings about how Barack Obama isn't an authentic black.The song has been around for two months, but NBC acted like they just found out about it. Co-host Matt Lauer charged: "Rush Limbaugh airing a racially-charged parody about presidential candidate Barack Obama. Is the radio talk show host getting a free pass? We'll have more on that in our next half-hour." The on-screen graphic also asked: "Obama Parody, Is Limbaugh Getting A Free Pass?"
The story by NBC reporter Michael Okwu presumed Limbaugh guilty of some great offense, and suggested his conservative audience is also culpable: "Media watch dogs say there's no hue and cry to stop Limbaugh because he speaks to a niche audience who either expects this or is willing to let him slide." Okwu included two sound bites from Paul Waldman of the hard-left Media Matters, who ludicrously claimed: "This is basically the radio equivalent of a black-faced, minstrel show." NBC helpfully put some old minstrel video on screen to illustrate the point.
"Legitimate satire, or something darker?" Okwu ominously wondered.
A transcript of the Sunday, June 24 NBC Nightly News story:
ANCHOR LESTER HOLT: That sweeping immigration overhaul plan that only a few weeks ago seemed doomed, may get a second chance this week as the Senate decides whether to bring it to a vote. The plan includes stronger border security as well as a guest worker program. NBC's John Yang is at the White House, which has a lot riding on all this. John, good evening.
JOHN YANG, from the White House: Good evening, Lester. President Bush is hoping the Senate will snatch this immigration bill from the jaws of defeat and give new life to his top domestic priority. In Los Angeles today, a rally in support of President Bush's sweeping overhaul of immigration laws which faces a make-or-break week on Capitol Hill.
SENATOR TRENT LOTT: If we don't get it done in the Senate now, it will not be done in the Senate this year or next year and not before sometime in 2009.
YANG: That would suit the bill's opponents just fine.
SENATOR JEFF SESSIONS, outside ABC News in DC: We've got to go back to the drawing board and work out something that will be effective.
YANG: On Tuesday, Senators are to decide whether to revive the measure, which they stalled earlier this month. The outcome is uncertain, largely because of the heated debate over how to treat people illegally in the country. On NBC's Meet the Press today, that debate turned ugly.
PAT BUCHANAN, on Meet the Press: Many of them are child molesters or drunk drivers, they're rapists, they're robbers, they've got a variety of crimes but they commit a felony by being here.
CONGRESSMAN LUIS GUTIERREZ (D-ILL), on Meet the Press: The vast, overwhelming majority of immigrants that come here to this country come here to work hard, sweat, toil, and make our country a better place and to cast aspersions on them and to generalize -- if I could just finish, Pat, if I could just finish-
YANG: Those emotions are being fanned by conservative radio talk show hosts, such as Rush Limbaugh.
UNDATED AUDIO OF LIMBAUGH: They want low-skilled, uneducated, cheap labor in the country -- because that's their next class of victims.
YANG: And TV ads.
NEWT GINGRICH, IN TV AD: This bill does not even allow convicted criminals to be deported.
YANG: Some of them targeting specific lawmakers.
WOMAN IN TV AD: Where's the fence?
YANG: The issue cuts across party lines, putting Mr. Bush on the same side as liberal Democrats and against conservative Republicans, including Senator Jeff Sessions, for whom he helped raise nearly $1 million in campaign money just this past week. President Bush has been personally involved in lobbying for this bill and on Tuesday, the day of the Senate vote, he'll have an immigration event here at the White House.
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





The story by NBC reporter Michael Okwu presumed Limbaugh guilty of some great offense, and suggested his conservative audience is also culpable: "Media watch dogs say there's no hue and cry to stop Limbaugh because he speaks to a niche audience who either expects this or is willing to let him slide." Okwu included two sound bites from Paul Waldman of the hard-left Media Matters, who ludicrously claimed: "This is basically the radio equivalent of a black-faced, minstrel show." NBC helpfully put some old minstrel video on screen to illustrate the point.
JOHN YANG, from the White House: Good evening, Lester. President Bush is hoping the Senate will snatch this immigration bill from the jaws of defeat and give new life to his top domestic priority. In Los Angeles today, a rally in support of President Bush's sweeping overhaul of immigration laws which faces a make-or-break week on Capitol Hill.
PAT BUCHANAN, on Meet the Press: Many of them are child molesters or drunk drivers, they're rapists, they're robbers, they've got a variety of crimes but they commit a felony by being here. 













Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Same distorting what someone
June 25, 2007 - 03:44 ET by well99Same distorting what someone has said.Just a different day.I wonder if NBC news understands why their ratings are dropping?Someone should tell NBC about the internet and the ability of people to get the facts.Thanks Brent
When Liberals get caught sa
June 25, 2007 - 06:07 ET by motherbeltWhen Liberals get caught saying something stupid, they claim they were taken "out of context" when they really should claim they didn't mean it the way it sounded.
They should look at the Limbaugh and Buchanan examples here: now those are REALLY examples of being taken out of context. Buchanan had said get rid of the criminals in ther previous sentence, for Pete's sake...that's who "they" were...and they left that out to change the whole character of what he said. And Limbaugh's "faux pas" had "context" too. It was done, not as an insult to Obama, but as a parody of the LA writer and Joe Biden, who had both put feet in their mouths with their remarks about him.
Biden and the LA Times writer got the pass; not Limbaugh.
On the bright side - Limbaugh
June 25, 2007 - 10:19 ET by TruthMongerOn the bright side - Limbaugh was aired on MTP free of charge - may have even been paid for use of his clip:)!
Limbaugh's brilliant message receives tons of extra exposure to many who would otherwise not hear it - consequently waking many of them from their MSM slumber - they begin to tune into Rush...
MTP portrays tons of their own hypocracy in this whole process. Their ratings continue to slide....
Their are so many positives to this it boggles the mind. Let's not tell anyone outside the NB website please...heh-heh-heh...
...it was hard but I managed to keep religion out of it:)...
Natural New Consituency
June 25, 2007 - 06:51 ET by allanfIllegal aliens (sorry I don't go for undocumented aliens-- they have documents, just not the right ones) are the next great consituency for the Democratic Party. Democrats believe that government can spend your money better than you can. Of course part of that spending will include largess to these poor downtrodden immigrants. Naturally they will repay their new master's with their votes.
After the immigration bill passes, the next great Democrat push will be to allow non-citizens to vote, as long as they are here legally.
Then hang on to your wallets.
June 25, 2007 - 09:07 ET by pbanks7Then hang on to your wallets. After a full tax year of legal residence, they're eligible for the Earned Income Credit. Last year the max was about $4500 per family.
Ignorance is bliss. It's easier to repeat a mindless slogan than to do some actual research.
Lawlessness
June 25, 2007 - 07:48 ET by StokeyBobI’m getting a kick out of some of the comments here because
I’m NOT an economist.
When the economy collapses I figure it will be because of
the illegal labor, and this problem is now worldwide.
I can sort of see how a myopic economist may be able to see
an increase in profits by snuffing the descendants of the founders of this
country. That makes room for the criminals in business’s illegal labor. Not
only can many of the illegal invaders be paid off in token wages but that also
leaves the honest workers stiffed with the criminal’s taxes, medical and social
services. It’s a pure genius way of eliminating any competition. They won’t be
able to compete on that playing field. Every day more and more will go under.
The part that confuses me is I can see examples of some of
the illegal aliens previous work. How will all of the crime that surrounds
illegal immigration be helping you out when the honest people are forced to
join in, in the lawlessness?
Very philisophical stokeybob
June 25, 2007 - 10:23 ET by TruthMongerVery philisophical stokeybob - a nation either saves itself or collapes upon it self...stay tuned for the thrilling finale I guess...
...it was hard but I managed to keep religion out of it:)...
I can't wait to hear Rush add
June 25, 2007 - 10:01 ET by drillanwrI can't wait to hear Rush address this on today's radio show.
Actually, three comments:It p
June 25, 2007 - 10:08 ET by KC MulvilleActually, three comments:
Geraldo also likes to claim i
June 25, 2007 - 10:17 ET by drillanwrGeraldo also likes to claim illegals have the lowest crime rate here (or some-such).
First, they actually broke the law in coming here, and are repeat offenders in doing so everyday
Second, from what I understand, California jails are jammed with illegals who have committed other crimes once here.
Geraldo is a racist who lies
June 25, 2007 - 11:53 ET by well99Geraldo is a racist who lies.He has no credibility.Even when a video was shown with what Michelle Maulkin(SP) said he still tried useing same lie.Just a elitism that thinks were too stupid to see how he trys to manipulate us.
First cup of coffee..spelling maybe way off.
.
"Second, from what I und
June 25, 2007 - 12:18 ET by Darth Dutch"Second, from what I understand, California jails are jammed with illegals who have committed other crimes once here."
Got that right. Check out the link to this website for a study that says illegals cost California $10.5 billion, and this study was done in 2004, I believe.
http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2004/12/illegal_aliens_1.php
Dutch
Well, how the hell does he ke
June 25, 2007 - 14:15 ET by drillanwrWell, how the hell does he keep making the claim, and not getting called on it? I am surprised in his debate on BO`R's Factor with first Bill, and on another night with Michelle Malkin they both failed to point this out to him. I'm just a pinky finger in the "unwashed masses" and I knew to shout the fact back at the TV when he made the remark.
This NBC piece just furthers
June 25, 2007 - 11:09 ET by thefightinggopThis NBC piece just furthers what Tammy Bruce told Bill O'Reilly, "...With a word that was plucked out of a sentence used in an attempt to destroy one person.”
No doubt they're "pluck(ing)" Rush's words to go after him too.
For more information, see "Conspiratorial Media" Pt 1
thefightinggop.org
Ah Illegals are Criminals is why they are Ilegal
June 25, 2007 - 11:57 ET by Lame CherryAh I can name several laws illegals have broken without the influx of child molesters, rapists, drunk drivers and murderers coming into America for those who think illegal means violent crime only.
First in busting the border they are criminals invading a nation.
Second in part of that finance ring they are involved human traffic which has entire Constitutional Ammendment forbidding it.
Third they commit fraud in fake identification from Social Security numbers to driver's licenses.
Fourth they commit embezzlement in not paying income taxes in being hired for kickback wages to American profiteers.
Fifth they commit money laundering by removing billions of US dollars into other nations.
Sixth there is the huge problem of these walking criminal disease infestation illegals spreading plague TB which has no cure all through America. That is a crime. The laundering of money is funding narco terrorism against America and finally the middle income jobs which should be going to blacks, poor whites and native American in construction to farming are going to illegals.
Want the real facts no one is addressing?
Ilegals have a hand in killing fifty to one hundred thousand Americans every year from inter city black related crime to health care denied US poor citizens. (See Americans have a 30 million group which will not take health care, because they can not get on welfare and they would not take welfare even if they could due to their Judeo Christian backgrounds, so conditions which could be cured linger and manifest into death.)
All of these "non violent" attacks upon America are causing blacks to
end up in prison as there are no ground jobs for them. The removal of
funds and taking SS funds deprives poor children and people from health
care to housing.
So let a whole lot of reality shine on this as Limbaugh has not even touched on the reality and Buchanan has sugar coated it. EVERY ILLEGAL whether Mexican, Chinese or Russian is an attack upon the United States citizen and the US Republic in causing literal death and hardship on US citizens.
Oh and if you never considered it, just how many gallons of gas does 10 million illegals consume in a week????? The answer is the difference between a gas shortage which drives gas to 3 bucks a gallon to gas being 2 dollars a gallon.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
Are there any immigrants from
June 25, 2007 - 19:40 ET by 4arrowAre there any immigrants from Great Britain in your neighbourhood?
It has been made very difficult for Brits to settle here. Why?
Um, because they speak the Qu
June 25, 2007 - 19:48 ET by BlondeUm, because they speak the Queen's English?
We can understand them?
They share our values?
They're not lawbreakers?
Take your choice. Then prepare for a flood of criminals. It's the choice of our senators, after all.
The alphabet networks will l
June 25, 2007 - 20:25 ET by Airforce_5_OThe alphabet networks will look to place the blame of the backlash on a bad bill on anyone who has pointed it out. They want to see talk radio and Rush fall. They don't want competition in the arena of Ideas. They want the American Public to line up and drink from their trough of truth and not think on their own. To look into if what they are reporting is the truth.
They hate the new media that has brought forward the scrutiny of them and their left leaning spin.
A blogger cost Dan Rather his job and it scared the hell out of them.
Press on Rush and the rest of talk radio, you have them running for cover.